Replace "via Graph API Explorer" label by my application name - api

I am quite new in Facebook application development. I was playing the all day with "how to post a message on the wall of a page?". I finally succeeded but each message got "via Graph API Explorer". I tried to find how to change it to my application name without success. I tried to see if I could force the value of application in the api command but it did not take it into account. Maybe I miss something :( If someone can help, that would be great!
I am still quite confused. Let me try to explain what I want to do: I would like to automatically publish on a page (as the page) some event that are defined on a website (in a kind of agenda). What I miss, I think, is how everything is working together on Facebook side:
1. the login process: as the application will run in a cron, this should not display a login dialog box.
2. the access token: application or page one?
3. the permissions: from my understanding, I need manage_pages (and publish_stream) but not clear how this should be set.
Thx for any clarification and maybe a clear example :o)

You need the user to authorise your own App using one of the Login flows and grant you one of the publishing Permissions -
If it says 'via Graph API Explorer' on the posts your app makes you're using the access token you retrieved when you were testing the API using the Graph API Explorer tool, not one produced by your own app

OK I think I have finally found the way to do it. I needed a page access code and not an application access code. The token must be generated outside the application as a long live one.
Get a code using:
https://www.facebook.com/dialog/oauth?client_id={app_id}&redirect_uri={my_url}&scope=manage_pages,publish_stream
app_id is your application ID
my_url is your application URL
scope is the permission you want to be granted
In the redirected URL, you will have a code parameter. Copy it.
Generate the user access code using:
https://graph.facebook.com/oauth/access_token?client_id={app_id}&redirect_uri={my_url}&client_secret={app_secret}&code={code}
app_secret is your application secret key
code is the code from step 1
You will get as output the user access token. This one is a short live one.
convert the short live to a long live user access token using:
https://graph.facebook.com/oauth/access_token?grant_type=fb_exchange_token&client_id={app_id}&client_secret={app_secret}&fb_exchange_token={short live access token}
Replace the "short live access token" by the one you got on step 2
You will get as output the infinite user access token.
Get the page access token (this one will be infinite access token as
the user access token is now an infinite access token too):
https://graph.facebook.com/me/accounts?access_token={infinite user access token}
Replace the "infinite user access token" with the value you got on step 3.
This command will list all the pages you administer. The output contains the page access token you need in field "access_token". You can so use this token in any API command in your application.
The best of the best is to do all those steps via a server side program (PHP for me) as the application secret key should remain "secret".

Related

How is the access_type=online oauth mode (no refresh token) supposed to work?

This question is has a lot in common to the previous question Google OAuth: can't get refresh token with authorization code (and I won't be offended if it's considered a duplicate) but there are some differences: that question uses the Javascript and PHP libraries, and I'm using neither of those. That question wants to know how to get a refresh token, and I want to know if I should want a refresh token, or how the mode with no refresh tokens is intended to work.
I'm following this guide:
https://developers.google.com/identity/protocols/OAuth2WebServer
The goal is to allow users to upload files from Google Drive to my web application.
I'm not using one of Google's favored programming languages, so I don't have a library abstracting away all the interaction with Google. I need to know what the HTTP requests should actually should look like.
One of the parameters in the authorization request is access_type. The description says
Set the value to offline if your application needs to refresh access tokens when the user is not present at the browser.
I won't need to do that (I'll only want to retrieve a file on my server immediately after the user selects it) so in the spirit of not asking for more privileges than you really need, I used access_type=online. This gives me an access token and no refresh token. I've successfully used the access token to make some requests to Google Drive.
The user comes back the next day and tries to upload another file. While processing this request from the user, I make a request to Google Drive. The access token is expired, so I get a 401. What's supposed to happen next?
My guess is I should pretend this is a completely new user and send them through the full authorization process again. That would mean I have to abort whatever the user was trying to do, redirect them to https://accounts.google.com/o/oauth2/auth with all the parameters (scope, client_id, etc.) and embed enough information in the state parameter that I can resume the original request when the user gets back from their detour.
This seems rather difficult (in particular the part about saving and resuming the state of my application at some arbitrary point). It's a big enough obstacle that it should be explained somewhere. But the description of the access_type parameter didn't say anything about needing to insert authorization redirects everywhere. It just said the user must be "present".
You are using the right implementation. You don't need offline access if you aren't going to make requests when the user is not using the application. The thing is that access tokens expire in 1 hour. So you need to generate new access tokens if a user leaves the application and come back later.
If users have authorized your application, calling this URL with your configuration should return a new valid access token:
https://accounts.google.com/o/oauth2/v2/auth?
scope=scopes&
include_granted_scopes=true&
state=state_parameter_passthrough_value&
redirect_uri=http://oauth2.example.com/callback&
response_type=token&
client_id=client_id

