I need to rename a lot of similar named job names so i want to run an update statement to change the name column of msdb..sysjobs.
Editing system tables is something i am pretty aware of, but changing job names doesn't feel that dangerous, because i think the job_id is what counts. Is it safe to do it in this case?
I am using sql server 2008.
When you have the same jobs running in multiple environments, it's a better practice to refer to jobs by name rather than by ID, because a job with the same name will be created with a different ID in every environment.
If you change the name of the jobs, make sure that any scripts you use to manipulate those jobs also use the new name.
I think there is nothing to worry about, you can modify it.
Please find detail about sysjobs here.
It is NOT save to just rename it. Using sql profiler shows, that renaming a package using the object exlorer will start several procedures. It will create a new package using sp_add_dtspackage and drop it later using sp_drop_dtspackage. The package id is although set using a parameter, so setting it random really seems to be a potential risk.
Related
The aim is when updating the application and update the access database without altering the data so update by update only the new tables or new columns so i want to copy the exact table with it's structure to the old database vb.net and access database.
what I've tried is detecting the differences between the old database and the new one by getting in combobox1 the only missed table and in combobox2 the missed columns in the old database in exact table already there in both database and get it's data type .
so i want to copy the entire table and then create only missed columns
thank you
There is not a built in tool to do this.
But, worse yet, there is no "generate" change scripts in Access
(Like say with SQL server).
So, how do you approach this issue? What do some of the accounting systems or commercial programs that use ms-access as the database?
Well, you have to build a kind of "up-grade" system in your software.
This means two things:
To add a new column to a table (for example), you NEVER go open up the access database with access, but "add" or "write" the code to add that field in question.
In fact, I had an applcation deployed out in the field - many desktops.
So, I had a code module called upgrade. And each time I needed a new field or whatever, then I would write the code to add that new colum.
AS LONG as I always added things into that code module, I was ok. (never break the rule for adding new fields, tables or even increasing the length of some field? - use code).
And it became quite easy after I had some code written. I would in fact often cut + paste a previous bit of code to add a new column to a table.
However, after about 5 years, that messy code module had 800+ lines of code in it!!!
But, I ALSO realized that MOST things like adding a new column or whatever? Same code over and over.
So, what I did next was built a "upgrade" table. It looked like this:
Version action SQL RunCode
2.5 AddTable tblCustomers
2.5 AddField "sql here to add table"
etc. etc.
So, I had a version number, and then I compare against the up-grade table. I had "action", and the code would simple loop this table, and do whatever.
So, for example, to add a field, you can use access "DDL" command (data definition commands - most SQL systems support this, and so does Access).
so, say like this:
' any new table code goes here:
If lngVer < 1148 Then
' add event Invoice text option
ExecuteSQLNR "ALTER TABLE dbo.Events ADD InvoiceText ntext NULL"
ExecuteSQLNR "ALTER TABLE dbo.Events ADD HideEventDate bit NULL default 0"
Or, say to increase a column lengh from 50 to 55
db.Execute "ALTER TABLE tblGroupRemind ALTER COLUMN Anotes text(255)", dbFailOnError
As noted, since oh so many the commands were VERY similar, then I started putting that information into a table, and then I would execute the required upgrades in a loop.
For a whole new table? Well, I thought that was too much code, so I always included a blank empty database - and for new tables, I would place them in that upgrade.accDB table - and "transfer/copy" the table from that upgrade database to the real one. That way, I could with great ease create a whole new table, and create in Access designers, and then add/copy that table to the "upgrade.accDB" database.
As noted? The above ideas an approaches work quite well.
In fact, over time, I found it LESS hassle while coding away to add the new column or whatever LESS effort then having to open up ms-acces, and then the table, and then the designer and make the changes.
However, the BIG issue with above?
Well, you have to get all users at least upgraded to your EXISTING schema, and there is no automated tools.
in fact, before I had any automated tools? I would open up note pad, and if I added some field to some table? I would simple type into note pad that new field in such and such table is required).
Then, when on customer site, I would open up their database, and then go look at the note pad document for the list of changes I was to make. (that is what I was doing before I started automating the process - and of course it not always practical to be "on site" or have the customers database.
But, ONCE I had all of the above working?
Then during development, I would open up my "upgrade" database, add the new row and action (new table, new column, (and more).
I even had a column that defined the function to run AFTER that one command. I mean, quite often when you add a new column, or change somthing in a table, often you need to copy data, or at least process some data after you make that change.
