Raven DB HTTP API - Property Traversal - ravendb

I am given the following JSON structure:
{
"document": {
"sections": {
"x": {
"title": "foo"
},
"y": {
"title": "bar"
}
}
}
}
How do I update value of the title property for a given section using the HTTP API?
I would like to provide a path (string) to get to the property.

This was fixed in build 2254. You should now be able to issue a single scripted patch like this:
EVAL http://localhost:8080/docs/foos/1
{Script:"this.document.sections.x.title = newTitle;",Values:{"newTitle":"Whatever"}}

Related

SQL Server stored procedure in .NET Core 6 Web API to produce JSON data used in Angular app

I have a SQL Server stored procedure that has an ID parameter and returns a string in JSON format that is needed in the Angular app.
Here is a sample of the JSON needed:
[
{
"type": "date",
"name": "asofdate",
"ui":
{
"label": "As Of Date",
"placeholder": "Enter a date"
},
"validators": { "required": "true" }
},
{
"type": "select",
"name": "scope",
"ui": { "label": "Scope", "placeholder": "Select a scope" },
"validators": { "required": "true" },
"source": [
{ "value": 1, "text": "ABC" },
{ "value": 2, "text": "CDE" },
{ "value": 3, "text": "FGI" }
]
}
]
Here is a what the result of running the stored procedure looks like:
When I run the Web API passing the ID parameter to the stored procedure, I would like to capture the response as a JSON object to be used in the Angular app.
But the Web API is returning this:
[
{
"jsonResponse": "[
{
\"type\":\"date\",
\"name\":\"asofdate\",
\"ui\":{\"label\":\"As Of Date\",\"placeholder\":\"Enter a date\"},
\"validators\":{\"required\":\"true\"}
}
,
{
\"type\":\"select\",
\"name\":\"scope\",
\"ui\":{\"label\":\"Scope\",\"placeholder\":\"Select a scope\"},
\"validators\":{\"required\":\"true\"},
\"source\":[{\"value\":1,\"text\":\"ABC\"},{\"value\":2,\"text\":\"DEF\"},{\"value\":3,\"text\":\"GHI\"}]}
}
]
Is there a way to get the JSON response from the Web API without all the "\" and without:
{
"jsonResponse": "
so that it matches the sample above?
Here is the code from the Web API:
[HttpGet("{ReportID}")]
public async Task<ActionResult<IEnumerable<usp_ReportParameterResult>>> GetReportParameters(int ReportID)
{
if (_context.usp_ReportParameterAsync == null)
{
return NotFound();
}
var op = new OutputParameter<int>();
var JSONresponse = await _context.usp_ReportParameterAsync(ReportID, op);
if (JSONresponse == null)
{
return NotFound();
}
return JSONresponse;
}
The stored procedure uses JSON_QUERY and JSON PATH to create the needed nested arrays.
So, in the angular code I have the following hard-coded:
TESTDATA:any[] = [
{
type:'text',
name:'firstName',
validators:{
required:true
},
ui:{label:'First Name',placeholder:'Enter Your First Name'}
}
,
{
"type":"date",
"name":"asofdate",
"ui":{"label":"****As Of Date","placeholder":"Enter a date","class":["date-picker-wrapper"]},
"validators":{"required":"true"}
}
]
What I need is instead of this data being hrad-coded it is being dynamically generated from a Web API.
The hard-coded data looks like the following from browser debug:
[![enter image description here][2]][2]
From the web api data looks like the following:
It is not an array like the TESTDATA. Is the a way to get response from web api into an array format as required?
Actually, easiest solution was to remove the backlashes in the Angular app by simply doing the following:
for (let item of this.formattedJSON) {
item.ui = JSON.parse(item.ui);
item.validators = JSON.parse(item.validators);
}

How to update the status on a Jira issue vis Jira Rest Api

I want to change the status of the project issue on Jira. The status is Open and I want to make it Fixed. My url is PUT https://jiradbg-sandbox.deutsche-boerse.de/rest/api/latest/issue/PID-XX
{
"update": {
"fields":{
"status": [
{
"set": "Fixed"
}
]
}
}
}
and the response is:
{
"errorMessages": ["Can not deserialize instance of java.util.ArrayList out of START_OBJECT token\n at [Source: org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteInputStream#5de98556; line: 3, column: 9]
(through reference chain: com.atlassian.jira.rest.v2.issue.IssueUpdateBean[\"update\"])"]
}
There are two problems that you are encountering here.
The first problem is update or fields should be provided separately to Jira's edit issue API, not one inside of the other. They have equivalent functionality so normally only one is used. For example to update the summary field provide either update:
{
"update": {
"summary": [
{
"set": "Updated by update"
}
]
}
}
or fields:
{
"fields": {
"summary": "Summary set by fields"
}
}
However the status field is a special case and can't be updated directly, which is the second problem here. Changing a status in Jira is called a transition. You need to trigger the transition to move the issue into the status you want.
Start by identifying the available transitions by calling the get transitions API:
GET https://example.net/rest/api/latest/issue/PID-XX/transitions
This tells you which transitions are currently available, something like this:
{
"expand": "transitions",
"transitions": [
{
"id": "21",
"name": "Fixed",
"to": {
"self": "https://example.net/rest/api/2/status/10001",
"description": "",
"iconUrl": "https://example.net/images/icons/status_generic.gif",
"name": "Fixed",
"id": "10001",
"statusCategory": {
"self": "https://example.net/rest/api/2/statuscategory/3",
"id": 3,
"key": "done",
"colorName": "green",
"name": "Done"
}
}
}
]
}
Take the id of the transition you want, in this case 21, then post it to the issue transition API:
POST https://example.net/rest/api/latest/issue/PID-XX/transitions
Use a request body like this:
{
"transition": {
"id": 21
}
}
You should get a 204 HTTP response from Jira which indicates the transition was successful.

