I have a very strange problem.
I have a working WCF service.
[ServiceContract]
public interface IService
{
[OperationContract]
int AddResult(int result, string name);
[OperationContract]
int list(int count);
}
In another class I have the implementation of this service. And it works.
But when I change the method "list" like this:
[ServiceContract]
public interface IService
{
[OperationContract]
int AddResult(int result, string name);
[OperationContract]
List<string> list(int count);
}
When I add service reference from targeted project (it is a Windows Phone application) I receive several errors and warnings. The key idea of them is that the service cannot be loaded (or endpoints can not be loaded).
The difference between two methods is very small - List instead of int type. But it is crucial.
Why it is so? Why I can not use List?
did you try to encapsulate your List collection into a proxy class? You could try something like:
[DataContract]
public class MyData
{
[DataMember]
public List<string> list { get; set; }
}
[ServiceContract]
public interface IService
{
[OperationContract]
int AddResult(int result, string name);
[OperationContract]
MyData list(int count);
}
Also, take a look at this link, I think that it might be what you are looking for.
UPDATE
As per discussed on the comments section of this thread, the problem was not located in the WCF service itself, but on the client that was being generated in #user1460819 Windows Phone app.
This problem was solved after the WCF Service binding was changed to "basicHttpBinding", the WCF reference on the client side was regenerated and the whole project was rebuilt.
Related
I have written following code, but only first method in service shows up in client side but rest of two doesn't :(
any one guide me what could be the issue?
ServiceInterface:
[ServiceContract]
public interface IService1
{
[OperationContract]
claimantResponse SaveClaimant(claimant claimant);
[OperationContract]
claimantResponse RenewExpiry(claimantMin claimantMin);
[OperationContract]
claimantResponse getAccessCode(claimantMin claimantMin);
}
ServiceImplementation:
public class Service1 : IService1
{
public claimantResponse SaveClaimant(claimant claimant)
{
return new claimantBLL().SaveClaimant(claimant);
}
public claimantResponse RenewExpiry(claimantMin claimantMin)
{
return new claimantBLL().RenewExpiry(claimantMin);
}
public claimantResponse getAccessCode(claimantMin claimantMin)
{
return new claimantBLL().getAccessCode(claimantMin);
}
}
Data:
[DataMember]
public class claimantResponse
{
private List<string> _ErrorMessage = new List<string>();
[DataMember]
public List<string> ErrorMessage
{
get { return _ErrorMessage; }
set { _ErrorMessage = value; }
}
private List<int> _ErrorCode = new List<int>();
[DataMember]
public List<int> ErrorCode
{
get { return _ErrorCode; }
set { _ErrorCode = value; }
}
[DataMember]
public String FormStatus { get; set; }
[DataMember]
public DateTime ExaminationDate { get; set; }
[DataMember]
public String AccessCode { get; set; }
[DataMember]
public String Status { get; set; }
[DataMember]
public string temp2 { get; set; }
}
It shows two strange methods getdata and getdataobject instead of my own methods.. :(
Any help would be appreciated.
The code that you have posted will not compile. Due to the data member attribute on the class.
If you then press "run anyway" (cannot remember the exact text, but something close to that). Then it will run the last version of the code that compiled. The method names that you are seeing could have been in the original template that you used to create the service.
I resolved this problem by simply restarting Visual Studio 2012 :-)
My version of the problem was that renaming methods and removing the OperationContract attribute off an interface did not make a change to the methods I saw when I ran WCF test client. I even commented out a method and Visual Studio ran the debugger for that method! I restarted Visual Studio and it was back to normal.
I got solution to this problem and posting here so might help any body else with same scenario:
1) Removing [DataMember] attribute from the class and properties.
2) creating a new WCF simple service and putting same code worked.
i did remove datamember attribute from the old service but it was not working, so i assume my service was got corrupted because it was not showing any new method that a new service did :(
3) web.cofig would remain same from the time you you created sample of wcf and no change is required in this case.
Thank you!
So I had the same issue and could not see any new method that added regardless of Datacontract
first thing you need to have to expose your methods will be Data Annotation (attribute) OperationContract above your method inside the interface like the example below:
[ServiceContract]
public interface IService
{
[OperationContract]
Student_Identification GetStudentIdentification(int StudentId);
}
This was my first problem but I still couldn't see it, so I decide to update my service reference in the app where its being referenced
When I clicked Update Service Reference, an error message displayed saying it was unable to connect to server. In my case, the service was pointing to a different server. But I needed to point to my local computer, so I clicked Configure Service Reference
An there was my problem, the client address was set to a different url and not my local dev machine. I tried adding a host entry in my host file with the existing url the service was using and that still didn't fix my issue. So I went ahead and opened IIS since I have this project setup locally. selected my site, right clicked and selected Edit Bindings...
