I have three tables:
Advertisers: a list of business that produce adverts, Adverts: the adverts themselves and AdvertiserChild: a table of Advertisers parents; note that this is a flat hierarchy and a single advertiser can be listed multiple times with a parent, no inkling as to 'level' is provided they are simply 'parents'.
So, I am trying to select all of the advertisers that had ads between certain dates where their names match the users input. The rub is that the name can also match a parent advertiser. Let me try and phrase that differently, the user input can match the name of either the parent or child advertiser as long as the child has some valid ads between the specified dates.
I'm just having trouble conceptually in regard to getting the parent information in there:
SELECT NewsPaperAd.AdvertiserID AS ADID, Advertiser.NameAbbrev AS Name
FROM NewsPaperAd INNER JOIN
Advertiser ON NewsPaperAd.AdvertiserID = Advertiser.AdvertiserID
WHERE (NewsPaperAd.PubDate BETWEEN '1/1/2012' AND '4/1/2012')
Ok, I think I have it!
Thanks.
I assume the hierarchy is defined with a ParentID or similar column in the Advertiser table. Then something like this might work:
DECLARE #search NVARCHAR(255);
SET #search = '%some search phrase%';
;WITH a AS
(
SELECT a.AdvertiserID, a.NameAbbrev, Parent = p.NameAbbrev
FROM dbo.Advertiser AS a
LEFT OUTER JOIN dbo.Advertiser AS p
ON a.ParentID = p.AdvertiserID
WHERE a.NameAbbrev LIKE #search
OR p.NameAbbrev LIKE #search
)
SELECT ADID = a.AdvertiserID, a.NameAbbrev, a.Parent
FROM dbo.NewsPaperAd AS n
INNER JOIN a
ON a.AdvertiserID = a.AdvertiserID
WHERE n.PubDate >= '20120101'
AND n.PubDate < '20120401';
Some suggestions: (1) don't change the column output name. ADID does not say the same thing to me as AdvertiserID; what is the point of the abbreviation? (2) Don't use BETWEEN for date/time range queries... while it is ok if your data type is DATE, that can't be the case in your scenario since you're using SQL Server 2005. (3) Don't use regional formatting like m/d/y for string literals. In fact I'm still not sure if your query is supposed to end on April 1st or January 4th. Depending on language and regional settings, SQL Server might get it wrong too.
Related
Consider the following tables:
Table A:
DOC_NUM
DOC_TYPE
RELATED_DOC_NUM
NEXT_STATUS
...
Table B:
DOC_NUM
DOC_TYPE
RELATED_DOC_NUM
NEXT_STATUS
...
The DOC_TYPE and NEXT_STATUS columns have different meanings between the two tables, although a NEXT_STATUS = 999 means "closed" in both. Also, under certain conditions, there will be a record in each table, with a reference to a corresponding entry in the other table (i.e. the RELATED_DOC_NUM columns).
I am trying to create a query that will get data from both tables that meet the following conditions:
A.RELATED_DOC_NUM = B.DOC_NUM
A.DOC_TYPE = "ST"
B.DOC_TYPE = "OT"
A.NEXT_STATUS < 999 OR B.NEXT_STATUS < 999
A.DOC_TYPE = "ST" represents a transfer order to transfer inventory from one plant to another. B.DOC_TYPE = "OT" represents a corresponding receipt of the transferred inventory at the receiving plant.
We want to get records from either table where there is an ST/OT pair where either or both entries are not closed (i.e. NEXT_STATUS < 999).
I am assuming that I need to use a FULL OUTER join to accomplish this. If this is the wrong assumption, please let me know what I should be doing instead.
UPDATE (11/30/2021):
I believe that #Caius Jard is correct in that this does not need to be an outer join. There should always be an ST/OT pair.
With that I have written my query as follows:
SELECT <columns>
FROM A LEFT JOIN B
ON
A.RELATED_DOC_NUM = B.DOC_NUM
WHERE
A.DOC_TYPE IN ('ST') AND
B.DOC_TYPE IN ('OT') AND
(A.NEXT_STATUS < 999 OR B.NEXT_STATUS < 999)
Does this make sense?
UPDATE 2 (11/30/2021):
The reality is that these are DB2 database tables being used by the JD Edwards ERP application. The only way I know of to see the table definitions is by using the web site http://www.jdetables.com/, entering the table ID and hitting return to run the search. It comes back with a ton of information about the table and its columns.
