I know now the new Objective-C compiler lets you not need to synthesize your properties anymore. I have one file that has two classes in it. My .h for a simple helper class looks like this:
#interface ViewFrameModel : NSObject
#property (nonatomic, strong) UIView *view;
#property (nonatomic, assign) CGRect frame;
- (id)initWithView:(UIView *)view frame:(CGRect)frame;
#end
In the same .h file, for my other class (class 2), I have:
#property (nonatomic, strong) ViewFrameModel *viewFrameModel;
In class 2.m, I can do this:
- (void)setViewFrameModel:(ViewFrameModel *)viewFrameModel {
_viewFrameModel = viewFrameModel;
[self pushViewFrameModel:viewFrameModel];
}
This works fine with no complaints from the compiler, however, when I add this:
- (ViewFrameModel *)viewFrameModel {
return _viewFrameModel;
}
I get two complaints, one on the first method setViewFrameModel:
"Use of undeclared identifier _viewFrameModel, did you mean viewFrameModel"
And the other on return _viewFrameModel:
"Use of undeclared identifier _viewFrameModel, did you mean viewFrameModel"
"Reference to local variable viewFrameModel' declared in enclosing context"
Why do I get these errors when I add in the
- (ViewFrameModel *)viewFrameModel {
return _viewFrameModel;
}
method? I want to override this method with some custom info, but it's complaining at me :-. Thoughts? TIA.
If you override both the setter and the getter, the compiler will not automatically create the instance variable for you anymore. You can add it to your class implementation like so:
#implementation ClassName {
ViewFrameModel *_viewFrameModel;
}
...
#end
Here is the results of some testing I did last year: iOS automatic #synthesize without creating an ivar.
In short, you need to use #synthesize or declare an iVar explicitly.
To summarize the answers:
If you override both the setter and the getter, the compiler will not create the instance variable for you.
Why? In that case, the compiler assumes that the property is dynamic: that it might be a property that relies on other properties for storage / computation, or that it will be created in other ways, for example, at runtime using Objective-C runtime functions.
To help the compiler understand the situation better there are two potential solutions:
#implementation Class
#synthesize property = _property;
...
#end
or
#implementation Class {
PropertyClass *_property;
}
...
#end
Related
There is a class that looks like this (I'm omitting the imports for brevity):
Base.h:
#interface Base : NSObject
#property (strong, readonly) NSString *something;
- (id)initWithSomething:(NSString *)something;
#end
Base.m:
#implementation Base
- (id)initWithSomething:(NSString *)something {
self = [super init];
if (self) _something = something;
return self;
}
#end
As you see, the 'something' property is readonly. Now I want to create a subclass that overrides that property to be writable as well:
Sub.h:
#interface Sub : Base
#property (strong) NSString *something;
#end
Sub.m:
#implementation Sub
#end
And the code:
main.c:
int main(int argc, const char * argv[]) {
#autoreleasepool {
Sub *o = [Sub new];
o.something = #"foo";
NSLog(#"%#", o.something);
}
return 0;
}
This code results in:
2013-09-07 13:58:36.970 ClilTest[3094:303] *** Terminating app due to uncaught
exception 'NSInvalidArgumentException', reason: '-[Sub setSomething:]: unrecognized
selector sent to instance 0x100109ff0'
Why is that? Why doesn't it find the setSelector?
When I do this in the subclass instead:
Sub.m:
#implementation Sub
#synthesize something = _something;
#end
it all works. Does this mean the subclass' property is not synthesized by default even though it is defined as #property in the #interface? Does the compile somehow 'see' the automatically generated getter from Base and doesn't generate the setter? And why, I think the setter should be generated as it doesn't exist yet. I'm using Xcode 4.6.2 and the project is a Cli Tool (type Foundation), but the same happens in my actual project which is an iPhone app.
Background: I have a heavy object (instance of Base) that requires a Bluetooth connection to some equipment and I am supposed to create a view controller for some functionality. For easy testing I don't want to be connected to BT (actually, I would need a physical device and test the code on it), I would like to be able to test it in the simulator.
