I am developing in DX 10/11, & when I tried the code on another computer with a NV 660, it said that d3dx11d_43 was not found. I reinstalled the Visual C++ 2012 32/64 bit & DirectX Runtime, but still says that. I think that the user needs to install the SDK or something.
I get the warning that the debug info cant be found.
From what I have reading, it is because I have something that depends on something debug related. No idea what though.
Is there a way to make the game compile with most, if not all, of the DLLs? I dont mind the extra size. The content of many games out-weigh the extra DLLs that are used.
I did compile as Release.
Edit:
Removed 1st question, since no one answered it.
You can add the dlls you need to the resource file, then compile the resource file to your exe file, and at last, parse the resource file at run time to get the dlls you need. here is a similar question, you can take a look.
d3dx11d_43 is a debug version of d3dx11_43 which your program links with when you do a debug build rather than a release build. The debug version is not included in the directx runtime installer, only in the SDK.
The license does not allow you to distribute it either.
You should build and distribute release versions of the code, or else require users to install the SDK which probably wouldn't be so popular!
Related
I have just installed DM 3.4 and am generally quite satisfied. Though, I have one issue concerning a custom .dll which causes the warning
"You have incompatible plug-ins on your system. Do you want to load these potentially harmful plug-ins?"
If I press yes everything works normally and I trust the author of the .dll hence I'd like to suppress this warning.
Is there anything like an ignore list in which one can force to load the .dll straight?
No there isn't, and it is there for a good reason. Regardless of your trust to the other author, the used DLL was not compiled with the correct version of the SDK. As a result, even the most tested and well written code can produce completely unexpected random crashes.
The warning is there to make you aware of this and don't report "bugs" of GMS which aren't any.
If the 3rd party DLL is important to you, please contact the original author and request that he rebuilds the DLL with the required version of the SDK.
I've got a strange question that I can't seem to find any answers for. I'm building a quite simple application for sending/receving data from/to a PCB, and the application itself builds, but when I exited Atmel Studio (Version 7.0) and reopened the project, the library files no longer built. At least that's what I think happened. I didn't change any code between building the project before and after restart of the program. It has happened before, and that time I solved it by creating the project from scratch, but I'd really like that not to be the only solution. I've also tried restarting the program again, as well as the computer. I also removed and re-added the library.
Has anyone encountered the same issue? If so, any help in the right direction would be greatly appreciated. Information on my system and error messages below:
I'm building for the ATSAMV71N21B board, with Atmel Studio 7.0. I've imported the lwip library trough the ASF wizard, and these files built before the program restart.
These are the files that won't build:
The 122 build errors mainly consists of "expected expression before 'struct'" and undeclared functions and variables, even though these clearly are defined in the various files in the library.
It ended up being because of my NO_SYS setting being 1. When I switched it to 0, everything built, (except for sys_check_timeouts(), but I think I'll find another answer for this). Keeping this here for reference if anyone needs it one day.
I've been tearing my hair out over this, and Google hasn't yielded much so my problem must be caused by my own specific brand of stupidity.
Basically, having installed Xcode 4 I removed the /Developer-old folder (properly, can't remember the command but I used the uninstall script rather than sticking it in the trash).
Xcode builds projects fine, and the latest version of all the Objective-C frameworks seem to live in /System/Library/Frameworks, but when I compile something (which built fine in the Xcode 3 days) clang complains that it can't find any headers, e.g:
fatal error: 'Cocoa/Cocoa.h' file not found
I've tried forcing the framework search path with -F to no avail- is there a common underlying issue or have I just screwed my machine?
Reinstall the developer tools. It will take a lot less time than tracking down whatever you broke.
I have compiled shared libraries dynamically linked against libstdc++.so using GLIBCXX_3.4.11. I want to send my code to someone whose stdc++ library is only of version 3.4.10. Rather than ask him to update his library version (this is a software customer, so I can't assume they'll be willing or able to change system files) I would like to ship the appropriate version of libstdc++.so, placed in a lib folder with the directory location of my code. How do I get my own code to use the appropriate (later) version? I find that /etc/ld.so.conf includes the directory /lib64, where an offending older version of libstdc++.so resides. Setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH does not override this. This seems to deviate from the advertised behavior. Any idea why this is happening? How do I complete my rather simple task?
Thanks.
I understand that this question is old, but I found it while trying to sort out my own linking trouble which was similar. You will have to build your program against a version of libstdc++ which is compatible with your colleague's version of the library. The easiest solution, of course, is to link against his version of the library so he doesn't need to make special tweaks on his side to link your library.
To do this, you will want to install a version of GCC which can build binary compatible libraries so you can actually link against his version of libstdc++. GLIBCXX_3.4.11 is from gcc-4.4 and later, so you will need gcc-4.3. Build your program using this and you should be in good shape.
You can consult the following page for a list of library ABI compatabilities:
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/manual/abi.html
You could also build an rpm/deb which requires the version of libstdc++ you already have and if it's not available, refuse to install. This gives you a bit of an interface which gives him a promise that if his system is setup with the correct dependencies, he can use your library. In that sense, it's like a loose SLA for your library in what you do and don't support.
