Checking if Port is Open in Rails - ruby-on-rails-3

In my Rails 3.2 app, I'm using embedded javascript charts from TradingView. However, it seems that port 443 must be opened for it to show. Therefore, I'm trying to do a check on if the port is open for the user, and if not, show something aside from the chart.
I found this post, "Ruby - See if a port is open" and have been working of this answer:
require 'socket'
require 'timeout'
def port_open?(ip, port, seconds=1)
Timeout::timeout(seconds) do
begin
TCPSocket.new(ip, port).close
true
rescue Errno::ECONNREFUSED, Errno::EHOSTUNREACH
false
end
end
rescue Timeout::Error
false
end
However, I modified it to be:
def port_open?(ip, port=443, seconds=1)
since the port to check will always be the same for me.
I'm calling the method like this:
#ip = request.remote_ip
test = port_open?(#ip)
I discovered the issue when I was behind a firewall.
What I don't understand is that I can see the chart now that I'm not behind a firewall, yet if I run the code below locally, I can see the chart, but I receive false.
However, if I change the port=3000 I receive true. What am I doing wrong? Thanks!

Ports under 1000 are protected by the system and need to be run with root privileges. At first glance, I'd guess this is what's wrong.

Port 443 is the normal channel for SSL (https) connections -- it would be quite surprising if a company set outbound restrictions on this port on their firewall. More likely, it's the IP address of the site that may be restricted.
Get to a command line and try with telnet. First try something you know works, like google
> telnet google.com 443
> Trying 74.125.226.231...
> Connected to google.com.
> Escape character is '^]'.
The Connected to google.com response demonstrates that your machine has made a successful connection to the port and IP address. Otherwise, it will hang at the Trying x.x.x.x... line.
Another possibility is that your intranet is set up to go through a proxy server -- you make a connection internally to a machine in your network, and it in turn makes the actual connection. This can screw things up -- not sure what you would need to do to handle that, but something special -- browsers have special settings for handling proxy servers, so your Rails code would need to, as well.

Related

webrtc app show my Turn server broken, but it works

I have my stun / turn server running on local pc (CoTurn). It is tested on "https://webrtc.github.io/samples/src/content/peerconnection/trickle-ice/" and works. I have a domain name and configured the modem with public ip. I configured apache2 to make the site visible to the world. I have active and valid letsencript certificates. Everything works in short. But the test application starts the connection (the external pc communicates with the local via socket.io) but then the video is not seen and the console returns the error: ICE failed, your TURN server appears to be broken, see about:webrtc for more details.
The link of the application that I use as a test, because with my original I had no comparisons to make. First time with socket.io. But socket.io send and receive messages so these not appear a problem for now.
https://github.com/anoek/webrtc-group-chat-example
P.S.:
Ok. Server is behind the nat. My app (but linked app too) work very fine on local network (sorry I checked this point first before). These with my turn/stun server, than with public stun/turns google servers. This evidently indicates a bad setting of apache2 server or/and turn server. Where could I find a guide about it?
My server situation: myServerIpLocal-xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx -> nat/router/modem WithPublicIpStatic-xx.xx.xx.xx. I can see my sites from all the world, but turn server not work outside the local network. Inside local network work ok.
these my turn config:
listening-port=3478
tls-listening-port=5349
alt-listening-port=3479
alt-tls-listening-port=5350
listening-ip=xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx /*mylocal ip*/
relay-ip=xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx /*mylocal ip*/
external-ip=xx.xx.xx.xx /*my public ip on nat/ruter/modem */
min-port=49152
max-port=65535
verbose
fingerprint
userdb=/var/lib/turn/turndb
realm=mysite.com
cert=/etc/ssl/certificate.pem
pkey=/etc/ssl/private.key
dh-file=/etc/turn/dhparam.pem
no-stdout-log
log-file=/myhome/.turn/turn.log
lt-cred-mech
user=myusername:mypasswd
# Turn OFF the CLI support.
# By default it is always ON.
# See also options cli-ip and cli-port.
#
no-cli
#Local system IP address to be used for CLI server endpoint. Default value
# is 127.0.0.1.
#
cli-ip=127.0.1.1
# CLI server port. Default is 5766.
#
cli-port=5766
# CLI access password. Default is empty (no password).
#
cli-password=logen
no-sslv3
no-tlsv1
my old code on turn.conf:
lt-cred-mech
user=myusername:mypasswd
but turn work only locally .... probabily because I use:
sudo turnserver -L myPublicIp -o -a myrealm
at every coturn start command ....
actually I try not use the command "turnserver" and I try to use onlu sudo coturn start .....
basically in my turn.conf file I change these:
lt-cred-mech
user=mypasswd:myusername /***** mind the gap ;) *****/
these because my index.js file debug never see my external connection as authrized user ..... magically at these time my app perform webrtc multiple connection with every pc and mobile .... inside and outside my lan .... (I try connect my appa from phone in barcelona spain to other one in london with good result).
May be coturn wiki need to update?
Finally I would like to thank the serverfault and super-user guys who rejected my question. Since I had to make arrangements, I was able to acquire new and interesting information on this subject.
regards

