#interface Set : NSObject
{
// instance variables
int repetitions;
int weight;
}
// functions
- (id)init;
- (id)initWithReps: (int)newRepetitions andWeight: (int)newWeight;
#implementation Set
-(id)init
{
if (self = [super init]) {
repetitions = 0;
weight = 0;
}
return self;
}
-(id)initWithReps: (int)newRepetitions andWeight: (int)newWeight
{
if (self = [super init])
{
repetitions = newRepetitions;
weight = newWeight;
}
return self;
}
#implementation eFit2Tests
- (void)setUp
{
[super setUp];
// Set-up code here.
}
- (void)tearDown
{
// Tear-down code here.
[super tearDown];
}
- (void)testInitWithParam
{
Set* test = nil;
test = [test initWithReps:10 andWeight:100];
NSLog(#"Num Reps: %d", [test reps]);
if([test reps] != 10) {
STFail(#"Reps not currectly initialized. (initWithParam)");
}
NSLog(#"Weight: %d", [test weight]);
if([test weight] != 100) {
STFail(#"Weight not currectly initialized. (initWithParam)");
}
}
For some reason the test at the bottom of this code snippet fails because the values of repetitions and weight are always equal to 0. I come from a background in Java and am clueless as to why this is the case. Sorry for the silly question...
You are setting test to nil, and then sending it initWithReps:andWeight:. This is equivalent to [nil initWithReps:10 andWeight:100], which obviously isn't what you want. nil just responds to any message with itself or 0, so that init message is returning nil and sending reps to nil is returning 0.
To create an object, you want the alloc class method — i.e. Set *test = [[Set alloc] initWithReps:10 andWeight:100]. (And if you're not using ARC, you'll want to release this object when you're finished with it, per the memory management guidelines.)
Where you're initializing your set, replace it with:
Set *test = [[Set alloc] initWithReps: 10 andWeight: 100];
You're getting 0 because that's the default return from a nil object (you've initialized test to nil) - there are no NullPointerExceptions in Objective-C
Related
I'm working on a react-native project that requires some native modules. One of them is a Bluetooth module that allows me to access some CSRGaia methods. Ultimately, I want to be able to read the eq values on the PS-key so that I can set my equalizer to the corresponding values. I know almost nothing about Objective-C
Currently there is a method that looks like this:
RCT_EXPORT_METHOD(setEQValues:(NSArray *)values callback:(RCTResponseSenderBlock)callback)
{
CSRPeripheral *connectedPeripheral = [CSRConnectionManager sharedInstance].connectedPeripheral;
if( connectedPeripheral == nil )
{
callback(#[DISCONNECTED]);
return;
}
[[CSRGaia sharedInstance] setEQValues:values];
}
This works with no issues. However, when I tried to write my own
RCT_EXPORT_METHOD(getUserEQ: (NSArray *)values callback:(RCTResponseSenderBlock)callback)
{
CSRPeripheral *connectedPeripheral = [CSRConnectionManager sharedInstance].connectedPeripheral;
if( connectedPeripheral == nil)
{
callback(#[DISCONNECTED]);
return;
}
[[CSRGaia sharedInstance] getUserEQ: values];
}
I get the following error:
No visible #interface for 'CSRGaia' declares the selector 'getUserEQ:'
I double checked the CSRGaia.m file to verify that both methods exist.
