How can I find number of records processed by PostgreSQL after executing a SQL statement using ActiveRecord::Base Connection class?
temp_sql = "UPDATE table_a SET column_a ='abc' WHERE column_b = 1"
result = ActiveRecord::Base.establish_connection(#db).connection.execute(temp_sql)
Or can you suggest better way to do this. Please keep in mind that above update statement is a simple one to keep question brief. My real queries are "set based" and involves complex create temp tables, update, insert statements.
Found the answer in PG::Result class. It is cmd_tuples method;
temp_sql = "UPDATE table_a SET column_a ='abc' WHERE column_b = 1"
result = ActiveRecord::Base.establish_connection(#db).connection.execute(temp_sql)
number_of_records = result.cmd_tuples
Related
I have an update query in which I am trying to locate data in a column from a single table. All while taking other defined data listed in the query to update another column in the same table once a match has been found with that original search. Below is an example of my update statement. My end goal is to find '003447710' then update AltId to '540112'
UPDATE Site
SET AltId = ('540112'
'540129'
'540142'
'540143')
WHERE CCMFStatus in ('003447710',
'002754540',
'003564370',
'005942870')
I am sure there may already be something like this out there but I am really having trouble on an easy method on how to do this quickly and accurately.
Try this
update site
set altid = a.altid
from
(select altid,CCMFstatus from site) as a
where site.CCMFstatus = a.CCMFstatus
The best way might be multiple update statements:
UPDATE Site
SET AltId = '540112'
WHERE CCMFStatus = '003447710';
And so on.
If not, you can do this with a giant case statement or a join:
WITH values as (
SELECT '003447710' as oldstatus, '540112' as newaltid UNION ALL
SELECT '002754540', '540129' UNION ALL
SELECT '003564370', '540142' UNION ALL
SELECT '005942870', '540143'
)
UPDATE s
SET AltId = va.newaltid
FROM site s JOIN
values v
ON s.CCMFStatus = v.oldstatus;
If you already have the values in a table, then you don't need the WITH statement. You can just use the table.
Have you tried using CASE statement?
UPDATE SITE SET AltID = (CASE
WHEN CCMFStatus = '003447710' THEN '540112'
WHEN CCMFStatus = '002754540' THEN '540129'
END)
WHERE
CCMFStatus in ('003447710', '002754540', '003564370', '005942870');
BR,
Can anyone advise me as to what is wrong with the following SQL server update statement:
IF (SELECT * FROM TBL_SystemParameter WHERE code='SOUND_WRONG_GARMENT') = ''
GO
UPDATE TBL_SystemParameter
SET [Value] = 'Ping.wav'
WHERE ID = (SELECT ID
FROM TBL_SystemParameter
WHERE code = 'SOUND_WRONG_GARMENT')
You don't need an if statement - you can just run the update statement, and if the subquery returns no rows, no rows will be updated. The if won't really save anything - you're performing two queries instead of one.
You either want
UPDATE TBL_SystemParameter
SET [Value] = 'Ping.wav'
WHERE ID In (SELECT ID
FROM TBL_SystemParameter
WHERE code = 'SOUND_WRONG_GARMENT')
if there are multiple ID's with that code OR use
UPDATE TBL_SystemParameter
SET [Value] = 'Ping.wav'
WHERE code = 'SOUND_WRONG_GARMENT'
either way and lose the IF statement as #Mureinik said.
Although Mureinik's answer is the logical solution to this, I will answer why this isn't actually working. Your condition is wrong, and this approach will work instead using IF EXISTS:
IF EXISTS (SELECT * FROM TBL_SystemParameter WHERE code='SOUND_WRONG_GARMENT')
BEGIN
UPDATE TBL_SystemParameter
SET [Value] = 'Ping.wav'
WHERE ID IN (SELECT ID
FROM TBL_SystemParameter
WHERE code = 'SOUND_WRONG_GARMENT')
END
As a side note, you're using an = sign instead of IN, which means you'll be matching to an arbitrary singular ID and only update 1 row based on this. To use a set based operation, use the IN clause.
You could actually 'golf' this by doing away with the derived query altogether, and using a simple WHERE code='SOUND_WRONG_GARMENT' on the table you're updating on.
I have a SQL which I am using for updating many rows at the same time using a complex case condition. Currently, I am setting 2 column using the same CASE condition.
For example, I need to do something like:
UPDATE MyTable
SET([MyColumn1], [MyColumn2]) = ('','')
What I am doing now is:
UPDATE MyTable
SET [MyColumn1] = COMPLEX CASE RETURN STRING,
[MyColumn2] = 100% SAME COMPLEX CASE RETURN A Different STRING
I tried but getting error. Is this is possible in SQL SERVER?