Configuring apache on ipv6 no connection

Solution: It turns out ipv6 has got it's own firewall which I didn't know and it filtered out 80 and 443! Thanks so much Nicholas Pipitone!
I'm having difficulties to get apache to accept ipv6 connections (everything perfect on ipv4). Results from ready.chair6.net:
What I tested/tried:
Disabling firewall doesn't change the result
Getting apache to listen on all interfaces or specifically the ipv6 interface doesnt change the result
Executing 'curl https://v6.ident.me/' correctly sends me back my ipv6 address
Netstat tells me that both the ipv4 AND ipv6 address are listening for connections on 80 and 443
I'm really stuck here, what else can I do?
The MX record error means it's having a problem getting the IP address from the DNS servers.
Solution: Try dig +short AAAA $hostname and dig +short MX $hostname, with $hostname being your URL. If you don't see an IPv6 IP in the terminal, then you don't have DNS fully setup. If you just recently setup your URL, then wait a day for caches to be updated. If it's been a while, talk to who you bought the domain name from / who's responsible for making your URL point to your IP.
Note: MX is only for mail. If you don't want incoming mail / that's not what the problem is, then that test is testing something it doesn't have to test, and you can ignore it.
More possibilities: Is the hostname on line 4 the same as the host name on the second to last line? Try pinging that IPv6 address from line 4 on a different computer (Not on the same private network); what do you get?
If you get a response, try nmaping the IPv6 on another computer to see if port 80 is open to the public.
-If the nmap fails then try checking your port forwarding settings if you're behind a NAT. If you're not behind the NAT then something might be blocking the request in-between their computer and your computer (Very unlikely); you can try telnet'ing to port 80 remotely and see if you're getting the requests - because then it's just an apache issue.
-If nmap succeeded, then what do you get? Send an HTTP request over command line from the another computer and see if you get a response.
If pinging doesn't work, then you're just not connected to the internet (o.O), idk how to help with that. If pinging the IPv6 works but pinging the URL doesn't, then dig must not be showing anything and it's the DNS as mentioned previously. If dig does show something in that case, then I'm lost.

TURN server broken - Coturn

Just a bit of background first.
I have installed coturn server in my local machine (Behind a firewall and with local IP).
I have created a port forwarding for cotrun server lets say my local ip is: 192.168.0.11:3478 is mapped with my public ip 10.1.10.212:3478.
When I use some online utility to check my public IP has this port open it? that utility shows that it is open.
I am trying to test this server using this fiddle: Code to test TURN server
I removed the stun configuration from it, and added my live ip and port. And when I try to test it, it says your TURN server is broken in console on web browser. And I see failed as output.
I have also used following commands to create a user from this link.
Wiki to Coturn Configuration
// created test user
sudo turnadmin -a -u test -r test -p test
// enabling admin support in web (not sure how to access it in browser)
sudo turnadmin -A -u test -p test
I start the turn server using following command:
turnserver -L 192.168.0.11 -a -f -v -X -r test
I have enabled the "TURNSERVER_ENABLED"
/etc/default/coturn
TURNSERVER_ENABLED=1
Screenshot of my about:webrtc:
Please find the below attached Screen shot for my about:webrtc. I am not sure what is missing.
EDIT-1
I can also see the incoming packet message processed, error 401: Unauthorized in the console of TURN server
EDIT-2
I resolved the TURN server related issue, added the turn server in client code as well, still facing issue, call is not going through,
Update
Here is what I found, the reason why it wasn't working earlier was due to a defective router in the network. This thing has harassed me for almost a month (however the internet used to work fine). But I found that there is a loss of packets and I switch to LAN cable I even avoided the firewall of the organization and there it was working just fine. Then I configured the rules in firewall and it started working as well.
A few issues that might be causing this:
The -X option requires an argument - the external IP if the TURN server is behind a NAT.
If you are setting all your parameters on the command line, you should include -n to ensure that it does not load an unrelated configuration file.
TURNSERVER_ENABLED=1 is to start turnserver with default configuration at system boot. You do not want this if you are starting turnserver manually from the command line.
https://github.com/coturn/coturn/blob/master/README.turnserver
" I have created a port forwarding for CoTurn server lets say my local ip is: 192.168.0.11:3478 is mapped with my public ip 10.1.10.212:3478."
Now surely you are aware that the private address-spaces in IPV4 are (private IP ranges):
10.0.0.0 – 10.255.255.255
172.16.0.0 – 172.31.255.255
192.168.0.0 – 192.168.255.255
So, your first IP is in the last private IP range, and your so-called "public IP" is in the first private IP-range. Now you need to find your TRUE REAL public-IP address to try to connect to it from outside. I would say that it looks like your ISP has you behind a NAT. So your TURN server might be behind two NATs. Which is kind of ironic situation for a server designed to help penetrate NATs of webRTC-clients. You might want to try to put CoTurn somewhere where it is possible for it to work like AWS (special case of CoTurn friendly NAT).
Just recently got (well with lots of help -- that even did the most of the work) CoTurn to work in cloud and on local Ubuntu ;-) (never stopped me from bragging though). Though there is troubling few srflx-call-successes yet (mostly local network or relay(TURN) calls). :-D