- (void)setEQValues:(NSArray *)values {
NSMutableData *payload = [[NSMutableData alloc] init];
for( NSNumber *value in values ) {
uint8_t hex = [value unsignedCharValue];
[payload appendBytes:&hex length:1];
}
[self sendCommand:GaiaCommand_SET_HEP_EQ_PSKEY
vendor:CSR_GAIA_VENDOR_ID
data:payload];
}
- (void)getUserEQ {
[self sendCommand:GaiaCommand_GetUserEQControl
vendor:CSR_GAIA_VENDOR_ID
data:nil];
}
you are calling this method:
'getUserEQ:'
notice the 2 dots colon
it's different from method
'getUser'
with no colon
and in your .m file there is only
- (void)getUserEQ {}
i guess you wanted to use the setter method, instead
- (void)setEQValues:(NSArray *)values{}
like this:
[[CSRGaia sharedInstance] setEQValues: values];
add anyway both
- (void)getUserEQ;
- (void)setEQValues:(NSArray *)values;
in CSRGaia.h file
between
#interface OSRGaia
and
#end
I'm trying to find the minimum value of a binary tree. Every time I run my code I get a long 5 digit number like '32675'. I'm pretty sure my understanding of pointers is wrong, but I'm not positive. If I could get some advice I'd really appreciate it. Thanks!
Node definition
#interface Node:NSObject {
#property (nonatomic, strong) Node *left;
#property (nonatomic, strong) Node *right;
#property (nonatomic, assign) int *value;
}
-(id)initWithValue:(int)val {
self = [super init];
if(self) {
self.value = &(val);
self.left = nil;
self.right = nil;
}
return self;
}
Insert Algorithms for Tree
-(void)insertValue:(int)value {
Node *node = [[Node alloc] initWithValue:value];
[self insertNode:node];
}
-(void)insertNode:(Node *)node {
if (root == nil) {
root = node;
} else {
[node insertNode:node];
}
}
Insert Algorithms for Node
-(void)insertNode:(Node *)node{
if (node.value < self.value) {
[self insertOnLeft:node];
} else {
[self insertOnRight:node];
}
}
-(void)insertOnLeft:(Node *)node {
if (self.left == nil) {
self.left = node;
} else {
[self.left insertNode:node];
}
}
-(void)insertOnRight:(Node *)node {
if (self.right == nil) {
self.right = node;
} else {
[self.right insertNode:node];
}
}
3 values go in to my tree:
[tree insertValue:4];
[tree insertValue:6];
[tree insertValue:2];
int min = [tree findMinimum];
Tree's findMinimum method is called
-(int)findMinimum {
assert(root != nil);
return [root findMinimum];
}
Which call's root's findMinimum - root is a node
-(int)findMinimum {
Node *node = self;
int min = 0;
while (node != nil) {
min = *(node.value);
node = node.left;
}
return min;
}
Your are filling your tree not with integers but with stack addresses which are immediately invalid with this code:
self.value = &(val);
Here val is a parameter variable, which will disappear as soon as the method returns. Taking its address should only be done in rare circumstances and that address should never be stored in a location which outlives val.
Change the type of the value property of Node to int and remove the uses of address of (&) and indirection (*) associated with that property.
HTH
The assignment in the initializer of a pointer to the parameter won't work. Unless you have a good reason not to, actually allocate the int into the Node structure by declaring it an int, not an int *. So your initializer will look like this:
-(id)initWithValue:(int)val {
self = [super init];
if(self) {
self.value = val;
}
return self;
}
EDIT If you weren't sorting on insert (which I missed in the OP), you could instead search for the min recursively as follows:
-(int)findMinimum {
if (self.left && self.right)
return MIN([self.left findMinimum], [self.right findMinimum]);
else if (self.left)
return [self.left findMinimum];
else if (self.right)
return [self.right findMinimum];
else
return self.value;
}
I'm fairly new to Objective-C; but have been coding for years and this one really stumps me.
I'm trying to build an iPhone app and wanted to create a "settings" screen which will use a Table format. (Xcode 5.1.1).
I want to future proof the main Settings screen and make it easy for the application coding by hiding the "hard work" in subroutines/methods.
