Iterate through collection of List<object> - asp.net-mvc-4

I have what is probably simple problem, but I am stumped. I call a method from another assembly that returns me a List<object>, this data is Excel spreadsheet data queried using LinqToExcel. Under the scenes, that collection is actually a List<LinqToExcel.Cell>. In LinqToExcel, that makes up a LinqToExcel.Row. I want to be able to bind this data to a Telerik ASP.NET MVC grid for viewing. Here's my controller code:
TypeOfServiceCodeListingDetailViewModel model = new TypeOfServiceCodeListingDetailViewModel();
model.Excel_Data = new List<LinqToExcel.Row>();
using (LinqToExcelReader reader = new LinqToExcelReader(fileName, true))
{
previewData = reader.ReadRawDataByPage(5, 0);
foreach (LinqToExcel.Row item in previewData)
{
model.Excel_Data.Add(item);
}
return View(new GridModel(model.Excel_Data));
}
And in my view:
#(Html.Telerik().Grid(Model.Excel_Data)
.Name("Grid2")
.HtmlAttributes(new { style = "width:400px;" })
.DataBinding(dataBinding => dataBinding.Ajax().Select("GetExcelData", "TypeOfService"))
.Columns(columns =>
{
columns.AutoGenerate(column =>
{
column.Width = "150px";
});
}))
Here's what my grid has headers like the below with no data:
Capacity Count
Thanks for the help!

Here's the code that solved my problem. I'm sure there's a better approach.
using (LinqToExcelReader reader = new LinqToExcelReader(modelDetail.FileName, true))
{
var previewData = reader.ReadRawDataByPage(5, 0);
List<List<string>> masterList = new List<List<string>>();
for (int x = 0; x < previewData.Count; x++)
{
List<string> list = new List<string>();
foreach (var cell in (LinqToExcel.Row)previewData[x])
{
list.Add(cell);
}
masterList.Add(list);
}
var listTest = masterList;
modelDetail.ExcelData = new List<ExcelData>();
foreach (List<string> theList in masterList)
{
ExcelData xlsData = new ExcelData();
xlsData.Column1 = theList[0];
xlsData.Column2 = theList[1];
xlsData.Column3 = theList[2];
xlsData.Column4 = theList[3];
xlsData.Column5 = theList[4];
xlsData.Column6 = theList[5];
xlsData.Column7 = theList[6];
xlsData.Column8 = theList[7];
xlsData.Column9 = theList[8];
xlsData.Column10 = theList[9];
modelDetail.ExcelData.Add(xlsData);
}

Related

Asp.Net Core - Control empty Excel cells to enter information in the database?

I use the EPPlus plugin to get information from Excel.The following code works perfectly, but how to control it when it gets an error after it reaches the empty Excel cell?
public async Task<IActionResult> AddExcellHorse(IFormFile ExcelFile)
{
using (var stream = new MemoryStream())
{
await ExcelFile.CopyToAsync(stream);
using (var package = new ExcelPackage(stream))
{
ExcelWorksheet worksheet = package.Workbook.Worksheets[0];
var rowCount = worksheet.Dimension.Rows;
for (int i = 2; i <= rowCount; i++)
{
AddExcelHorse viewModel = new AddExcelHorse()
{
MicrochipCode = worksheet.Cells[i, 1].Value.ToString().Trim(),
EnHorseName = worksheet.Cells[i, 2].Value.ToString().Trim(),
EnFatherHorseName = worksheet.Cells[i, 3].Value.ToString().Trim(),
EnMotherHorseName = worksheet.Cells[i, 4].Value.ToString().Trim(),
};
if (viewModel.MicrochipCode != null)
{
if (!_admin.ChechMicrochip(viewModel.MicrochipCode))
{
_admin.AddExcelHorse(viewModel);
}
} }
return RedirectToAction(nameof(Index));
}
}
}
I assume you run into a null reference exception, because the cell value is null, then .ToString() cannot be called.
You could wrap everything in a seperate if-block:
if(worksheet.Cells[i, 1].Value != null)
{
MicrochipCode = worksheet.Cells[i, 1].Value.ToString().Trim(),
}
or you use the null propagation:
MicrochipCode = worksheet.Cells[i, 1].Value?.ToString().Trim(),
//or with default value, if null is not good enough.
MicrochipCode = worksheet.Cells[i, 1].Value?.ToString().Trim() ?? String.Empty,

