How can I do different project settings for users in the same project. I have a project with some .properties file like email.properties which contains user-specific settings.I need something like user-specific enviroment settings, something like this: email..properties, and variable contains in OS enviroment or, maybe, in project file
Here's how I've done this in some projects. I create a System Property to the path of the property file. The path is outside of the project so the properties file is never committed. But to help others who are running the project for the first time, I commit a template properties file with default options.
In intellij, I start the project with a different -D option than my coworkers do and the startup options don't get committed (because we don't commit the .idea folder).
As a result a do the same: at first I created properties folder in propject root, add there file env.properties which contains current environment name (or user can add it as JVM start paramenter -Denv=<env name>. I add static class and method Properties getProperty(String fileName) which receive property file name as parameter and return all records in file as java.util.Properties.
public static Properties loadProperties(String fileName)
{
Properties properties = null;
if (propertiesMap.containsKey(fileName)) {
properties = (Properties)properties.get(fileName);
} else {
String environment = getEnvironment();
try {
properties = (new PropertiesLoaderImpl()).LoadAllPropertiesForUtilAndEnv(environment, fileName);
} catch (FileNotFoundException exception) {}
}
return properties;
}
private static String getEnvironment() {
// Проверка на наличие параметра при запуске java-машины
String environment = System.getProperty("env");
if (environment == null) {
try {
// Попытка найти файл env.properties
ResourceBundle bundle = ResourceBundle.getBundle("properties/env");
environment = bundle.getString("env");
} catch (MissingResourceException exception) {
environment = "";
}
}
return environment;
}
Property search implements that way:
1. look in ..proeprties;
2. if there is no suitable property, then look in .property;
3. else return empy.
Related
How one would write a Lucene 8.11 ByteBuffersDirectory to disk?
something similar to Lucene 2.9.4 Directory.copy(directory, FSDirectory.open(indexPath), true)
You can use the copyFrom method to do this.
For example:
You are using a ByteBuffersDirectory:
final Directory dir = new ByteBuffersDirectory();
Assuming you are not concurrently writing any new data to that dir, you can declare a target where you want to write the data - for example, a FSDirectory (a file system directory):
Directory to = FSDirectory.open(Paths.get(OUT_DIR_PATH));
Use whatever string you want for the OUT_DIR_PATH location.
Then you can iterate over all the files in the original dir object, writing them to this new to location:
IOContext ctx = new IOContext();
for (String file : dir.listAll()) {
System.out.println(file); // just for testing
to.copyFrom(dir, file, file, ctx);
}
This will create the new OUT_DIR_PATH dir and populate it with files, such as:
_0.cfe
_0.cfs
_0.si
segments_1
... or whatever files you happen to have in your dir.
Caveat:
I have only used this with a default IOContext object. There are other constructors for the context - not sure what they do. I assume they give you more control over how the write is performed.
Meanwhile I figured it out by myself and created a straight forward method for it:
#SneakyThrows
public static void copyIndex(ByteBuffersDirectory ramDirectory, Path destination) {
FSDirectory fsDirectory = FSDirectory.open(destination);
Arrays.stream(ramDirectory.listAll())
.forEach(fileName -> {
try {
// IOContext is null because in fact is not used (at least for the moment)
fsDirectory.copyFrom(ramDirectory, fileName, fileName, null);
} catch (IOException e) {
log.error(e.getMessage(), e);
}
});
}
I am importing a library that reads from the file system instead of my web archive's resource folder. I want to be able to essentially mock that file by adding an asset with that path using ShrinkWrap, so I can run tests on my build server without guaranteeing the file system has all these files. I tried to add a String Asset in the appropriate path, but the code can't find that asset. Here's an example of what I'm trying to achieve.