I may be getting too clever but I've created a class for each 'setting' that contains screen prompts, default values etc and using an Enum to cross-reference it (so the compiler will highlight typos etc)
The problem I'm encountering is that when I add entries to my NSMutableDictionary and use lldb to print the values; every entry seems to have the same "key" and values. I've tried converting the eNum to an NSNumber and also as an NSString -- no difference in the result - so I'm obviously doing something else daft but just can't see it
The following code is from various .m & .h files, I've omitted boring stuff that you always "have to have" to keep it short
// basic x-ref I want to use in my code
typedef NS_OPTIONS(NSInteger, ConfigurationType) {
unDefined = -1,
Server = 0,
Id = 1,
Phone = 2
};
// definition for a "single" Settings value
#interface SettingDefinition : NSObject
#end
#implementation SettingDefinition
ConfigurationType _cfgType;
NSString *_cfgName;
NSString *_screenTitle;
NSString *_value;
- (NSString *)description
{
NSString *className = NSStringFromClass([self class]);
return [NSString stringWithFormat:#"<%#: x%p Type=%d dbKey=%# '%#' -> %#>", className, self, _cfgType, _cfgName, _screenTitle, _value];
}
- (id)initType:(ConfigurationType)cfgOption
withDbKey: (NSString*)dbKey
asOptionTitle:(NSString*)cfgTitle
withValue:(NSString*)itmValue
{
self = [super init];
if (self) {
_screenTitle = cfgTitle;
_cfgName = dbKey;
_cfgType = cfgOption;
_value = itmValue;
}
return self;
}
#end
#interface Configuration : NSObject
#end
#implementation Configuration {
NSMutableDictionary *Settings; // List of Setting structures
};
- (id)init {
self = [super init];
if (self) {
Settings = [[NSMutableDictionary alloc]init];
[self add:Server withDbKey:#"Server" asOptionTitle:#"Server"];
[self add:Id withDbKey:#"Id" asOptionTitle:#"Your ID"];
[self add:Phone withDbKey:#"Phone" asOptionTitle:#"Phone No."];
}
return self;
}
- (void) add:(ConfigurationType)cfgOption
withDbKey:(NSString*)dbKey
asOptionTitle:(NSString*)cfgTitle
{
NSString * itmValue = [self configurationValue: cfgOption cfgName:dbKey];
SettingDefinition *x = [[SettingDefinition alloc]
initType: cfgOption
withDbKey: dbKey
asOptionTitle: cfgTitle
withValue: itmValue];
[Settings setObject:x forKey:[self asKey:cfgOption]];
}
- (NSString *) asKey:(ConfigurationType) settingType {
NSString *rc = [NSString stringWithFormat:#"%d", settingType];
return rc;
}
- (NSString *) configurationValue:(ConfigurationType) settingType {
// returns a suitable value from my system setup
// which is initially a null value until the user sets everything up
}
the debug window shows the following when I break after the final call to [self add: ...]
(lldb) po Settings
{
0 = "<SettingDefinition: x0x8e7c280 Type=2 dbKey=Phone 'Phone No.' -> (null)>";
1 = "<SettingDefinition: x0x8c703a0 Type=2 dbKey=Phone 'Phone No.' -> (null)>";
2 = "<SettingDefinition: x0x8e7c310 Type=2 dbKey=Phone 'Phone No.' -> (null)>";
}
The (null) is obviously due to no data in 'value' yet; but why do they all show as 'Phone'; if I break after the second call to [self add:..] they all show as 'Id'
UPDATE:
DOH! obviously they're globals (I've been using another IDE where everything is local until exposed) .. If I enclose them in braces in the implementation as the documentation states then the exhibited problem vanishes. I have properties to access the variables but as the setter does more than just set the memory, I thought I'd need my "own" variables to hold the data.. said it was something daft .. thank you!
I've just started with the sparrow framework, and have been following "The Big Sparrow Tutorial" by Gamua themselves. I'm on the first part of the tutorial, using the AppScaffold 1.3 but when I try to compile my basic code it hangs at the loading screen and gives me a SIGABRT error.
