How to write hsqldb in binary form? - sql

I'm searching a good (JDBC-compatible) replacement for SQLite in java. I've found hsqldb and it's quite satisfying me, but there are some questions.
First. How it operates when database size will be 3-4GB? Still load all to RAM?
Second. There said, it can support binary format, not only script. How can I enable it?
Class.forName("org.hsqldb.jdbcDriver");
PleaseHsqlUseBinaryFormat(); // What should I write here or somewhere else?
link = DriverManager.getConnection("jdbc:hsqldb:file:/tmp/mydatabase.hsql","sa","");
try
{
// Work with database
}

HSQLDB is flexible and allows you to choose how the data is stored. If you want the data to be stored in disk tables, use CACHED tables. The easiest way to do this is by adding a property to the connection URL:
jdbc:hsqldb:file:/tmp/mydatabase.hsql;hsqldb.default_table_type=cached
All CREATE TABLE and similar statements are stored in the .script file. If you don't want this file to be in text format, add another property:
jdbc:hsqldb:file:/tmp/mydatabase.hsql;hsqldb.default_table_type=cached;hsqldb.script_format=3
The Guide covers the different options:
http://hsqldb.org/doc/2.0/guide/management-chapt.html

Related

Trouble loading data into Snowflake using Azure Data Factory

I am trying to import a small table of data from Azure SQL into Snowflake using Azure Data Factory.
Normally I do not have any issues using this approach:
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/data-factory/connector-snowflake?tabs=data-factory#staged-copy-to-snowflake
But now I have an issue, with a source table that looks like this:
There is two columns SLA_Processing_start_time and SLA_Processing_end_time that have the datatype TIME
Somehow, while writing the data to the staged area, the data is changed to something like 0:08:00:00.0000000,0:17:00:00.0000000 and that causes for an error like:
Time '0:08:00:00.0000000' is not recognized File
The mapping looks like this:
I have tried adding a TIME_FORMAT property like 'HH24:MI:SS.FF' but that did not help.
Any ideas to why 08:00:00 becomes 0:08:00:00.0000000 and how to avoid it?
Finally, I was able to recreate your case in my environment.
I have the same error, a leading zero appears ahead of time (0: 08:00:00.0000000).
I even grabbed the files it creates on BlobStorage and the zeros are already there.
This activity creates CSV text files without any error handling (double quotes, escape characters etc.).
And on the Snowflake side, it creates a temporary Stage and loads these files.
Unfortunately, it does not clean up after itself and leaves empty directories on BlobStorage. Additionally, you can't use ADLS Gen2. :(
This connector in ADF is not very good, I even had problems to use it for AWS environment, I had to set up a Snowflake account in Azure.
I've tried a few workarounds, and it seems you have two options:
Simple solution:
Change the data type on both sides to DateTime and then transform this attribute on the Snowflake side. If you cannot change the type on the source side, you can just use the "query" option and write SELECT using the CAST / CONVERT function.
Recommended solution:
Use the Copy data activity to insert your data on BlobStorage / ADLS (this activity did it anyway) preferably in the parquet file format and a self-designed structure (Best practices for using Azure Data Lake Storage).
Create a permanent Snowflake Stage for your BlobStorage / ADLS.
Add a Lookup activity and do the loading of data into a table from files there, you can use a regular query or write a stored procedure and call it.
Thanks to this, you will have more control over what is happening and you will build a DataLake solution for your organization.
My own solution is pretty close to the accepted answer, but I still believe that there is a bug in the build-in direct to Snowflake copy feature.
Since I could not figure out, how to control that intermediate blob file, that is created on a direct to Snowflake copy, I ended up writing a plain file into the blob storage, and reading it again, to load into Snowflake
So instead having it all in one step, I manually split it up in two actions
One action that takes the data from the AzureSQL and saves it as a plain text file on the blob storage
And then the second action, that reads the file, and loads it into Snowflake.
This works, and is supposed to be basically the same thing the direct copy to Snowflake does, hence the bug assumption.

