My map has 9 layers which can be toggled on and off by means of a tick box. Each layer is loaded in by JS. My problem is that only 5 of the nine load when their tick box is active. Is there a limit on how many kml layers can be loaded in to v3 api? In total there is less than 1mb, though they do have quite a few custom marker icons.
Thanks
Darren
I am having a eerily familiar-sounding issue. I am working with KML files in similar fashion (an array of map layers as KML files are picked/loaded by JS via a tick box, not big, although quite a few custom marker icons, long descriptions, etc..).
I have just now become aware of what seems like a NEW limit. Wish I could be more help, but I will share what I know.
In my case, the exact same code was working fine as far back as June 2011 and the map has been viewed/used by 1000s of people. It's a custom v3 api map for an annual event. The 'legend' has about 34 layers containing lines or markers, classified by type, any of which could be 'on' at any given time. The default, and most commonly used, setup had about 12 "layers" on. Only one of the layers (happens to be the last one in the array when it loads) is one that changes significantly from year to year. It's also the most important one. If people were getting significant errors in June 2011 in some browser/OS, I would have heard about it. It was this file that I sat down to "quickly" edit and re-upload in time for the 2012 event. I hadn't even touched it before I noticed that something was wrong. I haven't needed to look at the map since last year, so unfortunately I can't be more precise as to when this started happening.
Findings/Conclusions/Ideas?:
dumping the browser cache does nothing
Through trial and error, I found that it will actually load up to 6 "layers", but it seems to depend on the size/type/juju? of any given kML file in the comma delineated list. But, like you, it's usually around 5 or 6.
Oddly, the KML files themselves seem to be there in the background. Invisible markers will affect the mouse pointer "on hover over" and their info boxes will show up when clicked. Strange.
This problem is definitely less than a year old for me.
If not somehow related to some new action of Google's (in which case I would suspect we'd hear about it or have found something in the API forums..) perhaps it is related to some new limits placed by one of our servers and is simply a coincidence?
---> hmm. I recently had a wordpress site's menu item limit issue and got my hosting provider to change some suhosin request limits(?) I can try migrating the source file to another server, and see if it works from there. If it does, that would be a significant clue, and I will report back.
Other than that, I have no idea. Just thought I'd share what I've learned and hope someone else has some idea of what's going on.
Related
I'm trying to build a new voice for MaryTTS in German for a while now, but didn't succeed so far. I followed a tutorial (https://github.com/marytts/marytts/wiki/HMMVoiceCreation) and tried to understand each step. No matter what I do, I get stuck at step 14 (HMMVoiceMakeVoice), the error being:
ERROR [+2121] HInit: Too Few Observation Sequences
which usually means, that the tested phone (en9 in this example) is not found within my data set.
After changing the locale, the same error happend on the phone "de27" as Nikolay Shmyrev pointed out.
I doubt that though, since I use about 500 Audio files, which have a length of at least 5 sec, so a total well over an hour of footage.
In fact, I skipped the "en9" phone, since I don't know what exactly is represented by it. The next one to fail was "oI", which I located manually about ten times in the first few audio files.
I think it has to do with the automatic labeling to not work properly (step 2-4), but I don't know, what I can do, to get a better result?
Edit: I uploaded all the files I get until this step, which can be inspected on this shared google drive. Note, that I could not, for copyright reasons, upload the wav folder. In the logs directory, you can find the logs after each step. I couldn't find any problems there, but maybe someone will.
I do not completely understand the structure of the generated data, but I thought changing the MARYBASE/mary/trickyPhones.txt and running the make tools again would be enough to change the map name from "tS" to "Z" which sounds about the same in German. But the HMMVoiceMakeVoice still results in the same output.
So my I swear by PHPStorm, I have been using it for over a year now and have had no issues up until now.
I have now come to slight problem in the form of sluggish editing.
I have a model file that is just under 4000 lines of code - nothing too big, but PHPStorm seems to be having some trouble with it. My other models seem to be just fine, but this one goes sluggish every few seconds while editing. Meaning, it will let me start typing and editing the code, but then it will freeze briefly for a few seconds and then complete the actions I entered... like lag.
I am assuming it has something to do with the fact that it's an SQL file since I have other control files that are larger.
Ultimate, I guess I can reduce the model in size to be separated into other models, but I would rather not.
Anyone else have experience with this?
