Why the statement
BREAK-POINT 'my username'.
affects not only me but other users too? Am I insane? Maybe this is a problem of permissions or any other reason? Can anybody explain me?
This statement is located in method body in class which implements BAdI.
If you want to use break points only for your username, you have to use it like this:
BREAK username.
If you use
BREAK-POINT.
it is going to affect everyone.
The actual meaning of BREAK-POINT 'my username'. is completely different (comment from vwegert):
See the documentation of BREAK-POINT - you've been using your user name as a log text
Not the direct answer for your question, but maybe also helpful:
In transaction SAAB you can define a checkpoint group (e.g. Z_MYbreaks).
Then you can use the following command:
BREAK-POINT ID Z_MYbreaks.
The breakpoint will have no effect, unless you activate it in transaction SAAB. The advantage over break USERID:
Can can (de)activate it without a code change (you could transport it to the productive system and activate it only, when you want to test something).
It can be ativated by and for everybody, not only for the one user id in the break-command. (Sure: you need the authorization)
Details can be found at
http://help.sap.com/abapdocu_70/en/ABAPBREAK-POINT.htm#&ABAP_ADDITION_1#1#
http://www.saptechnical.com/Tutorials/ABAP/CheckpointGroup/Index.htm
Related
In our company, repository objects must be created with original language EN.
Is there a way to check the logon language in case of creating a new object in the ABAP repository?
Desired behaviour:
SE80 - Create program/class/data element/table/....
==> user exit/badi checks the logon language. When it is not 'EN', the creation will be refused.
regards,
Umar Abdullah
I know there is a exit for this but I haven't remember exact name. You can use general purpose for finding exit. Go to SE24 and open CL_EXITHANDLER class, find GET_INSTANCE method and add break point. Then start creating item, it will pause on debugger multiple times, try to find suitable one.
As #mkysoft suggested, you may implement a check in the BAdI CTS_REQUEST_CHECK, method CHECK_BEFORE_ADD_OBJECTS, which is invoked when the object is about to be attached to a transport request. Raise the exception CANCEL to make the attachment fail (and so the object is not created too).
EDIT: sorry, ignore my answer, "this method is NOT released for Customer usage" as said in note 2150125 - Method CHECK_BEFORE_ADD_OBJECTS not triggered
DISCLAIMER: THE METHOD DESCRIBED HERE IS ABSOLUTELY NOT RECOMMENDED.
As correctly pointed out by the other members there is no standard and customer-exposed method to achieve your requirement, but if you absolutely must enable this check during creation you can use the below method. As well as the previously offered to you, it also involves modification of SAP standard.
There is a system BAdi CTS_TADIR_SUBSCREEN that is located inside enhancement point CTS_ES_TADIR_POPUP. They are SAP internal and not released for customer usage, so do this at your own risk.
Implementation procedure:
Step 0. First thing you need to change is a SAP internal usage flag, for which you need Object Access key which can be obtained from SAP or from SAP partner that made the implementation in your org. In virgin state this BAdi throws the error if you try to implement it
So hereinafter we assume that you already ticked off this checkbox in BAdi settings
Step 1.
In order to implement the BAdi one need to implement enhancement spot prior to that. This is the most complicated part, because despite we disabled internality flag the SAP-namespaced enhancements must be stored only in SAP-namespaced objects. By SAP namespace I mean non-Z, non-Y and non-T (Test). This means to implement this enhancement, besides modifying the enhancement definition, one need to create, for example, CTS_ES_TADIR named enh.impl., and save it to non-Z package, which you also need to create. Your enhancement implementations selector should look somehow like this
On the above screen only the second will work, all the rest Z will not.
Every non-Z object need Object Access Key, remember? Too bad. But just to show the proof-of-concept, I will proceed.
Step 2. After you created the enh. implementation in SAP-namespace it will propose you to create the BAdi implementation. The same principle applies here: only SAP-namespaced container for SAP-namespaced objects, hence CTS_TADIR_SUBSCREEN should have implementing class for example CL_TADIR_SUBSCREEN. During the creation of enhancement you will see many warnings
but finally you should have something like this, where all system-named objects are created and the enhancement/BAdi is activated.
