NinjectModule and IProvider not resolving types - ninject

Here is the set up that is not working
Using Ninject V3.0
public class LoggerModule : NinjectModule{
public override void Load()
{
Bind<ILogger>.ToProvider(MyLoggerProvider);
}
}
public class MyLoggerProvider: IProvider<ILogger>
{
public object Create(IContext context){
return new OneOfMyLoggers();
}
}
In my application wherever I inject instance of ILogger (using constructor or property injection, just does matter) I never get instance of ILogger resolved.
But If do not use module and/or povider, and bind when kernel is created, everything works like a charm. The following works
public class MyDiResolver()
{
public MyDiResolver()
{
MyKernel = new StandardKernel();
MyKernel.Bind<ILogger>().To<OneOfMyLoggers>();
}
}
The same arrangement of modules and providers works fine in Ninject2.x version. Is there something different about Ninject V3.0 that I am missing?
Thanks

Try passing the module into the StandardKernel so it knows to use it:
using (IKernel kernel = new StandardKernel(new LoggerModule()))
{
ILogger logger = kernel.Get<OneOfMyLoggers>();
}

Related

Resteasy and Google Guice: how to use multiple #ApplicationPath and resource with #Injection?

I created a project to test the dependency injection offered by Google Guice in my Jax-rs resources, using Resteasy.
My intentions are:
Use multiple #ApplicationPath for the versions of my API. In each class annotated with #ApplicationPath I load a set of classes for the specific version.
Each resource have a #Inject (from Google Guice) in his constructor to inject some services.
I created two classes annotated with #ApplicationPath: ApplicationV1RS and ApplicationV2RS. In both I added the same resources classes (UserResource and HelloResource), only for my test.
My Module is configured like this:
public class HelloModule implements Module
{
public void configure(final Binder binder)
{
binder.bind(IGreeterService.class).to(GreeterService.class);
binder.bind(IUserService.class).to(UserService.class);
}
}
When I call http://localhost:9095/v1/hello/world or http://localhost:9095/v2/hello/world, I receive the same error:
java.lang.RuntimeException: RESTEASY003190: Could not find constructor
for class: org.jboss.resteasy.examples.guice.hello.HelloResource
Well, as I expected, this not works. The Google Guice is not "smart" to instantiate the resource classes using the construtor for me.
But I can't find a way to work. To be really honest, I'm really confuse about how the Google Guice, Jetty and Resteasy play with each other in this scenario.
If I abandon the idea of use #ApplicationPath, my resources work with Google Guice configuring my HelloModule like this:
public class HelloModule implements Module
{
public void configure(final Binder binder)
{
binder.bind(HelloResource.class);
binder.bind(IGreeterService.class).to(GreeterService.class);
binder.bind(UserResource.class);
binder.bind(IUserService.class).to(UserService.class);
}
}
But in this case, I'm passing the control to register my resources (HelloResource and UserResource) to Guice. It's not flexible for me, I can't setup my multiple #ApplicationPath.
So, what I'm missing or not understanding?
I created a project with the problemetic code. Is very easy to setup and test: https://github.com/dherik/resteasy-guice-hello/tree/so-question/README.md
Thanks!
When you have getClasses method in your Application then it tries to create instance for all the registered resources using the default constructor which is missing in our Resources class. One way is to create a default constructor and Inject the dependencies through setter Injection.
And then instead of overriding getClasses in ApplicationV1RS and ApplicationV2RS you override getSingletons. Since Resources can be Singleton.
Below are the changes that I made to make it work the way you want.
ApplicationV1RS.java
#ApplicationPath("v1")
public class ApplicationV1RS extends Application {
private Set<Object> singletons = new HashSet<Object>();
public ApplicationV1RS(#Context ServletContext servletContext) {
}
#Override
public Set<Object> getSingletons() {
Injector injector = Guice.createInjector(new HelloModule());
HelloResource helloResource = injector.getInstance(HelloResource.class);
UserResource userResource = injector.getInstance(UserResource.class);
singletons.add(helloResource);
singletons.add(userResource);
return singletons;
}
}
ApplicationV2RS.java
#ApplicationPath("v2")
public class ApplicationV2RS extends Application {
private Set<Object> singletons = new HashSet<Object>();
public ApplicationV2RS(#Context ServletContext servletContext) {
}
#Override
public Set<Object> getSingletons() {
Injector injector = Guice.createInjector(new HelloModule());
HelloResource helloResource = injector.getInstance(HelloResource.class);
UserResource userResource = injector.getInstance(UserResource.class);
singletons.add(helloResource);
singletons.add(userResource);
return singletons;
}
}
HelloResource.java
#Path("hello")
public class HelloResource {
#Inject
private IGreeterService greeter;
public HelloResource() {
}
#GET
#Path("{name}")
public String hello(#PathParam("name") final String name) {
return greeter.greet(name);
}
}
UserResource.java
#Path("user")
public class UserResource {
#Inject
private IUserService userService;
public UserResource() {
}
#GET
#Path("{name}")
public String hello(#PathParam("name") final String name) {
return userService.getUser(name);
}
}
Add #Singleton to your Service Classes.
Hope it helps.
I have also pushed the code to forked repo. check it out