GraphQL query - Query by ID

I have installed the strapi-starter-blog locally and I'm trying to understand how I can query article by ID (or slug). When I open the GraphQL Playground, I can get all the article using:
query Articles {
articles {
id
title
content
image {
url
}
category {
name
}
}
}
The response is:
{
"data": {
"articles": [
{
"id": "1",
"title": "Thanks for giving this Starter a try!",
"content": "\n# Thanks\n\nWe hope that this starter will make you want to discover Strapi in more details.\n\n## Features\n\n- 2 Content types: Article, Category\n- Permissions set to 'true' for article and category\n- 2 Created Articles\n- 3 Created categories\n- Responsive design using UIkit\n\n## Pages\n\n- \"/\" display every articles\n- \"/article/:id\" display one article\n- \"/category/:id\" display articles depending on the category",
"image": {
"url": "/uploads/blog_header_network_7858ad4701.jpg"
},
"category": {
"name": "news"
}
},
{
"id": "2",
"title": "Enjoy!",
"content": "Have fun!",
"image": {
"url": "/uploads/blog_header_balloon_32675098cf.jpg"
},
"category": {
"name": "trends"
}
}
]
}
}
But when I try to get the article using the ID with variable, like here github code in the GraphQL Playground with the following
Query:
query Articles($id: ID!) {
articles(id: $id) {
id
title
content
image {
url
}
category {
name
}
}
}
Variables:
{
"id": 1
}
I get an error:
...
"message": "Unknown argument \"id\" on field \"articles\" of type \"Query\"."
...
What is the difference and why can't I get the data like in the example of the Github repo.
Thanks for your help.
It's the difference between articles and article as the query. If you use the singular one you can use the ID as argument

How does the base URL change plain name fragment resolution with JSON Schema?

An excerpt from http://json-schema.org/draft-07/json-schema-core.html#rfc.section.8.2.4
{
"$id": "http://example.com/root.json",
"definitions": {
"A": { "$id": "#foo" },
"B": {
"$id": "other.json",
"definitions": {
"X": { "$id": "#bar" },
"Y": { "$id": "t/inner.json" }
}
},
"C": {
"$id": "urn:uuid:ee564b8a-7a87-4125-8c96-e9f123d6766f"
}
}
}
The schemas at the following URI-encoded JSON Pointers [RFC6901]
(relative to the root schema) have the following base URIs, and are
identifiable by any listed URI in accordance with Section 5 above:
...
#/definitions/B/definitions/X
http://example.com/other.json#bar
http://example.com/other.json#/definitions/X
http://example.com/root.json#/definitions/B/definitions/X
...
Why isn't http://example.com/root.json#bar a valid base URI for #/definitions/B/definitions/X?
http://example.com/root.json#bar would not be resolveable with the given schema.
Think of it like anchors in HTML.
$id is like defining a new page, so the location of #/definitions/B falls under "the page" $other.json, hence http://example.com/other.json#bar in the list you included that are equivilents for #/definitions/B/definitions/X.
If you create an HTML page which is at http://example.com/root.json, and try to click a link which is #bar, it would not find the # location because it's on the other.json page.
Please let me know if any of this doesn't make sense or is confusing.

How to change the example values for api requests in Swagger UI?

I'm making an API for a site and I'm using Swagger UI, I currently have a route for adding a favorite for a user the route is "/users/{id}/favorites/", and the params in the spec are:
"parameters":[
{
"in":"path",
"name":"id",
"description":"User's Id",
"required":true,
"schema":{
"$ref":"#/definitions/User"
}
},
{
"in":"body",
"name":"body",
"description":"Enter user's id and video id for favorite",
"required":true,
"schema":{
"$ref":"#/definitions/Favorite"
}
}
],
The definition for the favorites model in the spec looks like this:
"Favorite":{
"type":"object",
"properties":{
"id":{
"type":"integer",
"format": "int64"
},
"userId":{
"$ref":"#/definitions/User/properties/id"
},
"videoId":{
"$ref":"#/definitions/Video/properties/id"
}
},
"xml":{
"name":"Flag"
}
}
But currently when I go the /api route the example value being shown for the body param is
{
"id": 0
}
on the docs it displays an almost correct request sample correctly and shows:
{
"id": 0,
"userId": 0,
"videoId": 0
}
How do I change the example value for the /api route to show
{
"userId": 0,
"videoId": 0
}
as an example and how do I remove the id param from the example on the doc
Found a way to do it, not sure if this is the best way but I just changed the definition and made userId an int instead of a $ref and the same for videoId.