The Seaside book says: "saving [an image] while processing http requests is a risk you want to avoid“.
Why is this? Does it just temporarily slow down serving http requests or will requests get lost or will errors occur?
Before an image is saved registered shutdown actions are executed. This means source files are closed and web servers are shut down. After the image is saved it executes the startup actions, which typically bring up the web-server again. Depending on the server implementation open connections might be closed.
This means that you cannot accept new connections while you save an image and open connections might be temporarily suspended or closed. For both issues there are (at least) two easy workarounds:
Fork the image using OSProcess before you save it (DabbleDB, CmsBox).
Use multiple images and a load balancer so that you can remove images one at a time from the active servers before saving them.
It seems that it's just a question of slowing things down. There is this quite thorough thread on the Seaside list, the most relevant post of which is this case study of an eCommerce site:
Consequently, currently this is what happens:
image is saved from time to time (usually daily), and copied to a separate "backup" machine.
if anything bad happens, the last image is grabbed, and the orders and/or gift certificates that were issued since the last image save
are simply re-entered.
And, #2 has been very rarely done-- maybe a two or three times a
year, and then it turns out it is usually because I did something
stupid.
Also, one of the great things about Smalltalk is that it's so easy to run quick experiments. You can download Seaside and put a halt in a callback of one of the examples. For example:
WACounter>>renderContentOn: html
...
html anchor
callback: [
self halt.
self increase ];
with: '++'.
...
Open a browser on the Seaside server (port 8080 by default)
Click "Counter" to go to the example app
Click the "++" link
Switch back to Seaside. You'll see the pre-debug window for the halt
Save the image
Click "Proceed"
You'll see that the counter is correctly incremented, with no apparent ill effect from the save.
Related
I have a serious problem, is that I can not launch any query on clicking on some link in my website until the first request is finished:
I have a musical website in which I generate waveform on click on the track, the problem is that generating the waveform take some sometime (about 12 seconds) to be finished, so if I click on another track it will not start untill the generation (the call to the webservice) is not yet finished.
I have seen in FRONT calls but the problem seems to be in backend, because even in the logs of apache, it says that the first query was called at x time, when it finishes apache write down in the log the second call.
The strange thing is that the time of the second call written by apache is the x + some micro seconds, as the apache also was blocked waiting for the first request also to be finished.
Please help me.
BTW : the website is secured by a password so I must have contact with someone to see the problem
Ask me what ever you want for more details.
Kind regards.
I am using the UI Automation COM-to-.NET Adapter to read the contents of the target Google Chrome browser that plays a FLASH content on Windows 7. It works.
I succeeded to get the content and elements. Everything works fine for some time but after few hours the elements become inaccessible.
The (AutomationElement).FindAll() returns 0 children.
Is there any internal undocumented Timeout used by UIAutomation ?
According to this IUIAutomation2 interface
There are 2 timeouts but they are not accessible from IUIAutomation interface.
IUIAutomation2 is supported only on Windows 8 (desktop apps only).
So I believe there is some timeout.
I made a workaround that restarts the searching and monitoring of elements from the beginning of the desktop tree but the elements are still not available.
After some time (not sure how much) the elements are available again.
My requirements are to read the values all the time as fast as possible but this behavior makes a damage to the whole architecture.
I read somewhere that there is some timeout of 3 minutes but not sure.
if there is a timeout, is it possible to change it ?
Is it possible to restart something or release/dispose something ?
I can't find anything on MSDN.
Does anybody have any idea what is happening and how to resolve ?
Thanks for this nicely put question. I have a similar issue with a much different setup. I'm on Win7, using UIAutomationCore.dll directly from C# to test our application-under-development. After running my sequence of actions & event subscriptions and all the other things, I intermittently observe that the UIA interface stops working (about 8-10min in my case, but I'm heavily using the UIA interface).
Many different things including dispatching the COM interface, sleeping at different places failed. The funny revelation was I managed to use the AccEvent.exe (part of SDK like inspect.exe) during the test and saw that events also stopped flowing to AccEvent, too. So it wasn't my client's interface that stopped, but it was rather the COM-server (or whatever the UIAutomationCore does) that stopped responding.
As a solution (that seems to work most of the time - or improve the situation a lot), I decided I should give the application-under-test some breathing point, since using the UIA puts additional load on it. This could be a smartly-put sleep points in your client, but instead of sleeping a set time, I'm monitoring the processor load of the application and waiting until it settles down.
One of the intermittent errors I receive when the problem manifests itself is "... was unable to call any of the subscribers..", and my search resulted in an msdn page saying they have improved things on CUIAutomation8 interface, but as this is Windows8 specific, I didn't have the chance to try that yet.
