I have a big problem with the Windows Phone 8 Emulator.
First I have an Azure project ,I have a WebRole this webrole expose some DomainServices (RIA Services) .
I exposed this DomainServices like SOAP, with others Apps like Windows 8 metro style or WPF app clients this services work fine.
But I trying to consume this services with Windows Phone 8 Emulator and I can't do that!.
I followed this article: How to connect to a local web service from the Windows Phone 8 emulator
I need to be more specific:
I have a website in a webRole of Windows Azure Project.
This website has a DomainServices (RIA Services) because I have a Silverlight Application inside.
I exposed this services with this.
<domainServices>
<endpoints>
<add name="Soap" type="Microsoft.ServiceModel.DomainServices.Hosting.SoapXmlEndpointFactory,
Microsoft.ServiceModel.DomainServices.Hosting, Version=4.0.0.0,
Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35" />
</endpoints>
</domainServices>
I can consume this services with other apps. Windows metro Style and WPF and this services work fine.
Now, I want to develop a new application for Windows Phone 8 . But I need to consume this services.
In my local machine , I trying to connect this services with the emulator so, I researching and I found the emulator is a Virtual Machine and I need to configure IIS Express.
I followed this article How to connect to a local web service from the Windows Phone 8 emulator
But I can't connect my Services hosted in the webRole with Windows Phone 8 Emulator.
This is the structure of my Website Project:
This the configuration of my WebRole Called LandingPage this web role has the services.
This the configuration of IIS Express inside of Applicationhost.config.
<site name="LandingPage" id="2">
<application path="/" applicationPool="Clr4IntegratedAppPool">
<virtualDirectory path="/" physicalPath="E:\AnimesideFinal\AnimesideWebsite\LandingPage" />
</application>
<bindings>
<binding protocol="http" bindingInformation="*:24939:localhost" />
<binding protocol="http" bindingInformation="*:24939:192.168.2.114" />
</bindings>
</site>
This is the applications running in IIS Express is different of the Article.
Finally this is the Config of the service in the Windows Phone 8 emulator.
<configuration>
<system.serviceModel>
<bindings>
<basicHttpBinding>
<binding name="BasicHttpBinding_AuthenticationServiceSoap" maxBufferSize="2147483647"
maxReceivedMessageSize="2147483647">
<security mode="None" />
</binding>
</basicHttpBinding>
</bindings>
<client>
<endpoint address="http://192.168.2.114/Services/LandingPage-Services-AuthenticationService.svc/Soap"
binding="basicHttpBinding" bindingConfiguration="BasicHttpBinding_AuthenticationServiceSoap"
contract="AuthService.AuthenticationServiceSoap" name="BasicHttpBinding_AuthenticationServiceSoap" />
</client>
</system.serviceModel>
I followed all Steps of the article without results . I think something is wrong because I need to run my project from the Azure proj and in the properties of that exist the option to use IIS express or IIS web server.
And this is the error of Windows Phone Emulator.
{System.ServiceModel.CommunicationException: The remote server returned an error: NotFound. ---> System.Net.WebException: The remote server returned an error: NotFound. ---> System.Net.WebException: The remote server returned an error: NotFound.
at System.Net.Browser.ClientHttpWebRequest.InternalEndGetResponse(IAsyncResult asyncResult)
at System.Net.Browser.ClientHttpWebRequest.<>c__DisplayClasse.b__d(Object sendState)
at System.Net.Browser.AsyncHelper.<>c__DisplayClass1.b__0(Object sendState)
--- End of inner exception stack trace ---
at System.Net.Browser.AsyncHelper.BeginOnUI(SendOrPostCallback beginMethod, Object state)
at System.Net.Browser.ClientHttpWebRequest.EndGetResponse(IAsyncResult asyncResult)
at System.ServiceModel.Channels.HttpChannelFactory.HttpRequestChannel.HttpChannelAsyncRequest.CompleteGetResponse(IAsyncResult result)
--- End of inner exception stack trace ---
at System.ServiceModel.AsyncResult.End[TAsyncResult](IAsyncResult result)
at System.ServiceModel.Channels.ServiceChannel.EndCall(String action, Object[] outs, IAsyncResult result)
at System.ServiceModel.ClientBase1.ChannelBase1.EndInvoke(String methodName, Object[] args, IAsyncResult result)
at AnimesideWP7.AuthService.AuthenticationServiceSoapClient.AuthenticationServiceSoapClientChannel.EndLogin(IAsyncResult result)
at AnimesideWP7.AuthService.AuthenticationServiceSoapClient.AnimesideWP7.AuthService.AuthenticationServiceSoap.EndLogin(IAsyncResult result)
at AnimesideWP7.AuthService.AuthenticationServiceSoapClient.OnEndLogin(IAsyncResult result)
at System.ServiceModel.ClientBase`1.OnAsyncCallCompleted(IAsyncResult result)}
Thank you for your help .
