I have problem with UIScrollView, I try create sth like table with own rows ( separate nib ). Everything works good with 1-10 rows, but problem occurs with more than 20 elements. The application starts working slow, and stunt. Is there any solution to optimalize scroll view for 100-200 own subviews?
Use UITableView. That's precisely what it's designed for.
UITableView and UICollectionView are both optimizing by removing subviews that are no longer needed and putting them in a reuse queue. By reusing those views the system does not have to create and destroy their backing layers but can reuse them. This way you only have ever as many subviews on screen as can fit.
Typically you want to add/remove visible subviews in either the layoutSubviews of a scroll view subclass or the corresponding didScroll delegate method. Personally I prefer the layoutSubviews since it is a bit earlier in the chain of events.
Basically you would get a reusable subview from your reuse queue as soon as at least 1 px of the subview should appear within the bounds of the scroll view and remove the subview as soon as no pixel of it is visible any more.
If you use UITableview or UICollectionView instead of a plain scroll view they provide a mechanism to register views in NIB for certain reuse identifiers and then the dequeueing will automatically load a new instance of a subview from NIB is none is queue or dequeue one if there is.
Related
I have implemented a UIWebView object into a custom UIView (TSAlertView). My UIWebView sits in the middle of the UIView, as a subview.
When I rotate the iOS device screen, the UIWebView object redraws right on top of the old one, without deleting the old one. All the other elements of this custom UIView are destroyed and redrawn when the screen is rotated.
I imagine I must have missed some sort of procedure for deallocating resources or removing the UIWebView from view. I have tried adding 'autorelease' to the declaration of the UIWebView, but to no avail. I wonder if this is a common symptom of a simple oversight I have made in the way the UIWebView is created?
This seems to be a simple case of not telling the UIWebView object it should destroy itself before it is redrawn on each rotate - but I don't know how I can go about this...
Any wisdom gratefully received.
Ideally while rotating you should not create the views again. Instead you can rearrange the frame in delegates appropriately. In your case you might be creating a UIWebView again, which should be avoided. Instead of that, you can keep it as a class level param(Declare in .h file) and adjust the frame in delegate methods for rotation. Also please note that release/autorelease wont remove your view from superview. You need to call removeFromSuperview method to achieve that.
Check this for view resizing and layout handling
I have a simple case of an iOS application I would like to measure: a UITableView built with custom extended cells. Each cell is a composition of a main views and some subviews. Based on some criteria I am hiding or showing subviews in table cell.
Supposing I have to decide if adding subviews when needed, or built xib with all the outlets and hide/show when needed.
What could be the best approach for deciding between those two ?
Supposing also you didn't read Apple guidelines about composition of cell, what concrete steps you would do either via code (by putting NSLog statement for example), or via Xcode instruments (which one to choose etc...) to confirm the choice.
This is quite a new matter for me, so please be as much specific as you can.
This http://blog.giorgiocalderolla.com/2011/04/16/customizing-uitableviewcells-a-better-way/ is a great resource.
Having many subviews with transparent backgrounds degrades scrolling performance.
Dynamically adding subViews could get difficult to track, and if you don't do it "right" then you'll end up with cells with too many "extra" subviews, via the cell reuse queueing mechanism.
You'll have to add the subViews in the init method of the cell itself and not in the cellForRow method of your data source. (unless you're using some way to track the creation/availability of any given subview, like viewWithTag etc.)
I'm struggling with setNeedsDisplay. I thought it was supposed to trigger calls of drawRect: for the view for which it is called and the hierarchy below that if it's within the view's bounds, but I'm not finding that to be the case. Here is my setup:
From the application delegate, I create a view whose size is a square that covers essentially the whole screen real estate. This view is called TrollCalendarView. There is not much that happens with TrollCalendarView except for a rotation triggered by the compass.
There are 7 subviews of TrollCalendarView called PlatformView intended to contain 2D draw objects arranged around the center of TrollCalendarView in a 7-sided arrangement. So when the iPad is rotated, these 7 views rotate such that they are always oriented with the cardinal directions.
Each of the PlatformView subviews contains 3 subviews called Tower. Each tower contains 2D draw objects implemented in drawRect:.
So, in summary, I have TrollCalendarView with empty drawRect:, and subviews PlatformView and Platformview -> Tower that each have drawRect implementations. Additionally, Tower lies within the bounds of Platform, and Platform lies within the bounds of TrollCalendarView.
In TrollCalendarView I've added a swipe recognizer. When I swipe happens, a property is updated, and I call [self setNeedsDisplay] but nothing seems to happen. I added NSLog entries to drawRect: method in each of these views, and only the TrollCalendarView drawRect: method is called. Ironically, that is the one view whose drawRect method will be empty.
There is no xib file.
What do I need to do to ensure the drawRect method in the other subviews is called? Is there documentation somewhere that describes all the nuances that could affect this?
I'm struggling with setNeedsDisplay. I thought it was supposed to trigger calls of drawRect for the view for which it is called and the hierarchy below that if it's within the view's bounds
No, that is not the case. Where did you get that idea?