Once you get above going?
Then you simple NEVER make changes in the data tables directly, but use your "system" for this. And that works REALLY well.
For one, a customer could open up a older data file - say one from 4 or 5 years ago. The applcation version number would be detected, and then the upgrade code would run all though the versions to update that database. (and I did this automatic on startup - so they never even knew such a upgrade had occurred).
So, you just have to make sure that for each change you make, you put that code in your upgrade system, and you are done.
But, for existing systems? You have to look at what changes you made since last deploy, and write out the "ddl" commands (the alter table SQL commands).
There is no automated way of doing this.
As FYI?
One of the BEST and more valuable free tools in Visual Tools is the SQL server compare utility. It will not only automatic detect and tell you the changes between two SQL server databases, but will also upgrade for you. (very nice).
But, such a system is not available for Access. In fact, so valuable is that utility for SQL server, you might consider upgrading from Access to SQL server for this applcation. With that utility? I can work local, add fields, columns, tables and even stored procedures to that SQL database. When I am on site (or even by VPN), then I run that compare tool - it shows the changes, and ALSO has a button to update the target schema.
I don't know of a automated "schema" checker and updater for Access.
So, what I suggest for above ONLY works if you put such a system in place, and THEN as a developer always make your schema changes to your upgrade system, and never directly in the database with ms-access.
At last BigQuery supports using ; in the queries, so I can write more than one query in one "block", if I seperate them with semicolon.
If I run the code manually, it works. But I cannot schedule that.
When I want to schedule, I have two choices:
(New) Web UI: I must give a destination table. If I don't do it, I could not save the scheduled query. But all my queries are updates and inserts with different "destination tables". Like these:
UPDATE project.exampledataset.a
SET date = current_date()
WHEN TRUE
;
INSERT INTO project.otherdataset.b
SELECT c,d
FROM project.otherdataset.c
So I cannot even make a scheduling in the Web UI.
Classic UI: I tried this, because the official documentary states, that I should leave the "destination table" blank, and Classic UI allows it. I can setup the scheduling, but it doesn't run, when it should. I get the error message in email "Error status: Dataset specified in the query ('') is not consistent with Destination dataset 'exampledataset'."
AIK scripting (and using semicolon) is a very new feature in BigQuery, but I hope someone can help me.
Yes, I know that I could schedule every query one by one, but I would like to resolve it with one big script.
Looks like the scheduled query was defined earlier with destination dataset defined with APPEND/TRUNCATE type transaction. While updating the same scheduled query to a DML query, GUI doesn't show the dataset field / table name to update to NULL. Hence this error is coming considering the previously set dataset and table name in the scheduled query.
Hence the fix is to delete the scheduled query and create it from scratch with DML query option. It worked for me.
Scripting is supported in scheduled query now. However, scripting query, when being scheduled, doesn't support setting a destination table for now. You still need to use DDL/DML to make change to existing table.
E.g.:
CREATE OR REPLACE TABLE destinationTable AS
SELECT *
FROM sourceTable
WHERE date >= maxDate
As of 2022, the BQ Console UI will let you create a new scheduled query without a destination dataset, but it won't let you update a prior SELECT to use DDL/DML block syntax. However, you can use the BigQuery Data Transfer API to update the destinationDatasetId field, via transferconfigs/patch. Use transferconfigs/list to get the configId for a given scheduled query.
Note that you can either use the in-browser API Explorer, if you have the appropriate credentials, or write a programmatic solution. Also seems useful for setting/updating any other fields, including renaming scheduled queries.
In app config file. I used initial catalog ='jana' as database name.
Then i run it use it for some times.
Then later i changed initial catalog ='siva' as database name . That i changed database name alone and saved it. Whenever i run this 'siva' as initial catalog , select queries is using 'siva' database at the same time inserting /updating queries using my previous database 'jana'. Its really weird.
thanks for considering my query. I rectified mistake by myself.
Actually while inserting/updating queries , i have used databasename.dbo.tablename for all queries. That is the cause whenever i used different database , the one which i used on creating was always affected.
Hope u understand my scenario.
Thanks for all.
I'm writing a tool which is used to perform several database operations.
But the tool should only be used with one specific database.
Now I'm looking for a way, to securely identify the database, the tool is connected to.
First I thought about just checking a string like SERVERNAME\INSTANCE#Database.
