Here are my associations:
Class Post
belongs_to :user
has_many :favorites, :dependent => :destroy
has_many :favoriters, :through => :favorites, :source => :user
end
Class User
has_many :posts
has_many :favorites, :dependent => :destroy
has_many :favorited, :through => :favorites, :source => :post
end
Class Favorites
belongs_to :user, :post
end
I want to sort users' favorite posts by the created_at column of the Favorites association. However, this sorts by the Post created_at attribute, not the Favorites created_at attribute. How can I sort by the Favorites created_at attribute?
#posts=#user.favorited.order('created_at DESC')
You need to specify which table you want to use in the order by clause.
#posts = #user.favorited.order('posts.created_at DESC')
ought to do it.
One nice trick is to use the rails console when inspecting associations. Specifically, it helps to use the 'to_sql' method on Active Record queries you are performing.
For instance:
% bundle exec rails console
> u = User.last
> u.favorited.order('created_at DESC').to_sql
use this in your post model for set default order:
default_scope { order("created_at DESC") }
Related
I have a has_many through relationship between Course and User.
class Course < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :user
has_many :enrollments, :dependent => :delete_all
has_many :users, :through => :enrollments
attr_accessible :description, :duration, :name, :prerequisites, :short_name, :start_date, :user_id
accepts_nested_attributes_for :users, :allow_destroy => true
attr_accessible :users_attributes
and User:
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :subjects, :class_name => "Course" # to get this call user.subjects
has_many :enrollments, :dependent => :delete_all
has_many :courses, :through => :enrollments
and Enrollment:
class Enrollment < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :course
belongs_to :user
attr_accessible :course_id, :user_id
end
Now I'm trying to set user_ids from inside Course, using a nested form. It keeps giving me that Mass Assignment warning, and nothing is saved. I read I was supposed to add attr_accessible user_id but it still doesn't work.
Even if I do something like this from the rails console:
#c.update_attributes({:user_ids => [7,8]})
with #c being the course
Any help would be greatly appreciated,
Thank you.
It's user_ids, not user_id.
You need to add user_ids to your attr_accessible.
I need to query all posts from a specific user and include all comments and the user who belongs to the comment.
class User < ...
has_many :posts
has_many :comments
end
class Post < ...
belongs_to :user
has_many :comments
end
class Comment < ...
belongs_to :user
belongs_to :post
end
#posts = current_user.posts.include(:comments)
Is is possible to also get the comment user? I list a lot of posts and comments. I do not want to query each comment user.
Thx / Tobias
Try
#posts = current_user.posts.includes( :comments => :user)
Read more about it here
How about include at the relation definition statement?
:include
Specify second-order associations that should be eager loaded when this object is loaded.
class Post <
belongs_to :user
has_many :comments, :include => [:user], :limit => 5
end
I would like to order the article tags on my index page by popularity as opposed to by creation date i.e. the tags with the most amount of articles in them from highest to lowest. My model is as follows?
class Tag < ActiveRecord::Base
attr_accessible :name
validates :name, :uniqueness => true
# order by creation
default_scope :order => 'created_at DESC'
has_many :taggings, :dependent => :destroy
has_many :articles, :through => :taggings
end
I recommend using a counter cache column to store a taggings_count (which automatically gets updated when new taggings).
And then your default scope can look like this:
default_scope :order => 'taggings_count DESC'
For more info, search for "counter_cache" in the Rails guide for AR associations
rails g model Article name:string
rails g model Category name:string
rails g model Tag name:string taggable_id:integer taggable_type:string category_id:integer
I have created my models as shown in the preceding code. Articles will be one of many models which can have tags. The category model will contain all categories which may be assigned. The tag model will be a polymorphic join-table which represents tagged relationships.
class Article < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :tags, :as => :taggable
has_many :categories, :through => :taggable
end
class Category < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :tags, :as => :taggable
has_many :articles, :through => :taggable
end
class Tag < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :taggable, :polymorphic => true
belongs_to :category
end
I can't seem to get this to work, I can do it non polymorphic, but I must have something wrong with the polymorphic part. Any ideas?
Edit: Still not getting this right:
class Article < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :taggables, :as => :tag
has_many :categories, :through => :taggables, :source => :tag, :source_type => "Article"
end
class Category < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :taggables, :as => :tag
has_many :articles, :through => :taggables, :source => :tag, :source_type => "Article"
end
class Tag < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :taggable, :polymorphic => true
belongs_to :category
end
To create a polymorphic has_many :through, you must first create your models. We will use'Article,' 'Category,' and 'Tag' where 'Tag' is the join-model and Article is one of many objects which can be "tagged" with a category.
First you create your 'Article' and 'Category' models. These are basic models which do not need any special attention, just yet:
rails g model Article name:string
rails g model Category name:string
Now, we will create our polymorphic join-table:
rails g model Tag taggable_id:integer taggable_type:string category_id:integer
The join-table joins together two tables, or in our case one table to many others via polymorphic behavior. It does this by storing the ID from two separate tables. This creates a link. Our 'Category' table will always be a 'Category' so we include 'category_id.' The tables it links to vary, so we add an item 'taggable_id' which holds the id of any taggable item. Then, we use 'taggable_type' to complete the link allowing the link to know what it is linked to, such as an article.