MVC4 Web Api Castle Windsor Container.Resolve AllComponents count = 0

Current Code
public class SystemUserController : ApiController
{
ISystemUserDataAccess dataAccess;
public SystemUserController(ISystemUserDataAccess userDataAccess)
{
dataAccess = userDataAccess;
}
//Other api methods
}
And ISystemUserDataAccess is the interface which contains all the data access methods. I have following installer code, which is being called by the Global.asax
public class RepositoriesInstaller : IWindsorInstaller
{
public void Install(IWindsorContainer container, IConfigurationStore store)
{
container.Register(
Component.For(typeof(IConnectDB)).ImplementedBy(typeof(ConnectDB)),
Component.For(typeof(ISystemUserDataAccess)).ImplementedBy(typeof(SystemUserDataAccess));
}
}
public class ApiControllersInstaller : IWindsorInstaller
{
public void Install(Castle.Windsor.IWindsorContainer container,
Castle.MicroKernel.SubSystems.Configuration.IConfigurationStore store)
{
container.Register(Classes.FromThisAssembly()
.BasedOn<ApiController>()
.LifestylePerWebRequest());
}
}
Container Initialization at Global.asax
container = new WindsorContainer();
container.Install(FromAssembly.This());
It is all working fine. userDataAccess get injected properly and i can call all the DataAccess method without any problem.
My Data Access class looks like below.
public class SystemUserDataAccess : ISystemUserDataAccess
{
IConnectDB connectionManager;
public SystemUserDataAccess(IConnectDB connection)
{
connectionManager = connection;
}
//Data access methods
}
Actual Problem
Now I need an instance of SystemUserDataAccess within a non ApiController class (this is a static class). When I tried below code, but it is giving an exception, saying it couldnt find any component registered.
IWindsorContainer container = new WindsorContainer();
var asas = container.Resolve<ISystemUserDataAccess>();
When I inspect the container object, "All component" property is 0. Which is why it is throwing the error. What am I doing wrong here? Do i need another installer for that non ApiController class?
Instead of doing container.Install(FromAssembly.This()); in global.asax, use container.install(new RepositoriesInstaller());

