I wonder if yaourt can be set up to always use ABS (build form source) for certain packages (so they are built from sources even when performing full system upgrade: yaourt -Syua).
Something like BuildPkgs list in /etc/yaourtrc would come in handy, but I can't find anything like that.
Can anyone think of a way to do it?
Cheers.
You can do a workaround: you should install customizepkg from AUR. Yaourt can use customizepkg so if you've a file named foo in /etc/customizepkg.d/ package foo will built from source. If you don't want to change foo's PKGBUILD /etc/customizepkg.d/foo can be an empty file.
So if you don't want change the PKGBUILDs you only need touch /etc/customizepkg.d/package-build-from-source to every package which you want to build from source.
Related
I'm writing my first KDE plasmoid using QML. The hello world example uses a metadata.desktop file, while this KDE Plasmoid tutorial talks about a metadata.json instead and says that the metadata.desktop is 'discouraged' now and a desktop file should be converted to json using desktoptojson.
However, when I browse the globally installed plasmoids under /usr/share/plasma/plasmoids/ they all have both the metadata.desktop and metadata.json.
First question: So, what is really recommended? Just the metadata.json? Or both?
And, I wasn't able to find the desktoptojson tool. I'm using Linux Mint and the ./kdesrc-build --initial-setup for debian based systems says that it's "This is woefully incomplete and not very useful" ... I read that "most users of this [i.e. desktoptojson] utility will use the CMake macro kservice_desktop_to_json as part of the process of building a plugin.". However, I haven't found the documentation yet how to use this.
Second question: In case one should maintain both files (for whatever reason), should I use desktoptojson to keep them in sync? And if yes, how?
Thanks!
First question: So, what is really recommended? Just the metadata.json? Or both?
In the current source code, most stock KDE applets such as the task manager use metadata.json's and have dropped the metadata.desktop's. It may be that the desktop files you have locally are left over from old versions, the new format was installed but the old one was never deleted.
Second question: In case one should maintain both files (for whatever reason), should I use desktoptojson to keep them in sync? And if yes, how?
The man page on Arch you linked to has all the information. The tool is part of the package kservice. Find the equivalent in the repository for your distribution. Then, to use it
as part of a CMake macro:
add_library(myplugin MODULE ${myplugin_SRCS})
kservice_desktop_to_json(myplugin myplugin.desktop)
directly on the command-line:
desktoptojson -i myplugin.desktop -o myplugin.json
I want to be able to change the TESTS according to an environment variable like this
make check EXTRA=more
The makefile is generated with Automake. I don't want a configure-time solution via AM_CONDITIONAL. I also don't want to use make check TESTS=more since per default the test shouldn't be in TESTS.
The background is that there are tests that take a long time and shouldn't be run with a normal make check. Adding another target like make extracheck can be done but this doesn't give me the convenient parallel test harness from automake. If there is some variable in automake like TESTS_MORE that automagically works, I would love to hear it.
It should be possible to do it in plain make in a portable way. Someone mentioned here that automake would not touch a Makefile that I include but this is not what I observe. Also the documentation says that included files are interpreted by automake and not make.
If it isn't possible via environment variables, maybe you have a good alternative solution?
I have found a plugin (EELSTools.gtk from http://www.dmscripting.com) which I want to modify.
The plugin contains nearly every function I need, but I want also to integrate some extra functions.
Does anyone know how to open .gtk files?
You can't and shouldn't.
*.gtk files are packages files with the purpose of encapsulation. This might either be because of convenience, but it might as well be, because the author does not want to make the code open-source. (Note that there are some proprietory plugins as well, they are also .gtk files.)
If you have found a plugin and want to expand on it, the best way forward is to contact the plugin-author.
The *.gtk files get loaded before *.s files. If you install your own script from DM Menu Install Script File or Install Script, you can add it to the menu that the *.gtk file has, e.g. EELSTools. It is added at the end of the list. For example, I put a measure ZLP width script in EELSTools.
I'm writing a custom check for installed libraries in autoconf:
AC_DEFUN([AC_GHC_PKG_CHECK],[
...
GHC_PKG_RESULT=$($PYTHON autotools/check-ghc-version-range ....)
...
])
where my Python script that actually performs the check resides in the autotools/ sub-directory of the project.
However, this is not portable, for example make dist-check fails because then autoconf tools are called from a different directory. How can I reference the absolute path to my Python script so that it gets called properly no matter what the current directory is?
ac_top_srcdir or ac_abs_top_srcdir should work in this case:
AC_DEFUN([AC_GHC_PKG_CHECK],[
...
GHC_PKG_RESULT=$($PYTHON $ac_top_srcdir/autotools/check-ghc-version-range ....)
...
])
EDIT: I don't think this approach will work -- it seems that $ac_top_srcdir aren't evaluated until later (AC_OUTPUT?).
What I think might work in this instance is to do something similar to what the runtime C tests do: blast a configuration test to a temporary file (conftest.py instead of conftest.c in this case) and run it. Unfortunately, there's (yet) no builtin macros or for automake/autoconf other tools that directly assist with this task.
Fortunately it seems that a clever person has written at least a couple different ways to do this. The first one is GNU pyconfigure which seems to have facilities for writing Python test code as I described above. The second one is more of an ad hoc macro collection that he used for his project.
You can use $srcdir.
It's not necessarily an absolute path, but it's a path that points from the top of the build tree to the top of the source tree.
I have installed both the GNAT Programming Studio (GPS) and GtkAda. They both seem to work fine, but when I try to build the Simple Window project under New Project from Template, I get a bunch of errors saying "file gtk.ads not found." This seems to be a directory/dependency sort of problem - GPS doesn't know where to look for GtkAda. I'm running Windows 7, and have GPS installed at C:\GNAT\2011, and GtkAda installed at C:\GtkAda. I tried adding GtkAda to my PATH; at the moment my PATH user variable includes C:\GNAT\2011\bin, and my Path System variable includes C:\GtkAda\bin. Any advice on resolving this problem is greatly appreciated!
There are two things here.
First, "project" is key. Whenever you're building something that depends
on a library like GtkAda, it's much much easier if (a) you use GNAT
Project to manage it, and (b) you use the GPR(s) provided by the library
- always assuming it does, of course.
In the case of GtkAda, that means that your GPR needs to "with" GtkAda;
with "gtkada";
project Tinkering is
...
Second, gnatmake or gprbuild needs to be able to find gtkada.gpr.
The easiest way is to install GtkAda in such a way that gtkada.gpr is in
the default place that gnatmake/gprbuild expect to find GPR files. This
is $prefix/lib/gnat. GtkAda obeys this convention, so you could install
GtkAda under the same root as your compiler. I don't know why that's not recommended anyway.
If you don't want to do that, you can add the correct location to the
environment variable ADA_PROJECT_PATH, for example in your case set it
to C:\GtkAda\lib\gnat.
There is a lot of good stuff in the GtkAda README at libre.adacore.com, and in
the GtkAda User's Guide which I see from the README is also included with the
installed package at (in your case) C:\GtkAda\doc\GtkAda\gtkada_ug.