Keycloak - Multi/2FA Factor - OTP - QR Code - Custom Login Screen - Rest API

I have my own Login page where user enters username/password.
This username/password are used to login through Keycloak Rest API.
http://localhost:8080/auth/realms/Demo/protocol/openid-connect/token
input - {username,password,grant_type,client_secret,client_id}
And in response i get access token.
Now i wish to enable Authenticator (Google Authenticator). I have enabled it from backend. Now if user wishes to login thorugh my application, my login page i need to get below details.
1.) Somehow i need to include QR Code that appears on keycloak login page post username/password validation to show on my login screen for the first time login once user enter username/password. So do we have any API which return Keycloak QR code image in response.
2.) Subsequent login i will have OTP field, so need a REST api to pass OTP along with username/password.
Please help with REST API if keycloak has any. Integrating through Javascript.
Similar flow as described in use case 1 here
Just want to use keycloak as a database, doing all operation for me, input will be my screen. I do want redirection of URL's while login in and yet should be standalone deployed.
I've managed to implement this through the rest API of Keycloak. To realize this, you need to extend Keycloak yourself with a SPI. To do this create your own Java project and extend org.keycloak.services.resource.RealmResourceProvider and org.keycloak.services.resource.RealmResourceProviderFactory. You can find more information in the official docs (https://www.keycloak.org/docs/latest/server_development/#_extensions), github examples and other stack overflow posts how to do this.
Once you got this up and running you can implement it like this:
#GET
#Path("your-end-point-to-fetch-the-qr")
#Produces({MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON})
public YourDtoWithSecretAndQr get2FASetup(#PathParam("username") final String username) {
final RealmModel realm = this.session.getContext().getRealm();
final UserModel user = this.session.users().getUserByUsername(username, realm);
final String totpSecret = HmacOTP.generateSecret(20);
final String totpSecretQrCode = TotpUtils.qrCode(totpSecret, realm, user);
return new YourDtoWithSecretAndQr(totpSecret, totpSecretQrCode);
}
#POST
#Path("your-end-point-to-setup-2fa")
#Consumes("application/json")
public void setup2FA(#PathParam("username") final String username, final YourDtoWithData dto) {
final RealmModel realm = this.session.getContext().getRealm();
final UserModel user = this.session.users().getUserByUsername(username, realm);
final OTPCredentialModel otpCredentialModel = OTPCredentialModel.createFromPolicy(realm, dto.getSecret(), dto.getDeviceName());
CredentialHelper.createOTPCredential(this.session, realm, user, dto.getInitialCode(), otpCredentialModel);
}
The secret received with the GET must be send back with the POST. The initial code is the one from your 2FA app (e.g. Google Authenticator). The QR code is a string which can be displayed in an img with src 'data:image/png;base64,' + qrCodeString;
I know this is an old question, but I've recently been looking at something similar, and so thought it would be potentially valuable to share what I have found for others who may be looking into this and wondered what the possibilities are.
TL;DR
You can only really use the existing Keycloak actions to do this or embed the user account management page found at https://{keycloak server URL}/auth/realms/{realm name}/account in an iframe. That's it, I'm afraid. In my opinion it is currently best to just assign actions directly to accounts or use the Credential Reset emails to assign actions; both of these can be done via the Admin API if desired:
Send Credential Reset email containing assigned actions:
https://www.keycloak.org/docs-api/11.0/rest-api/index.html#_executeactionsemail
Set actions directly on the account (include the actions in the requiredActions portion of the user JSON that you send in the body to the endpoint):
https://www.keycloak.org/docs-api/11.0/rest-api/index.html#_updateuser
Background is that as part of a project that I have been working on we wanted to see if we could have an integrated way for users to set up their initial password and OTP device when a new account has been created for them, since the default method of sending them an email from Keycloak using the "Credential Reset" functionality has the limitations that a) it doesn't provide a link to the application itself unless you override the theme, and if you have multiple instances of the application for different users you have no way of knowing which instance to provide the link for, so may have to end up including a list of them, and b) it often doesn't feel truly native to the application, even with changes to the theme. If you're sensible though, I'd suggest you stop and just use this functionality - please see the TL;DR section above for details.
So, in short there is NO API endpoint for receiving a QR code to set up an OTP device. There are two places, however, where the QR code can be retrieved from - the OTP device setup screen when you log in as a user who has had a "Configure OTP" action assigned to their account, and the user's own account management screen.