I should also add that I also reduced the number of calls to UIA by incorporating more ui caching (FindAllBuildCache), as the less the frequency of back-and-forth the better it is for the uia. Thanks to the answer of Guy in another question: UI Automation events stop being received after a while monitoring an application and then restart after some time
Long polling has solved 99% of my problems. There is now just one other problem. Imagine a penny auction site, where people bid. On the frontpage, there are several Auctions.
If the user opens three of these auctions, and because javascript is not multithreaded, how would you get the other pages to ever load? Won't they always get bogged down and not load because they are waiting for long polling to end? In practice, I've experienced this and I can't think of a way around it. Any ideas?
There are two ways that javascript gets around some of this.
While javascript is single threaded conceptually, it does its io in separate threads using completion handlers. This means other pieces of javascript can be running while you are waiting for your network request to complete.
Javascript for each page (or even each frame in each page) is isolated from Javascript on the other pages/frames. This means that each copy of javascript can be running in its own thread.
A bigger issue for you is likely to be that browsers often limit the number of concurrent connections to a given site, and it sounds like you want to make many concurrent connections to the same site. In this case you will get a lock up.
If you control both the sever and client, you will need to combined the multiple long-poll request from the client into a single long-poll request to the server.
I'm making a mobile client for a web site now. And information exchange between my app and server is in JSON (searching users and data on server,sending messages, conversation threading, etc.) But all these features work too slow. I click on the button "send" and then wait for some second before the message will be sent, the same thing with searching, authorization, etc. So I have such a questions:
1. Why it's such a performance overhead?
2. Can it be troubles with the server side or it's JSON parser troubles or may be something else?
3. How can i fix/optimize this? All solutions, advices etc. will be helpful!
I would use Xcode to debug the app to see whether the majority of time is spent loading the data from the server or parsing the JSON once the data is received.
If it is the first, try loading the data from a PC over the same wireless connection and see if it is slow on that too. If so, clearly your server side code needs optimising.
If it is the second and the parsing is slow, you may want to look into using JSONKit instead of the native JSON parser as testing shows it is faster. You may also want to review the structure of your JSON.
One thing I have noticed however is that connections are slower on my iPad than on other machines. I've noticed this when comparing apps I've developed in the simulator to on the device on the same network and when conducting speedtests. As for why this happens, I am not sure - some form of additional overhead in iOS perhaps.
I can save you some time - it has nothing to do with JSON. It has to do with how the your app handles requests in general. It obviously needs optimization on the server.
EDIT:
I suppose it could also be that you might be experiencing high-latency on your phone, but again, that has nothing to do with your app.
Debug it using a regular browser and chrome dev tools (in the network tab) - you'll see that the requests take long even on a desktop at which point you'll have to start fishing around in the server-side code to see what's making it go slow (hint: unoptimized database queries are a big bottleneck....but then again, so is crappy hardware).
Sorry that I couldn't be of more help, but without seeing the entire setup of the server and the code that's going slow (not the client requests, but the server code), that's the best I can do.
Best of luck.
I have created a web-service app and i want to populate my view controllers according to the response i fetch(via GET) in main thread. But i want to create a scheduled timer which will go and control my server, if there becomes any difference(let's say if the count of an array has changed) i will create a local notification. As far as i read from here and some google results, i cant run my app in background more then ten minutes expect from some special situations(Audio, Vo-IP, GPS).. But i need to control the server at least one per minute.. Can anyone offer some idea-or link please?
EDIT
I will not sell the app in store, just for a local area network. Let's say, from the server i will send some text messages to the users and if a new message comes, the count of messages array will increment, in this situation i will create a notification. I need to keep this 'controlling' routing alive forever, whether in foreground or background. Does GCD give such a solution do anyone have any idea?
Just simply play a mute audio file in loop in the background, OR, ping the user's location in the background. Yes, that will drain the battery a bit, but it's a simple hack for in-home applications. Just remember to enable the background types in your Info.plist!
Note: "[...] I fetch (via GET) in main thread." This is not a good approach. You should never fetch any network resources on the main thread. Why? Because your GUI, which is maintained by the main thread, will become unresponsive whenever a fetch isn't instantaneous. Any lag spike on the network results in a less than desirable user experience.
Answer: Aside from the listed special situations, you can't run background apps. The way I see it:
Don't put the app in the background. (crappy solution)
Try putting another "entity" between the app and the "server". I don't know why you "need to control the server at least one per minute" but perhaps you can delegate this "control" to another process outside the device?
.
iOS app -> some form of proxy server -> server which requires
"babysitting" every minute.