System.Data.SQLite (SDS) is apparently the most popular way to use SQLite from a .Net application.
I was wondering if
SDS requires shipping the SQLite DLL in addition, or if SDS includes
the SQLite source code, and
SDS can be statically compiled into a
VB.Net application of it can only be shipped as a DLL?
Thank you.
To expand on my comment, SDS is a .net wrapper for unmanaged code, so you will need to ship your release code with a copy of the DLL.
As Steve mentions, there are 32 and 64bit versions of the DLL, and as i discovered after much frustration, you must have the corresponding visual c++ runtime installed on the target machine, so if you deploy the 32bit version onto a 64bit machine, it will need the 32bit c++ runtime environment installed.
An alternative that i am currently looking into but havent had time to test is csharpe-sqlite, a pure .net implementation:
http://code.google.com/p/csharp-sqlite/
Coded in c# as the name suggests, but of course usable in any .net language including vb.net
Actually it's quite easy to compile System.Data.SQLite.dll to the does not require C++ runtime. For example if you download source code and follow the build procedures you'll find statically linked (no C/C++ runtime required) copy of System.Data.SQLite.dll in the following path:
<your-src-root>\bin\<2008 or 2010>\<Win32 or x64>\ReleaseStatic
For example if your source is in C:\Work\sqlite-netFx-source-1.0.80.0 then statically linked binary for Win32 and .NET 3.5 (VS 2008) will be located in:
C:\Work\sqlite-netFx-source-1.0.80.0\bin\2008\Win32\ReleaseStatic
Furthermore since System.Data.SQLite.dll is a mixed-mode assembly consisting of a managed .netmodule and native .obj file linked together using link.exe, it is possible to build your app as a .netmodule as well and link it together with SQLite into a single mixed mode assembly.
The resulting assembly will still be either Win32 or x64, however since almost all x64 machines will have no problem running Win32 code you can just settle on Win32 as long as:
Your app is an .exe or a .dll the is always loaded into a Win32 process, and
You don't use any of x64 specific advantages such as larger address space or using unmanaged code available only in x64
Related
I am trying to use the SQLite's .Net DLL to access some data on a local SQLite database. The problem is that i need a way arround this error because i need to develop a software for 32/64 bits platforms (by using VB.Net not C#).
How can i stick to the 32bit version of the DLL to allow 32bit users of my program use it too?
If it's not possible to work with the 32bit version of SQLite's DLL, is it possible to include both versions in my Installer and programaticly choose which version of the DLL should be used?
Or..is there any other way to access SQLite databases without this particular DLL? (Things in C/C++ are much easier when it comes to SQLite usage as i remember)
Thanks!
If you change your Target Platform to x86 instead of AnyCPU your code will be emitted as 32bit code also on 64bit systems and you could use just the 32bit dll of SQLite.
If you think that you are loosing some value working exclusively with x86 then I can give you this reference where the PRO and CONS of AnyCpu are critically examined.
To change the Target Platform use:
Menu BUILD, then Configuration Manager
Choose x86 from the Active Solution Platform combo.
If you don't have an x86 choice,
choose New and Select x86 and copy the default settings from AnyCpu.
I'm having a problem with assembly resolution on an end-user machine and I believe it's related to using Portable Class Libraries....
I have a .NET 4.0 application that was originally written in Visual Studio 2010. Recently we upgraded to Visual Studio 2012 and we've created a few projects that are Portable Class Libraries. I don't believe we need these features now, but we're also building a Windows 8 Store application that might benefit from these libraries.
When I compile my project, what exactly does the portable library feature do? I expect that it allows me to run it on different frameworks without modification or recompiling.
When I look at the library in reflector dotPeek it shows the Platform attribute as:
.NETPortable,Version=v4.0,Profile=Profile5
And the references seem 2.0-ish:
mscorlib, Version=2.0.5.0
System, Version=2.0.5.0
System.Runtime.Serialization, Version=2.0.5.0
When I run the application on this end-user's machine, I see an error in the log file:
Could not load file or assembly, 'System.Core, Version=2.0.5.0...'
Googling System.Core 2.0.5.0 seems to refer to SilverLight -- which appears to be one of the targeted frameworks.
This machine does not have Visual Studio installed, but has .NET 4.0 (4.0.3 update)
Is there something I should be doing differently to compile, something I should investigate in my dependencies or something I should be looking to install on the end-user machine? What does the 2.0.5.0 refer to?
For .NET 4, you need an update (KB2468871) for Portable Class Libraries to work. From the KB Article:
Feature 5
Changes to the support portable libraries. These changes include API
updates and binder modifications. This update enables the CLR to bind
successfully to portable libraries so that a single DLL can run on the
.NET Framework 4, on Silverlight, on Xbox, or on the Windows Phone.
This update adds public Silverlight APIs to the .NET Framework 4 in
the same location. The API signatures will remain consistent across
the platform. All modifications are 100 percent compatible and will
not break any existing code.
