How can I change the functionality of a button that I used previously? For example, If I had a button that did "Proceed/Cancel" and let's say you "Proceed" the button would change to something such as "View/Go Back"? Basically I want to re-use the same button for something else, but since I don't know how maybe someone can help me understand it better. Thank you.
- (IBAction)someButton:(NSButton *)sender {
if ([someString isEqualToString:someThing]) {
isAllowed = YES;
[oneButton setTitle:#"Proceed"];
[self continue];
}
else {
[oneButton setTitle:#"Cancel"];
return;
}
}
- (void)continue {
// I would like to make someButton (above) take on different functionality
// here if that's even possible. such as:
[oneButton setTitle:#"View"];
[self whatNow];
At some point in your program lifecycle you could replace the previous target and/or action of a NSButton by the desired one.
[oneButton setAction:#selector(continue)];
This will cause your continue selector to be called instead of the someButton: for the oneButton instance.
OBS: just pay attention at your selectors as the one from the NIB file has a parameter #selector(someButton:) and the one you are creating does not have any, so it stays as #selector(continue)
as seen here: Cocoa forControlEvents:WHATGOESHERE
Related
It's common to have a text editor for code or other structured content that balances delimiters of some sort; when you double click on a { it selects to the matching }, or similarly for ( ) pairs, [ ] pairs, etc. How can I implement this behavior in NSTextView in Cocoa/Obj-C?
(I will be posting an answer momentarily, since I found nothing on SO about this and spent today implementing a solution. Better answers are welcome.)
ADDENDUM:
This is not the same as this question, which is about NSTextField and is primarily concerned with NSTextField and field editor issues. If that question is solved by substituting a custom NSTextView subclass into the field editor, then that custom subclass could use the solution given here, of course; but there might be many other ways to solve the problem for NSTextField, and substituting a custom NSTextView subclass into the field editor is not obviously the right solution to that problem, and in any case a programmer concerned with delimiter balancing in NSTextView (which is presumably the more common problem) could care less about all of those NSTextField and field editor issues. So that is a different question – although I will add a link from that question to this one, as one possible direction it could go.
This is also not the same as this question, which is really about changing the definition of a "word" in NSTextView when a double-click occurs. As per Apple's documentation, these are different problems with different solutions; for delimiter-balancing (this question) Apple specifically recommends the use of NSTextView's selectionRangeForProposedRange:granularity: method, whereas for changing the definition of a word (that question) Apple specifically states that the selectionRangeForProposedRange:granularity: method should not be used.
In their Cocoa Text Architecture Guide (https://developer.apple.com/library/prerelease/mac/documentation/TextFonts/Conceptual/CocoaTextArchitecture/TextEditing/TextEditing.html), Apple suggests subclassing NSTextView and overriding selectionRangeForProposedRange:granularity: to achieve this sort of thing; they even say "For example, in a code editor you can provide a delegate that extends a double click on a brace or parenthesis character to its matching delimiter." However, it is not immediately clear how to achieve this, since you want the delimiter match to happen only at after a simple double-click on a delimiter, not after a double-click-drag or even a double-click-hold-release.
The best solution I could come up with involves overriding mouseDown: as well, and doing a little bookkeeping about the state of affairs. Maybe there is a simpler way. I've left out the core part of the code where the delimiter match actually gets calculated; that will depend on what delimiters you're matching, what syntactical complexities (strings, comments) might exist, and so forth. In my code I actually call a tokenizer to get a token stream, and I use that to find the matching delimiter. YMMV. So, here's what I've got:
In your NSTextView subclass interface (or class extension, better yet):
// these are used in selectionRangeForProposedRange:granularity:
// to balance delimiters properly
BOOL inEligibleDoubleClick;
NSTimeInterval doubleDownTime;
In your NSTextView subclass implementation:
- (void)mouseDown:(NSEvent *)theEvent
{
// Start out willing to work with a double-click for delimiter-balancing;
// see selectionRangeForProposedRange:proposedCharRange granularity: below
inEligibleDoubleClick = YES;
[super mouseDown:theEvent];
}
- (NSRange)selectionRangeForProposedRange:(NSRange)proposedCharRange
granularity:(NSSelectionGranularity)granularity
{
if ((granularity == NSSelectByWord) && inEligibleDoubleClick)
{
// The proposed range has to be zero-length to qualify
if (proposedCharRange.length == 0)
{
NSEvent *event = [NSApp currentEvent];
NSEventType eventType = [event type];
NSTimeInterval eventTime = [event timestamp];
if (eventType == NSLeftMouseDown)
{
// This is the mouseDown of the double-click; we do not want
// to modify the selection here, just log the time
doubleDownTime = eventTime;
}
else if (eventType == NSLeftMouseUp)
{
// After the double-click interval since the second mouseDown,
// the mouseUp is no longer eligible
if (eventTime - doubleDownTime <= [NSEvent doubleClickInterval])
{
NSString *scriptString = [[self textStorage] string];
...insert delimiter-finding code here...