I put an exception breakpoint, and it stopped here, in GameController.m (seen at bottom) of the AppScaffold:
mGame = [[Game alloc] initWithWidth:gameWidth height:gameHeight];
This was also my only output:
2012-07-30 07:19:54.787 AppScaffold[1682:10a03] -[Game initWithWidth:height:]: unrecognized selector sent to instance 0x7553980
(lldb)
I am using the stock AppScaffold, the only thing I changed was the Game.m.
This is my Game.m:
#interface Game : SPSprite
#end
#implementation Game
{
#private
SPImage *mBackground;
SPImage *mBasket;
NSMutableArray *mEggs;
}
- (id)init
{
if((self = [super init]))
{
//load the background image first, add it to the display tree
//and keep it for later use
mBackground = [[SPImage alloc] initWithContentsOfFile:#"background.png"];
[self addChild:mBackground];
//load the image of the basket, add it to the display tree
//and keep it for later use
mBasket = [[SPImage alloc] initWithContentsOfFile:#"basket.png"];
[self addChild:mBasket];
//create a list that will hold the eggs,
//which we will add and remove repeatedly during the game
mEggs = [[NSMutableArray alloc] init];
}
return self;
}
- (void)dealloc
{
[mBackground release];
[mBasket release];
[mEggs release];
[super dealloc];
}
#end
I've tried my best to use my basic troubleshooting tactics, but I'm very new to Obj-C and Sparrow and could use a hand :)
Thanks
EDIT: I've addded the GameController.m contents here for clarity:
//
// GameController.m
// AppScaffold
//
#import <OpenGLES/ES1/gl.h>
#import "GameController.h"
#interface GameController ()
- (UIInterfaceOrientation)initialInterfaceOrientation;
#end
#implementation GameController
- (id)initWithWidth:(float)width height:(float)height
{
if ((self = [super initWithWidth:width height:height]))
{
float gameWidth = width;
float gameHeight = height;
// if we start up in landscape mode, width and height are swapped.
UIInterfaceOrientation orientation = [self initialInterfaceOrientation];
if (UIInterfaceOrientationIsLandscape(orientation)) SP_SWAP(gameWidth, gameHeight, float);
mGame = [[Game alloc] initWithWidth:gameWidth height:gameHeight];
mGame.pivotX = gameWidth / 2;
mGame.pivotY = gameHeight / 2;
mGame.x = width / 2;
mGame.y = height / 2;
[self rotateToInterfaceOrientation:orientation animationTime:0];
[self addChild:mGame];
}
return self;
}
- (void)dealloc
{
[mGame release];
[super dealloc];
}
- (UIInterfaceOrientation)initialInterfaceOrientation
{
// In an iPhone app, the 'statusBarOrientation' has the correct value on Startup;
// unfortunately, that's not the case for an iPad app (for whatever reason). Thus, we read the
// value from the app's plist file.