Thanks
B
So this is an intro class I am taking in reverse engineering.
So I have two files that are the same program and one is supposed to have a trojan in it.
I looked at both files and have found some very odd things. However, I don't have reasons as to why it would happen.
The PE header is different. In one file in the DOS header the PE header is located at offset F0 and the other at F8. Why? I don't really understand. Why would someone change the PE header by 8 bytes?
I noticed the code entry points are different too. Does this mean that the start of the program is jumping else where meaning both programs are running from different locations.
I noticed all of the RVA's for say the export or import table have increased or shifted up higher. I assume this is because the PE header shifted by 8 bytes, therefore everything else in the file will shift up too.
The size of code value is different, as I found one file is a bit larger than the other. The time stamps are different too meaning that the file must have been edited.
One of the files has the import symbol execve, while the other does not. I don't know what this symbol does?
Lastly, I think 1 of the export symbols has jumps and such, that the other does not have. Meaning that it is doing something it shouldn't be doing.
Anyway, these are some observations I have noticed. I just need help making sense of what these observations might mean.
Thanks.
A Noob reverse engineer.
hopefully this will clear some things up.
I noticed the code entry points are different too. Does this mean that the start of the program is jumping else where meaning both programs are running from different locations.
Ok the change in the code entry points can clearly indicate that the code has been tampered with and often means that the malicious code will be called on entry and then the malicious code will run the normal code there-after. This is done so that the user does not notice the application has been tampered with.
The size of code value is different, as I found one file is a bit larger than the other. The time stamps are different too meaning that the file must have been edited.
The change in size can also indicate that there is malicious code in the executable because executables are not supposed to grow (I don't know you are feeding yours).
One of the files has the import symbol execve, while the other does not. I don't know what this symbol does?
As for execv, please see _execv, _wexecv MSDN
I have a vb.net application successfully processing the text in TIF files, but it is ignoring the checkboxes. Is there anyway to use MODI to process anything within the file that is not text? Such as a mark that a person has made with a pen inside a checkbox? I think I would need to be able to evaluate where the pixels are. This is for a zero budget personal project. Thank you.
MODI is capable of OCR and what you describe is called ICR (intelligent checkmark recognition). As far as i know, there are no free/open source tools/SDKs that provide such data capture functionality, there are some low-budget solutions (this one for example, free 90 days trial and processing one checkmark pricing starts from $0.008).
I'm trying to build an NSTextView that can take "marked up" input that is automatically translated into beautiful RTF-style text while the user types.
The idea is to let the user enter text in "plain text" format, but to "beautify" it on the spot, e.g.
H1 A quick list:
* first item
* second item
would be translated into a first line with a header font, followed by a bulleted list.
I have found plenty of potential ways of doing this, but the Text System is incredibly complicated (with reason) and I don't want to start "cooking my own" if there is already something suitable built-in. BTW I would be happy with a Snow Leopard only API.
The first thing I thought of was "data detectors", but I can't find a public API for doing this.
Having reached the end of the road with that, I turned to the new "Text Input Sources API". This does all kinds of things, but the "data-driven input methods" section of the WWDC 2006 presentation "Take Charge of the Text Input" seems interesting in my context. Beyond that single presentation slide however nothing seems to exist anywhere, so it's a bit of a dead end again.
Finally, I had a look at the NSSpellChecker class which is also supposed to offer completion features and automatic corrections.. but I'm not sure how this could be re-purposed for my requirements either.
At the moment, I'm tempted to just re-parse the entire NSTextStorage manually and make the changes myself when the user stops typing.. but I'm sure there are cleverer heads around this forum..
Any advice or pointers in the right direction would be greatly appreciated.
Neither data detectors nor the spell checker are appropriate for this task. Assuming you're just looking for a way to pass the input to a parser/formatter you already have, interfacing with the text system isn't too difficult. You're on the right track with handling the editing to NSTextStorage.
Along those lines, there's no need to re-parse the entire thing when the user stops. The text system sends you the modified range and gives you the opportunity to act on those changes (and even reject them out of hand). Since all changes funnel through this (typing, pasting, dropping...), this is the point where you want to intercede.
Because you're dealing with headings and bulleted lists, I'd get the enclosing paragraph of the modified range. This gives you a nice, round unit of work that is easily discovered and perfectly fits what you're trying to accomplish.
Good luck!