Step 3. In order to get the BAdi working we need to enable this subscreen processing
during the playing with enhancement I found out that BAdi class is not being triggered standalone, without screen events not enhanced, so to make it work you need to touch a screen enhancement for screen 100
If you do not wanna modify screen elements logic, just put the dummy enhancement in SHOW_TADIR dialog module in the end of the include LSTRDO18
PROCESS BEFORE OUTPUT.
MODULE SHOW_TADIR. "<-- create the dummy enhancement here
CALL SUBSCREEN subs_info INCLUDING gv_badi_prog gv_badi_dynnr.
for example declaration statement like I did
Step 4. Activate your created BAdi class and put the necessary logic there. I wasn't able to trigger method GET_DATA_FROM_SCREEN, but PUT_DATA_TO_SCREEN worked fine
If we put this simple processing for your requirement
METHOD cts_if_tadir_subscreen~get_data_from_screen.
IF object_data-l_mstlang <> 'E'.
MESSAGE 'Objects in non-English languages are not allowed!' TYPE 'A'.
ENDIF.
ENDMETHOD.
it will not allow creating objects in languages other than English.
The check in method get_data_from_screen is being done before showing the screen so language is determined from system logon settings. If to play more with this BAdi, I suppose the method GET_DATA_FROM_SCREEN can also be enabled, which will make it possible to check user input, i.e. the case when the user gonna change the default language.
So my friend is trying to access a command block, he has op and gamemode 1, but when he right clicks it, nothing happens. Does anyone know how to fix this?
In your server.properties, you must set commandblocks to true(I am not looking at one at the moment, but it is something like that). Once that is set, restart your server, and it should work.
Maybe a plugin is blocking the commandblock access.
Can you use the commandblock?
Add you and your friend to the op list (also check ops.json).
Try to put you and your friend into the same permission group if you have a permission plugin.
As #mttprvst13 said, make sure commandblocks is set to true in your server.properties. Plugins may also be blocking it, but probably not due to the fact that he is an operator.
I've watched quite a few videos on YouTube and have a basic understanding of how to find user-exits (enhancements?) and implement them. However when I try to replicate what I've seen it doesn't appear to be working.
I'm looking to create a user-exit that would execute when a production order has been confirmed (closed/finished) via CO11N. Someone suggested that I put in a line of code "BREAK username." So that I could verify that my code was firing. Nothing breaks. I've tried putting in a message from code found on the internet
MESSAGE s208(00) WITH 'TEST'.
No message is shown. I've activated the include and the project. I've tried different exits/includes and no matter what I do, nothing seems to break or show a message.
Is there something simple I'm missing? I've tried CONFPI05 and CONFPM05.
CONFPI05 is for process orders. CONFPM05 is for plant maintenance orders. First you need to check which kind of order you use. I assume you use production orders. You should check User-Exit CONFPP05 than.
Anyway, I would recommend using BAdI WORKORDER_CONFIRM. Within this BAdI there are methods available where you can raise an error message.
From the BAdI documentation:
Note that in the methods, no system messages may be sent. The only
exceptions are the AT_SAVE and AT_CANCEL_CHECK methods. Within these
methods, a system message may be issued, but only if you trigger the
exception ERROR_WITH_MESSAGE (for AT_SAVE method) or NOT_ALLOWED (for
AT_CANCEL_CHECK method) at the same time.
Note also that within the methods, the "commit work" instruction may
not be carried out because this would lead to incorrect data in the
database.
I strongly recommend not to use MESSAGE statement in any User-Exit or BAdI implementation. The MESSAGE statement will implicit call a COMMIT WORK which could cause database inconsistencies (happens very often by the way).
One additional note. You should check using Checkpoint Groups instead of using BREAK-POINT or BREAK username directly.