NSDictionary *bundleInfo = [[NSBundle mainBundle] infoDictionary];
NSString *initialOrientation = [bundleInfo objectForKey:#"UIInterfaceOrientation"];
if (initialOrientation)
{
if ([initialOrientation isEqualToString:#"UIInterfaceOrientationPortrait"])
return UIInterfaceOrientationPortrait;
else if ([initialOrientation isEqualToString:#"UIInterfaceOrientationPortraitUpsideDown"])
return UIInterfaceOrientationPortraitUpsideDown;
else if ([initialOrientation isEqualToString:#"UIInterfaceOrientationLandscapeLeft"])
return UIInterfaceOrientationLandscapeLeft;
else
return UIInterfaceOrientationLandscapeRight;
}
else
{
return [[UIApplication sharedApplication] statusBarOrientation];
}
}
- (void)rotateToInterfaceOrientation:(UIInterfaceOrientation)interfaceOrientation
animationTime:(double)animationTime
{
float angles[] = {0.0f, 0.0f, -PI, PI_HALF, -PI_HALF};
float oldAngle = mGame.rotation;
float newAngle = angles[(int)interfaceOrientation];
// make sure that rotation is always carried out via the minimal angle
while (oldAngle - newAngle > PI) newAngle += TWO_PI;
while (oldAngle - newAngle < -PI) newAngle -= TWO_PI;
// rotate game
if (animationTime)
{
SPTween *tween = [SPTween tweenWithTarget:mGame time:animationTime
transition:SP_TRANSITION_EASE_IN_OUT];
[tween animateProperty:#"rotation" targetValue:newAngle];
[[SPStage mainStage].juggler removeObjectsWithTarget:mGame];
[[SPStage mainStage].juggler addObject:tween];
}
else
{
mGame.rotation = newAngle;
}
// inform all display objects about the new game size
BOOL isPortrait = UIInterfaceOrientationIsPortrait(interfaceOrientation);
float newWidth = isPortrait ? MIN(mGame.gameWidth, mGame.gameHeight) :
MAX(mGame.gameWidth, mGame.gameHeight);
float newHeight = isPortrait ? MAX(mGame.gameWidth, mGame.gameHeight) :
MIN(mGame.gameWidth, mGame.gameHeight);
if (newWidth != mGame.gameWidth)
{
mGame.gameWidth = newWidth;
mGame.gameHeight = newHeight;
SPEvent *resizeEvent = [[SPResizeEvent alloc] initWithType:SP_EVENT_TYPE_RESIZE
width:newWidth height:newHeight animationTime:animationTime];
[mGame broadcastEvent:resizeEvent];
[resizeEvent release];
}
}
// Enable this method for the simplest possible universal app support: it will display a black
// border around the iPhone (640x960) game when it is started on the iPad (768x1024); no need to
// modify any coordinates.
/*
- (void)render:(SPRenderSupport *)support
{
if (UI_USER_INTERFACE_IDIOM() == UIUserInterfaceIdiomPad)
{
glEnable(GL_SCISSOR_TEST);
glScissor(64, 32, 640, 960);
[super render:support];
glDisable(GL_SCISSOR_TEST);
}
else
[super render:support];
}
*/
#end
Here is my Xcode project: http://cl.ly/2e3g02260N47
You are calling a
initWithWidth:height:
method, while none is defined in your class.
From your edit, it seems that the initWithWidth method is declared in the class GameController, not in Game.
So, it seems that the
In which context are you calling initWithWidth:height: method is declared in Game.h but you define it in GameController.m.
This explains both why you get the SIGABRT and the errors when compiling.
The fix is calling
mGame = [[GameController alloc] init];
from GameController initWithWidth...
- (id)initWithWidth:(float)width height:(float)height
{
if ((self = [super initWithWidth:width height:height]))
{
float gameWidth = width;
float gameHeight = height;
// if we start up in landscape mode, width and height are swapped.
UIInterfaceOrientation orientation = [self initialInterfaceOrientation];
if (UIInterfaceOrientationIsLandscape(orientation)) SP_SWAP(gameWidth, gameHeight, float);
mGame = [[Game alloc] init];
mGame.pivotX = gameWidth / 2;
mGame.pivotY = gameHeight / 2;
mGame.x = width / 2;
mGame.y = height / 2;
[self rotateToInterfaceOrientation:orientation animationTime:0];
[self addChild:mGame];
}
return self;
}
The tutorial was very old and was incompatible with the latest scaffold;
I did this:
- (id)init
{
if((self = [super init]))
{
when I should've done this:
- (id)initWithWidth:(float)width height:(float)height
{
if ((self = [super initWithWidth:width height:height]))
{
thanks, though sergio!
(There are much better sparrow tutorials and I'm even making my own video tutorials :P)
Very basic question, but I have an error in my code that can only be answered by one assumption: my class isn't being instantiated!
I haven't written much in Objective C in some time, and I was never really good, so please point out even the most painfully obvious.