The first option of the Configure OTP action screen is a non-starter. It only shows up when you log in, and so by definition the user has to log in to Keycloak via the Keycloak login page in order to trigger the page to be displayed. At this point you're already on a Keycloak page instead of one of your app's pages, and so unless you can get very creative with changes to these Keycloak pages via a custom theme, tapping into this page isn't really an option.
The second option is more interesting, but far from ideal. Every user who has logged in has access to an account management page that can be found at https://{keycloak server URL}/auth/realms/{realm name}/account. This page allows you to do things like change your name, password, etc. and it also allows you to add an OTP device if you don't already have one, or delete any existing OTP devices associated with your account. This OTP device tab of the account management page can be reached directly via https://{keycloak server URL}/auth/realms/{realm name}/account/totp.
As I mentioned, there isn't an API that you can access to view the QR code that shows up on this page. The only way it is accessible is via the GET request to https://{keycloak server URL}/auth/realms/{realm name}/account/totp, which returns the HTML for the page I've already mentioned. Okay great, so can we scrape the QR code programmatically and then put it in our own page on our application? Err, no, not really. You see, whilst a lot of the Keycloak API endpoints rightly allow you to send a bearer token (e.g. access token) in the authorization header to access and endpoint, this page will not accept a bearer token as a means of authentication/authorization. Instead it uses a session cookie that is locked down to the Keycloak URL. This cookie is set when you log in to your application via the Keycloak login page, and so is available to this account management page when you navigate to it, having already logged in, and since the account management page uses the same server and domain name as the original Keycloak login page, it has access to the cookie and can let you in. This cookie cannot be sent by your application to e.g. your own REST API to then programmatically call the account management page and scrape the QR code, because your application doesn't have access to it for good security reasons. This might be something you can change in Keycloak somewhere, but if there is I would strongly recommend against changing it.
So if we can't scrape the page from our own server, can we do something on the front-end? Well, as mentioned, your application doesn't have access to the session cookie but if you make a request (e.g. using fetch or axios) in your front-end JavaScript to the account management page then that request will send the cookie along with it, so that could work right? Umm, well actually you will get hit with an error message in this scenario due to CORS. CORS is Cross-Origin-Resource-Sharing and in order to allow the Keycloak page to be accessed then you would have to open up the settings on the server to allow it to be accessed from your website's address. I've seen some articles that look at how you can open up your CORS settings on Keycloak if you wish but I'd be very nervous about doing this. I don't know enough about the internals of Keycloak and how it operates to comment on how much of a security risk this is, but I certainly wouldn't recommend it. There some information here (Keycloak angular No 'Access-Control-Allow-Origin' header is present) on changing the "Web Origins" setting of your application's Keycloak client, but this opens up your application to some serious potential abuse. There is also the MAJOR issue that even if you scraped the QR code, the device isn't actually added to the user's account (even though it appears in the authenticator app) until you enter a code into the page that the QR code is on and click Save. Since there isn't an API endpoint that you can use to complete this operation, I therefore don't think that this option is viable either. I've tried out whether or not you can use the token retrieval endpoint at https://{keycloak server URL}/auth/realms/{realm name}/protocol/openid-connect/token to see if making a request with your username/password/otp code will somehow "register" your device and complete the process, but although you can get a token this way, and it doesn't complain about the otp code, it doesn't actually take any notice of the code because as far as it's concerned the user's account doesn't have a device registered with it. So we have to use the form on the account management page in order to complete this registration process.
So the final way of possibly doing this is.... an iframe. Sorry, yeah it's rubbish but that's all your left with. You can have the iframe point at your account management page, and because the user is logged in then they will be able to see the contents from your application's page. You can use relative positioning, fixed width and height and remove scroll bars to ensure that you ONLY show the QR code and the fields for the one time code, device name, and the Save/Cancel buttons. This, sadly, seems to be the only option at the moment, and due to how nasty and unreliable iframes can be in general - they certainly don't feel native to your application, and you'll need to override your Keycloak theme to get the page in question to look more like your app - I'd recommend steering clear of this and using the standard approach of using Keycloak actions and the Admin API instead.
If you've made it this far, congratulations, you win at Stack Overflow :-)