PDI or mysqldump to extract data without blocking the database nor getting inconsistent data?

I have an ETL process that will run periodically. I was using kettle (PDI) to extract the data from the source database and copy it to a stage database. For this I use several transformations with table input and table output steps. However, I think I could get inconsistent data if the source database is modified during the process, since this way I don't get a snapshot of the data. Furthermore, I don't know if the source database would be blocked. This would be a problem if the extraction takes some minutes (and it will take them). The advantage of PDI is that I can select only the necessary columns and use timestamps to get only the new data.
By the other hand, I think mysqldump with --single-transaction allows me to get the data in a consistent way and don't block the source database (all tables are innodb). The disadventage is that I would get innecessary data.
Can I use PDI, or I need mysqldump?
PD: I need to read specific tables from specific databases, so I think xtrabackup it's not a good option.
However, I think I could get inconsistent data if the source database is modified during the process, since this way I don't get a snapshot of the data
I think "Table Input" step doesn't take into account any modifications that are happening when you are reading. Try a simple experiment:
Take a .ktr file with a single table input and table output. Try loading the data into the target table. While in the middle of data load, insert few records in the source database. You will find that those records are not read into the target table. (note i tried with postgresql db and the number of rows read is : 1000000)
Now for your question, i suggest you using PDI since it gives you more control on the data in terms of versioning, sequences, SCDs and all the DWBI related activities. PDI makes it easier to load to the stage env. rather than simply dumping the entire tables.
Hope it helps :)
Interesting point. If you do all the table inputs in one transformation then at least they all start at same time but whilst likely to be consistent it's not guaranteed.
There is no reason you can't use pdi to orchestrate the process AND use mysql dump. In fact for bulk insert or extract it's nearly always better to use the vendor provided tools.

SQL, moving million records from a database to other database

I am a C# developer, I am not really good with SQL. I have a simple questions here. I need to move more than 50 millions records from a database to other database. I tried to use the import function in ms SQL, however it got stuck because the log was full (I got an error message The transaction log for database 'mydatabase' is full due to 'LOG_BACKUP'). The database recovery model was set to simple. My friend said that importing millions records using task->import data will cause the log to be massive and told me to use loop instead to transfer the data, does anyone know how and why? thanks in advance
If you are moving the entire database, use backup and restore, it will be the quickest and easiest.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms187048.aspx
If you are just moving a single table read about and use the BCP command line tools for this many records:
The bcp utility bulk copies data between an instance of Microsoft SQL Server and a data file in a user-specified format. The bcp utility can be used to import large numbers of new rows into SQL Server tables or to export data out of tables into data files. Except when used with the queryout option, the utility requires no knowledge of Transact-SQL. To import data into a table, you must either use a format file created for that table or understand the structure of the table and the types of data that are valid for its columns.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms162802.aspx
The fastest and probably most reliable way is to bulk copy the data out via SQL Server's bcp.exe utility. If the schema on the destination database is exactly identical to that on the source database, including nullability of columns, export it in "native format":
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms191232.aspx
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms189941.aspx
If the schema differs between source and target, you will encounter...interesting (yes, interesting is a good word for it) problems.
If the schemas differ or you need to perform any transforms on the data, consider using text format. Or another format (BCP lets you create and use a format file to specify the format of the data for export/import).
You might consider exporting data in chunks: if you encounter problems it gives you an easier time of restarting without losing all the work done so far.
You might also consider zipping the exported data files up to minimize time on the wire.
Then FTP the files over to the destination server.
bcp them in. You can use the bcp utility on the destination server for the BULK IMPORT statement in SQL Server to do the work. Makes no real difference.
The nice thing about using BCP to load the data is that the load is what is described as a 'non-logged' transaction, though it's really more like a 'minimally logged' transaction.
If the tables on the destination server have IDENTITY columns, you'll need to use SET IDENTITY statement to disable the identity column on the the table(s) involved for the nonce (don't forget to reenable it). After your data is imported, you'll need to run DBCC CHECKIDENT to get things back in synch.
And depending on what your doing, it can sometimes be helpful to put the database in single-user mode or dbo-only mode for the duration of the surgery: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb522682.aspx
Another approach I've used to great effect is to use Perl's DBI/DBD modules (which provide access to the bulk copy interface) and write a perl script to suck out the data from the source server, transform it and bulk load it directly into the destination server, without having to save it to disk and move it. Also means you can trap errors and design things for recovery and restart right at the point of failure.
Use BCP to migrate data.
Another approach i have used in the past is to take a backup of the transaction log and shrink the log Prior to the migration. Split the migration script in parts and run the log backup- shrink - migrate iteration a few times.