Rest Resource
#Path("/hello-world")
public class HelloWorldResource {
#GET
public Response getHelloWorld(){
return Response.ok(getFileContent()).build();
}
private String getFileContent() {
StringBuilder builder = new StringBuilder();
try {
BufferedReader bufferedReader = new BufferedReader(
new FileReader(
"/usr/myFile.txt"));
String line = bufferedReader.readLine();
while (line != null) {
builder.append(line);
line = bufferedReader.readLine();
}
}
catch (Exception e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
return builder.toString();
}
}
Test
#RunWith(Arquillian.class)
public class HelloWorldResourceTest {
#Deployment
public static WebArchive createDeployment()
{
WebArchive webArchive = ShrinkWrap
.create(WebArchive.class)
.addPackages(true,
HelloWorldApplication.class.getPackage(),
HelloWorldResource.class.getPackage(),
Hello.class.getPackage())
.add(new StringAsset("Blah"),"/usr/myFile.txt")
.addAsWebInfResource(EmptyAsset.INSTANCE, "beans.xml");
System.out.println("WebArchive: " + webArchive.toString(true));
return webArchive;
}
#Test
#RunAsClient
public void testHello(
#ArquillianResteasyResource("hello-world") final WebTarget webTarget)
{
final Response response = webTarget
.request(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON)
.get();
String hello = response.readEntity(String.class);
System.err.println("Hello: " + hello);
Assert.assertEquals("Status is not OK", response.getStatus(), 200);
}
}
Web Archive toString
/WEB-INF/
/WEB-INF/classes/
/WEB-INF/classes/com/
/WEB-INF/classes/com/
/WEB-INF/classes/com/
/WEB-INF/classes/com/helloworld/
/WEB-INF/classes/com/helloworld/application/
/WEB-INF/classes/com/helloworld/application/HelloWorldApplication.class
/WEB-INF/classes/com/helloworld/resource/
/WEB-INF/classes/com/helloworld/resource/HelloWorldResourceTest.class
/WEB-INF/classes/com/helloworld/resource/HelloWorldResource.class
/WEB-INF/classes/com/helloworld/dataobjects/
/WEB-INF/classes/com/helloworld/dataobjects/Hello.class
/WEB-INF/beans.xml
/usr/
/usr/myFile.txt
I get the following error:
java.io.FileNotFoundException: /usr/myFile.txt (No such file or
directory)
Seems like ShrinkWrap is adding /usr/myFile.txt as a relative path within the archive instead of making it seem like /usr/myFile.txt is at the root directory of my file system. Is there any way I can get ShrinkWrap to do what I want?
Shrinkwrap is intended to create archives, so the API is scoped to create assets within the archive you are creating. If you want to have resources created in the regular filesystem simply use JDK, there is nothing Shrinkwrap could help you with.
Alternatively, if possible, change your resource to read resources from the classpath, not filesystem path. With this approach, you can easily swap content for the test using Shrinkwrap as you are trying now with your example.
I currently have this in my grails view to open a pdf file in a new window:
${file.getValue()}<br/><br/>
where file.getValue() is the name of the file with extension.
This defaults to the path of grails-app/assets/userGuides. I want to change this so that it opens the file from a local destination, for example C:/Users/user1/userGuides/
How would I change this ?
If you're in grails 2.x, you can configure a target directory in Config.groovy
For instance
grails.datapath.userguides = "C:/Users/user1/userGuides/"
if you want to configure this depending the environment you can do like this :
development {
grails.datapath.userguides = "C:/Users/user1/userGuides/"
}
test {
grails.datapath.userguides = "C:/anotherDirectory/userGuides/"
}
production {
grails.datapath.userguides = "/var/www/${appName}/userGuides/"
}
Then define a controller to access your files, for example a DocumentsController with this action
def downloadUserGuide()
{
... // code to get your entity file that you use in your example to do
... // file.getValue()
String path = grailsApplication.config.grails.datapath.userguides
String label = ... // If you want to display another file name
render(contentType: "application/pdf", file: new File(path + file.getValue()), fileName: label)
}
What are the options for setting a project version with .NET Core / ASP.NET Core projects?
Found so far:
Set the version property in project.json. Source: DNX Overview, Working with DNX projects. This seems to set the AssemblyVersion, AssemblyFileVersion and AssemblyInformationalVersion unless overridden by an attribute (see next point).
Setting the AssemblyVersion, AssemblyFileVersion, AssemblyInformationalVersion attributes also seems to work and override the version property specified in project.json.