What I came up with is that I simply create a subclass (Sub) that stubs a few methods / properties and use it instead, and when the code is ready I just remove the code for the subclass, replace its instance with the correct one, test in with a device, commit and push. It actually works fine, except for the weird thing with #property above.
Could somebody tell me what is going on with property overriding?
For a readonly property, only a getter method is synthesized, but no setter method.
And when compiling the subclass, the compiler does not know how the property is realized
in the base class (it could be a custom getter instead of a backing instance variable).
So it cannot just create a setter method in the subclass.
If you want to have write access to the same instance variable from the subclass,
you have to declare it as #protected in the base class
(so that it is accessible in the subclass), re-declare the property
as read-write in the subclass, and provide a setter method:
Base.h:
#interface Base : NSObject {
#protected
NSString *_something;
}
#property (strong, readonly) NSString *something;
- (id)initWithSomething:(NSString *)something;
#end
Sub.h:
#interface Sub : Base
#property (strong, readwrite) NSString *something;
#end
Sub.m:
#implementation Sub
-(void)setSomething:(NSString *)something
{
_something = something;
}
#end
Your solution
#synthesize something = _something;
generates getter and setter method in the subclass, using a separate instance
variable _something in the subclass (which is different
from _something in the base class).
This works as well, you just should be aware that self.something refers to
different instance variables in the base class and in the subclass. To make that
more obvious, you could use a different instance variable in the subclass:
#synthesize something = _somethingElse;
The given answer works perfectly fine. This is an alternative answer, that apparently Apple likes a bit more.
You can define a private extension of your class, a Base+Protected.h file, which needs to be included in Base.m and Sub.m.
Then, in this new file, you redefine the property as readwrite.
#interface Base ()
#property (strong, readwrite) NSString *something;
#end
This alternative allows you to use the accessor self.something rathern than the ivar _something.
Note: you still need to keep the definition of something in your Base.h as is.
I guess that the backing variables are the same when the property is not synthesized in the subclass. So at runtime the programm tries to call the setSomething in the superclass. But since it doesnt exist there an Exception is thrown.
Since recent runtimes in iOS, we are able to define properties that will generate accessors for instance variables. From what I understand, it is not mandatory to declare the instance variable used since it will be automatically done for us.
For example, if I write:
#interface MyFirstClass
#property (readonly, nonatomic) int size;
#end
and in the .m
#implementation MyFirstClass
#synthesize size;
#end
Then an instance variable named "size" will be added for me and a method called "-(int)size" will be implemented.
The problem is that when I create a second class MySecondClass which is a subclass of MyFirstClass, it seems that I can't access the instance variable size within this subclass:
#interface MySecondClass : MyFirstClass
#end
#implementation MySecondClass
- (id)init {
if (self = [super init]) {
size = 10; // this yields and error
}
return self;
}
#end
Are the automatically created instance variables private? Is there a possibility to set them as protected so I can access them in subclasses?
I know there is the possibility to declare the instance variable myself, but I'm just wondering...
With a superclass like this it works: (Is it because it's expressly declared as protected?)
#interface MyFirstClass {
int size; // defined expressly and used as #protected
}
#property (readonly, nonatomic) int size;
#end
Thank you for your help!!
Nicolas.
Any instance variable not declared in the main interface is automatically private, and this cannot be overridden. If you try to use a scope modifier when defining instance variables in the implementation, you will get an error that the specification is inconsistent.
The reason for this is that there is usually only one class per implementation file, which means the compiler doesn't know about the instance variable when compiling other classes. If you have multiple classes in the same file, the compiler could know about it, but you still aren't allowed to override the scope. Possible reasons in this case could be for consistency, or just so the compiler doesn't have to look in so many places for instance variables.
Use:
self.size = 10;
That will map to setSize method.
I'm trying convert my code to Modern Objective-C style. How i read here http://www.techotopia.com/index.php/The_Basics_of_Modern_Objective-C": "In the case of Modern Objective-C, however, the synthesis takes place by default, making the use of #synthesize declarations unnecessary. When using default property synthesize, instance variable properties are accessible from within code using the property name prefixed with an underscore."