Regards.
see the iis express solution section
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windowsphone/develop/jj684580(v=vs.105).aspx
Related
I have a third Party WCF service which I am able to call when my application is using IIS Express but when I host my application on Local IIS and calling to that WCF service it throws exception:
"A connection attempt failed because the connected party did not properly respond after a period of time, or established connection failed because connected host has failed to respond"
The service is also giving me result very quickly when I consume it from console application & SOAP UI
So what I think this is not a data related issue rather it is something related to IIS (version 10).
The issue comes up when I hosted my application on Local IIS
this is my config file
<system.serviceModel>
<bindings>
<basicHttpBinding>
<binding name="BasicHttpBinding_IABCDPaymentService"/>
</basicHttpBinding>
</bindings>
<client>
<endpoint address="http://XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX/Service.svc"
binding="basicHttpBinding" bindingConfiguration="BasicHttpBinding_IABCDPaymentService"
contract="BankServiceWCF.IABCDPaymentService" name="BasicHttpBinding_IABCDPaymentService" />
</client>
Looking for help on my issue.
Thanks!
The issue was that i was not able to consume it when i was using local IIS.So i found the solution and the problem was with administrative rights.when i provided the rights it works!
I have a Windows forms app which uses WCF services. Our application sends messages using one of our WCF services to specific users running our client, so our callback “http:” string is dynamically constructed each time a message is sent to a user. It includes the server IP address and port (126.221.97.105:701) onto which the current user is logged, the user’s id (56281), and the client GUID (7392d27a-e4a0-42e2-89a3-adc332e28934). So, a typical callback “http:” string looks like this:
http://xxx.xxx.xx.xxx:701/CmesCns/CALLBACK/56281/7392d27a-e4a0-42e2-89a3-adc332e28934
We have an http namespace (http://+:701/) on our client and the group “Everyone” is tied to this namespace with all of the access permissions checked (GenericAll, GenericExecute, GenericRead, and GenericWrite). We use “http namespace” to create our namespaces.
Our application has been in production (on Windows Server 2003) for a few years and everything is working fine.
We have recently converted our application to run in the Windows 2008 server environment. The “Target Framework” in each of our projects is set to the “.NET Framework 4.0”. Our application works fine on my Windows 7 developer workstation. That is, I am able to receive messages from our WCF service, but when I place our application onto our Windows 2008 server and I attempt to run the application, I receive the following error message:
"There was no endpoint listening at http://xxx.xxx.xx.xxx:701/CmesCns/CALLBACK/56281/7392d27a-e4a0-42e2-89a3-adc332e28934
that could accept the message. This is often caused by an incorrect address or SOAP action. See InnerException, if present, for more details.”
The http namespace (http://+:701/) exists on my developer workstation and on my Windows 2008 server. The group “Everyone” is tied the namespace on my Windows 7 box and on my Windows 2008 server, and all of the access permissions are checked (GenericAll, GenericExecute, GenericRead, and GenericWrite).
We have been searching the web for an answer but have not discovered anything. Would anybody have any ideas on why this would work on our Windows 7 workstations, but not on our Windows 2008 servers?
Any help is greatly appreciated!
Kevin
When you host a WCF service in IIS you don't specify an absolute url in the address. You should use a relative url to the .svc file. The base url will be determined by the web site where it is hosted.
