I am going through a major crisis here and i would like to ask for advices.
I have been developing a game the last couple of months which is entirely based on lua scripting. The project is a cocos2d based project with the inclusion of the mclua library (more about mcLua can be found here http://www.grzmobile.com/blog/2009/12/1/integrating-lua-into-and-iphone-app-part-2.html).
Now i am nearly at the end of the implementation of the project and i just found out that apparently the version of lua that i use which is 5.1.4 does not have a goto statement which is of great importance to this project. The latest version of lua 5.2 however supports now goto statements.
My problem is that when i tried to add the lua version 5.2 to my project the library mclua throws a bunch of errors and it seems that this library doesn’t work with any other version of lua other than 5.1.4.
What can i do about this now? I was supposed to be nearly at completion of the project. Does this mean i am completely screwed now ?
Then you have a choice to make. You may:
Stop doing whatever makse goto "of great importance to this project". I've used Lua for a while and I've never needed goto that badly. Whatever you're doing can be done in some other way.
Modify this "mclua" library to fix the "bunch of errors" you get when you try to link it against Lua 5.2. Since you didn't explain what these errors are, we can't really help you in solving them.
Note that Lua's minor version numbers are not intended to guarantee backwards compatibile with prior versions. While the changes are generally relatively small, that doesn't mean that effort was extended to make code work in both without modification.
Related
I'm sorry in advance if this question is not well expressed, I am trying to achieve something quite new to me and I am a little lost.
I am trying to include a Canon SDK inside an Objective-C wrapper, I understand from this paragraph that I needed to download the 64bit SDK:
There are a few steps that need to be taken in order to use EOSFramework in a project. First, ensure that you have downloaded the latest Canon EDSDK 64bit. EOSFramework currently relies on ARC which is only supported in 64bit. Therefore you must use the 64bit version of EDSDK. Also ensure that you have compiled or downloaded the latest version of EOSFramework as a .framework file.
Incidentally, after following instructions, the errors that I'm getting while building the frameworks are related to 64bit. Please see picture attached:
Can someone point out a way for me to figure this out?
I'm not sure if this won't bring a problem in the long run, but I found an answer in this post: _int64 does not name a type
Following this:
It looks like you you are trying to use MSVC specific __int64 type with GCC. That does not work, use long long instead.
Can someone point out a way for me to figure this out?
You need to track down the declaration of EdsUInt64 in the SDK you have downloaded and figure out why it is not being seen by the compiler when compiling the source you've shown.
Try right-clicking on EdsUInt32 (which the compiler was happy with) and jumping to its definition. Now look around, are the 64-bit types defined in the same place? Are they inside #if constructs? If so why are the conditions not true? Etc. Do some detective work.
You can also use TextWrangler/BBEdit, or other good editor, to do quick multi-file searches over all the SDK source to find the definitions.
If you don't find the definitions then you've got the wrong version of one of the SDKs, go back to Canon and get the right one.
The solution is very unlikely to be you needing to define the type yourself. The ARC comments in particular indicate you do have Mac specific source code, Canon compile it on a Mac, so it's unlikely to be a MS or Gnu specific issue failing on a Mac etc.
Good Hunting!
HTH
I have looked into at least 6 different SQL Lua extensions, and they all seem to have their latest version compatible with up to version 5.1 of Lua. I have had zero success in implementing any of them into my current project which uses Lua 5.2, with the best case scenario ending in either silent program crashes or attempt to call global 'module' (a nil value).
I am not the original project owner, so I am trying not to be forced into changing the source code for it (though more recently, I have even gone down that road now).
And often times, it is unclear if these crashes are related to the way the project itself operates, the way the project implements Lua (as a static library), the way that Lua tries to implement it's extensions, the way the extensions implement their dependencies, a versioning conflict, or some sort of crazy combination of each. It's practically impossible to debug a silent crash in this manner, because the source of evil could literally be anything.
As the answer states in this question, I have even tried supporting the module function (which most lua sql extensions utilize, but was deprecated in 5.2), but the program still crashes or just complains about a seemingly infinite amount of missing dependencies. And after spending hours of tracking down (what would seem to be) all of the dependencies it would complain about, it still crashes.
Changing the project's source code to use the Lua 5.1 source appears to break the functionality of the project, resulting in various compiler errors regarding missing 5.2-related functions. Linking the MySQL C/C++ connector to the project results in rather vague runtime errors, which seem to conflict with the way the project implements Lua 5.2.
Are there ANY sqlite/MySQL extensions out there which actually work with Lua 5.2 on a 32-bit Windows machine? Preferably, "out-of-the-box" precompiled binaries with Lua source/ffi bindings?
OR alternatively, are there any clear instructions on how to get this set up properly, without having to scavenge through separate instructions across the web for each required assembly?
I'm currently trying to compile an old program (made with C++ builder 2 or 3) with the "current" Embarcadero RAD Studio XE2.
So, I was wondering whether there is an easy way to use the old code, as Borland once claimed to be fully compatible to lower versions... however I couldn't find a "project-file", only source-code (.cpp, .h, .res, etc.).
I tried to "add to project" the main .cpp, however there seem to be some wrong include-paths... it also seem to use the OWL-package and includes its important source-files...