However, I have:
Relationship.h
#interface Relationship : NSObject <NSCoding>
//...
#property(nonatomic, weak) Person* first;
//...
#end`
OtherRelationship.h
#import "Relationship.h"
#interface OtherRelationship : Relationship
#end
OtherRelationship.m
#import "OtherRelationship.h"
#implementation OtherRelationship
#synthesize first = _first;
- (void)foo
{
NSLog(#"%#", _first);
}
and it's working. But when i delete
#synthesize first = _first;
i get "Use of undeclared identifier '_first'" error. Does inheritanced variables doesn't work with autosynthesize or should i looking for problem elsewhere?
The backing ivar in the superclass is #private to the subclass. That is, the subclass may call self.first, but not _first. If you want to #synthesize again, use a different name because you can't refer to _first. For example, replace with #synthesize first = _ffirst; or just drop the #synthesize.
this is my first post; this site has been an invaluable resource.
I'm fairly new to objective-c so please bear with.
So I have a base class with a few properties which I want "private" so I made them readonly. To be clear, I don't want them mutable externally, but I DO wan't to use the 'set' accessor within this class. So...
// .h file
#interface Vehicle
#property (nonatomic, readonly) int speed;
#end
Also I repeated the property declaration within a category interface block to make the accessors writable in this class
// .m file
//Private properties and methods
#interface Vehicle()
#property (nonatomic, readwrite) int speed;
#end
#implementation
#synthesize speed = _speed;
- (void) someMethod {
[self setSpeed:10]; // Works fine
}
#end
But now if I inherit this class the derived class no longer has the set accessor method (setSpeed in my case). Do I need to synthesize again? Seems like that would defeat the purpose of inheritence. I know i can modify the instance variable directly (_speed = 10;) but would rather not. I'm sure there's something wrong with my understanding. Thanks!
// Example
#interface Ship : Vehicle
#end
#implementation
- (void) someOtherMethod {
[self setSpeed: 2]; // DOES NOT WORK, would like it to
}
#end
But now if I inherit this class the derived class no longer has the set accessor method (setSpeed in my case).
Actually, it does have the set accessor, it's just that the compiler doesn't know about it. You have a choice:
put the class extension (the #interface Vehicle() .... #end bit in a separate header file that gets imported into the .m for Vehicle and its subclasses (or use a category)
redeclare the read/write property in a class extension for the subclass. To avoid a warning, use #dynamic speed in the subclass's implementation.
Since there is no such thing as 'protected' methods, you need to create a private shared header where your anonymous category goes. Then both your original implementation and your derived classes include this header to get access to this 'private' stuff.
I'm new to C, new to objective C. For an iPhone subclass, Im declaring variables I want to be visible to all methods in a class into the #interface class definition eg
#interface myclass : UIImageView {
int aVar;
}
and then I declare it again as
#property int aVar;
And then later I
#synthesize aVar;
Can you help me understand the purpose of three steps? Am I doing something unnecessary?
Thanks.
Here, you're declaring an instance variable named aVar:
#interface myclass : UIImageView {
int aVar;
}
You can now use this variable within your class:
aVar = 42;
NSLog(#"The Answer is %i.", aVar);
However, instance variables are private in Objective-C. What if you need other classes to be able to access and/or change aVar? Since methods are public in Objective-C, the answer is to write an accessor (getter) method that returns aVar and a mutator (setter) method that sets aVar:
// In header (.h) file
- (int)aVar;
- (void)setAVar:(int)newAVar;
// In implementation (.m) file
- (int)aVar {
return aVar;
}
- (void)setAVar:(int)newAVar {
if (aVar != newAVar) {
aVar = newAVar;
}
}
Now other classes can get and set aVar via:
[myclass aVar];
[myclass setAVar:24];
Writing these accessor and mutator methods can get quite tedious, so in Objective-C 2.0, Apple simplified it for us. We can now write:
// In header (.h) file
#property (nonatomic, assign) int aVar;
// In implementation (.m) file
#synthesize aVar;
...and the accessor/mutator methods will be automatically generated for us.