ServiceStack - Use Ninject instead of Funq

I am trying to use ServiceStack with Ninject rather than Funq. I have the following:
public interface IContainerAdapter
{
T Resolve<T>();
T TryResolve<T>();
}
public class NinjectIocAdapter : IContainerAdapter
{
private readonly IKernel kernel;
public NinjectIocAdapter(IKernel kernel)
{
this.kernel = kernel;
}
public T Resolve<T>()
{
return this.kernel.Get<T>();
}
public T TryResolve<T>()
{
return this.kernel.TryGet<T>();
}
}
Then inside my Configure method:
public override void Configure(Funq.Container container)
{
//Set JSON web services to return idiomatic JSON camelCase properties
ServiceStack.Text.JsConfig.EmitCamelCaseNames = true;
IKernel kernel = new StandardKernel();
container.Adapter = new NinjectIocAdapter(kernel);
//Set MVC to use the same Funq IOC as ServiceStack
//ControllerBuilder.Current.SetControllerFactory(new FunqControllerFactory(container));
}
But I get the following error:
Cannot implicitly convert type 'NinjectIocAdapter' to 'ServiceStack.Configuration.IContainerAdapter'.
I'm also unsure whether I have to uncomment the line to set MVC to use Funq IoC? I have commented it out as I will be using Ninject. Is that correct?
I assume once this is all working. I can simply register any dependencies inside:
private static void RegisterServices(IKernel kernel)
{
}
The code exactly matches the documentation with one subtle difference.
You have to use ServiceStack.Configuration.IContainerAdapter instead of your own IContainerAdapter
.
Delete your implementation, add a reference to ServiceStack.Configuration and you should be fine.

SignalR Dependency Resolver not working from Javascript Hubs

I've recently upgraded to the new version of the excellent SignalR library, and moved all my Dependency Injection from StructureMap to Ninject, as Ninject seemed to be better supported.
I've got the dependency injection working fine for Server-side notifications using the "Broadcasting over a Hub from outside of a Hub" described here: https://github.com/SignalR/SignalR/wiki/Hubs.
The problem I'm getting is that all SignalR messages originating from the Javascript hub don't seem to be triggering the dependency injection.
I'm also using MVC4 WebAPI which also takes some shoe-horning to get dependency injection working.
Here's my Hub:
public class PresenceHub : Hub, IPresenceHub
{
private readonly IUserRepository _userRepository;
private readonly IFormsAuthenticationProvider _formsAuthenticationProvider;
public PresenceHub(IFormsAuthenticationProvider formsAuthenticationProvider, IUserRepository userRepository)
{
_userRepository = userRepository;
_formsAuthenticationProvider = formsAuthenticationProvider;
}
public void PresenceChange(string presence)
{
var user = _userRepository.FindById(_formsAuthenticationProvider.GetUserId());
var rosterEntry = Mapper.Map<User, RosterEntryDto>(user);
rosterEntry.Presence = presence;
Clients.updatePresence(rosterEntry);
}
}
Here's my Ninject Bootstrapper:
Namespace SLx.Web.App_Start
{
using System;
using System.Web;
using Microsoft.Web.Infrastructure.DynamicModuleHelper;
using Ninject;
using Ninject.Web.Common;
public static class NinjectWebCommon
{
private static readonly Bootstrapper bootstrapper = new Bootstrapper();
public static void Start()
{
DynamicModuleUtility.RegisterModule(typeof(OnePerRequestHttpModule));
DynamicModuleUtility.RegisterModule(typeof(NinjectHttpModule));
bootstrapper.Initialize(CreateKernel);
}
public static void Stop()
{
bootstrapper.ShutDown();
}
private static IKernel CreateKernel()
{
var kernel = new StandardKernel();
kernel.Bind<Func<IKernel>>().ToMethod(ctx => () => new Bootstrapper().Kernel);
kernel.Bind<IHttpModule>().To<HttpApplicationInitializationHttpModule>();
// SignalR Ninject Resolver
GlobalHost.DependencyResolver = new SignalR.Ninject.NinjectDependencyResolver(kernel);
// WebApi Ninject Resolver
GlobalConfiguration.Configuration.DependencyResolver = new NinjectDependencyResolver(kernel);
RegisterServices(kernel);
return kernel;
}
private static void RegisterServices(IKernel kernel)
{
}
}
I'm notifying clients on the serverside via a PresenceProxy defined as follows:
public class PresenceHubProxy : IPresenceHubProxy
{
private readonly IHubContext _hubContext;
public PresenceHubProxy()
{
_hubContext = GlobalHost.ConnectionManager.GetHubContext<PresenceHub>();
}
public void NotifyLogin(RosterEntryDto user)
{
_hubContext.Clients.updatePresence(user);
}
public void NotifyLogout(RosterEntryDto user)
{
_hubContext.Clients.updatePresence(user);
}
}
The Proxy works fine, injected into Controllers or their dependencies, and can send messages to the clients.
When the clients try to call SignalR via Javascript I get the following error:
No parameterless constructor defined for this object.
It looks like Ninject is not being invoked because the dependencies are not being injected into the constructor. What do I need to do to get Dependency Injection working for Javascript calls too?
Update --
Following advice from DFowler, I've replaced the Resolver in PostApplicationStart. Debugging I can see in the Immediate Window that SignalR.GlobalHost.Resolver is of type NinjectDependencyResolver but its still not working I get the same error - no paramaterless constructor.
I've then removed the NinjectDependencyResolver NuGet Library and added the source file to my solution and am using that for debugging purposes. Debugging on GetService and GetServices shows that neither method is ever called in NinjectDependencyResolver.
Any Ideas?
Problem was I hadn't called RouteTable.Routes.MapHubs:
GlobalHost.DependencyResolver = new SignalRNinjectResolver(NinjectWebCommon.Kernel);
RouteTable.Routes.MapHubs(new SignalRNinjectResolver(NinjectWebCommon.Kernel));
From the docs https://github.com/SignalR/SignalR/wiki/Extensibility:
NOTE: DO NOT override the global resolver in PreApplicationStart, it will not work, or it'll work only sometimes. Do it in PostApplicationStart (using WebActivator) or in Global.asax.