<service name="WebService.Receptor">
<endpoint
address="/WS.svc"
binding="wsHttpBinding"
contract="IMyContract"
/>
and on the client, depending on how your IIS is configured you should obviously specify the full address:
<client>
<endpoint
name="Receptor"
address="http://MyServer:8000/WS.svc"
binding="wsHttpBinding"
contract="IMyContract"
/>
This assumes that you have configured a site in IIS that listens on the 8000 port and that you have hosted your WCF application inside this site.
if it does not help please follow these links, hope it would be useful.
Stack overflow link
Multiple Endpoint
Typically, this error is because there is no endpoint on the server that matches what the client is requesting (the address, the service, or the authentication is different).
However, in my case, I had the exact same error, and it was not due to any of these things.
When I enabled the tracing on IIS and reviewed the svclog trace with SvcTraceViewer.exe (included in Visual Studio), the actual internal error was "Maximum request length exceeded."
My client was uploading an image via the service. And I guess the image was too big.
To enable tracing I added this to the configuration section:
<system.diagnostics>
<sources>
<source name="System.ServiceModel"
switchValue="All"
propagateActivity="true">
<listeners>
<add name="traceListener"
type="System.Diagnostics.XmlWriterTraceListener"
initializeData= "c:\log\Traces.svclog" />
</listeners>
</source>
</sources>
To solve the error, I increased the message request length in the web config and the error went away.
To do this, in the system.websection in the web.config I added the line:
<httpRuntime maxRequestLength="32768" />
Then I added this section inside the configuration section
<system.webServer>
<security>
<requestFiltering>
<requestLimits maxAllowedContentLength="32000000" />
</requestFiltering>
</security>
</system.webServer>
So I recommend you enable tracing and then review the trace for the exact error.
I have an application that connect to an external web service.
The application works fine but with one client I can't get through their proxy.
Since the proxy is configured on the computer i started with
<binding useDefaultWebProxy="true" ... >
With this I get the error message:
The remote server returned an error: (407) Proxy Authentication Required.
Then I tried to add:
<security mode="Transport">
<transport proxyCredentialType="Windows"
realm="" />
</security>
but the error message did not change
With some googling I found out that the default setting is to not send credentials to the proxy. The following setting is supposed to enable sending credentials:
<system.net>
<defaultProxy useDefaultCredentials="true" />
</system.net>
However, I now get another error message:
Insufficient permissions for setting the configuration section 'defaultProxy'.
Request for the permission of type 'System.Net.WebPermission, System, Version=4.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089' failed.
I don't understand this message. The application is running on the local computer so it should have full trust. Checked with caspol -m -l and it shows
1. All code: Nothing
1.1. Zone - MyComputer: FullTrust
Now I am out of ideas.
I don't know how to add WebPermission to an assmebly running on the local computer and I don't know if this solves the original problem with proxy authentication.
Some other details which I don't know if it matters.
Windows 7 64-bit
webservice uses https (I can reach the service via internet explorer)
user is local admin
In summary
How do I acces a WCF service on localhost when hosted in IIS on Azure? Azure does not bind localhost or 127.0.0.1 to my website.
Details
I have an ASP.Net application hosted on Azure. I have added a .svc and some workflows that I want to use via WCF. To keep matters simple, my web app simply calls the service on localhost, so I have endpoints like these in web.config;
<client>
<endpoint address="http://localhost:8080/Router.svc/Case" binding="basicHttpBinding" contract="NewOrbit.ExVerifier.Model.Workflow.Case.ICaseWorkflow" name="Case" />
<endpoint address="http://localhost:8080/Workflow/Case/Case_default1.xamlx" binding="basicHttpBinding" contract="*" name="Case_default1" />
</client>
This works just fine on my local machine. The problem is that when I publish this to Azure, the Website in IIS does not get a binding to localhost, instead the bindings are always to the actual IP address of the server.