SoapUI Automated OAuth2 token retrieval issue

I'm a new user with SoapUI, but I feel like this process should be easy. I've read all of the documentation I can find on this matter but I can't seem to get around this.
The issue:
I am working on load testing a website for a customer, this will involve creating 1000 accounts and navigating through a course signup process. I've managed to create test cases that step through the creation process for a new user, upon creating the new user the website automatically does an OAuth2 process and redirects the user to their profile. The way this process flows is: account created > credentials sent to a token URI in the REQUEST > RESPONSE kicks back an access token > token is used to grab credentials and redirect user to profile.
I have successfully extracted the token as a variable and stored it to the local test case, however this is where I get stuck. The only way I am able to retrieve the user profile is by manually pasting the access token into the OAuth2 access token field in SoapUI, then running the test case. Since I have to do this with 1000 accounts, this is obviously not an effective method.
I've attempted to grab ElementIDs of the login page/user creation page using the automated access token script editor, but all of these fields are located in a separate .js script, therefore the ElementID doesn't exist in SoapUI.
Am I going about this wrong, or is there someway this can be done? I'm not looking for anyone to write my code, merely explain this process if I'm understanding it incorrectly.
I managed to bypass the OAuth2 Authentication method by creating a Groovy Script that grabs the "Set-Cookie" header from the token call then adds the cookie to each call afterwards.
This method appears to have solved the issue!
import com.eviware.soapui.support.types.StringToStringMap
def getcookie = context.testCase.testSteps["Token"].testRequest.response.responseHeaders["Set-Cookie"][0]
def headers = new StringToStringMap()
headers.put('Cookie', getcookie)
testRunner.testCase.getTestStepByName('Get User').testRequest.setRequestHeaders(headers)

Facebook Login without JSSDK, how to get token if already authorized previously

So I am updating an older desktop app (written in VB, .net 4.0) with facebook integration and followed the guide found here, and have been able to successfully get a token (by parsing the uri of the embedded webview if it contains "token="). Now my problem is if I try to login with a facebook account that has already approved the app in a prior session, the webview just gets redirected to https://www.facebook.com/connect/login_success.html without any token information.
Do I HAVE to log all of the tokens I generate manually (ie on successful token generation, I can call their profile info, use their FB ID as key and save the token)? Even if I do, since the email and password is input directly into the facebook login window, how do I check if the user already has a token?
Thanks in advance
The access token can change any time, you need to get it everytime. After getting the token, I immediately get the user information https://graph.facebook.com/me?access_token=??? and use that ID to find their database information.
I couldn't quickly find facebook information but on google's oauth information it says "The access token is also associated with a limited scope that define the kind of data the your client application has access to (for example "Manage your tasks"). An important goal for OAuth 2.0 is to provide secure and convenient access to the protected data, while minimizing the potential impact if an access token is stolen."
https://code.google.com/p/google-api-php-client/wiki/OAuth2
Ok so I finally figured it out myself. My mistake was apparently requesting the access_token directly (ie https://www.facebook.com/dialog/oauth?response_type=token...) to try and save time.
I fixed it by making a request for a 'code' instead (ie https://www.facebook.com/dialog/oauth?response_type=code), which I then use to make a second request to retrieve an access token as documented here: https://developers.facebook.com/docs/facebook-login/login-flow-for-web-no-jssdk/, "Exchanging code for an access token" section a bit lower on the page.
Hope this helps someone in the future, this was very frustrating on my part.
Regards,
Prince

When is access_type = Online appropriate? :OAuth2 - Google API

When requesting OAuth credentials, I can specify the access_type to be Offline or Online.
Opting for the Online access type forces the users to approve access to my app each time they login. Why is that? Hasn't the user already approved my app?
Update #1:
I have my approval_prompt set to 'auto'.
If I just log out of Google without deleting any cookies, it doesn't prompt me again. But deleting the cookies brings back the grant screen.
Update #2:
It works fine through the OAuth Playground. http://code.google.com/oauthplayground/
Using OAuth 2.0 for Web Server Applications
https://developers.google.com/accounts/docs/OAuth2WebServer
Update #3:
Relevant code snippets
Helper method to generate OAuth URL
def build_auth_uri
return #client.authorization.authorization_uri(
:access_type => :online,
:approval_prompt => :auto
).to_s
end
Calling the Helper method in the View
Connect Me!
Generated OAuth URL on the webpage
https://accounts.google.com/o/oauth2/auth?access_type=online&approval_prompt=auto&redirect_uri=http://localhost:3000/gclient/gcallback&response_type=code
There is one other parameter that comes into play in these flows and I suspect you're running into it. It's the approval_prompt parameter.
When access_type=online you are also allowed to specify a value for approval_prompt. If it is set to approval_prompt=force, your user will always be prompted, even if they have already granted.
On the other hand, when access_type=offline, approval_prompt can only be set to approval_prompt=force, but to make up for this restriction you're also provided a refresh_token which you can use to refresh your access token.
Check the URL that your access_type=online is opening. Try setting approval_prompt=auto. The grant screen should only appear the first time.