I did simple java to java transformation with programmatic configuration and it worked well. Now I need to extend it with following use cases, actually all of them depend on MVEL expressions.
I found examples with Xml configuration, so solution may look as follows:
<jb:expression property="underlying" execOnElement="__und">
mapper.lookup(__some/_field)
</jb:expression>
But how to do it with programmatic configuration (i.e. using Bean)?
following worked for me (Smooks 1.5):
.bindTo("underlying", rmp.newBean(String.class, "__und",
new MVELFactory<String>("mapping.lookup(__some/_field)")))
Related
Currently in our project we have layered architecture implemented in following way where Controller, Service, Repository are placed in the same package for each feature, for instance:
feature1:
Feature1Controller
Feature1Service
Feature1Repository
feature2:
Feature2Controller
Feature2Service
Feature2Repository
I've found following example of arch unit test where such classes are placed in dedicated packages https://github.com/TNG/ArchUnit-Examples/blob/master/example-junit5/src/test/java/com/tngtech/archunit/exampletest/junit5/LayeredArchitectureTest.java
Please suggest whether there is possibility to test layered architecture when all layers are in single package
If the file name conventions are followed properly across your project, how about you write custom test cases instead of using layeredArchitecture().
For Example:
classes().that().haveSimpleNameEndingWith("Service")
.should().onlyBeAccessed().byClassesThat().haveSimpleNameEndingWith("Controller")
noClasses().that().haveSimpleNameEndingWith("Service")
.should().accessClassesThat().haveSimpleNameEndingWith("Controller")
I know this question is rather old. But for the record, this has been possible for a while using predicates for the layers, e.g.
layeredArchitecture().consideringAllDependencies()
.layer("Controllers").definedBy(HasName.Predicates.nameEndingWith("Controller"))
.layer("Services").definedBy(HasName.Predicates.nameEndingWith("Service"))
.layer("Repository").definedBy(HasName.Predicates.nameEndingWith("Repository"))
.whereLayer("Controllers").mayNotBeAccessedByAnyLayer()
.whereLayer("Services").mayOnlyBeAccessedByLayers("Controllers")
.whereLayer("Repository").mayOnlyBeAccessedByLayers("Services")
However, I'm not sure how well this works in practice. Because usually you don't just have classes following this naming pattern and that's it. A service might also have some POJO as method parameter type (e.g. MyInput) and that should maybe for example not be used by repositories as well. Also, using forward dependency rules (mayOnlyAccessLayers(..)) this might then cause unwanted violations.
I'm trying to write a maven plugin with kotlin DSL that creates a configuration object. The plugin will depend on that configuration during its operation.
I think I need to use the DSL like following: in runtime load a separate file with kotlin script, execute it and assign result to a variable in the plugin code.
Is there any good way to do it?
It turns out there is a simple answer:
https://github.com/JetBrains/kotlin/blob/master/libraries/examples/kotlin-jsr223-local-example/
Can you set custom suffix and naming rule mapper xml and interfaces in MyBatis Generator (MBG)?
For example, When generating mapper files for class Book. MBG generates mapper file BookMapper.xml and interface PartnerDao.java. However, I wish to change the suffix to something else, like BookMapperBase.xml or BookDaoBase.xml, and PartnerMapperBase.java or PartnerDaoBase.java.
The reason is, former colleagues were using BookMapper.xml for their hand-written sql statements and using the same name would cause confusion. Moreover, I do not wish to use generated mappers directly, but use custom mapper files that extend BookMapperBase.xml.
I have searched online and found some github projects and hot rod ORM, but is it really not supported by official Mybatis Generator? If not, what is your recommended alternative?
There are a couple of options.
You could use a domain object renaming rule as documented here: http://www.mybatis.org/generator/configreference/domainObjectRenamingRule.html
If that doesn't work the way you want it to, you could write a MyBatis Generator plugin to change the names of the generated artifacts. There is an example here: https://github.com/mybatis/generator/blob/master/core/mybatis-generator-core/src/main/java/org/mybatis/generator/plugins/RenameExampleClassPlugin.java
I use InteliJ to run JUnit tests.
I would like to specify the name/path of the command it uses to execute them. Specifically, rather than the specified JDKs/bin/java, I'd like to use a custom command (e.g. my_java).
My particular reason is that I'd like my_java to be a small script that launches "java" at a lower priority. If there is an alternate approach, that would be just as useful.
I reached out to JetBrains and asked them directly. According to them, specifying a custom binary is "not possible". They did suggest I look at writing a custom external tool.
Suppose I am working on exposing some of my server-side classes to a GWT application, but certain parts could be done much better using GWT-specific components (like JSNI, for instance).
What are some techniques for doing so without being too hacky?
For instance, I am aware of using a subpackage and using the <super-source/> tag, but this requires the package names to be different, which causes eclipse to complain. The general solution in the community is to then tell eclipse to use that as a source folder, but then eclipse complains about there being two classes with the same name.
Ideally, there would just be a way to keep everything in a single source tree, and actually have different classes which apply the alternate implementations. This would feel like a more OO approach.
I would like to add a suffix to a class like _gwt which accomplishes this automatically, and I know I could write a script to do this kind of transformation, but that is a kludge for sure.
I've been considering using Google's GIN/GUICE libraries for my projects in general, and I think there might be some kind of a solution there, but I am not sure as I have not thoroughly investigated it.
What are some solutions you have tried in the past on GWT projects?
The easiest way to have split implementations is to use super-source code, but only enough to instantiate a uniquely-named instance or dispatch to a different method. Ideally, the super-source implementation is just a few lines long, and not so bad that you can't roll it by hand.
To work around the Eclipse / javac double-mapping and package name issues, the GWT source uses two top-level roots for user code: user/src and user/super. For example, the AutoBeans package has a split-implementation of JSON quoting and evaluation, one for the JVM and one for the browser.
There's really no non-kludgy way to implement super-source, as this is a feature way outside what you can specify in the language. There's nothing that lets you say "use this implementation in this environment" without the use of some external tool.