I'm a bit confused which type of main project I have to open first, since you need to open a new project before adding the source to it. As the running .exe has a GUI, I tried a Form-Window first, but it may be better to use a console or service as the real form is produced within the code as far as I understand.
So, after installing OWL and correcting the include-paths, do you think it should be running fine? Or is there something else to take care of?
If your old project was using OWL, you're probably well outside of the supported upgrade path.
That being said, valid C++ code should still compile and work and I've heard of people using OWL with recent versions of C++Builder. (via OWLNext)
Regarding your confusion as to which type of project to use, I believe a console application would be your best bet. A forms application is completely wrong, that will bring in the VCL and give you no end of problems trying to reconcile the different windowing systems. A service application is a completely different beast as well, and isn't meant for GUI applications. A console application should work, but you'll need more. The OWLNext project has a wiki that should help quite a bit.
I use Intellij Idea 7 for Java dev. My dev is 'limited' to all J2SE features plus light JSP, Servlets, and super light usage of JPA. No J2EE, no massive use of random frameworks, etc.
Is it worth upgrading to ver 8? "Worth it" to me means better "core functionality" in terms of speed (ESPECIALLY startup speed), memory utilization (seems like it starts having serious problems with four or more projects open), and auto bug-finding.
More frameworks supported and more languages supported (other than perhaps Haskell and C++), and more refactorings don't interest me at this time.
A while back, I installed a preview version of 8 and it seemed -exactly- the same as 7, as far as my needs were concerned.
Anyone loving the upgrade to 8, and if so, why?
Thanks
It also seems to be easier to configure a new project over top of a complex collection of existing code.
For example, something that you would naturally configure into 5 or more modules.
There is a really beautiful go to/create test wizard that is bound to ctrl-shift-T. Worth the upgrade by itself
The best way to tell is to check out the list of new features and decide for yourself. I haven't discovered any single feature so far that by itself is worth upgrading - the simplified UML view is quite nice, as is the improved Maven integration. The UI feels a bit more streamlined and faster. It seems like most of the attention has gone into non-Java features like better Flex support (which I am really thankful for as I don't like FlexBuilder but I haven't had a chance to use yet).
IntelliJ 8 has a configure plugins feature that allows you to disable plugins with dependencies. Nothing trial and error couldn't replicate, but it is nice.
Startup is only marginally slower. But indexing once opened is a lot faster than before, even unnoticeable for most projects, except after a commit to Subversion. It seems a commit to subversion triggers the indexing twice.
I am working on the Diana-EAP build - but 8 has git integration built in. The EAP has better git integration than the 8.0.1 release - it looks like that is something they are really focusing on.
Definitely not! Seems that the variables defined in our custom taglibs are no longer able to be used in the jsp (worked in 7.0.4). All red. No auto complete.
Oh, and the new settings menu is horrendous!
Some benefits of IntelliJ IDEA 8:
IDEA 8 supports Subversion 1.5 new functionality - e.g. merge tracking, which may be useful especially if your team (like ours) uses a lot of development branches and thus merging is frequent.
One detail I appreciated about IDEA 8: As you probably know, IDEA has had changelists for pretty long now, built on top of any underlying version control system - this is a really useful feature. So, now that Subversion itself supports changeslists, IDEA's changelist implementation has been changed so that it is perfectly compatible with Subversion's native changeslists. (For example, you'll be able to work with any changelists created in IDEA also when using svn command line tools directly.)
Edit: in your case, perhaps it is not worthwhile to upgrade. For me, at least, startup and file indexing seems to be somewhat slower in 8 than 7. [But for me personally the upgrade was definitely worth it, because it solved a long-standing VCS problem with IDEA 7 - it could hang "waiting for VCS sync to finish" for an hour or whatever after hitting Ctrl-K.]
I have code from PowerBuilder 5 that can't be built. The compiler just stops before it is done without any error codes.
I would like to upgrade the code to the recent version of PowerBuilder but there are some intermediate versions of PowerBuilder that have binary dependencies to an old Microsoft java dll that Microsoft no longer can distribute due to some court case.
So, is there a way to get my code running in a newer environment?
/johan/
Firstly, you don't need to use "intermediate versions of PowerBuilder" to migrate up to a current version, so even if this java DLL dependency sounds questionable to me (at least it doesn't ring a bell), it's irrelevant unless it affects the target version of PowerBuilder.
For migrating, you might want to check out this migration guide, as well as a list of changes to PB that may affect you.
Very unusual sounding problem. You could give a try to migrating the code to a more recent version of PowerBuilder and see if it will compile or at least fail but give you some useful error messages.
I would also recommend posting this in the PowerBuilder section of the Sybase newsgroups. They are very active and full of some brilliant PB minds with lots of experience. You can find them here: http://forums.sybase.com
From here:http://forums.sybase.com/cgi-bin/webnews.cgi?cmd=item-4558&group=sybase.public.powersite
I just learned that the combination of "severe" message, and message
that psdwc70.dll was unable to self-register is probably because
msjava.dll is not present and/or registered on your machine. The
psdwc70.dll file relies on msjava.dll in order to install properly.
/johan/
Have you tried exporting the code in PB5 and importing in new version?