Seeding thousands of records in Rails 3

I have several tables that need to be populated when I move my project to production, each of these tables has several thousand rows. I have the data stored in a CSV file now, but using the seed.rb file seems like it would be cumbersome because the data from my CSV file would have to be formatted to meet the seed.rb format. If this were only a handful of rows, it wouldn't such a problem. What would be the best/easiest way to get this data loaded?
I would probably use a little custom script and the faster_csv gem which has good tools to parse .csv files quickly. Then you can map the fields to model attributes.
I would implement this via TDD as model methods and use ActiveRecords's create method to instantiate instances. While this is slower than writing SQL straight out, it's safer in that your data will run through all the model validations and you have a better confidence in the data integrity.
Flushing out data integrity issues from legacy data import up front will save you a lot of trouble later.
If I were doing this using MySQL, I'd use MySQL's load data function, like
load data infile '/my/rails/project/data.csv' replace into table table_name fields terminated by 'field_terminator' lines terminated by 'line_terminator';
If the tables' designs do not change frequently, you could put a such a statement into a perl, ruby, or shell script.
Like others have mentioned many db's have bulk load support. But if your looking for a Rails style solution; ar-extensions has bulk insert
http://rorstuff.blogspot.com/2010/05/activerecord-bulk-insertion-of-data-in.html
https://github.com/zdennis/ar-extensions
You also can checkout ActiveWarehouse
https://github.com/zdennis/ar-extensions
fast_seeder gem will help you. It populates database from CSV files using multiple inserts and supports different DB adapters
As most of the answers are outdated, this gem will help you: https://github.com/zdennis/activerecord-import.
E.g. if you have a collection of books, you can use:
Book.import(books)
It will execute only one SQL statement.
The gem also works with associations.

Doctrine schema changes while keeping data?

We're developing a Doctrine backed website using YAML to define our schema. Our schema changes regularly (including fk relations) so we need to do a lot of:
Doctrine::generateModelsFromYaml(APPPATH . 'models/yaml', APPPATH . 'models', array('generateTableClasses' => true));
Doctrine::dropDatabases();
Doctrine::createDatabases();
Doctrine::createTablesFromModels();
We would like to keep existing data and store it back in the re-created database. So I copy the data into a temporary database before the main db is dropped.
How do I get the data from the "old-scheme DB copy" to the "new-scheme DB"? (the new scheme only contains NEW columns, NO COLUMNS ARE REMOVED)
NOTE:
This obviously doesn't work because the column count doesn't match.
SELECT * FROM copy.Table INTO newscheme.Table
This obviously does work, however this is consuming too much time to write for every table:
SELECT old.col, old.col2, old.col3,'somenewdefaultvalue' FROM copy.Table as old INTO newscheme.Table
Have you looked into Migrations? They allow you to alter your database schema in programmatical way. WIthout losing data (unless you remove colums, of course)
How about writing a script (using the Doctrine classes for example) which parses the yaml schema files (both the previous version and the "next" version) and generates the sql scripts to run? It would be a one-time job and not require that much work. The benefit of generating manual migration scripts is that you can easily store them in the version control system and replay version steps later on. If that's not something you need, you can just gather up changes in the code and do it directly through the database driver.
Of course, the more fancy your schema changes becomes, the harder the maintenance will get i.e. column name changes, null to not null etc.