I am having an issue with inserting records into CoreData after parsing XML webservice. I parse the web service and store the records in an array and the count i get for array is 239. Before i insert the data i see the array count for existing core data.Its 0 records. So now i push the data into the coredata. All goes well. But, i end up with 1 extra record. A duplicate for an existing record. The count i get is 240.HOw is it happening?I did this process with another table.I got from the webservice for this new table table this time 113 records. After i insert the data, the table has 114 records and 1 extra record(duplicate again). I check using the firefox add on sqlite manager. Peculiar thing to note is that there is a field (not the one i designed) called Z_OPT, which has the value 239 (remaining fields identical) and for the table with 113 records the 114th record has z_OPT= 113(remaining fields identical).Did this happen to anyone?Any information would be of great help. If you need more information, please ask.Thanks...
Related
i'm trying to delete n rows from database and n is variable should be given in the api method like deleting the last 10 boxes of items in supermarket which means they are sold so how i would do so i'm using spring data rest i don't know how to write the query in the repository and how i would get the variable n and use it in the sql query also i should check if that number of rows exist before deleting
Ok, so I need some SQL 101 assistance. I am building a new table in SQL that will be used in a VPN connection to an outside source. I have built a view inside of SQL that contains all the information I need from the main database for this new table. I now need to push the data into the table. The problem is that the data is constantly changing and I am not really sure what my easiest way to do this is. I need to be able to copy the data from the view to the table initially but after that I need to be able to update already existing records with new information and insert new records into the table that don't already exist.
Now, the reason I am not just using the view to deal with the data needed through the VPN is because the outside source that will be using the data needs to be able to push back some values that don't exist anywhere in my table and save them to the unique records they are associated with. When I do the update, I need to leave those values that are pushed back alone and just update the values that already exist in my database.
I hope this makes sense as I need some guidance on how to do this as I have not done this before.
The table for this looks like this:
ID Name Address Email X Y Z<br>
123456 John Smith 123 Any St john#d.com 123 12 1125
X Y & Z are the fields that will be filled from an outside source which will be tied to the ID number of the record from the web service.
Thanks for the assistance
I have what I consider a real need to create a query with several hundred columns.
We are working on a mailing for our client. In this mailing, they are listing out several locations where their customers can go to get information. As our designers create the template for this mailing, they are setting up "Slots" for each address. The number of slots on the mailing varies from one mailing to the other, from 6 to possibly 50.
My need for the query is to setup the merge of data into the mailing. I need to provide a query where each mailing is 1 record containing all the information they need for that mailing. I am dynamically creating the SQL statement with the max number of slots on that mailing. With up to 50 slots on that mailing, my query needs to look like this:
MailingID,
LogoLocation,
APNCode,
TFN,
CopyVersion,
Slot1_Name,
Slot1_Address,
Slot1_City,
Slot1_State,
Slot1_DateTime,
...
Slot50_Name,
Slot50_Address,
Slot50_City,
Slot50_State,
Slot50_DateTime
My first attempt was to create a table with all these fields, but I got this error:
The table has been created, but its maximum row size exceeds the allowed maximum of 8060 bytes. INSERT or UPDATE to this table will fail if the resulting row exceeds the size limit.
They only want the data in a CSV file, so I don't need to create a temp table for it.
My problem is that I'm trying to create a standard process and with the number of fields varying like that, I want to set this up in a way that we won't blow up the system every time we try and run it.
I've looked at a few pages and found details on the size limitations of SQL Server and several comments saying a table like this shows a bad database design.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms143432(v=sql.105).aspx
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/fec1efbb-94ff-4fe9-8d69-12e95c48587d/its-maximum-row-size-exceeds-the-allowed-maximum-of-8060-bytes-insert-or-update-to-this-table-will?forum=transactsql
Work around SQL Server maximum columns limit 1024 and 8kb record size
I'm hoping that someone out there has some experience doing this and can share some insights on how to make this efficient. Is there another way to accomplish this that I don't know about?
UPDATE:
Thanks for all the quick replies.
More detail on my scenario. You get a flyer in the mail and when you turn the flyer over, it lists 50 locations in your county where you could go take a class or attend a meeting or something. All the details for that flyer needs to be in 1 record so they can map the fields on the one page. If that county has 50 address/date/time combinations, they need them included in the 1 record so they can properly slot the flyer. Think giant mail merge where there might only be 100 counties (100 flyers) but each flyer has tons of information.
When the data is actually stored in the database, I'm storing an id for the specific flyer (MailingID) and each address/date/time combo is its own record. It's just the file they need to merge the details onto the creative piece that has to be denormalized like this.
