I hope I worded that right...
Anyway... while writing a VB program I noticed something. In the file explorer under C:\Users\Username\ you see folders like My Documents and My Pictures. When you look at them in command prompt, you see that they are actually called Documents and Pictures. Weird.
Now lets say I want to make a folder, in VB, named My Files, but I want it to point to the actual folder Files. How would I do that?
I can't vouch for this but I've heard you can achieve it through Create A Special Folder In Windows Explorer. I would definitely backup your registry first.
You can make "virtual folders" with Namespace Extensions. It's a pain with .NET. There are components like EZNamespaceExtensions.Net that make the process a little easier.
Related
Is there a way to do so ? I searched Google but couldn't find any answer, so I guess the answer would be no. Is there anything close ? If not, would it be easy to extend red-lang to do so ?
From http://www.rebol.com/docs/setup.html
Startup Scripts
When REBOL starts it will automatically run the rebol.r and user.r files, if they exist.
The system looks for these files first in the current directory (or the directory of the script being run), then in the directory that contains the REBOL executable program.
Note that REBOL/Core runs fine without the rebol.r and user.r files. They simply provide an easy way to include additional code and data on startup, such as your network preferences.
If you compile your own Red interpreter you can add an autoloading file, maybe in console.red after system/console/init "Red Console" and before system/console/launch Best advice is to ask on the https://gitter.im/red/help site to ask for help. I guess this was already discussed.
okay, so i dont really know much about DLLs. but i need to edit some of them. ones that seem like archive files.
such as: firefox's xul.dll, windows/twain_32.dll
when i tried to open them in .NET Reflector, it couldnt open them. and a really downvoted answer on here made me realize they can be opened with 7zip, and seem to have files inside.
i can extract the files, but cant edit the dll, and i dont know how to create a dll like this. i dont have visual c++ or basic, and i dont know if i could do this with them.
thank you in advance, or how to say
A dll file usually contains program code (that is: binary code you can not easily understand). Some dll files may also contain resources, which can be sometimes edited with a resource editor (such as ResourceHacker).
dll files are no archives and their primary usage does not include holding files. Resources normally are rather small data elements such as icons.
Edit: If you open a dll file in 7zip, you will see some virtual files (which are no real files but sections of the binary object file, see symbol table and relocation table in object file for example) along with a virtual folder .rscs (abbreviation for "resources") that contains the mentioned resources you can edit with a resource editor. Again, remember these are not files. 7zip only displays them in a way you may think of files.
The object code inside of .text, .data and .reloc contains binary program code and initialization data along with the reallocation table. It makes no sense to edit those information unless you use a disassembler, can understand the generated assembler code, know about the pitfalls of disassembling, make senseful changes and are able to reassemble the code.
Not that even if you did so, you'd apply the disassembler to the whole object file instead of single sections.
Say you create a project. Then you want to do something else. You want to create another project that uses all the files of the previous project. You then modify it a little bit.
In vb.net it's simple. You just copy the vbproj file and that's it.
In objective-c copying the xcproj will result in a project file that won't compile.
Solution?
Note:
I do not want to do simple copy. If I do simple copy changes will not be propagated. I want if the fork change so will the original file.
As far as I know changing the project file name will make the project fail to compile. So just copying the project file doesn't work unless I do something wrong.
I think it's utterly ridiculous that there is no easy way to make the project work after changing the name of the xcodeproj file? I can't even open that xcodeproj file in textedit. In vb.net I can hack the project file straight. Why not in xcode?
There are two options which I would prefer :-
If there are classes which are constant and are not changing, you can make library which is called as Cocoa Touch Static Library
OR
Just copy folder to another location, rename application name and changes you want to do and run it!
Hope this info helps you..
I long for the day when you can simply choose "save as template" from Xcode(!)
In the meantime it might save you some headache to check out Project Duplicator from the AppStore. I haven't tried it out myself yet, but it sounds like it's designed to do exactly what you're asking for.
If you want to do it the manually way you could duplicate the folder with all corresponding files in the Finder and go about renaming everything from there.
You can create multiple targets for your project.
look at this link.
I know how to open/save files, ect and do fairly well with programming. I am not a pro, but I get the job done. I know quite a bit, and am good with using Google to find my answers.
Maybe it is because I am pretty tired right now, or I am not sure what exactly I am looking for to put into Google correctly...
I am needing to allow the user to choose a directory to save in. They can create a new directory if they want/need, and once they choose the directory, my program will save a few pre-coded files into that directory.
I don't think this would use the OpenFileDialog. Thank you in advance!
What you seek is the folder select dialog. It lets the user do all the stuff you are loking for.
Ì have had this problem in a number of projects and I have almost given up. I am sure there is a solution though. When I insert a Flash object in a VB.Net Windows Forms application, it works fine for a little while and then I see this error in the Design Screen. I am using Visual Studio 2010
Could not load file or assembly 'Interop.ShockwaveFlashObjects, Version=1.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null' or one of its dependencies. The system cannot find the file specified.
I have read several descriptions of why this happens, and apparently it has something to do with strong naming (or lack thereof), but have not found a solution yet. I used Add Reference->COM->Shockwave Flash (C:\Windows\SysWOW64\Macromed\Flash\Flash32_11_2_202_235.ocx) If I ignore the error it appears to work fine, but I don't want my users to have a problem.
I know I can use a browser control and play the Flash in that, but for reasons I won't get into, I have to use a Flash control. Any ideas would help.
Okay. I can't promise this to work for you, but it worked for me.
First, you have to locate a file on your computer titled AxImp.exe. You have to run it from the command prompt. This file is located (for me at least) here:
C:\Program Files\Microsoft SDKs\Windows\v7.0\Bin\x64
Once you do find and run it, you have to point it to the correct Flash.ocx file you're using, like so:
AxImp.exe <path>\Flash.ocx
Once you've done that you should end up with 2 DLL files in the same directory as the .ocx file. One called AxShockwaveFlashObjects.dll and another called ShockwaveFlashObjects.dll.
You don't care about ShockwaveFlashObjects.dll, just AxShockwaveFlashObjects.dll.
Grab that file and the Flash*.ocx file and paste them into the project directory.
Then include them into your references. This should open up two new references, AxShockwaveObjects and ShockwaveObjects.
Make sure you're Using both of them.
After this, you have to register the Flash*.ocx using RegSvr32 from your command prompt (make sure to run CMD in admin mode). That is done like so:
C:\RegSvr32 <path>\Flash.ocx
This worked for me. I was having the exact same problem (which is what led me here). It could be a half backed hack workaround but for now, that's how it worked for me.
Let me know if it works for you or not.
Hope it goes well for you.
I know this is an old post but I had this issue yesterday and the solution, at least in my case, was very simple. All I had to do was to change the Platform and Platform Target to x86 (Build tab of project property).