To sum up:
int aVar; declares an instance variable aVar
#property (nonatomic, assign) int aVar; declares the accessor and mutator methods for aVar
#synthesize aVar; implements the accessor and mutator methods for aVar
This declares an instance variable in your object:
#interface myclass : UIImageView {
int aVar;
}
Instance variables are private implementation details of your class.
If you want other objects to be able to read or set the value of the instance variable (ivar), you can declare it as a property:
#property int aVar;
This means that the compiler expects to see setter and getter accessor methods for the property.
When you use the #synthesize keyword, you are asking the compiler to automatically generate setter and getter accessor methods for you.
So, in this case the compiler will generate code similar to this when it encounters the #synthesize keyword:
- (int) aVar
{
return aVar;
}
- (void)setAVar:(int)someInt
{
aVar = someInt;
}
By default on the iPhone (and on the 32-bit runtime on the Mac), #synthesize requires an instance variable to be present in order to store the property's value. This ivar is usually named the same as the property, but doesn't have to be, for instance you could do this:
#interface myclass : UIImageView {
int aVar;
}
#property int someValue;
#synthesize someValue = aVar;
Neither #synthesize nor #property are actually required, you can create your own getter and setter methods, and as long as you create them using Key-Value Coding-compliant syntax, the property will still be usable.
The requirement for an ivar to be present as well as the #property declaration is due to the fragile base class limitation of the 32-bit Objective-C runtime on both the Mac and iPhone. With the 64-bit runtime on the Mac you don't need an ivar, #synthesize generates one for you.
Note that there are numerous keywords you can use with your #property declaration to control what sort of synthesized accessor code is created, such as readonly for a getter-only accessor, copy, atomic, nonatomic and so on. More information is in the Objective-C 2.0 Programming Language documentation.
Classes can have instance variables (ivars). These are in the first section, and are only visible to code in that class, not any outside code. I like to prefix them with an underscore to show their internal-ness. In low level terms, the ivars are added as an additional member to the struct that the class you are creating uses internally.
The second declaration, #property, is a declared property. It is not required (except when you are using #synthesize), but it helps other programmers (and the compiler!) know that you are dealing with a property, and not just two methods -setAVar and -aVar, which is the alternative way of doing this.
Thirdly, the #synthesize actually creates the methods to set and access the property from outside the class. You can replace this with your own setter and getter methods, but only do that if you need to, as the built-in ones have some features that you would otherwise have to code yourself. In fact, using the #synthesize aVar = _someVariable; syntax, you can have your property actually reference a differently named instance variable!
Short version:
The #property is just a hint to the compiler and other programmers that you are making a property and not just getter/setter methods. The instance variables are internal to the class, and otherwise cannot be normally accessed from outside it. The #synthesize just creates simple getters and setters for you, to go with your #property, but you can also just code those getters and setters yourself, like any other method.
Class A
#interface myclass : UIImageView {
int aVar;
}
If you declare like this then you can only use this variable within your class A.
But suppose in Class B
A *object=[A new];
object.aVar---->not available
For this you should **declare aVar as a property in Class A**
so class A should look like
Class A
#interface myclass : UIImageView {
int aVar;
}
#property int iVar;
and
.m file
#synthesize iVar;
So now you can use this iVar in another class Suppose B
Class B
#import "Class A.h"
enter code here
A *object=[A new];
object.aVar---->available
means
object.aVar=10;
#interface declares the instances variables of a class in obj-c. You need it to create an instance variable. However the variable is not visible outside the class by default (as the field is by default protected).
#property tells the compiler to specify a particular property accessor (get/set) method. However, you will need to use #synthesize to actually have the compiler generate the simple accessors automatically, otherwise you are expected to create them on your own.
I recently started learning iphone apps. As per my knowledge #property is used in .h file as a setter method and #synthesize in .m file as getter method. In Java we use setter and getter methods, same as Java, in Objective C we use #property and #synthesize.
Please forgive me If u think I mislead you.