Click add and add the url address in the service and dont forgot to add it to you host file just in case. commonly located here -> C:\Windows\System32\drivers\etc
go back to the app thats referencing the service, right click service reference and select update service reference. This worked for me hopefully this helps someone on their journey.
I have several WCF service contracts, all of which contain exactly the same method StopOperation, having the same signature:
[ServiceContract]
public interface IMyServiceA
{
[FaultContract(typeof(ServiceAError))]
[OperationContract]
void StopOperation(TaskInformation taskInfo);
// other specific methods
}
What I'd like to be able to do is to extract StopOperation into an interface, IStoppable, and have all my services inherit this operation. However, I have a problem with the FaultContract definition, as it defines a concrete fault type.
Is it possible to have FaultContract refer to an abstract ErrorBase type, and have the concrete ones specified by KnownContract somehow? Kind of like:
[ServiceContract]
public interface IStoppable
{
[FaultContract(typeof(ErrorBase))]
[OperationContract]
void StopOperation(TaskInformation taskInfo);
}
No matter where I tried specifying KnownContract, it didn't seem to take.
Have you tried using a generic type ?
For instance:
[ServiceContract]
public interface IStoppable<T> where T : ErrorBase
{
[FaultContract(typeof(T))]
[OperationContract]
void StopOperation(TaskInformation taskInfo);
}
Then you'd say
[ServiceContract]
public interface IMyServiceA : IStoppable<ServiceAError>
{
// other specific methods
}
Haven't tested this, but I don't see any reason why this shouldn't work.
[DataContract]
Base
{
[DataMember]
public int Id {get;set;}
}
[DataContract]
A : Base
{
[DataMember]
public string Value {get;set;}
}
[ServiceContract]
interface IService
{
[OperationContract]
void SetValue (Base base);
}
is there a way to use the service like the following style:
new Service ().SetValue (new A ());
You tagged this WCF so I assume you want to use it.
You need to connect to the endpoint using the ChannelFactory and then open the channel.
This will not work:
new Service ().SetValue (new A ());
You need to do smth. like this:
using (var scf = new ChannelFactory< IService >(<Binding>,<EndpointAddress>)
{
IService proxy = scf.CreateChannel();
proxy.SetValue(new (A));
}
This will return you a proxy object that implements the IService interface. You can call the SetValue on this object.
As well as changing the way you're calling the service as indicated by #Flo, you'll also need to make a small change to prepare the Data Contract Serializer to deal with the inheritance hierarchy.
The easiest way of doing this is decorating Base with the KnownTypeAttribute. Like this,
[DataContract]
[KnownType(typeof(A))]
Base
{
[DataMember]
public int Id {get;set;}
}
[DataContract]
A : Base
{
[DataMember]
public string Value {get;set;}
}
I have a small test web service to emulate something odd I'm noticing in a real world app. As the demo shows the same behaviour as the app I will use the demo for brevity.
In short My service interface file looks as follows (as you can see it is the default WCF service created by VS2008 but I have added a new public method (GetOtherType()) and two new classes at the bottom (SomeOtherType and SomeComplexType). SomeOtherType manages a generic List of type SomeComplexType
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Runtime.Serialization;
using System.ServiceModel;
using System.Text;
namespace WCFServiceTest
{
[ServiceContract]
public interface IService1
{
[OperationContract]
string GetData(int value);
[OperationContract]
CompositeType GetDataUsingDataContract(CompositeType composite);
[OperationContract]
SomeOtherType GetOtherType();
}
[DataContract]
public class CompositeType
{
bool boolValue = true;
string stringValue = "Hello ";
[DataMember]
public bool BoolValue
{
get { return boolValue; }
set { boolValue = value; }
}
[DataMember]
public string StringValue
{
get { return stringValue; }
set { stringValue = value; }
}
}
[DataContract]
public class SomeOtherType
{
public List<SomeComplexType> Items { get; set; }
}
[DataContract]
public class SomeComplexType
{
}
}
My Service is implemented as follows
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Runtime.Serialization;
using System.ServiceModel;
using System.Text;
namespace WCFServiceTest
{
public class Service1 : IService1
{
#region IService1 Members
public string GetData(int value)
{
throw new NotImplementedException();
}
public CompositeType GetDataUsingDataContract(CompositeType composite)
{
throw new NotImplementedException();
}
#endregion
#region IService1 Members
public SomeOtherType GetOtherType()
{
throw new NotImplementedException();
}
#endregion
}
}
The problem I have is that if I include a service reference to this service in an ASP.NET Web Application, I cannot see SomeComplexType via intellisense. The error relates to the type or namespace cannot be found. However, SomeOtherType can be found (I'm assuming as the type is a return type from one of the public methods).
Am I right in thinking I can't expose a type from a WCF Service if that type is not featured in the method signature of one of my public methods (either return type or argument)? If so, how would I be able to iterate over the Items inside an instance of SomeOtherType on the client?
Many Thanks and I hope this is clear.