Hope that helps!
I have built a .dll under WinXP that claims it can't find DWMAPI.DLL when it's loaded. The problem is that this DLL is a Vista DLL, and this a known issue for XP users that have IE7 installed. The recommendation is to uninstall IE7 or repair the .NET Framework via Add/Remove programs. I did the repair, and nothing changed. I'm not about to uninstall IE7 since there must be a better solution that's not the equivalent of "reinstall windows".
I've read bad things about people who attempted to uninstall IE7, so I'm reluctant to go that route.
I am using C++ under Visual Studio 2003 (7.1). I don't see an option where I may have forced delay loading at application launch. I just used default settings when I created the DLL project. I did just now find an interesting option, Linker->Input->Delay Loaded DLLs, so I put DWMAPI.DLL in there to force it to be delay-loaded. However, I get this when linking:
LINK : warning LNK4199: /DELAYLOAD:dwmapi.dll ignored; no imports found from dwmapi.dll
.. and it of course didn't change a thing when trying to load my DLL. For the heck of it, I added the whole tree of DLLs that lead to DWMAPI.DLL, and I get the same message. (For the record, it's foundation.dll->shell32.dll->shdocvw.dll->mshtml.dll->ieframe.dll->dwmapi.dll .)
To be more specific about what I'm doing, I am writing a Maya plugin and get the always-helpful text in the script editor:
// Error: Unable to dynamically load : D:/blahblahblah/mydll.mll
The specified module could not be found.
//
// Error: The operation completed successfully.
//
// Error: The operation completed successfully.
(mydll) //
I used Dependency Walker to initially track down the problem, and that's what lead me to DWMAPI.DLL. These are the message depends gives me, and DWMAPI.DLL is the only thing that has a yellow question mark next to it:
Warning: At least one delay-load dependency module was not found.
Warning: At least one module has an unresolved import due to a missing export function in a delay-load dependent module.
Gerald is right. Maya is, in fact, using a different PATH than the Dependency Walker. My plug-in loads another DLL (for image processing) that lives in the Maya plug-ins directory and depends found it with no problem, but Maya didn't. I had to add ";plug-ins" to the PATH in Maya.env.
Seeing as this problem wasn't related to DWMAPI.DLL after all, but DWMAPI is a common problem, I'll post the best link I found about the DWMAPI issue on Novell's website here. Basically, most programs will have this warning in depends.exe, but if there is a delay-load icon next to it, and you are sure that the program won't directly or indirectly call DWMAPI, then it's fine. The problem is elsewhere. If the delay-load icon isn't present, then you have to look at the /DELAY and /DELAYLOAD options in Visual Studio. The fact that depends gave me a "warning" and not an "error" was a clue to the fact that DWMAPI is not being loaded automatically.
Based on your updated problem, DWMAPI.dll is probably not your problem. Dependency walker will always give you that error whenever you are linking to mshtml as it always checks delay loaded DLLs.
At this point my best guess is that you have your project set to dynamically load the runtime libraries and the search path for DLLs is being changed by Maya. So it may be unable to find the MSVC runtime DLL(s). I haven't developed Maya plugins in a long time, but I've had that problem with other apps that have plugin DLLs recently.
Try changing your setting in C/C++->Code Generation->Runtime Library to Multi-Threaded rather than Multi-Threaded DLL.
Aside from that you can try fiddling with Dependency Walker to make it use the same search paths as Maya and see if you can come up with another dependency problem.
As a last resort you can launch Maya in a debugger and set a breakpoint on LoadLibrary and find out which library is not being loaded that way.
This is a tricky one. There's really 2 main ways you will get this error.
1) You have your project set to force delay loaded DLLs to load at application launch. DWMAPI.dll is a delay-loaded DLL and thus normally will not be loaded unless one of it's functions is called. That won't happen on XP unless you're trying to do it in your DLL. But it's possible to set a compiler option to force your app to load the delay loaded DLLs anyway. If you're doing that, don't.
2) It's often a false error that you will get from depends.exe when there is another problem. Run your DLL through dependency walker and see if there are any other dependency problems. If all else fails, try uninstalling IE7 and see if the problem persists. If it is a false error, after you install IE7 you will see the real error. You can install IE7 again afterwards.
I had exactly this problem.
Sneaky problem that took hours to solve.
Anyway. I compiled my managed C++ application on the release machine. Got complaints from customers that could not run it, worked like a charm on all of our machines.
It turned out that the release machine was automatically patched one night a month ago with the ATL vulnerability fix, and so was all other machines also, except one XP machine.
That particulare XP machine could not run the application either. Installed the ATL fix (see link below), and voilá, every thing worked just like before.
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=766A6AF7-EC73-40FF-B072-9112BAB119C2&displaylang=en
So lesson learned, always check your intermediate manifests (found the in debug or release directory), that will tell you what version of the DLL that the program have been linked against.
Hope it helps anyone.
Try changing your setting in C/C++->Code Generation->Runtime Library to Multi-Threaded rather than Multi-Threaded DLL.