I haven't been able to find any details on limitations on views. Does a View have the same limitations as a table? Would it work to create a view for them that they can download when they need the data?
All the details for that flyer needs to be in 1 record so they can map the fields on the one page That is a questionable assumption. Why can't the data be stored in 50 rows in a 2nd table?
Anyway, if you insist on storing everything in one row you should probable use XML or JSON. That makes all these problems go away. SQL Server has great support for XML. You can even generate XML on the fly. So you could properly store the 50 items in a 2nd table and only combine them into one XML value for query purposes.
I have two databases, Database A and Database B.
Database A contains some data which needs to be placed in a table in Database B. However, before that can happen, some of that data must be “cleaned up” in the following way:
The table in Database A which contains the data to be placed in Database B has a field called “Desc.” Every now and then the users of the system put city names in with the data they enter into the “Desc” field. For example: a user may type in “Move furniture to new cubicle. New York. Add electric.”
Before that data can be imported into Database B the word “New York” needs to be removed from that data so that it only reads “Move furniture to new cubicle. Add electric.” However—and this is important—the original data in Database A must remain untouched. In other words, Database A’s data will still read “Move furniture to new cubicle. New York. Add electric,” while the data in Database B will read “Move furniture to new cubicle. Add electric.”
Database B contains a table which has a list of the city names which need to be removed from the “Desc” field data from Database A before being placed in Database B.
How do I construct a stored procedure or function which will grab the data from Database A, then iterate through the Cities table in Database B and if it finds a city name in the “Desc” field will remove it while keeping the rest of the information in that field thus creating a recordset which I can then use to populate the appropriate table in Database B?
I have tried several things but still haven’t cracked it. Yet I’m sure this is probably fairly easy. Any help is greatly appreciated!
Thanks.
EDIT:
The latest thing I have tried to solve this problem is this:
DECLARE #cityName VarChar(50)
While (Select COUNT(*) From ABCScanSQL.dbo.tblDiscardCitiesList) > 0
Begin
Select #cityName = ABCScanSQL.dbo.tblDiscardCitiesList.CityName FROM ABCScanSQL.dbo.tblDiscardCitiesList
SELECT JOB_NO, LTRIM(RTRIM(SUBSTRING(JOB_NO, (LEN(job_no) -2), 5))) AS LOCATION
,JOB_DESC, [Date_End] , REPLACE(Job_Desc,#cityName,' ') AS NoCity
FROM fmcs_tables.dbo.Jobt WHERE Job_No like '%loc%'
End
"Job_Desc" is the field which needs to have the city names removed.
This is a data quality issue. You can always make a copy of the [description] in Database A and call it [cleaned_desc].
One simple solution is to write a function that does the following.
1 - Read data from [tbl_remove_these_words]. These are the phrases you want removed.
2 - Compare the input - #var_description, to the rows in the table.
3 - Upon a match, replace with a empty string.
This solution depends upon a cleansing table that you maintain and update.
Run a update query that uses the input from [description] with a call to [fn_remove_these_words] and sets [cleaned_desc] to the output.
Another solution is to look at products like Melisa Data (DQ) product for SSIS or data quality services in the SQL server stack to give you a application frame work to solve the problem.
I'm implementing a php page that display data in pagination format. My problem is that these data change in real time, so when user request next page, I submit last id and query is executed for retrieve more 10 rows from last id order by a column that value change in real time. For example I have 20 rows:
Id 1 col_real_time 5
Id 2 col_real_time 3
Id 3 col_real_time 11
Etc
I get data sorted by col_real_time in ascending order, so result is
id 2, id 1, id 3
Now in realtime id 2 change in col_real_time 29 before user send request for next page, user now send request for next results and because id 2 now is 29 he already see it.
How can I do?
Now in realtime id 2 change
You basically have to take a snapshot of the data if you don't want the data to appear to change to the user. This isn't something that you can do very efficiently in SQL, so I'd recommend downloading the entire result set into a PHP session variable that can be persisted across pages. That way, you can just get rows on demand. There are Javascript widgets that will effectively do the same thing, but will send the entire result set to the client which is a bad idea if you have a lot of data.
This is not as easy to do as pure SQL pagination, as you will have to take responsibility for cleaning the stored var out when it's no longer needed. Otherwise, you'll rather quickly run out of memory.
If you have just a few pages, you could:
Save it to session and page over it, instead of going back to the
database server.
Save it to a JSON object list and use Jquery to read it and page
over it.
Save it to a temp table indicating generation timestamp, user_id and
session_id, and page over it.