Apache2 and SSH. Both on port same IP and port

My question may be a little confusing, but anyway. My school is going to open up WiFi DMZ on separate IP for students, but they said port 80 will be the only port open.
What do I want? Well I want to tunnel my traffic thru my home server, which is running Apache2 on 80 and SSH on 21. It's just a regular setup. As it is a production machine and I want clients to be able to connect on port 80, but I want to connect to port 80 to make a tunnel. The question is: How to do that?
The possible sollution: Abandon possibility of connecting to websites running on the server from the school IP and use IPTABLES. If source ip == $school_ip && port == 80: Redirect to port 21. Done. But I think there must another, elegant sollution... Isn't it possible to actually use the HTTP transfer for SSH transit? I mean create a host named for example ssh.mydomain.tld and use some apache module to do a server-side redirection to port 21 but only on that particular hostname? What can I do?
Box is running Debian GNU/Linux
Thanks for any help...
Off topic: They think they will block any sort of illegal operation. In fact HTTP is probably the second most-vulnerable protocol after BitTorrent. Why don't lock it down too? It'll be absolutely safe if there's no open ports, wouldn't it? I don't personally think blocking ports for POP, IMAP, Jabber, etc is any good. I think they'll probably seriously piss someone off if they even can't open mail teacher sent them. Oh, there's a webmail? No no no! SSL/TLS goes on port 443, remember? I don't think blocking all the traffic will be any good. IMO they should block unencrypted BitTorrent and apply low-priority QoS for unclassified transfers.
You could try the instructions found here:
http://dag.wieers.com/howto/ssh-http-tunneling/
proxytunnel is available in the stable repo:
http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=proxytunnel&searchon=names&suite=stable&section=all
A simple and working solution is sslh.
It is exactly the tool to solve that problem.
BTW ssh is usually set on port 22.