Also I found this question where the solution is to use a GUID, but this GUID changes if the DB is restored on another server.
The DB should be recognized even when it is being moved to another server or instance, or if the database name changes.
Is there a reliable way to achieve this?
You might be able to achieve this with an extended property.
To create:
exec sp_addextendedproperty #name = 'dbUniqueIdentifier' #value = 'ABCD1234'
To confirm:
select value from sys.extended_properties where name = 'dbUniqueIdentifier'
In my organization, we use extended properties to identify which build and changeset the database schema came from. The properties survive backup/restore/migration.
I want to modify a column name to new name present in a table
but here problem i want to manually modify the column name present in Triggers or SP's.
Is there a any better way of doing it.
To rename a column am using this
sp_RENAME 'Tablename.old_Column', 'new_column' , 'COLUMN';
similarly how can i do it for triggers or SP's.? without opening each script?
Well, there are a bunch of 3rd party tools that are promising this type of "safe rename", some for free and some are not:
ApexSQL has a free tool for that, as MWillemse wrote in his answer,
RedGate have a commercial tool called SQLPrompt that also have a safe renaming feture, However it is far from being free.
Microsoft have a visual studio add-in called SQL Server Data Tools (or SSDT in the short version), as Dan Guzman wrote in his comment.
I have to say I've never tried any of these specific tools for that specific task, but I do have some experience with SSDT and some of RedGate's products and I consider them to be very good tools. I know nothing about ApexSQL.
Another option is to try and write the sql script yourself, However there are a couple of things to take into consideration before you start:
Can your table be accessed directly from outside the sql server? I mean, is it possible that some software is executing sql statement directly on that table? If so, you might break it when you rename that column, and no sql tool will help in this situation.
Are your sql scripting skills really that good? I consider myself to be fairly experienced with sql server, but I think writing a script like that is beyond my skills. Not that it's impossible for me, but it will probably take too much time and effort for something I can get for free.
Should you decide to write it yourself, there are a few articles that might help you in that task:
First, Microsoft official documentation of sys.sql_expression_dependencies.
Second, an article called Different Ways to Find SQL Server Object Dependencies that is written by a 13 years experience DBA,
and last but not least, a related question on StackExchange's Database Administrator's website.
You could, of course, go with the safe way Gordon Linoff suggested in his comment, or use synonyms like destination-data suggested in his answer, but then you will have to manually modify all of the columns dependencies manually, and from what I understand, that is what you want to avoid.
Renaming the Table column
Deleting the Table column
Alter Table Keys
Best way use Database Projects in Visual Studio.
Refer this links
link 1
link 2
you can do what #GorDon suggested.
Apart from this,you can also play with this query,
select o.name, sc.* from sys.syscomments sc inner join sys.objects o
on sc.id=o.object_id where sc.text like '%oldcolumnname%'
this will return list of all proc and trigger.Also you can modify filter to get exact list.then it will be very easy for you to modify,manually.
But whatever you decide,don't simply drop old column.
To be safe,even keep back up.
This suggestion relates to Oracle DB, however there may be equivalent solutions in other DBMS's.
A temporary solution to your issue is to create a pseudocolumn. This solution looks a little hacky because the syntax for a pseudocolumn requires an expression. The simplest expression I can think of is the case statement below. Let me know if you can make it more simple.
ALTER TABLE <<tablename>> ADD (
<<new_column_name>> AS (
CASE
WHEN 1=1 THEN <<tablename>>.<<old_column_name>>
END)
);
This strategy basically creates a new column on the fly by evaluating the case statement and copying the value of <<old_column_value>> to <<new_column_value>>. Because you are dynamically interpolating this column there is a performance penalty vs just selecting the original column.
The one gotcha is that this will only work if you are duplicating a column once. Multiple pseudocolumns cannot contain duplicate expressions in Oracle.
The other strategy you can consider is to create a view and you can name the columns whatever you want. You can even INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE (execute DML) against views, but this would give you a whole new table_name, not just a new column. You could however rename the old table, and name your view the same as your old table. This also has a performance penalty vs just accessing the underlying table.
You might want to replace that text in definition. However, you will be needing a dedicated administrator connection in sql server. Versions also vary in setting up a dedicated administrator connection. Setting up the startup parameter by adding ;-T7806 under advanced. And by adding Admin: before the servername upon logging in. By then, you may be able to modify the value of the definition.