Suppose I have a class Foo. I also have a view on Foo called Foo_Foo that lists a many-to-many association between Foos. I mapped this association as a simple immutable set on each Foo, with cascade="none":
<set name="association" table="Foo_Foo" cascade="none" mutable="false">
<key column="ParentFoo" />
<many-to-many class="Foo, MyAssembly" column="BaseFoo" />
</set>
However, when I try to delete a Foo, NHibernate tries and rightly fails to delete the Foo.association.
How can I prevent NHibernate from trying to delete the association to a view?
The collection belongs to Foo. You can't share the collection, so there is no need to keep it in the database. Cascade is used to tell NH if the referenced Foos should be also deleted or not.
Why do you want the Foo_Foo records to keep in the database? If this should be a bidirectional many-to-many self reference, it doesn't work like this.
Edit, after understanding the question.
Cascade doesn't work in your case, because it affects only the referenced Foos.
To avoid inserts / updates and deletes of the collection table, you may try one of the following:
First obvious attempt is mutable="false", which you already tried. I don't really understand why it isn't working. You may ask in the Nhibernate user group.
Less obvious, but promising is inverse="true". Inverse tells NH that the collection is mapped somewhere else and doesn't need to be stored from here. So it just omits inserts, but I don't know about deletes.
If this doesn't work, you need to explore more complex solutions. You could map it as a one-to-many of an intermediate entity which references the Foos. The intermediate entity is a mapping to the view. It is immutable (which still may lead to delete statements). In this case, cascade="false" will work (because it is the referenced entity). It will also work configure insert, update and delete sql statements (which are empty), but this is most probably not even necessary.
Related
Here's my problem: I have a set of ids. These are the ids of a collection of root entities. Now I want to delete all these root entities, efficiently.
I can't do a WHERE Id IN (1, 2, 3) type of clause, as I'm deleting root entities with children.
I'm wondering if it's possible to avoid retrieving all root entities and deleting them one by one. The problem with that approach isn't so much the SELECT, it's have lots of separate DELETE statement.
Is it possible for NHibernate to batch this, including the delete of all the children? Extra complexity: children can have their own children.
So I'd want NHibernate to first delete the 'bottom-most' children with an IN-clause (maybe multiples ones), then the children with an IN-clause, and then finally the root entities with an IN-clause.
If this isn't possible, what's a good approach to delete multiple root entities efficiently with NHibernate?
UPDATE
This is not valid in your case where you had a list of ids (didn't read your question properly).
First, batch deletes of the "parents" can be made setting adonet.batch_size, http://nhibernate.info/doc/nh/en/index.html#performance-batch-updates.
END UPDATE
Secondly, to avoid reading the children (and generate deletes for these), you can set the cascading delete to happen on db level by setting ON CASCADE DELETE as a foreign key constraints.
Eg (note the on-delete attr)
<set name="TheCollection" inverse="true" cascade="save-update">
<key name="theKey" on-delete="cascade"/>
<one-to-many class="TheType"/>
</set>
Note that
this only works on inverse (bidirectional) relationships.
your db schema needs to be updated with this fk constraint
don't use cascade="all" or similar where deletes are included
Might help using the Session.Delete statement passing an array of IDs? I believe this will delete the whole map for those objects matching the IDs in the array.
Session.Delete("from MyTable t where t.ID in :IDs", IDs, NHibernate.NHibernateUtil.Guid);
where IDs is an array of Guids in this case, but could be any object.
I am developping a ASP.NET with VB using NHIBERNATE to map the tables of a pre-existing database (SQL Server 2005). I have a many-to-many relationship between to entities, that I map like this:
<list name="PropName" table="TableHoldingRelation" lazy="false" >
<key column="idEntity1"></key>
<index column ="orderingColumn" ></index>
<many-to-many class="Entity2" column="idEntity2"></many-to-many>
</list>
The mapping works perfectly and the list(of Entity2) its ordered by the selected column.
The problem is that this column is not continuous, as there might be some values missing (ie: 0,1,3,8). NHibernate is leaving those spaces as null/nothing elements. I would want to have the list "compacted", only containing existing elements, ordered by that column.
Can I achieve this without having to update the database? (updating is not a good solution as it probably will happen in the future that some elements get removed)
Thanks in advance for your help.
EDIT: A bit more info in the problem.
The tables/entities in this case refer to Menus and MenuItems. The application that I am working is is a very complex website, with lots of diferent roles. Each role has his unique menus congfiguration, with their unique items. There are even single users with unique settings. My task is to rewrite the .NET clases and mappings, as they are really messy and other things not relevant for this question. So the database design I am mapping is (for this question, obviously there are other tables):
One table holding menus and their attributes(like wich role do they correspond to)
One table holding menuitems and their attributes (like a link they point to)
One table holding de relation menu-menuitem and a "position"/order column inside that menu.
Just in case more insight on the problem was needed.
As you can read here NHibernate Mapping - <list/> - by Ayende, this behaviour is by design. An extract from comments (close to your question):
...Because in general, having NH doing something like that for you can be
bad. There is a meaning to null values.