Simon
The problem I have is that if I
include a service reference to this
service in an ASP.NET Web Application,
I cannot see SomeComplexType via
intellisense. The error relates to the
type or namespace cannot be found.
However, SomeOtherType can be found
(I'm assuming as the type is a return
type from one of the public methods).
Am I right in thinking I can't expose
a type from a WCF Service if that type
is not featured in the method
signature of one of my public methods
(either return type or argument)? If
so, how would I be able to iterate
over the Items inside an instance of
SomeOtherType on the client?
You are absolutely right - your SomeComplexType is never used in any of the service methods, and it's also never tagged as a [DataMember] in any of the types that are indeed used as parameters in your service methods. Therefore, from the point of view of WCF, it's not needed, and won't show up in the WSDL/XSD for the service.
As Graham already pointed out - you are using the SomeComplexType in one place:
[DataContract]
public class SomeOtherType
{
public List<SomeComplexType> Items { get; set; }
}
but since the Items element is not tagged as a [DataMember], it (and therefore the type it uses) will not be included in the WSDL/XSD of your service. Since the Items are not marked as DataMember, they won't be in your serialized WCF message either, so you won't ever need to iterate over this collection :-)
So most likely, what you really want, is just add the [DataMember] attribute to your Items property; then it'll be included in the WSDL/XSD, and so will the SomeComplexType.
Looks like you need the [DataMember] attribute on your SomeOtherType.Items property, i.e.
[DataMember]
public List<SomeComplexType> Items { get; set; }
I'm not at all an expert on this topic, so just as a shot in the blue: Empty DataContracts are discarded by WCF? Try exposing anything in ComplexDataType (some int is enough) and see if that changes anything.
Also, I believe you can verify the availability of the type using the built-in wcftestclient (you need to turn metadata exchange on for this).
We can use Known type in Service in order to get exposed of the class and its members when it is not used in the operation contract signature directly or indirectly.
For such types where you just want it to be available on the client side even if its not used, below attribute class is handy to make it available on client side.
[KnownType(typeof(SomeComplexType))]
I am implementing a WCF service (Contract A) that will eventually make calls to a standalone service (Contract B) hosted by the client. At design-time when the client queries my service's WSDL to build its proxy, I'd like to include the WSDL for Contract B so the client can build its service around that. Unfortunately, I can't figure out how to inject Contract B into the WSDL emitted by the service. Since the contract is an interface and doesn't have the [DataContract] attribute I can't add it as a known type. Is there any other way to inject a contract into emitted WSDL?
Here's an example:
[ServiceContract]
public interface IServerService
{
[OperationContract]
void GiveTheServerMyServiceUri(string uri);
[OperationContract]
void TellAllClientsSomething(string message);
}
// THIS IS THE INTERFACE I WANT TO INCLUDE IN THE WSDL
[ServiceContract]
public interface IClientService
{
[OperationContract]
void ReceiveMessageFromServer(string message);
}
public class ServerService : IServerService
{
private List<string> knownClients;
public void GiveTheServerMyServiceUri(string uri)
{
knownClients.Add(uri);
}
public void TellAllClientsSomething(string message)
{
foreach (string clientUri in knownClients)
{
// 1. Create instance of ClientServiceProxy using client's uri
// 2. Call proxy.ReceiveMessageFromServer(message)
}
}
}
At first it seems that this is a textbook example of a duplex contract. However, for this particular application, for a variety of reasons, I need a bit more separation between client and server so I was hoping to just give the client an interface to implement (via the WSDL), let it host its own service, then just tell me the service's url.
I don't see that this makes sense. Unless your service is implementing the service contract of the other service, then don't do this.
On the other hand, your service can implement the other service contract, and become a client to the other service. It can then delegate calls to the other service contract to that other service.
I just tried this to make sure. I created a new WCF Service library project. This created a Service1 implementing IService1, with two operations. I modified the [ServiceContract] attribute to use a specific namespace (http://localhost/service1).
I then added a new service, which gave me Service2, implementing IService2, with a single operation (DoWork). I updated the [ServiceContract] to use http://localhost/service2/.
I then updated Service1 to implement IService2 as well as IService1, and to delegate IService2.DoWork to the Service2 service. I did also have to add a new endpoint implementing IService2, and I had to specify a relative address, so that the two would not conflict (since they were in the same project). Here's the result:
using System;
namespace WcfServiceLibrary1
{
public class Service1 : IService1, IService2
{
public string GetData(int value)
{
return string.Format("You entered: {0}", value);
}
public CompositeType GetDataUsingDataContract(CompositeType composite)
{
if (composite.BoolValue)
{
composite.StringValue += "Suffix";
}
return composite;
}
public void DoWork()
{
Service2Reference.IService2 svc = null;
try
{
svc = new Service2Reference.Service2Client();
svc.DoWork();
}
finally
{
if (svc != null)
{
((IDisposable)svc).Dispose();
}
}
}
}
}