...return the matched range, or NSBeep()...
}
else
{
inEligibleDoubleClick = false;
}
}
else
{
inEligibleDoubleClick = false;
}
}
else
{
inEligibleDoubleClick = false;
}
}
return [super selectionRangeForProposedRange:proposedCharRange
granularity:granularity];
}
It's a little fragile, because it relies on NSTextView's tracking working in a particular way and calling out to selectionRangeForProposedRange:granularity: in a particular way, but the assumptions are not large; I imagine it's pretty robust.
I need to pass parameters with #selector and here is the method that i need to call using selector:
-(void)clickedInfo:(NSString *)itemIndex{
// some work with itemIndex
}
I know that what i can do is to use an intermediate method as described here.
This approach doesn't work in my case because im adding the target to the uibutton in the cellForItemAtIndexPath method for the collectionView.
The parameter that i need to pass to the clickedInfo method is indexPath.row
and i can not obtain this parameter in an intermediate method.
Thanx in advance
So you want to store some information that can be accessed by the action of a button. Some options are:
Use the tag property of the control. (can only store an integer)
Subclass UIButton and use that class for the button. The class can have a field that stores the information.
Use associated objects (associative references) to attach an object to the button. This is the most general solution.
You can use the performSelector:withObject: selector to pass an object.
Example:
[self performSelector:#selector(clickedInfo:) withObject:myIndex];
- (void) clickedInfo:(NSString *)itemIndex{
// some work with itemIndex
}
Edit: Should be just #selector(clickedInfo:) rather than what I had before.
Edit: Using #newacct 's suggestion, I'd recommend doing something similar to the following:
- (UITableViewCell *)tableView:(UITableView)tableView cellForRowAtIndexPath:(NSIndexPath)indexPath
{
button.tag = indexPath.row;
[button performSelector:#selector(clickedInfo:)];
// or
[button addTarget:self action:#selector(clickedInfo:) forControlEvents:UITouchUpInside];
}
- (void) clickedInfo:(id)sender
{
int row = sender.tag;
// Do stuff with the button and data
}
this is addressed lots of places, but it is easier to answer than to point you there:
[someObject performSelector:#selector(clickedInfo:) withObject:someOtherObject];
where someObject is the receiver and someOtherObject is the parameter passed to clickedInfo
I have a text field and I bind it to an NSString instance variable.
When I type in the text field, it does not update the variable. It waits until I press the Enter key. I don't want to hit Enter every time.
What do I need to change in order to make the binding change value immediately?
By default, the value binding of an NSTextField does not update continuously. To fix this, you need, after selecting your text field, to check the "Continuously Updates Value" box in the Bindings Inspector under the Value heading:
However, most often, what you really want to do is update the property to which the text field is bound when the user has finished editing and presses a button ("Save" or "OK", for example). To do this, you needn't continuously update the property as described above, you just need to end editing. Daniel Jalkut provides an extremely useful implementation of just such a method:
#interface NSWindow (Editing)
- (void)endEditing;
#end
#implementation NSWindow (Editing)
- (void)endEditing
{
// Save the current first responder, respecting the fact
// that it might conceptually be the delegate of the
// field editor that is "first responder."
id oldFirstResponder = [oMainDocumentWindow firstResponder];
if ((oldFirstResponder != nil) &&
[oldFirstResponder isKindOfClass:[NSTextView class]] &&
[(NSTextView*)oldFirstResponder isFieldEditor])
{
// A field editor's delegate is the view we're editing
oldFirstResponder = [oldFirstResponder delegate];
if ([oldFirstResponder isKindOfClass:[NSResponder class]] == NO)
{
// Eh ... we'd better back off if
// this thing isn't a responder at all
oldFirstResponder = nil;
}
}
// Gracefully end all editing in our window (from Erik Buck).
// This will cause the user's changes to be committed.
if([oMainDocumentWindow makeFirstResponder:oMainDocumentWindow])
{
// All editing is now ended and delegate messages sent etc.