How to write a tag-helper for alphabetical paging

I came across the following article https://www.mikesdotnetting.com/article/256/entity-framework-recipe-alphabetical-paging-in-asp-net-mvc describing how to generate paging links from the data instead of the alphabet in a asp.net application.
The solution shown here is based on html helpers.
How can I implement this feature using tag helpers instead?
I'm using asp.net core 1.1.
The code I'm referrig to is:
public static class HtmlHelpers
{
public static HtmlString AlphabeticalPager(this HtmlHelper html, string selectedLetter, IEnumerable<string> firstLetters, Func<string, string> pageLink)
{
var sb = new StringBuilder();
var numbers = Enumerable.Range(0, 10).Select(i => i.ToString());
var alphabet = Enumerable.Range(65, 26).Select(i => ((char)i).ToString()).ToList();
alphabet.Insert(0, "All");
alphabet.Insert(1, "0-9");
var ul = new TagBuilder("ul");
ul.AddCssClass("pagination");
ul.AddCssClass("alpha");
foreach (var letter in alphabet)
{
var li = new TagBuilder("li");
if (firstLetters.Contains(letter) || (firstLetters.Intersect(numbers).Any() && letter == "0-9") || letter == "All")
{
if (selectedLetter == letter || selectedLetter.IsEmpty() && letter == "All")
{
li.AddCssClass("active");
var span = new TagBuilder("span");
span.SetInnerText(letter);
li.InnerHtml = span.ToString();
}
else
{
var a = new TagBuilder("a");
a.MergeAttribute("href", pageLink(letter));
a.InnerHtml = letter;
li.InnerHtml = a.ToString();
}
}
else
{
li.AddCssClass("inactive");
var span = new TagBuilder("span");
span.SetInnerText(letter);
li.InnerHtml = span.ToString();
}
sb.Append(li.ToString());
}
ul.InnerHtml = sb.ToString();
return new HtmlString(ul.ToString());
}
}
Any idea how to proceed?

Rally c# task time spent

I have a C# .net application using the rally 3.0.1 API. When I query task in my system I get 0.0 for time spent when I know they have time against them. Anyone know how to get this? Below is my code:
if (uTasks.Count > 0)
{
Request taskRequest = new Request(resultChild["Tasks"]);
QueryResult TaskQueryResult = restApi.Query(taskRequest);
foreach (var items in TaskQueryResult.Results)
//foreach (var items in uTasks)
{
DataRow dtrow2;
dtrow2 = dt.NewRow();
dtrow2["TaskID"]=items["FormattedID"];
dtrow2["Task Name"] = items["Name"];
if (items["Owner"] != null)
{
var owner = items["Owner"];
String ownerref = owner["_ref"];
var ownerFetch = restApi.GetByReference(ownerref, "Name");
string strTemp = ownerFetch["_refObjectName"];
dtrow2["Owner"] = strTemp.Replace(",", " ");
}
\\else { dtrow2["Owner"] = ""; }
dtrow2["Task-Est"] = items["Estimate"];
dtrow2["Task-ToDo"] = items["ToDo"];
dtrow2["Task-Spent"] = items["TimeSpent"];
dtrow2["ObjectType"] = "T";
dt.Rows.Add(dtrow2);
}
}
It seems like that should work. You may want to make sure you're including the TimeSpent field in your fetch before issuing the request.
taskRequest.Fetch = new List<string>() { "TimeSpent" };

Get resolved SPUser IDs from Sharepoint 2010 PeoplePicker

I try to get selected user IDs from people picker control as below:
function GetUserIdsFromPP() {
var xml = _picker.find('div#divEntityData');
var visiblefor = new Array();
xml.each(function (i, row) {
var data = $(this).children().first('div').attr('data');
var xmlDoc;
if (window.DOMParser) {
parser = new DOMParser();
xmlDoc = parser.parseFromString(data, "text/xml");
}
else // Internet Explorer
{
xmlDoc = new ActiveXObject("Microsoft.XMLDOM");
xmlDoc.async = false;
xmlDoc.loadXML(data);
}
var uid = xmlDoc.getElementsByTagName('Value')[0].firstChild.nodeValue;
visiblefor.push(uid);
});
return visiblefor;
}
The problem is that sometimes XML doesn't contain <Key>SPUserID</Key><Value>1</Value> and I get FQUN (user login with domain name).
What is the better way to resolve selected SPUserIds from PeoplePicker control?
This is how resolve emails from people picker control on client side
function GetEmailsFromPicker() {
var xml = _picker.find('div#divEntityData');
var result = new Array();
xml.each(function (i, row) {
var data = $(this).children().first('div').attr('data');
var xmlDoc;
if (window.DOMParser) {
parser = new DOMParser();
xmlDoc = parser.parseFromString(data, "text/xml");
}
else // Internet Explorer
{
xmlDoc = new ActiveXObject("Microsoft.XMLDOM");
xmlDoc.async = false;
xmlDoc.loadXML(data);
}
var emailIndex = -1;
for (var i = 0; i < xmlDoc.childNodes[0].childNodes.length; i++) {
var element = xmlDoc.childNodes[0].childNodes[i];
var key = element.childNodes[0].childNodes[0].nodeValue;
if (key == 'Email') {
var uid = xmlDoc.childNodes[0].childNodes[i].childNodes[1].childNodes[0].nodeValue;
result.push({ EMail: uid });
break;
}
}
});
return result;
}
Use the above answer, but...
Replace this with an appropriate Jquery or Javascript element name.
var xml = _picker.find('div#divEntityData');

Why does this controller double the inserts when I try to archive the results of the Bing Search API?