Tunnel over HTTPS

At my workplace, the traffic blocker/firewall has been getting progressively worse. I can't connect to my home machine on port 22, and lack of ssh access makes me sad. I was previously able to use SSH by moving it to port 5050, but I think some recent filters now treat this traffic as IM and redirect it through another proxy, maybe. That's my best guess; in any case, my ssh connections now terminate before I get to log in.
These days I've been using Ajaxterm over HTTPS, as port 443 is still unmolested, but this is far from ideal. (Sucky terminal emulation, lack of port forwarding, my browser leaks memory at an amazing rate...) I tried setting up mod_proxy_connect on top of mod_ssl, with the idea that I could send a CONNECT localhost:22 HTTP/1.1 request through HTTPS, and then I'd be all set. Sadly, this seems to not work; the HTTPS connection works, up until I finish sending my request; then SSL craps out. It appears as though mod_proxy_connect takes over the whole connection instead of continuing to pipe through mod_ssl, confusing the heck out of the HTTPS client.
Is there a way to get this to work? I don't want to do this over plain HTTP, for several reasons:
Leaving a big fat open proxy like that just stinks
A big fat open proxy is not good over HTTPS either, but with authentication required it feels fine to me
HTTP goes through a proxy -- I'm not too concerned about my traffic being sniffed, as it's ssh that'll be going "plaintext" through the tunnel -- but it's a lot more likely to be mangled than HTTPS, which fundamentally cannot be proxied
Requirements:
Must work over port 443, without disturbing other HTTPS traffic (i.e. I can't just put the ssh server on port 443, because I would no longer be able to serve pages over HTTPS)
I have or can write a simple port forwarder client that runs under Windows (or Cygwin)
Edit
DAG: Tunnelling SSH over HTTP(S) has been pointed out to me, but it doesn't help: at the end of the article, they mention Bug 29744 - CONNECT does not work over existing SSL connection preventing tunnelling over HTTPS, exactly the problem I was running into. At this point, I am probably looking at some CGI script, but I don't want to list that as a requirement if there's better solutions available.
Find out why the company has such a restrictive policy. It might be for a good reason.
If you still find that you want to bypass the policy, you could write a small proxy that will listen on your server on port 443 and then, depending on the request, will forward the traffic either to your web server or to the SSH daemon. There are two catches though.
To determine whether it's an HTTPS request or an SSH request, you need to try to read some data with a (small) timeout, this is because TLS/SSL handshakes start with the client sending some data, whereas the SSH handshake starts with the server sending some data. The timeout has to be big enough to delays in delivering the initial data from the client in the TLS/SSL handshake, so it'll make establishing SSH connections slower.
If the HTTP proxy in your company is smart, it'll actually eavesdrop on the expected TLS/SSL "handshake" when you CONNECT to port 443, and, when it detects that it's not an TLS/SSL handshake, it might terminate the SSH connection attempt. To address that, you could wrap the SSH daemon into an TLS/SSL tunnel (e.g., stunnel), but then you'll need to differentiate requests based on the TLS/SSL version in your client request to determine whether to route the TLS/SSL connection to the web server or to the TLS/SSL-tunneled SSH daemon.
You should be able to use iptables to forward ssh traffic from your work machines to ssh while all other machines attaching to your home server on port 443 get the Apache server.
Try a rule like this:
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp -s 111.111.111.111 --dport 443 -j REDIRECT --to-port 22
Where 111.111.111.111 is your office computer's ip address.
That all assumes you're running Linux >= 2.4, which you should be by now. It's been out for almost a decade.
Documentation for iptables is at http://www.netfilter.org.
Set up OpenVPN 2.1 server at home, use port 443 (if you set up your home any HTTPS service at port 443, trigger OpenVPN's port-share option to handle both OpenVPN and HTTPS transactions at port 443; this feature is only available to non-Windows OS)
Then, set up your OpenVPN client on your laptop in road-warrior mode to access the OpenVPN server at home. You will be able to call home or anywhere you like within a secure VPN network you've created with OpenVPN. It is no longer required to use SSH for this purpose.
I'm really sorry for being the Devil's advocate here, but if they are blocking ports at your work, its likely because they don't want people breaching security.
Now if you get permission to open a tunnel from your boss, that's fine, but IF something happens, ANYTHING, and they figure out you have a tunnel, I can almost assure you, you'll become the scapegoat. So if I were you I'd not be opening tunnels at work if they are setting up firewalls against it.
How about using 2 IP adresses on your machine?
Bind apache/https on one IP_1:443 and your sshd on the other IP_2:443?
Could you set up a middle man?
Run a small/free/cheap instance in the cloud listening on 443 for SSH, then though that cloud instance tunnel to your home box on your favorite port - 22 or whatever.
It'll add some latency I'm sure, but it solves the problem of leaving the original home setup intact.
I think you'll have to find a port that you're not using currently that you can get out on, and listen on that. 443 is the obvious candidate, but you say that's not possible. What about mail (25, 110, 143), telnet (23), ftp (21), DNS (53), or even whois (43)?
Proxy tunnel may be your answer
http://proxytunnel.sourceforge.net/
lets say my ssh server is host.domain.tld and my works proxy server is 10.2.4.37
I would add this to my local ssh config
Host host.domain.tld
ProxyCommand /usr/local/bin/proxytunnel -q -p 10.2.4.37:3128 -d %h:%p
ProtocolKeepAlives 30
See:
SSH Through or Over Proxy
http://daniel.haxx.se/docs/sshproxy.html
http://www.agroman.net/corkscrew/
Since apache has no problem whatsoever with CONNECT when no SSL is involved, I turn off SSL features and I use stunnel to serve an https version of my site. This does not require any recompilation, and allows your site to serve https normally. So far, the cleanest workaround I know.
See http://chm.duquesne.free.fr/blog/?p=281 for details.
Must work over port 443, without disturbing other HTTPS traffic (i.e. I can't just put the ssh server on port 443, because I would no longer be able to serve pages over HTTPS)
Is it possible to bind your HTTPS server to a different port? Depending on what it's used for, you may even be able to get around the problem of not being able to directly access it from work by just SSHing home and then using lynx from there.
So, then, give proxifier a try (- it supports HTTP Proxy Server)!
http://www.proxifier.com/documentation/intro.htm
I managed to bypass my company's firewall using the following design via AjaxTerm, it works for me.
PC on company network --> company's proxy via https --> INTERNET --> My home Apache reverse proxy server on SSL + .htpasswd protection --> AjaxTerm Server(From here on ward, I can SSH to any other servers ).
Still not the perfect world... would be good if I can can tunneling to my home network via HTTPS.