Is there any chance how I could write something to ISA card in Visual Basic .Net for Windows XP and higher? (I know Win XP and higher have restriction so U cant directly write data to port)
I have also done some research and if I understand the situation I have only 2 options:
Write driver (very problematic option :)) or
Try to use existing driver in kernel32 like driver to serial/paralel port.
If there arent any other options, how I have to modify "using of serial/paralel port" to use it for ISA port?
Modern versions of Windows will not allow direct port I/O from a user application. Your program is running in Ring 3, not Ring 0. You need some kind of driver to do the port I/O on your application's behalf.
The first thing to do would be to contact the card manufacturer and see if they made a Windows driver for your board.
If a Windows driver is not available, and you are only looking to do basic reigster reads and writes (no interrupts or DMA), there are some freely-downloadable libraries that you can download to do port I/O. Basically, the library includes a dummy "driver" that sits in Ring 0 and does the I/O for you. I have the most experience with WinIO.
WinIO has a C/C++ API, nothing .Net/CLR. You will need to use P/Invoke to call the WinIO functions from managed code.
If you search around, you may find a toolkit similar to WinIO that provides APIs for managed code. (Edit: Here is one I have bookmarked called DirectIO.)
The biggest problem with WinIO is that you are limited to basic register reads/writes. If you need interrupts or DMA, you are out of luck. At that point, you will need to write a "real" driver.
Writing a driver can be a pretty major task for the uninitiated (there is a lot you will screw up). You will need to start by getting a copy of the Windows Driver Kit, and studying Microsoft's Kernel Mode Driver Framework. You could also look into purchasing a copy of Jungo WinDriver. WinDriver is a third party tool that simplifies driver development considerably, but it is quite expensive for a one-off project.
Related
I'm using the same code that is still working for a new version of equipment the company the bought.
I can't communicate with the equipment in vb in visual studio (the language of the last code I wrote). But I can make a simple code in LabVIEW to see if the equipment is communicating and it is.
So, my question is what code is labview sending to the equipment?
The only thing I see from the LabVIEW GUI is *IDN?\n
Is that the same as what I writing?
mySerialport.WriteLine("*idn?" + Chr(10))
*IDN?\n
is not the same as :
mySerialport.WriteLine("*idn?" + Chr(10))
The former is capitalized while the later is not and it may cause an issue depending on the instrument.
You are using the serial port, so the most important thing to consider is the baud rate. It is possible that the later model equipment your company purchased has a different baud rate to the one that was used previously.
If you want to see exactly the data that LabVIEW is sending, you can use NI IO Trace or a non NI serial port monitor such as listed here
The question isn’t what language LabVIEW uses. LabVIEW is a programming environment with library APIs to speak to lots of hardware and the ability for anyone to write code to speak to even more hardware. The question is “what language does the HARDWARE speak?” To answer that, you’d post what kind of hardware it is and probably go to the manufacturer’s website for a spec sheet.
“*IDN?/n” looks like a GPIB command, which is just a framework serial protocol. You’d need the spec sheet of the hardware to know the particular commands that your hardware understands.
PS: LabVIEW doesn’t have a GUI showing anything about hardware communication. You have an application written in LabVIEW that has a GUI that is displaying information. You can edit the program to print out more info if you want, just like you could in VB. Complaining about the “LabVIEW GUI” in this case is equivalent to complaining about the Visual Studio GUI when the problem is with the program you’ve written in VS!
"The only thing I see from the labview GUI is *IDN?/n"
That sounds more like you are using the VISA Test Panel in MAX (Measurement and Automation eXplorer). It is related to LabVIEW in that it is also a tool developed by National Instruments (NI). But it does not sound like you have actually touched LabVIEW itself.
As was already stated, *IDN?\n is a typical command that an instrument that follows the SCPI messaging standard. On a Windows system, that is usually the same as "*idn?" + Chr(13) + Chr(10).
As SeanJ pointed out *IDN?\n is not the same as "idn?". Further, make sure that space character in your calling method is visible. Sometimes machines require you to manually type "\r\n" for complete carriage return.
I have a single button USB controller, but it did not come with any drivers (simply a Windows program that communicates with it directly for its intended purpose).
USB Fidget
Vendor ID: 0x1d34
Product ID: 0x0001
Product name: DL100A Dream Cheeky Generic Controller
So, I would like to be able to read whether or not the button is being pressed. My main development environment is Mac, but I'd like the solution to run on Windows too. So ideally a cross platform solution would be best.
I can find pieces of code for other devices by the same manufacturer but there are differences in Product ID so the code does not work and I lack understanding to change anything other than the vendor/product.
As far as I understand it I need to poll the USB device with a feature request packet?
Is there some software I can use to "watch" the USB device so I can see what is actually happening when I press the button? If not, how would I go about writing some myself?
basically on MacOs very huge amount of usb devices work through IOUserClient. This standart class provide to user mode programs ability to control device without kernel mode driver (by using usermode part of IOKit framework). To sniff for usb packets you can use USB Prober, start from this article http://developer.apple.com/library/mac/#qa/qa1370/_index.html
On windows standart way - standart USB driver + standart HID driver, no need in specific vendor driver if they not develop some additional functionality over standart. You can use any of commercial or freeware tools to sniff usb packets - like this one http://www.hhdsoftware.com/usb-monitor
I don't know of any cross platform way to handle it. This is the presentation I point people to for how to create a driver app for a random piece of HID hardware:
https://developer.apple.com/videos/wwdc/2011/?id=207
For testing / accessing HID devices, i.e.