I checked the documentation:
CONFPI05 to update your own data after saving the confirmation
In another documentation I found another warning:
In this customer enhancement it is strictly forbidden to send error messages or other messages because otherwise there is the danger that data will be inconsistent. SAP cannot be held responsible for this!!
This sounds like changes in update task. By default breakpoints in update task are not enabled.
Should your code be processed after you pushed save?
If yes, what you can try:
Set anywhere a breakpoint. Or try /h during data insertion.
In debug screen activate the update debugging:
Continue the process with F8.
Hopefully you stop at your break-point.
I am interested in loading some system params into the Yii::app()->params array from the database using a CActiveRecord extension called SiteSetting.
Unfortunately I couldn't find much advice online for this, but believe I can place a method in SiteSetting called loadSiteSettingsToAppParams and add the setting...
'onBeginRequest'=>array('SiteSetting', 'loadSiteSettingsToAppParams')
...to the config.
I would like to know if I can only add this onBeginRequest to the Yii::app() somewhere within the SiteSetting class (to keep my code modular) and whether this is a sensible approach.
Thanks in advance.
Just re-read your question now and I'd try to provide answers.
To the question "I would like to know if I can only add this onBeginRequest to the Yii::app() somewhere within the SiteSetting class (to keep my code modular)": the answer is, You're not restricted to just a Class. You could (theoretically) place it anywhere within your application and also in the config.php file.
As to whether it's a sensible approach, it depends on the time it would take to request those settings from the database and whether you're prepared to add that time to your HttpRequest response time. The onBeforeRequest is fired before every HttpRequest and if the loadSiteSettingsToAppParams method consumes lots of time, you're adding that time to your HttpRequest response time.
I'd advise that you fetch those settings once after login and then update them only when they change (the settings are updated). This way, you could place the call to loadSiteSettingsToAppParams in the UserIdentity class and call it after a successful login.
That's just how I'd go about doing this though.
Hope I helped.
The easy & nice way to accomplish this by using a comoponent like SettingComoponent and place in the components directory protected/components then pre load this component in the preload section like this preload => array('log', 'setting', ...). That's it and now you can call this component anywhere you want like Yii:app()->setting->whatever.
I hope this is answer can be useful for you.
Is it possible, in general, to call an interactive function from init.el, if it's parameters are known?
Let me give a concrete example: In the sql package, there is a interactive function sql-connect.
When invoked as
M-x sql-connect
it asks for Connection in the minibuffer. Answering
my-mysql-localhost-connection1
opens an SQL buffer with mysql prompt which it what I want.
I would like to start the connection in a SQL buffer on Emacs startup. But adding, in my init.el:
(sql-connect 'my-mysql-localhost-connection1)
does not do anything. Is what I am trying to achieve possible in this case, and for a general interactive function (which parameters are known)
Thanks
In general:
Yes, and you can use repeat-complex-command (C-xM-:) after the interactive call to find out what the arguments ended up looking like. This is a useful approach to remember, because sometimes there are hidden manipulations in an interactive form which can transform the user's input into something different1.
That doesn't necessarily give you the best arguments to use in a non-interactive call (that will always be dependent on the function in question), but it's probably the best place to start if you're unsure how to translate the one to the other2.
1 align-regexp is a good example of this.
2 Assuming that you've at least read the docstring for the function in question -- it's not uncommon for a given interactive command to be the wrong thing to call in a non-interactive context, and the function help is usually good enough to point this out.
The answer to your general question is yes: you can invoke an interactive function from code, instead of using M-x.
Wrt your more specific question:
You should not need to call the function interactively (i.e., no need to use call-interactively) unless for some reason you really want to invoke it interactively for some reason (e.g., to prompt the user). ;-)
Just call it by supplying the necessary arguments, and you should be OK. IOW this should work:
(sql-connect 'my-mysql-localhost-connection1)
But the doc says that the CONNECTION arg must define actual connection settings, per sql-connection-alist. Check that my-mysql-localhost-connection1 does follow sql-connection-alist in defining connection settings properly so that the user is not prompted for any login parameters.