}
else
{
// For some reason the text object being edited will
// not resign first responder status so force an
/// end to editing anyway
[oMainDocumentWindow endEditingFor:nil];
}
// If we had a first responder before, restore it
if (oldFirstResponder != nil)
{
[oMainDocumentWindow makeFirstResponder:oldFirstResponder];
}
}
#end
So if for example you had a "Save" button targeting your view controller's method -save:, you would call
- (IBAction)save:(id)sender
{
[[[self view] window] endEditing];
//at this point, all properties bound to text fields have the same
//value as the contents of the text fields.
//save stuff...
}
The previous answer is beautiful, and I learned from it about tricking the Window/View/Document system to end-editing on everything at the programmer's will.
However, the default responder chain behavior (including the preservation of the first responder until the USER moved their focus to something else) is fundamental to the Mac's "look and feel" and I wouldn't mess with it lightly (I swear I did very powerful things in responder-chain manipulation, so I don't say that out of fear.)
In addition - there is even a simpler method - that does not require changing the binding. In the Interface-builder, select the text field, and select the "Attribute Inspector" tab. You'll see the following:
Checking the red-circled "continuous" will do the trick. This option is basic and older even than binding, and its main use is to allow validator object (a whole new story) to validate the text and change it on the fly, as the user types. When the text-field calls validator calls, it also updates bound values.
I have the following, seemingly simple piece of code handling button taps in an iOS application:
- (IBAction)tapKeypadButton:(UIButton *)sender {
NSString *buttonLabel = sender.titleLabel.text;
if ([buttonLabel isEqualToString:#"<"]) {
[self _tapBackButton];
} else {
[self _tapDigitButton:buttonLabel];
}
}
To completely follow the Clean Code principles by Robert C. Martin, would I need a ButtonTapFactory or something in the same line?
You have two types of buttons, with different behaviors (back button and digit button). To make this code clean, you should have two actions for each type. The type should not be determined by the contents of the text inside the button, but through a semantically meaningful way. (i.e. subclass).
Further, an action method should only contain a call to another method that does the actual logic. Everything else is not testable. In code:
- (IBAction) tapBackButton:(id) sender
{
[self _tapBackButton:sender];
}
- (IBAction) tapDigitButton:(id) sender
{
[self _tapDigitButton:sender];
}
This way you can have unit tests calling your methods without your UI code interfering. Please also note that I removed the label from the call to _tapDigitButton. The digit should not be parsed from the label, but be passed in a more semantically stable way, for example using the tag property.
Given
#interface Canvas:NSView {
NSNumber * currentToolType;
...
}
declared in my .h file
and in the .m file
- (id)initWithFrame:(NSRect)frame {
self = [super initWithFrame:frame];
if (self) {
currentToolType=[[NSNumber alloc]initWithInt:1];
}
return self;
}
and further down
-(void)mouseUp:(NSEvent *)event
{
NSLog(#"tool value in event: %d",[currentToolType intValue]);
//rest of code
}
-(NSBezzierPath *)drawPath:(NSRect)aRect
{
NSLog(#"tool value in draw: %d",[currentToolType intValue]);
//rest of drawPath method code that uses the value of currentToolType in a switch statment
}
-(IBAction)selectToolOne:(id)sender
{
[currentToolType release];
[currentToolType = [[NSNumber alloc]initWithInt:0];
}
-(IBAction)selectToolTwo:(id)sender
{
[currentToolType release];
[currentToolType = [[NSNumber alloc]initWithInt:1];
}
The action methods are the only place where currentToolType is changed. But, for some reason, it seems to be a different instance of currentToolType in the mouseUp. I did not write (or synthesize) accessors for the var as it is used only by itself. I noticed that initWithFrame is called twice - I'm assuming it's for the parent window and the NSView?
What am I missing?THANKS!
This is an XCode generated Document based app using COCOA and Obj-C. I'm new at both.
You mention that initWithFrame: is called twice. Your initWithFrame: should only be called once (unless you happen to have two Canvas views).
Is it possible you have the Canvas view in your nib/xib file and are also creating another in code (with alloc/initWithFrame:)?
In which case you have two Canvas objects. You probably have one hooked up to your controls and the other one is in the window (and thus responding to the mouseUp: and it is giving you the same value every time).
If you have the Canvas view setup in IB, you can fix this problem by removing your code that is creating the second one.
You've probably run in to a special case: NSNumber could have cached instances to represent commonly-used numbers.
Two observations, though:
You're wasting a whole lot of memory using NSNumber when you could be simply using NSIntegers or maybe an old-fashioned enumerated type, completely avoiding the object overhead.
You never actually showed your code for when you look at the instances of NSNumber; without it, there's not really enough information here to answer your question.