Get Feature Report (matt's original question)
Sending Feature Reports
Sending Output Reports
Receiving Input reports
I'd suggest the "HIDAPI Test Tool" / "testgui" included in the great cross-platform HID library from signal11/hidapi.
On Windows you require an additional 3rd party package to compile the testgui application, but it was pretty easy and the GUI tool was more straightforward that other code examples and tools I saw. (I could cross-check if I am maybe allowed to publish a VS2008 compiled version of this.)
Another free option for sending output reports and receiving input reports, is our own "Docklight" tool (in evaluation mode, unlimited time, just no storing), see Docklight Scripting HID USB.
I want to develop a USB host on an embedded device that will talk to printers from various vendors. Drivers for the vendor specific printers would be available on PC which is ultimately communicating with printer but my device is facilitating this communication and needs to perform the basic handshaking/setup of the printer (i.e, it needs to know when the printer is connected, what are the socket IDs that needs to be opened for CTRL and DATA transmissions etc). All of these printers are supposed to comply with IEEE 1284.4 standards but I see that many of them vary quiet a bit.
One approach I have is to take the USB traces of handshaking from each of these printers and write various sections of code respectively (I know, that sounds ridiculous!). Is there a generic way to do this? Is there any available forum where these standard informations are mentioned? For eg: EPSON uses 'EPSON-CTRL' and 'EPSON-DATA' for its control and data services which needs to be provided to get the socket ID for these services. I am pretty sure HPs, Canon's etc would have their own service names as well. As per the standards, this was supposed to be captured in IANA but I dont see anything there. Any help on this would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks and regards,
Ullas
No, you can't do this because EPSON and HP will implement their printers differently even if they do the exact same thing. Your "generic" driver will have to explicitly account for each type of printer.
That being said, you could theoretically implement each driver type in your generic driver suite and have it determine which driver to use when the printer becomes available. But, this seems like a bit of overkill since you can just get the drivers free online at the manufacturer's website.
how can i find whether a program has device driver or not (or know program run in ring0 or ring3)
i need function(api) for this in c# or c/c++
like regmon it has device driver
thank
Is it Windows?
(Disclaimer: I have no experience with drivers. I'm just finding information from Google)
To find out whether a certain piece of code actually runs in ring0, you will need a kernel mode debuger, like WinDbg.
To find out whether a certain ring3 program communicates with a certain driver, use SysInternals Process Explorer and see if the ring3 program opens any files that says "\Device\something"
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en/Vsexpressvc/thread/5bc594a5-b593-4368-a2b3-31cc5f4a7ddb
http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/resources/default.mspx
Link
Another sign that a program uses a device driver is that if it imports/invokes the DeviceIoControl Function.
I'm working on MPSOC, specially STM ST40 (SH4 base) and ST231 and I'm wondering which OS i can use on these to port a parallel application, I already had a look at STLinux which is the STM distribution of a Linux platform for their MPSOC (which unfortunately doesn't work well for ST231 coprocessors) and I also had a look at OS21 which is a task based OS.
Any information about other RTOS are warmly welcome! (specially those with libc and pthreads :)
Those 4 came to my mind:
MicroC/OS-II: Its free and simple, but i think there are too few good resources available
LibeRTOS: I can recommend that. I used it several times for different projects. It's good it's fast and the dual kernel concept is really well done.
RTLinux: Can't tell you much about that one. Only used it once for a very small project and didn't get deep "behind the scenes" But it was fast and reliable. (and very expensive)
VxWorks: Awesome OS... From Wikipedia:
multitasking kernel with preemptive and round-robin scheduling and fast interrupt response
Memory protection to isolate user applications from the kernel
SMP support
Fast, flexible inter-process communication including TIPC
Error handling framework
Binary, counting, and mutual exclusion semaphores with priority inheritance
Local and distributed message queues
Full ANSI C compliance and enhanced C++ features for exception handling and template support
POSIX PSE52 certified conformance
File system.
IPv6 Networking stack
VxSim simulator
Supports: C/C++/JAVA
If money is no problem: Use VxWorks! You can do anything: Upgrade your fridge, built a war machine or fly to Mars ;-)
Otherwise check out LibeRTOS...
If you really want ot use an RTOS, be prepared to use a native API that is way more efficient and streamlined than pthreads...
I have used Micrium's µC/OS-II on several projects, on SH4 and a couple of different ColdFires. I continue to recommend it for new projects today.
Micrium has just announced a major upgrade to be called µC/OS-III that will add unlimited preemptively scheduled threads, as well as a round-robin scheduler for equal priority threads. It doesn't appear to be for sale yet, however.
If you need the capabilities, they also have a FAT file system, a PEG graphical UI library, USB device and host, and TCP/IP available for additional license fees.
Source code to everything is included in the price, and I've always found their support to be friendly and knowledgeable.
With the processors you mention you seem to be into set-top boxes.
You have the choice between the ST Linux distro, which is not very stable and the OSXX distro, which is proprietary for ST, but much more stable and with nice tools for debugging and the like (I'm not so sure about OSCC and libc/pthreads)
Barebones/AMP - because it allows 100% control and it allows the lowest latency.
Using Linux or FreeRTOS is very comfortable but it comes with a price tag.