Table A is really F4211 and table B is really F4311.
Right now, I've simplified the query to keep it simple and keep variables to a minimum. This is what I have currently:
SELECT CAST(F4211.SDDOCO AS VARCHAR(8)) AS SO_NUM,
F4211.SDRORN AS RELATED_PO,
F4211.SDDCTO AS SO_DOC_TYPE,
F4211.SDNXTR AS SO_NEXT_STATUS,
CAST(F4311.PDDOCO AS VARCHAR(8)) AS PO_NUM,
F4311.PDRORN AS RELATED_SO,
F4311.PDDCTO AS PO_DOC_TYPE,
F4311.PDNXTR AS PO_NEXT_STATUS
FROM PROD2DTA.F4211 AS F4211
INNER JOIN PROD2DTA.F4311 AS F4311
ON F4211.SDRORN = CAST(F4311.PDDOCO AS VARCHAR(8))
WHERE F4211.SDDCTO IN ( 'ST' )
AND F4311.PDDCTO IN ( 'OT' )
The other part of the story is that I'm using a reporting package that allows you to define "virtual" views of the data. Virtual views allow the report developer to specify the SQL to use. This is the application where I am using the SQL. When I set up the SQL, there is a validation step that must be performed. It will return a limited set of results if the SQL is validated.
When I enter the query above and validate it, it says that there are no results, which makes no sense. I'm guessing the data casting is causing the issue, but not sure.
UPDATE 3 (11/30/2021):
One more twist to the story. The related doc number is not only defined as a string value, but it contains leading zeros. This is true in both tables. The main doc number (in both tables) is defined as a numeric value and therefore has no leading zeros. I have no idea why those who developed JDE would have done this, but that is what is there.
So, there are matching records between the two tables that meet the criteria, but I think I'm getting no results because when I convert the numeric to a string, it does not match, because one value is, say "12345", while the other is "00012345".
Can I pad the numeric -> string value with zeros before doing the equals check?
UPDATE 4 (12/2/2021):
Was able to finally get the query to work by converting the numeric doc num to a left zero padded string.
SELECT <columns>
FROM PROD2DTA.F4211 AS F4211
INNER JOIN PROD2DTA.F4311 AS F4311
ON F4211.SDRORN = RIGHT(CONCAT('00000000', CAST(F4311.PDDOCO AS VARCHAR(8))), 8)
WHERE F4211.SDDCTO IN ( 'ST' )
AND F4311.PDDCTO IN ( 'OT' )
AND ( F4211.SDNXTR < 999
OR F4311.PDNXTR < 999 )
You should write your query as follows:
SELECT <columns>
FROM A INNER JOIN B
ON
A.RELATED_DOC_NUM = B.DOC_NUM
WHERE
A.DOC_TYPE IN ('ST') AND
B.DOC_TYPE IN ('OT') AND
(A.NEXT_STATUS < 999 OR B.NEXT_STATUS < 999)
LEFT join is a type of OUTER join; LEFT JOIN is typically a contraction of LEFT OUTER JOIN). OUTER means "one side might have nulls in every column because there was no match". Most critically, the code as posted in the question (with a LEFT JOIN, but then has WHERE some_column_from_the_right_table = some_value) runs as an INNER join, because any NULLs inserted by the LEFT OUTER process, are then quashed by the WHERE clause
See Update 4 for details of how I resolved the "data conversion or mapping" error.
i want to group this query by project only because there are two records of same project but i only want one.
But when i add group by clause it asks me to add other columns as well by which grouping does not work.
*
DECLARE #Year varchar(75) = '2018'
DECLARE #von DateTime = '1.09.2018'
DECLARE #bis DateTime = '30.09.2018'
select new_projekt ,new_geschftsartname, new_mitarbeitername, new_stundensatz
from Filterednew_projektkondition ps
left join Filterednew_fakturierungsplan fp on ps.new_projekt = fp.new_hauptprojekt1
where ps.statecodename = 'Aktiv'
and fp.new_startdatum >= #von +'00:00:00'
and fp.new_enddatum <= #bis +'23:59:59'
--and new_projekt= Filterednew_projekt.new_
--group by new_projekt
*
look at the column new_projekt . row 2 and 3 has same project, but i want it to appear only once. Due to different other columns this is not possible.
if its of interested , there is another coluim projectcondition id which is unique for both
You can't ask a database to decide arbitrarily for you, which records should be thrown away when doing a group. You have to be precise and specific
Example, here is some data about a person:
Name, AddressZipCode
John Doe, 90210
John Doe, 12345
SELECT name, addresszipcode FROM person INNER JOIN address on address.personid = person.id
There are two addresses stored for this one guy, the person data is repeated in the output!