-setNeedsDisplay: applies only to the view to which it is sent. If you need to invalidate other views, you need to add some code to send -setNeedsDisplay: to them, too. That's all there is to it.
I think this is an optimization in the framework; if your subviews don't need to draw again, then this is a major performance improvement. Realize that almost anything animatable does not require drawrect (moving, scaling, etc).
If you know that all of your subviews should be redrawn (and not simply moved), then override setNeedsDisplay in your main view and do like this:
-(void) setNeedsDisplay {
[self.subviews makeObjectsPerformSelector:#selector(setNeedsDisplay)];
[super setNeedsDisplay];
}
I have tested this, and it causes all subviews to be redrawn as well. Please note that you will earn efficiency karma points if you somehow filter your subviews and make sure you only send that to subviews which actually need redrawn... and even more if you can figure out how not to need to redraw them. :-)
I have a situation whereby I am adding a view from another viewcontroller to an existing viewcontroller. For example:
//set up loading page
self.myLoadingPage = [[LoadingPageViewController alloc]init ];
self.myLoadingPage.view.frame = self.view.bounds;
self.myLoadingPage.view.hidden = YES;
[self.view addSubview:self.myLoadingPage.view];
Is it possible to set 'self.myLoadingPage' to be the first responder? This is the case whereby the loadingpage view size does not cover the entire size of the existing view and users can still interact with the superview (which is not the desired behaviour). I want to just enable the subview in this case.
When I had a similar problem, I made an invisible UIView that covered the entire screen, I added the large invisible UIView on top of the main view and made the loading view a subview of the invisible UIView.
The simplest solution is to override hitTest method in your loading view to return TRUE. This top view is first in the responder chain, the hitTest method gets called which NORMALLY returns TRUE if the point is within the view and will therefore be handled, returning TRUE regardless means you get the touch event and effectively block the message being resent to the next responder.
Interesting question. I found a similar post with a quote from the Apple Developer Forums on this issue:
To truly make this view the only thing
on screen that can receive touches
you'd need to either add another view
over top of everything else to catch
the rest of the touches, or subclass a
view somewhere in your hierarchy (or
your UIWindow itself) and override
hitTest:withEvent: to always return
your text view when it's visible, or
to return nil for touches not in your
text view.
This would seem to indicate there isn't a terribly straightforward solution (unless there was an API change regarding this made after October, 2010.)
Alternatively, I suppose you could go through all the other subviews in your superview and individually set their userInteractionEnabled properties to NO (but that would probably prove more cumbersome than the quoted solutions).
I would love to see other ways to allow this.
I've got a fairly complex view, for me anyway, that has a few "trays" with custom interface items on them. They slide in and out of my root view. I'd like to nest (addSubview) the items inside the view. Each needs some setup before being displayed...and none can be configured in IB (they're subclasses of UIView).
I'm wondering if it makes sense to subclass UIViewController for each "tray" and then have the VC's view property point to the "tray" view which I can populate with my custom UIView objects. This way I can leverage the viewDidLoad, etc... methods in UIViewController.
I'm not aware of others doing this - at least in the few samples I've looked at. It would create a situation where there would be multiple view controllers being displayed on the screen at once. from the Navigation controller itself on down to the rootViewController and its view and then any number (well, screen size permitting) of these small trayViewControllers. If so, how's the responder chain work? i assume it'd go from lowest UIView to its enclosing VC, then to that VC's parent view, then that view's VC, etc. etc. repeat, repeat.. up to UIApplication... am I asking for trouble?
OR, do I just stick with UIViews and adding subviews into subviews, etc. etc..
Prior to iOS 5.0 this will specifically not recommended because the nested view controllers' lifecycle events – viewWillAppear, etc. – won't be called. See Abusing UIViewControllers.
With multiple UIViewController’s views visible at once some of those controllers may not receive important messages like -viewWillAppear: or -didReceiveMemoryWarning. Additionally some of their properties like parentViewController and interfaceOrientation may not be set or updated as expected.
iOS 5.0 added containment UIViewControllers that correctly handles those lifecycle events by adding child view controllers.
- (void)addChildViewController:(UIViewController *)childController
I spent countless hours trying to get nested view controllers to work in iOS 4. I eventually did, but it required a lot of glue code that was easy to get wrong. Then I saw the warning in the docs.
I'm trying to do the same thing, but was dissuaded from your approach by Apple's documentation, which states that "You should not use view controllers to manage views that fill only a part of their window—that is, only part of the area defined by the application content rectangle. If you want to have an interface composed of several smaller views, embed them all in a single root view and manage that view with your view controller."
My experience on what you are trying to do has been a good one. I try to keep nib files as simple as possible, so I take any posible "subview" and encapsulate it in its own nib file with it's own view controller, therefore I end up having nested view controllers.
In one of my apps I have a very complex table view cell, that has a subview. So I ended up having a hierarchy that goes like this: the tableview controller on the top level, the tableviewcell's controllers for each row and inside each of these a subviewcontroller for the subview inside each cell.
And everything works fine.
Pardon my english.