But broadly, it is because it is not the responsibility of NHibernate
to do so. If you want something like that, you don't need a list, you
need an ordered set...
With this we can try to change your mapping (see the order-by attribute):
<bag name="PropName" table="TableHoldingRelation"
order-by="orderingColumn"
lazy="false" >
<key column="idEntity1"></key>
<many-to-many class="Entity2" column="idEntity2"></many-to-many>
</bag>
But, this mapping won't allow you to insert into that column orderingColumn.
This documentation 24. Best Practices says:
Don't use exotic association mappings.
Good usecases for a real many-to-many associations are rare. Most of
the time you need additional information stored in the "link table".
In this case, it is much better to use two one-to-many associations to
an intermediate link class. In fact, we think that most associations
are one-to-many and many-to-one, you should be careful when using any
other association style and ask yourself if it is really neccessary.
So, maybe introduce the man-in-the middle pairing object, put the management of the OrderBy property there, and use the sorted list..
I have an object hierarchy as follows:
Object
Reports
Report Items
Based on other posts here, I set the Report.ReportItems mapping to Inverse, and CascadeAllDeleteOrphan. This makes it so when I remove a Report from an Object it goes to erase the ReportItems in that report.
The way it does it is very inefficient. It basically does a Delete ... Where ReportItemID = ?.
I've seen suggestions to increase the batch size to prevent this from being done in too many round trips, but that seems like a sloppy fix. Is there a way to make NHibernate generate a query like this instead:
Delete ... Where ReportID = ?
This way it would execute one query that would delete all the ReportItems instead of one statement per ReportItem.
Thanks in advance.
Edit
I have heard from a few people that NHibernate will simply not work this way with standard QueryOver etc.
I decided to start using HQL to fix the problem. I will later use some reflection to make sure there are no "magic strings" being used.
I had the idea to:
Use HQL to mass-delete the Report Items
Tell the Session to Refresh the object so it could detect that the Report Items are gone
Then tell the session to erase the Report, and let it clean up the remaining information
This does not work though. You can see the code below:
Session.CreateQuery("delete ReportItem r where r.Report= :report").SetEntity("report", SelectedReport).ExecuteUpdate()
Session.Refresh(SelectedReport)
Object.Reports.Remove(SelectedReport)
Session.Delete(SelectedReport)
Session.Update(Object)
I have also tried doing a Session.Evict after performing the HQL statements, but NHibernate keeps using the cache to try to delete the ReportItems. Any tips on how to do this?
If your foreign key has delete rule set to cascade then you can tell NH not to generate DELETE statements for child items when the parent is deleted. In this case NH will generate DELETE statement only for parent entity.
<bag name="ReportItems" cascade="all-delete-orphan" inverse="true">
<key column="report_id" on-delete="cascade" />
<one-to-many class="ReportItem" />
</bag>
After a lot of research I have found that this is simply not possible. You can use HQL, raw SQL statements, or rely on database rules to perform the deletes by enforcing a relationship. However, there is no way to tell NHibernate to delete a list of objects based on their owner's ID.
looking at an existing NHibernate implementation that maps a single class to two database tables that are joined. The current functionality is read-only. The table join is actually hidden away via a readonly view and it's the view that's referred to in the NHibernate mapping. Works fine for readonly behaviour. Except I need to add Insert, Update, Delete behaviour and only one of the tables needs to be inserted/updated/deleted. How best to do this? I can take readonly off the view of course, I could replicate the join in the NHibernate mapping, but how do I tell NHibernate that insert/update/delete affects one table only?
Thanks DC
You can set the update and insert attributes on the property mappings to false and they will be excluded from updates and inserts:
<property name="MyProperty" update="false" insert="false" />
Keep in mind that your view will need to have a single primary key defined to enable updates or inserts.
You can map to a view instead of a table, then define custom sql for your inserts, updates and deletes.
I would recommend calling a stored procedure.
See the docs: http://nhibernate.info/doc/nh/en/index.html#querysql-cud
I've used this technique quite a lot and it works fine.
I'm having a problem with a pretty simple setup in NHibernate. (I'm using Fluent Nhibernate)
I have two objects as follows, setup with a bi-directional many-to-many mapping.
Project
-- Categories (IList)
Category
-- Projects (IList) -- Inverse = True
This models as expected in the db.
If I try to delete a project NHibernate performs the delete in the many-to-many table then deletes the project as expected.
However, if I try to delete a category NHibernate throws an exception that it would violate a foreign key constraint.
I've experimentet with inverse="true" on both sides but the exception is thrown either when I try to delete a Project or a Category (depending on where inverse="true" is).If I remove inverse="true" from both sides the delete works as expected on either end. But this causes double entries when saving and updating.
Can anyone tell me where I am going wrong?
Is it possible that you're not synching up your entire object graph? The schema you show suggests that Project has a collection of Categories, and Category has a collection of Projects. Hibernate expects you to keep the associations in synch within your object graph. In order to delete a Category (for example), try first clearing its projects collection, and removing that category from the "categories" collections of any projects it was associated with.