"I don't want that. I only want to see one line for this guy, together with his address"
Which address?
That's what you have to tell the database
"Well, obviously his current address"
And how do you denote that an address is current?
"It's the one with the null enddate"
SELECT name, addresszipcode FROM person INNER JOIN address on address.personid = person.id WHERE address.enddate = null
If you still get two addresses out, there are two address records that are null - you have data that is in violation of your business data modelling principles ("a person's address history shall have at most one adddress that is current, denoted by a null end date") - fix the data
"Why can't i just group by name?"
You can, but if you do, you still have to tell the database how to accumulate the non-name data that it shows you. You want an address data out of it, it has 2 it wants to show you, you have to tell it which to discard. You could do this:
SELECT name, MAX(addresszipcode) FROM person INNER JOIN address on address.personid = person.id GROUP BY name
"But I don't want the max zipcode? That doesn't make sense"
OK, use the MIN, the SUM, the AVG, anything that makes sense. If none of these make sense, then use something that does, like the address line that has the highest end date, or the lowest end date that is a future end date. If you only want one address on show you must decide how to boil that data down to just one record - you have to write the rule for the database to follow and no question about it you have to create a rule so make it a rule that describes what you actually want
Ok, so you created a rule - you want only the rows with the minimum new_stundenstatz
DECLARE #Year varchar(75) = '2018'
DECLARE #von DateTime = '1.09.2018'
DECLARE #bis DateTime = '30.09.2018'
select new_projekt ,new_geschftsartname, new_mitarbeitername, new_stundensatz
from
(SELECT *, ROW_NUMBER() OVER(PARTITON BY new_projekt ORDER BY new_stundensatz) rown FROM Filterednew_projektkondition) ps
left join
Filterednew_fakturierungsplan fp on ps.new_projekt = fp.new_hauptprojekt1
where ps.statecodename = 'Aktiv'
and fp.new_startdatum >= #von +'00:00:00'
and fp.new_enddatum <= #bis +'23:59:59'
and ps.rown = 1
Here I've used an analytic operation to number the rows in your PS table. They're numbered in order of ascending new_stundensatz, starting with 1. The numbering restarts when the new_projekt changes, so each new_projekt will have a number 1 row.. and then we make that a condition of the where
(Helpful side note for applying this technique in future.. Ff it were the FP table we were adding a row number to, we would need to put AND fp.rown= 1 in the ON clause, not the WHERE clause, because putting it in the where would make the LEFT join behave like an INNER, hiding rows that don't have any FP matching record)
Good people of the internet, I need your help!
I'm trying to put together some SQL code to create a report. Basically, I'm needing to look at one table - tbl_Schedules - and fetch the maximum of the field SchedDone, which is a regular date field.
This is fair enough. I manage this using GROUP BY and MAX.
The same table also contains SchedFrom and SchedTo fields, and I need to get this from another record, but run alongside this.
Basically, I need a "LatestDate" field (which shows the max SchedDone), and then a "next scheduled" field (or fields), showing when it is next to be done, pulled from a row where the SchedDone is null.
My current code, displayed below (ignore everything but the tbl_Schedules stuff) is working to an extent. It shows the LatestDate as described above, but also shows the maximum of that Task's SchedFrom and SchedTo. These are all from different rows in the tbl_Schedules, which is what I want. I just need to know how to set up rules for the SchedFrom and SchedTo, preferably without involving any other tables or setting up multiple views.
I do have this working, but it's taking up several views and the speed involved is not good. I'd hope I can get it working in a single chunk of SQL code.
PS - tbl_PhysicalAssets is a one-to-many relationship with tbl_Operations (one row in tbl_PhysicalAssets to many in tbl_Operations), and tbl_Operations is a one-to-many relationship with tbl_Schedules (one row in tbl_Operations to many in tbl_Schedules).