It ends up looking like this in applicationHost.config:
<bindings>
<binding protocol="http" bindingInformation="10.61.90.44:80:" />
<binding protocol="https" bindingInformation="10.61.90.44:443:" />
<binding protocol="http" bindingInformation="10.61.90.44:8081:" />
</bindings>
So, as soon as my web app tries to call the service on localhost (or 127.0.0.1 for that matter) it fails instantly.
Needless to say, if I rdp on to the server and change the binding then all is fine.
What I find really odd is that there are tons of examples out there where people are accessing WCF services on localhost on Azure so I can't figure out why this is so. I have set the osFamily to 2 and in order to debug this I have enabled web publishing and remote desktop access which I guess, in theory, could mess things up.
What I have already looked at
I can rewrite the end-point address in my code at runtime to substitute localhost for the actual address or create the endpoint dynamically as described by Ron in the answers. Unfortunately I am using the WCF Routing service so I can version workflows. This means that my code calls the Router endpoint and the WCF Router in turns calls the actual service/workflow using an endpoint specified in web.config. I don't have control over the Routing services endpoint resolution without, I think, writing a whole set of routing logic which just seems to be a lot of work when all I want is to call localhost :)
Switching to using named pipes; Alas, it causes some strange issues with workflows, probably due to duplexing, and I am on a deadline so haven't got time to get to the bottom of that at the minute.
You have to build the endpoint address dynamically.
Step 1:
In your ServiceDefinition.csdef you need to declare an Endpoint.
<ServiceDefinition name="MyFirstAzureWorkflow" xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/ServiceHosting/2008/10/ServiceDefinition">
<WebRole name="WorkflowWeb" vmsize="ExtraSmall">
<Sites>
<Site name="Web">
<Bindings>
<Binding name="Endpoint1" endpointName="WorkflowService" />
</Bindings>
</Site>
</Sites>
<Endpoints>
<InputEndpoint name="WorkflowService" protocol="http" port="80" />
</Endpoints>
<Imports>
<Import moduleName="Diagnostics" />
</Imports>
</WebRole>
</ServiceDefinition>
Step 2:
When you want to call the service
var endpoint = RoleEnvironment.CurrentRoleInstance.InstanceEndpoints["WorkflowService"].IPEndpoint;
var uri = new Uri(string.Format(
"http://{0}:{1}/MyService.xamlx",
endpoint.Address,
endpoint.Port));
var proxy = new ServiceClient(
new BasicHttpBinding(),
new EndpointAddress(uri));
Okay, so this is how I solved it. IMHO it's a hack but at least it works.
Basically, I need to add a "*" binding, so I can do this in Powershell. The general recipe is here: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/tomholl/archive/2011/06/28/hosting-services-with-was-and-iis-on-windows-azure.aspx
That deals with adding Named Pipes support, but the principle is the same. I just changed the Powershell script to:
import-module WebAdministration
# Set up a binding to 8080 for the services
Get-WebSite "*Web*" | Foreach-Object {
$site = $_;
$siteref = "IIS:/Sites/" + $site.Name;
New-ItemProperty $siteref -name bindings -value #{protocol="http";bindingInformation="*:8080:"}
}
This now allows me to use http://127.0.0.1:8080/service.svc to access my service.
Note: You do need to follow the rest of the recipe to set elevated execution context and change the powershell execution mode, so do follow it carefully
I've got a small WCF webservice working with the built-in WCF Service Host and with hosting by the Visual Studio 2008 built-in development webserver.
I these hosting enviroments I have relied on the WCF Test Client for invoking the service methods.
Now I am running into problems with my next phase of testing:
I have it hosted in IIS 5.1 on my WinXP dev machine and I think maybe the problem is I cannot continue to use WCF Test Client anymore. Here is what's happening:
Case 1: "Anonymous Access" is CHECKED (ENABLED)
WCF Test Client UI comes up properly, exposing the WebMethods and the INVOKE button.
Yet when I click INVOKE it fails to connect with a backend data store (a 3rd party product) that requires Windows authentication. I could post the error I get back from the product.DLL but I don't think it is relevant.