Also see the "Deploying A .NET Framework App" section of the MSDN Portable Class Library Documentation.
EDIT: Actually, if the machine has .NET 4.0.3 installed as you mention, that should be sufficient. Can you double-check to make sure that it is actually installed?
I'm getting an 'AccessViolationException' 'Attempted to read or write protected memory' when calling a method in an x86 dll when running on an x64 platform (Windows 7). Everything works great on x86 platforms.
I've read many, many posts about similar problems but haven't been able to get my code to work.
I'm in the process of trying to make our old x86 app work happily on Windows 7 (x64) and Server 2008 R2 (x64). The app is an assortment of VB6 , VB.Net, C#, MicroFocus COBOL and C++. (We couldn't think of any other languages to throw in at the time). The DotNet code was originally written in Visual Studio 2003 for DotNet 1.1. I've ported the code up to Visual Studio 2010 and DotNet 4.0. I've set the target for all the projects to x86. When I call into un-managed 32 bit dll's I get the above error.
Our InstallShield setup routine is installing the x86 dll's into C:\Windows\sysWOW64 instead of C:\Windows\System32. This behavior seems correct. The dll's are some COBOL object code and runtime components linked together into a 'C Style' dll. I don't think the problem has to do with COBOL or the linking process as I also ported up a sample app from Code Project with a VB.Net WinForms app that calls a simple C++ dll, all targeted to x86. I get the same error there. I've also tried building a C++ command line app to call the dll. The Load Library succeeds. GetProcAddress succeeds. Calling the function pointer for the particular method fails. Our VB6 apps can call the dll's just fine when running on Windows 7 x64. I've also tried turning off UAC and setting the requestedExecutionLevel in the manifest to the highestAvailable. I've tried running as administrator.
Seems like this should work, but not sure what to try next. Any ideas?
On x64 .net programs will be run as 64-bit programs and cannot call 32bit-dlls.
Try compiling the application with target x86 instead of "Any Target". You can also force the
target of the built .exe with the .Net CorFlags.exe utility to run in 32bit-mode.
Of course your program will then run in the 32bit environment, especially it will only have a maximum of 2gb of RAM.
Good news,
We investigated DEP as a possible cause of the problem as we saw that even our VB6 code will fail when DEP is turned on. We noticed that the VB.Net code was failing in the same way as VB6 when DEP was on. Apparently our COBOL dll's do something that DEP isn't happy with. Unfortunately the DotNet assemblies don't seem to respect the operating system DEP setting, so you have to turn off DEP with using editbin.exe:
editbin.exe /nxnocompat:no
I still have to test it on our full application, but it looks like we have a solution!
I currently have a VS6 unmanaged C library that I deliver as either a .lib or .dll. I want to upgrade to VS2010 but I still have users that are in VS6, VS2005, and VS2008.
Can a .lib or .dll built in VS2010 be used in VS6, VS2005, or VS2008?
Thanks!
It depends on the runtime used to build the libraries. I would typically run into this problem when upgrading solutions from VS2005 to VS2008. The default runtime libraries are different from edition to edition.
When you're building the .lib and .dll, those files are getting linked against those editions of the runtime. Problems will typically be found when you're debugging the program between different VS editions or running it on a non-developer machine when assemblies built with different runtimes attempt to pass information across boundaries. See http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/abx4dbyh.aspx for details.
I know this is an old post but if anyone else comes across it this may be useful, upgrading from vc6 to vs2010 is a nightmare, but there is an alternative. You can upgrade to VS2010 environment while still using vc6 compiler. the tool you need is Daffodil and can be found here http://daffodil.codeplex.com/
This was our solution because the VS2010 environment is way more productive.
I am trying to add a VC6 COM DLL to our VS2010RC C# solution. The DLL was compiled with the VC6 tools to create an x86 version and was compiled with the VC7 Cross-platform tools to generate a VC7 DLL.
The x86 version of the assembly works fine as long as the consuming C# project's platform is set to x86. It doesn't matter whether the x64 or the x86 version of the DLL is actually registered. It works with both. If the platform is set to 'Any CPU' I receive a BadImageFormatException on the load of the Interop.<name>.dll.
As for the x64 version, I cannot even get the project to build. I receive the tlbimp error:
TlbImp : error TI0000: A single valid machine type compatible with the
input type library must be specified.
Has anyone seen this issue?
EDIT:
I've done a lot more digging into this issue and think this may be a Visual Studio bug. I have a clean solution. I bring in my COM assembly with language agnostic 'Any CPU' selected. The process architecture of the resulting Interop DLL is x86 rather than MSIL.
May have to make the Interop by hand for now to get this to work.
If anyone has another suggestion let me know.
This issue can be resolved by opening the CSProj file and adding the following node to any of the '(Configuration)|Any CPU' nodes that are missing it:
<PlatformTarget>AnyCPU</PlatformTarget>
If this node is not present TlbImp will default to x86 and cause issues.