Now, we need to set up our models:
class Article < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :tags, :as => :taggable, :dependent => :destroy
has_many :categories, :through => :tags
end
class Category < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :tags, :dependent => :destroy
has_many :articles, :through => :tags, :source => :taggable, :source_type => 'Article'
end
class Tag < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :taggable, :polymorphic => true
belongs_to :category
end
After this, setup your database using:
rake db:migrate
That's it! Now, you can setup your database with real data:
Category.create :name => "Food"
Article.create :name => "Picking the right restaurant."
Article.create :name => "The perfect cherry pie!"
Article.create :name => "Foods to avoid when in a hurry!"
Category.create :name => "Kitchen"
Article.create :name => "The buyers guide to great refrigeration units."
Article.create :name => "The best stove for your money."
Category.create :name => "Beverages"
Article.create :name => "How to: Make your own soda."
Article.create :name => "How to: Fermenting fruit."
Now you have a few categories and various articles. They are not categorized using tags, however. So, we will need to do that:
a = Tag.new
a.taggable = Article.find_by_name("Picking the right restaurant.")
a.category = Category.find_by_name("Food")
a.save
You could then repeat this for each, this will link your categories and articles. After doing this you will be able to access each article's categories and each categorie's articles:
Article.first.categories
Category.first.articles
Notes:
1)Whenever you want to delete an item that is linked by a link-model make sure to use "destroy." When you destroy a linked object, it will also destroy the link. This ensures that there are no bad or dead links. This is why we use ':dependent => :destroy'
2)When setting up our 'Article' model, which is one our 'taggable' models, it must be linked using :as. Since in the preceeding example we used 'taggable_type' and 'taggable_id' we use :as => :taggable. This helps rails know how to store the values in the database.
3)When linking categories to articles, we use:
has_many :articles, :through => :tags, :source => :taggable, :source_type => 'Article'
This tells the category model that it should have many :articles through :tags. The source is :taggable, for the same reason as above. The source-type is "Article" because a model will automatically set taggable_type to its own name.
You simply cannot make the join table polymorphic, at least Rails does not support this out of the box. The solution is (taken from Obie's Rails 3 way):
If you really need it, has_many :through is possible with polymorphic associations, but only by specifying exactly what type of polymorphic associations you want. To do so you must use the :source_type option. In most cases you will have to use the :source option, since the association name will not match the interface name used for the polymorphic association:
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :comments
has_many :commented_timesheets, :through => :comments, :source => :commentable,
:source_type => "Timesheet"
has_many :commented_billable_weeks, :through => :comments, :source => :commentable,
:source_type => "BillableWeek"
It's verbose and the whole scheme loses its elegance if you go this route, but it works:
User.first.commented_timesheets
I hope I helped!
Warning:Total Rails Newb (TRN). This should be a pretty basic question so I'm hoping someone can spare a couple mins to help shed some light.
Let's say I have the following models: User, Group, and Member
A user can have many groups (let's say friends, family, etc)
A group can have many members, namely other users.
How would I structure this?
Initially I tried this:
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :groups
has_many :groups, :through => :members
end
class Groups < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :users, :through => :members
belongs_to :user
end
class Member < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :group
belongs_to :user
end
However this gave me an error in User so I changed
has_many :groups, :through => :members
to
has_many :memberships, :through => :members, :source => :groups
Still getting an error about missing association when I try to do
group = Group.new
group.user.new
It will be useful: http://railscasts.com/episodes/47-two-many-to-many
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :members
has_many :groups, :through => :members
has_many :groups_as_owner, :class_name => "Group"
end
class Groups < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :members
has_many :users, :through => :members
belongs_to :owner, :class_name => "User", :foreign_key => :user_id
end
class Member < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :group
belongs_to :user
end
basically has_many-through associations are n:m associations (join-tables) that (shall) have more attributes than just the id's of the joined record ids...
so you have a table Groups (with an id), a table Users (with an id) and a table Members (no id, but user_id and group_id)
basically, what you did is nearly correct, just think about how you access a group from a user or vice versa....
a user would first look up its member information and through that member information get access to the group information ... and vice versa for a group
so you first set up
has_many :members
and then call
has_many :groups, :through => :members
all you need is
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :members
has_many :groups, :through => :members
end
class Groups < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :members
has_many :users, :through => :members
end
class Member < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :group
belongs_to :user
end
and you have another bug in your code above
you might want to use
user = group.users.new
instead of
user = group.user.new
Try this structure:
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :members
has_many :groups, :through => :members
end
class Groups < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :members
has_many :users, :through => :members
end
class Member < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :group
belongs_to :user
end
Also take a look at has_and_belongs_to_many, if you don't need to do with class Member then you should use has_and_belongs_to_many. In this case don't forget to create joining table in the database