For example, including 'version':'4.1.1-*' in project.json and setting [assembly:AssemblyFileVersion("4.3.5.0")] in a .cs file will result in AssemblyVersion=4.1.1.0, AssemblyInformationalVersion=4.1.1.0 and AssemblyFileVersion=4.3.5.0
Is setting the version number via attributes, e.g. AssemblyFileVersion, still supported?
Have I missed something - are there other ways?
Context
The scenario I'm looking at is sharing a single version number between multiple related projects. Some of the projects are using .NET Core (project.json), others are using the full .NET Framework (.csproj). All are logically part of a single system and versioned together.
The strategy we used up until now is having a SharedAssemblyInfo.cs file at the root of our solution with the AssemblyVersion and AssemblyFileVersion attributes. The projects include a link to the file.
I'm looking for ways to achieve the same result with .NET Core projects, i.e. have a single file to modify.
You can create a Directory.Build.props file in the root/parent folder of your projects and set the version information there.
However, now you can add a new property to every project in one step by defining it in a single file called Directory.Build.props in the root folder that contains your source. When MSBuild runs, Microsoft.Common.props searches your directory structure for the Directory.Build.props file (and Microsoft.Common.targets looks for Directory.Build.targets). If it finds one, it imports the property. Directory.Build.props is a user-defined file that provides customizations to projects under a directory.
For example:
<Project>
<PropertyGroup>
<Version>0.0.0.0</Version>
<FileVersion>0.0.0.0</FileVersion>
<InformationalVersion>0.0.0.0.myversion</InformationalVersion>
</PropertyGroup>
</Project>
Another option for setting version info when calling build or publish is to use the undocumented /p option.
dotnet command internally passes these flags to MSBuild.
Example:
dotnet publish ./MyProject.csproj /p:Version="1.2.3" /p:InformationalVersion="1.2.3-qa"
See here for more information: https://github.com/dotnet/docs/issues/7568
Not sure if this helps, but you can set version suffixes at publish time. Our versions are usually datetime driven, so that developers don't have to remember to update them.
If your json has something like "1.0-*"
"dotnet publish --version-suffix 2016.01.02" will make it "1.0-2016.01.02".
It's important to stick to "semvar" standards, or else you'll get errors. Dotnet publish will tell you.
Why not just change the value in the project.json file. Using CakeBuild you could do something like this (optimizations probably possible)
Task("Bump").Does(() => {
var files = GetFiles(config.SrcDir + "**/project.json");
foreach(var file in files)
{
Information("Processing: {0}", file);
var path = file.ToString();
var trg = new StringBuilder();
var regExVersion = new System.Text.RegularExpressions.Regex("\"version\":(\\s)?\"0.0.0-\\*\",");
using (var src = System.IO.File.OpenRead(path))
{
using (var reader = new StreamReader(src))
{
while (!reader.EndOfStream)
{
var line = reader.ReadLine();
if(line == null)
continue;
line = regExVersion.Replace(line, string.Format("\"version\": \"{0}\",", config.SemVer));
trg.AppendLine(line);
}
}
}
System.IO.File.WriteAllText(path, trg.ToString());
}
});
Then if you have e.g. a UnitTest project that takes a dependency on the project, use "*" for dependency resolution.