It is supported in IBM Db, http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/idshelp/v111/index.jsp?topic=/com.ibm.sqls.doc/sqls919.htm
But it seems there is no support in SQL Server
Update command syntax is:
UPDATE table_name
SET column1=value1,column2=value2,...
WHERE some_column=some_value;
update mytable
SET [MyColumn1] = COMPLEX CASE RETURN STRING,
[MyColumn2] = 100% SAME COMPLEX CASE RETURN A Different STRING
WHERE some_column=some_value;// please have the where condition
then only we can update the corresponding raw.
updating means we are changing some existing values so we need to provide the location where we want this change,for that we can use the where condition..
example
update author
set name="onv kurup"
set book="oralude"
where authorid=112;
if we are not giving the where condition all the data of the table will be get updated with same value in the update query we have given
After searching a lot, I have found the answer,
update table1
set col1 = a.col1, col2 = a.col2, col3 = a.col3 from
table1 as a Join on tablefunction
where table1.col1 <expression>
http://geekswithblogs.net/phoenix/archive/2009/10/13/update-multiple-columns-on-sql-server.aspx
I've been trying for a few hours (probably more than I needed to) to figure out the best way to write an update sql query that will dissallow duplicates on the column I am updating.
Meaning, if TableA.ColA already has a name 'TEST1', then when I'm changing another record, then I simply can't pick a value for ColA to be 'TEST1'.
It's pretty easy to simply just separate the query into a select, and use a server layer code that would allow conditional logic:
SELECT ID, NAME FROM TABLEA WHERE NAME = 'TEST1'
IF TableA.recordcount > 0 then
UPDATE SET NAME = 'TEST1' WHERE ID = 1234
END IF
But I'm more interested to see if these two queries can be combined into a single query.
I am using Oracle to figure things out, but I'd love to see a SQL Server query as well. I figured a MERGE statement can work, but for obvious reasons you can't have the clause:
..etc.. WHEN NOT MATCHED UPDATE SET ..etc.. WHERE ID = 1234
AND you can't update a column if it's mentioned in the join (oracle limitation but not limited to SQL Server)
ALSO, I know you can put a constraint on a column that prevents duplicate values, but I'd be interested to see if there is such a query that can do this without using constraint.
Here is an example start-up attempt on my end just to see what I can come up with (explanations on it failed is not necessary):
ERROR: ORA-01732: data manipulation operation not legal on this view
UPDATE (
SELECT d.NAME, ch.NAME FROM (
SELECT 'test1' AS NAME, '2722' AS ID
FROM DUAL
) d
LEFT JOIN TABLEA a
ON UPPER(a.name) = UPPER(d.name)
)
SET a.name = 'test2'
WHERE a.name is null and a.id = d.id
I have tried merge, but just gave up thinking it's not possible. I've also considered not exists (but I'd have to be careful since I might accidentally update every other record that doesn't match a criteria)
It should be straightforward:
update personnel
set personnel_number = 'xyz'
where person_id = 1001
and not exists (select * from personnel where personnel_number = 'xyz');
If I understand correctly, you want to conditionally update a field, assuming the value is not found. The following query does this. It should work in both SQL Server and Oracle:
update table1
set name = 'Test1'
where (select count(*) from table1 where name = 'Test1') > 0 and
id = 1234
I have below query that I am using ..
select * from app_subsys_param where assp_name like '%param_name%'
where param_name is the name of the parameter. From this query we will get the assp_id corresponding to the parameter. With this id we look up into app_subsys_parmval table to get the value of the parameter.
update app_subsys_parmval set aspv_value = 'true' where assp_id = id_val
Now instead of separately launching the two sql statements , I want to combime both of them as one is there any sub query or join mechanism that can combine both of them in one statement , please advise
You need to use UPDATE .. FROM syntax:
UPDATE app_subsys_paramval
SET aspv_value = 'true'
FROM app_subsys_param
WHERE app_subsys_param.id = app_subsys_paramval.id
AND app_subsys_param.value LIKE '%param_name%';
Use a subselect in your update statement:
UPDATE app_subsys_parmval
SET aspv_value = 'true'
WHERE id_val = (SELECT assp_id
FROM app_subsys_param
WHERE assp_name LIKE '%param_name%')
Note, I am assuming a bit about what's in the * of your select *.
Look at the MERGE statement. This is the ANSI SQL:2003 standard for UPDATE … FROM.
Documentation:
MERGE for DB2 for Linux/UNIX/Windows
MERGE for DB2 z/OS 9.1