Case 2: "Anonymous Access" is un-CHECKED (DISABLED)
WCF Test Client UI fails to even initialize properly. My researching of this tells me that MEX (WS-Metadata Exchange) requires "Anonymous Access" and (apparently) WCF Test Client requires MEX. Here are key snippets of the error being returned:
Error: Cannot obtain Metadata from http://localhost/wcfiishost
The remote server returned an error: (401) Unauthorized.HTTP GET Error
URI: http://localhost/wcfiishost
There was an error downloading 'http://localhost/wcfiishost'.
The request failed with the error message:
Security settings for this service require 'Anonymous' Authentication but it is not enabled for the IIS application that hosts this service
The are lots of explanations of binding options, message security, etc. and stuff I honestly do not understand. Here is my take on where I am but I would love your opinions:
(a) Because I know my WCF webservice MUST be configured to use Windows Authentication, I conclude I cannot continue to use the WCF Test Client when hosting my service in IIS. That it has effectively outlived it's usefulness to me. I will just have to take the time to write a web client because WCFTestClient won't work without Anonymous.
(or)
(b) It is possible to use WCF Test Client if it and the hosted service are configured propertly (I just don't know what the special configuration techniques are for this).
Which is correct? Time to stop using WCFTestClient or is there a way to have it both ways? Thanks in advance for your advice.
EDIT: 11 June 09
Is there anything else I can provide to help someone else help me on this question?
I just tried to have the same setup - but in my case, everything seems to work just fine.
ASP.NET web site
WCF service, using basicHttpBinding without any special settings at all
IIS Application with anonymous = enabled and Windows authentication = enabled (both turned on)
I can easily connect to it with the WcfTestClient and retrieve the metadata, and I can then call it, no problem.
Inside my service function, I check to see whether the current user is a known user or not, it is correctly identified as a Windows authenticated user:
ServiceSecurityContext ssc = ServiceSecurityContext.Current;
if (ssc.IsAnonymous)
{
return "anonymous user";
}
else
{
if(ssc.WindowsIdentity != null)
{
return ssc.WindowsIdentity.Name;
}
if (ssc.PrimaryIdentity != null)
{
return ssc.PrimaryIdentity.Name;
}
}
return "(no known user)";
I don't really know, what more to check for (except I'm on Vista with IIS7). Any chance you could include this code to check for the user in your service code? Just to see....
Marc
Marc, your setup is not even close to Johns.
John uses WSHttpBinding that uses Windows Credentials for Message mode transport. The Windows Authentication isn't being used with BasicHttpBinding. Furthermore, John had AnonymousAuthentication disabled, which is why the Metadata Exchange (mex) is failing.
The call won't even reach inside the service side function, because we get a Error 401 (Unauthorized) when we try to call.
Just know John, I have the same issue, and I'm trying to somehow set up separate bindings per endpoint. Hopefully that will work.
When I set the title/subject of this question and reached a dead end here, I opened up the same issue in the MSDN forum with a different emphasis on the title (content of question essentially the same).
For me, the real issue was how to use WCFTestClient in IIS without Anonymous Authentication being set (because my service needed Integrated Windows Authentication only).
Mex apparently requires Anonymous and by default WCFTestClient seems to need Mex. The key seems to be accomodating both my doctoring up the web.config file carefully.
Anyway, I got it working with this web.config below (the MSDN link is here:
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<configuration>
<endpoint address=""
binding="wsHttpBinding"
bindingConfiguration="wsBindingConfig"
contract="sdkTrimFileServiceWCF.IFileService">
<identity>
<dns value="localhost" />
</identity>
</endpoint>
<endpoint address="basic"
binding="basicHttpBinding"
bindingConfiguration="bindingConfig"
contract="sdkTrimFileServiceWCF.IFileService" />
</service>
</services>
<bindings>
<basicHttpBinding>
<binding name="bindingConfig">
<security mode="TransportCredentialOnly">
<transport clientCredentialType="Windows"/>
</security>
</binding>
</basicHttpBinding>
<wsHttpBinding>
<binding name="wsBindingConfig">
<security mode="Transport">
<transport clientCredentialType="Windows"/>
</security>
</binding>
</wsHttpBinding>
</bindings>
</serviceBehaviors>
</behaviors>