I am using:
ObjectSelectionViewController *length = [[ObjectSelectionViewController alloc] initWithMeasureType:0];
ObjectSelectionViewController *mass = [[ObjectSelectionViewController alloc] initWithMeasureType:1];
ObjectSelectionViewController *volume = [[ObjectSelectionViewController alloc] initWithMeasureType:2];
NSLog(#"%#", [length measurementType]);
NSLog(#"%#", [mass measurementType]);
NSLog(#"%#", [volume measurementType]);
The NSLogs return whichever measurement was assigned last, regardless of the separate allocs and inits.
Here is the constructor of the ObjectSelectionViewController class:
#import "ObjectSelectionViewController.h"
#implementation ObjectSelectionViewController
NSString *measurementType;
-(ObjectSelectionViewController*) initWithMeasureType:(int)value
{
switch (value) {
case 0: // Length
measureType = #"Length";
break;
case 1: // Mass
measureType = #"Mass";
break;
case 2: // Volume
measureType = #"Volume";
break;
}
return self;
}
-(NSString*) measurementType
{
return measureType;
}
Thanks for the help, it's driving me crazy!
You need to make measureType an instance variable, so that each object of this type that you create has its own copy:
#interface ObjectSelectionViewController : NSViewController {
NSString * measureType; // Declare an NSString instance variable
}
- (id) initWithMeasureType: (int)value;
#end
As it is, there is only one copy of the variable, and every time you instantiate a new object, its value changes. Since each instance is referring to the same copy, they all get the same value:
ObjectSelectionViewController *length = [[ObjectSelectionViewController alloc] initWithMeasureType:0];
NSLog(#"%#", [length measurementType]); // Prints "Length"
ObjectSelectionViewController *mass = [[ObjectSelectionViewController alloc] initWithMeasureType:1];
NSLog(#"%#", [length measurementType]); // Prints "Mass"
You also need to change your init... method as mentioned by other answerers:
- (id) initWithMeasureType: (int)value {
// Call superclass's initializer
self = [super init];
if( !self ) return nil;
switch (value) {
case 0: // Length
measureType = #"Length";
break;
case 1: // Mass
measureType = #"Mass";
break;
case 2: // Volume
measureType = #"Volume";
break;
}
return self;
}
Since you are assigning a literal string to the instance variable, you do not need to worry about managing its memory; if you were doing anything more complicated, you would probably do well by declaring a property.
Another note: initializer methods should always return id, a generic object pointer, to allow subclasses to work properly.
You need to call [super init] first, like this:
-(id) initWithMeasureType:(int)value
{
if ((self = [super init]))
{
switch (value) {
case 0: // Length
measureType = #"Length";
break;
case 1: // Mass
measureType = #"Mass";
break;
case 2: // Volume
measureType = #"Volume";
break;
}
}
return self;
}
Constructors are a convention in Objective-C rather than a language feature. So, for example, there's no automatic calling of parent constructors (just like you wouldn't expect any other overridden method to call its parent implementations). Similarly, the names used for constructors are just conventions, so the compiler knows nothing of init. With that in mind, what you actually want as your constructor is:
-(id) initWithMeasureType:(int)value
{
if((self = [super init]))
{
switch (value) {
case 0: // Length
measureType = #"Length";
break;
case 1: // Mass
measureType = #"Mass";
break;
case 2: // Volume
measureType = #"Volume";
break;
}
}
return self;
}
Assuming measureType is an instance variable (declared as part of the interface, generally speaking) and not a global then that should do what you want.
In your custom init method you just need to start with:
self = [super init];
- (id) initWithMeasureType: (int)value {
// Call superclass's initializer
self = [super init];
if( !self ) return nil;
switch (value) {
case 0: // Length
measureType = #"Length";
break;
case 1: // Mass
measureType = #"Mass";
break;
case 2: // Volume
measureType = #"Volume";
break;
}
return self;
}