I'm trying to archive my search results for a term by
Using the Bing API in an async controller
Inserting them into database using Entity Framework
using the Bing API and insert them into a database using entity framework. For whatever reason it is returning 50 results, but then it enters 100 results into the database.
My Controller Code:
public class DHWebServicesController : AsyncController
{
//
// GET: /WebService/
private DHContext context = new DHContext();
[HttpPost]
public void RunReportSetAsync(int id)
{
int iTotalCount = 1;
AsyncManager.OutstandingOperations.Increment(iTotalCount);
if (!context.DHSearchResults.Any(xx => xx.CityMarketComboRunID == id))
{
string strBingSearchUri = #ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["BingSearchURI"];
string strBingAccountKey = #ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["BingAccountKey"];
string strBingUserAccountKey = #ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["BingUserAccountKey"];
CityMarketComboRun cityMarketComboRun = context.CityMarketComboRuns.Include(xx => xx.CityMarketCombo).Include(xx => xx.CityMarketCombo.City).First(xx => xx.CityMarketComboRunID == id);
var bingContainer = new Bing.BingSearchContainer(new Uri(strBingSearchUri));
bingContainer.Credentials = new NetworkCredential(strBingUserAccountKey, strBingAccountKey);
// now we can build the query
Keyword keyword = context.Keywords.First();
var bingWebQuery = bingContainer.Web(keyword.Name, "en-US", "Moderate", cityMarketComboRun.CityMarketCombo.City.Latitude, cityMarketComboRun.CityMarketCombo.City.Longitude, null, null, null);
var bingWebResults = bingWebQuery.Execute();
context.Configuration.AutoDetectChangesEnabled = false;
int i = 1;
DHSearchResult dhSearchResult = new DHSearchResult();
List<DHSearchResult> lst = new List<DHSearchResult>();
var webResults = bingWebResults.ToList();
foreach (var result in webResults)
{
dhSearchResult = new DHSearchResult();
dhSearchResult.BingID = result.ID;
dhSearchResult.CityMarketComboRunID = id;
dhSearchResult.Description = result.Description;
dhSearchResult.DisplayUrl = result.DisplayUrl;
dhSearchResult.KeywordID = keyword.KeywordID;
dhSearchResult.Created = DateTime.Now;
dhSearchResult.Modified = DateTime.Now;
dhSearchResult.Title = result.Title;
dhSearchResult.Url = result.Url;
dhSearchResult.Ordinal = i;
lst.Add(dhSearchResult);
i++;
}
foreach (DHSearchResult c in lst)
{
context.DHSearchResults.Add(c);
context.SaveChanges();
}
AsyncManager.Parameters["message"] = "The total number of results was "+lst.Count+". And there are " + context.DHSearchResults.Count().ToString();
}
else
{
AsyncManager.Parameters["message"] = "You have already run this report";
}
AsyncManager.OutstandingOperations.Decrement(iTotalCount);
}
public string RunReportSetCompleted(string message)
{
string str = message;
return str;
}
}
Here is how I am calling it from my asp.net mvc 4 page.
#Ajax.ActionLink("Run Report", "GatherKeywordsFromBing", "DHWebServices",
new { id=item.CityMarketComboRunID},
new AjaxOptions { OnSuccess = "ShowNotifier();", UpdateTargetId = "TopNotifierMessage", HttpMethod = "POST", InsertionMode = InsertionMode.Replace, LoadingElementId = strCityMarketComboProgressID, LoadingElementDuration = 1000 },
new { #class = "ViewLink" })
<span class="ProgressIndicator" id="#strCityMarketComboProgressID"><img src="#Url.Content("~/Content/img/SmallBall.gif")" alt="loading" /></span>
For whatever reason all of
Try saving only once:
foreach (DHSearchResult c in lst)
{
context.DHSearchResults.Add(c);
}
context.SaveChanges();
Also there's nothing asynchronous in your code, so there's no point of using asynchronous controller. Not only that it won't improve anything but it might make things worse.