Also, do the bump before doing dotnet restore. My order is as follows:
Task("Default")
.IsDependentOn("InitOutDir")
.IsDependentOn("Bump")
.IsDependentOn("Restore")
.IsDependentOn("Build")
.IsDependentOn("UnitTest");
Task("CI")
.IsDependentOn("Default")
.IsDependentOn("Pack");
Link to full build script: https://github.com/danielwertheim/Ensure.That/blob/3a278f05d940d9994f0fde9266c6f2c41900a884/build.cake
The actual values, e.g. the version is coming from importing a separate build.config file, in the build script:
#load "./buildconfig.cake"
var config = BuildConfig.Create(Context, BuildSystem);
The config file looks like this (taken from https://github.com/danielwertheim/Ensure.That/blob/3a278f05d940d9994f0fde9266c6f2c41900a884/buildconfig.cake):
public class BuildConfig
{
private const string Version = "5.0.0";
public readonly string SrcDir = "./src/";
public readonly string OutDir = "./build/";
public string Target { get; private set; }
public string Branch { get; private set; }
public string SemVer { get; private set; }
public string BuildProfile { get; private set; }
public bool IsTeamCityBuild { get; private set; }
public static BuildConfig Create(
ICakeContext context,
BuildSystem buildSystem)
{
if (context == null)
throw new ArgumentNullException("context");
var target = context.Argument("target", "Default");
var branch = context.Argument("branch", string.Empty);
var branchIsRelease = branch.ToLower() == "release";
var buildRevision = context.Argument("buildrevision", "0");
return new BuildConfig
{
Target = target,
Branch = branch,
SemVer = Version + (branchIsRelease ? string.Empty : "-b" + buildRevision),
BuildProfile = context.Argument("configuration", "Release"),
IsTeamCityBuild = buildSystem.TeamCity.IsRunningOnTeamCity
};
}
}
If you still want to have the Solution Level SharedVersionInfo.cs you can do it by adding these lines to your project.json file:
"buildOptions": {
"compile": {
"includeFiles": [
"../../SharedVersionInfo.cs"
]
}
}
Your relative path may vary, of course.
use external version.txt file with version, and prebuild step to publish this version in projects
Seems pretty straight forward. Documentation at http://velocity.apache.org/engine/devel/developer-guide.html#Configuring_Logging
says to set the runtime.log property. Here's what I got for all my properties.
velocityEngine.setProperty(RuntimeConstants.FILE_RESOURCE_LOADER_PATH, templatesPath);
velocityEngine.setProperty("runtime.log", "/path/to/my/file/velocity.log");
velocityEngine.setProperty("resource.loader", "string");
velocityEngine.setProperty("string.resource.loader.class", "org.apache.velocity.runtime.resource.loader.StringResourceLoader");
velocityEngine.setProperty("string.resource.loader.repository.class", "org.apache.velocity.runtime.resource.util.StringResourceRepositoryImpl");
Not finding any log file where I told it to place it and instead finding the new errors placed into old (folder of initialization) location. Any ideas? :D
i had similar problem when setting at runtime some options. I figured out those problem whit a custom VelocityBuilder and an external velocity.properties file where you can put all the runtime properties.
Here is the code:
public class BaseVelocityBuilder implements VelocityBuilder {
private VelocityEngine engine;
private Log logger = LogFactory.getLog(getClass());
#Autowired
private WebApplicationContext webApplicationContext;
public VelocityEngine engine() {
if(engine == null) {
engine = new VelocityEngine();
Properties properties = new Properties();
InputStream in = null;
try {
in = webApplicationContext.getServletContext().getResourceAsStream("/WEB-INF/velocity.properties");
properties.load(in);
engine.init(properties);
} catch (IOException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
logger.error("Error loading velocity engine properties");
throw new ProgramException("Cannot load velocity engine properties");
}
IOUtils.closeQuietly(in);
}
return engine;
}
}
See this line:
in = webApplicationContext.getServletContext().getResourceAsStream("/WEB-INF/velocity.properties");
properties.load(in);
engine.init(properties);
So i have a velocity.properties file in /WEB-INF where i put some configuration:
resource.loader = webinf, class
webinf.resource.loader.description = Framework Templates Resource Loader
webinf.resource.loader.class = applica.framework.library.velocity.WEBINFResourceLoader
webapp.resource.loader.class = org.apache.velocity.tools.view.servlet.WebappLoader
webapp.resource.loader.path =
file.resource.loader.description = Velocity File Resource Loader
file.resource.loader.class = org.apache.velocity.runtime.resource.loader.FileResourceLoader
file.resource.loader.path =
class.resource.loader.description = Velocity Classpath Resource Loader
class.resource.loader.class = org.apache.velocity.runtime.resource.loader.ClasspathResourceLoader
runtime.log='/pathYouWant/velocity.log'
In the end in your application.xml :
<bean class="applica.framework.library.velocity.BaseVelocityBuilder" />
In this way you can have for example different file log for different application and when you give the war in production, the sysadm can change the properties due to env configuration of the production server.