bind to property always return null

I am trying to bind a repository to property using Ninject but always get null reference of binding object. I will explain the problem using code below.
public interface IServiceRepository
{
User GetUser(string email);
IQueryable<Statistic> GetStatisticForCurrentMonth(string ip);
void InsertStatistic(ConversionModel conversionModel);
class ServiceRepository : IServiceRepository
{
//Implementation of the Interface
}
I am would like to bind the repository above to class below while the class is created. Unfortunately Repository object is always null. Maybe I have misunderstood how Ninject is working? How to solve the problem?
public class Converter
{
[Inject]
public static IServiceRepository Repository { get; set; }
private static Converter _converter;
public static Converter Instance
{
get { return _Converter ?? (_Converter = new Converter ());
}
}
Ninject activator code
private static void RegisterServices(IKernel kernel)
{
kernel.Bind<IServiceRepository>().ToMethod(context => Converter.Repository);
}
Update
I have tried to rewrite code like this
public class Converter
{
private readonly IServiceRepository _repository;
public Converter(IServiceRepository repository)
{
_repository = repository;
}
//skip code
}
The test...
[TestMethod]
public void ConverterInstanceCreated()
{
using (IKernel kernel = new StandardKernel())
{
kernel.Bind<IServiceRepository>().To<ServiceRepository>();
Assert.IsNotNull(kernel.Get<Converter>());
}
}
gives exception
Test method PC.Tests.NinjectTest.ConverterInstanceCreated threw exception:
Ninject.ActivationException: Error activating IServiceRepository
No matching bindings are available, and the type is not self-bindable.
Activation path:
2) Injection of dependency IServiceRepository into parameter repository of constructor of type Converter
1) Request for Converter
I just lost, I am trying to understand how Ninject is working for about week without any success. In my case why this exception is thrown?
Also please someone post working example with one repository injection to singleton class.
Ninject does not inject statics. Change the coynverter to a non-static class and configure it as Singleton in ninject. Also use constructor injection and make the repo a private field.
Now you can inject the converter to the constructors where you need it.
Even though you are using Property injection and not Constructor injection I think it would still be
private static void RegisterServices(IKernel kernel)
{
kernel.Bind<IServiceRepository>().To<ServiceRepository>();
}
As ninject still just needs to know what concrete type to map to the Interface
I haven't tested this so apologies if it's wrong.