Is it possible to have a space in the field name that is defined in the schema.xml?
The bright spark who design the database, used field names like 'POST CODE' and 'CURRENT'
Is there a way around this? or am i stuck?
The database is an existing MSSQL 2005 database, with an unknown
number of systems connected to it. So it cannot be changed.
I am using the reverse command to generate the schema.xml
propel-gen . reverse
Propel 1.6.7
The only work around i have found is to remove the space in schema.xml, and then manually change each of the Base*Peer files.
e.g. Change
const POSTCODE = 'Customer.POSTCODE';
const POSTCODE = 'Customer.CURRENT';
to
const POSTCODE = 'Customer.[POST CODE]';
const POSTCODE = 'Customer.[CURRENT]';
Update:
I relised that i just need to add the 2 lines to the CustomerPeer.php not BaseCustomerPeer.php, that way i dont need to remeber it next time propel is built.
Related
i want to set default value in many2many field for example:
that field in models.py:
# alarms
alarm_ids = fields.Many2many(
'calendar.alarm', 'calendar_alarm_calendar_event_rel',
string='Reminders', ondelete="restrict",
help="Notifications sent to all attendees to remind of the meeting.")
also it is default values created by system, and i want first variant by default:
i know that i can set it by id, but dont know how.
You can use Command to set X2many field values.
From the documentation:
Via Python, we encourage developers craft new commands via the various functions of this namespace. We also encourage developers to use the command identifier constant names when comparing the 1st element of existing commands.
Example:
from odoo import Command, models, fields
class CalendarEvent(models.Model):
_inherit = 'calendar.event'
alarm_ids = fields.Many2many(default=lambda self: [Command.link(self.env.ref('calendar.alarm_notif_1').id)])
i just watch in postgres, there is no id`s like in xml screenshots, i just take id of a record and find some documentation.
next example works:
According to the Peoplebook here, CreateRowset function has the parameters {FIELD.fieldname, RECORD.recname} which is used to specify the related display record.
I had tried to use it like the following (just for example):
&rs1 = CreateRowset(Record.User, Field.UserId, Record.UserName);
&rs1.Fill();
For &k = 1 To &rs1.ActiveRowCount
MessageBox(0, "", 999999, 99999, &rs1(&k).UserName.Name.Value);
End-for;
(Record.User contains only UserId(key), Password.
Record.UserName contains UserId(key), Name.)
I cannot get the Value of UserName.Name, do I misunderstand the usage of this parameter?
Fill is the problem. From the doco:
Note: Fill reads only the primary database record. It does not read
any related records, nor any subordinate rowset records.
Having said that, it is the only way I know to bulk-populate a standalone rowset from the database, so I can't easily see a use for the field in the rowset.
Simplest solution is just to create a view, but that gets old very soon if you have to do it a lot. Alternative is to just loop through the rowset yourself loading the related fields. Something like:
For &k = 1 To &rs1.ActiveRowCount
&rs1(&k).UserName.UserId.value = &rs1(&k).User.UserId.value;
&rs1(&k).UserName.SelectByKey();
End-for;
I am developing a application based on native Indian language. I have to search the database column (in native language) student name in native language. Can anybody help me to solve this issue
my query builder code looks like this and shows syntax error
SELECT [ಕ್ರಮ ಸಂಖ್ಯೆ], [ವಿದ್ಯಾರ್ಥಿಯ ಹೆಸರು] AS Name, [ರಜಿಸ್ಟರ್ ಸಂಖ್ಯೆ], [ಡೈಸ್ ಸಂಖ್ಯೆ], [ವರ್ಗ], [ಕನ್ನಡ], [ಇಂಗ್ಲೀಷ], [ಹಿಂದಿ], [ಗಣಿತ], [ವಿಜ್ಞಾನ], [ಸಮಾಜ ವಿಜ್ಞಾನ], [ದೈಹಿಕ ಶಿಕ್ಷಣ], [ಒಟ್ಟು ಅಂಕಗಳು], [ಶೇಕಡಾ], [ಶ್ರೇಣಿ], [ಒಟ್ಟು ಅಂಕಗಳು ಅಕ್ಷರದಲ್ಲಿ], [ಲ,ಕ/ಕಲಾ ಶಿಕ್ಷಣ], [ಕಂಪ್ಯೂಟರ ಶಿಕ್ಷಣ], [ಫಲಿತಾಂಶ]
FROM Table11
WHERE ವಿದ್ಯಾರ್ಥಿಯ ಹೆಸರುCollate Indic_General_100_CI_AI LIKE N '%ಮ%'
I notice a couple things right off. Because the field in your where clause has a space in it... you have to put delimiters around it. Also, you don't seem to have a space between your field and the Collate keyword... that is necessary. Lastly, you can not have a space between the N and the apostrophe to specify a nvarchar string literal. So try a where clause like this:
WHERE [ವಿದ್ಯಾರ್ಥಿಯ ಹೆಸರು] Collate Indic_General_100_CI_AI LIKE N'%ಮ%'
If you are still getting an error, it could be that your field [ವಿದ್ಯಾರ್ಥಿಯ ಹೆಸರು] is not of a unicode string type. Make sure the field is defined as nvarchar, nchar,...etc.
From your comment it appears that you are querying a MS Access database. The above is for querying a SQL Server Engine. The where clause for access would look like this:
WHERE [ವಿದ್ಯಾರ್ಥಿಯ ಹೆಸರು] LIKE '*ಮ*'
To make it clearer I have this fields
Columntobesearch
aword1 bword1
aword2 bword2
aword3 bword4
Now what I want to do is search using the sql wild card so what I did is like this
%searchbox%
I placed to wildcards on both ends of my search but what it searches is just the first word on the field
when I search 'aword' all of the fields is showing but when I search 'bword' nothing is showing, Please help.
Here is my Full Code
$Input=Input::all();
$makethis=Input::flash();
$soptions=Input::get('soptions');
$searchbox=Input::get('searchbox');
$items = Gamefarm::where('roost_hen', '=',Input::get('sex'))
->where($soptions, 'LIKE','%' . $searchbox . '%')
->paginate(12);
If you use mysql you can try this:
<?php
$q = Input::get('searchbox');
$results = DB::table('table')
->whereRaw("MATCH(columntobesearch) AGAINST(? IN BOOLEAN MODE)",
array($q)
)->get();
Ofcourse you need to prepare your table for full text search in your migration file with
DB::statement('ALTER TABLE table ADD FULLTEXT search(columntobesearch)');
Any way, this is not the more scalable nor efficient way to do FTS.
For a scalable and reliable full text search I strongly recommend you see elasticsearch and implement any Laravel package to this task
I'm trying to generate a new SharePoint list item directly using SQL server. What's stopping me is damn tp_DirName column. I have no ideas how to create this value.
Just for instance, I have selected all tasks from AllUserData, and there are possible values for the column: 'MySite/Lists/Task', 'Lists/Task' and even 'MySite/Lists/List2'.
MySite is the FullUrl value from Webs table. I can obtain it. But what about 'Lists/Task' and '/Lists/List2'? Where they are stored?
If try to avoid SQL context, I can formulate it the following way: what is the object, that has such attribute as '/Lists/List2'? Where can I set it up in GUI?
Just a FYI. It is VERY not supported to try and write directly to SharePoint's SQL Tables. You should really try and write something that utilizes the SharePoint Object Model. Writing to the SharePoint database directly mean Microsoft will not support the environment.
I've discovered, that [AllDocs] table, in contrast to its title, contains information about "directories", that can be used to generate tp_DirName. At least, I've found "List2" and "Task" entries in [AllDocs].[tp_Leaf] column.
So the solution looks like this -- concatenate the following 2 components to get tp_DirName:
[Webs].[FullUrl] for the web, containing list, containing item.
[AllDocs].[tp_Leaf] for the list, containing item.
Concatenate the following 2 components to get tp_Leaf for an item:
(Item count in the list) + 1
'_.000'
Regards,
Well, my previous answer was not very useful, though it had a key to the magic. Now I have a really useful one.
Whatever they said, M$ is very liberal to the MOSS DB hackers. At least they provide the following documents:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd304112(PROT.13).aspx
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd358577(v=PROT.13).aspx
Read? Then, you know that all folders are listed in the [AllDocs] table with '1' in the 'Type' column.
Now, let's look at 'tp_RootFolder' column in AllLists. It looks like a folder id, doesn't it? So, just SELECT the single row from the [AllDocs], where Id = tp_RootFolder and Type = 1. Then, concatenate DirName + LeafName, and you will know, what the 'tp_DirName' value for a newly generated item in the list should be. That looks like a solid rock solution.
Now about tp_LeafName for the new items. Before, I wrote that the answer is (Item count in the list) + 1 + '_.000', that corresponds to the following query:
DECLARE #itemscount int;
SELECT #itemscount = COUNT(*) FROM [dbo].[AllUserData] WHERE [tp_ListId] = '...my list id...';
INSERT INTO [AllUserData] (tp_LeafName, ...) VALUES(CAST(#itemscount + 1 AS NVARCHAR(255)) + '_.000', ...)
Thus, I have to say I'm not sure that it works always. For items - yes, but for docs... I'll inquire into the question. Leave a comment if you want to read a report.
Hehe, there is a stored procedure named proc_AddListItem. I was almost right. MS people do the same, but instead of (count + 1) they use just... tp_ID :)
Anyway, now I know THE SINGLE RIGHT answer: I have to call proc_AddListItem.
UPDATE: Don't forget to present the data from the [AllUserData] table as a new item in [AllDocs] (just insert id and leafname, see how SP does it itself).