Current code below (again, please ignore the other tables!) -
SELECT
dbo.tbl_PhysicalAsset.FKID_Contract,
dbo.tbl_PhysicalAsset.MyLevel,
dbo.tbl_PhysicalAsset.L1_Name,
dbo.tbl_PhysicalAsset.L2_Name,
dbo.tbl_PhysicalAsset.L3_Name,
dbo.tbl_OpList.Operation_Name,
dbo.tbl_Teams.Team_Name,
MAX(tbl_Schedules_1.SchedDone) AS LatestDate,
MAX(tbl_Schedules_1.SchedFrom) AS Expr1,
MAX(tbl_Schedules_1.SchedTo) AS Expr2
FROM
dbo.tbl_Schedules AS tbl_Schedules_1
RIGHT OUTER JOIN
dbo.tbl_PhysicalAsset
INNER JOIN
dbo.tbl_Operations ON dbo.tbl_PhysicalAsset.PKID_PhysicalAsset = dbo.tbl_Operations.FKID_PhysicalAsset
INNER JOIN
dbo.tbl_OpList ON dbo.tbl_Operations.FKID_Operation = dbo.tbl_OpList.PKID_Op
INNER JOIN
dbo.tbl_Teams ON dbo.tbl_Operations.FKID_Team = dbo.tbl_Teams.PKID_Team ON tbl_Schedules_1.FKID_Operation = dbo.tbl_Operations.PKID_Operation
GROUP BY
dbo.tbl_PhysicalAsset.FKID_Contract,
dbo.tbl_PhysicalAsset.MyLevel,
dbo.tbl_PhysicalAsset.L1_Name,
dbo.tbl_PhysicalAsset.L2_Name,
dbo.tbl_PhysicalAsset.L3_Name,
dbo.tbl_OpList.Operation_Name,
dbo.tbl_Teams.Team_Name
HAVING
(dbo.tbl_PhysicalAsset.FKID_Contract = 6)
AND (dbo.tbl_PhysicalAsset.MyLevel = 3)
This is rough as we don't know the exact details of your table structure.
But basically you need to first write the queries that get the two separate bits of information, make sure they work in isolation. You can then just join them together.
So something like (I've assumed FKID_Operation is the 'common' piece of info):
select
a.FKID_Operation
, b.LatestDate
, c.NextToDate
, c.NextFromDate
from tbl_Schedules a
inner join
(
select
m.FKID_Operation
, Max(m.SchedDone) as LatestDate
from tbl_Schedules m
where SchedDone is not null
) b
on a.FKID_Operation = b.FKID_Operation
inner join
(
select
n.FKID_Operation
, n.SchedTo as NextToDate
, n.SchedFrom as NextFromDate
from tbl_Schedules n
where SchedDone is null
) c
on a.FKID_Operation = c.FKID_Operation
I'd also look into CTE's as they can make this kind of query much easier to understand.
I have two tables tmpModels and tmp_product. Need to find matching models based on the model in tmpModel.
For example, If tmpmodel.updatedmodel ='amb3771' and tmp_product.updatedmodel could be 'amb3771bian' or '123abc3771xv' then we have a match.
Meaning that the tmp_product.updatedmodel should contain a matching pattern from tmpmodel anywhere in the updatedmodel column.
I have actually created a stored procedure but here is a snippet checking the behaviour for one particular value.
declare #model1 nvarchar(255)
set #model1 = 'amb3771'
select g.updatedmodel as GFK,p.updatedmodel Product from dbo.tmpModels g
join dbo.tmp_product p
on g.updatedmodel= substring(p.updatedmodel,PATINDEX('%#model1%',p.updatedmodel),LEN(#model1))
select #model1
I am expecting only two rows to be shown in the result. I don't understand why a different value is being assigned to #model1 even though I am forcing it to 'amb3771' and strangely there is no result matching 'amb3771'!! Please help me understand why this logic doesn't work and give the desired result. Below is the result -
GFK Product
w679 w679
t754cw t754cw
wa5714 wa5714silber
fl2823 fl2823
dc7230 dc7230
wda100 wda100
wa74sd wa74sd
ev9547 ev9547
wa5714 wa5714weiss
wa7439 wa7439
wda210 wda210wpm
wda210 wda210wpm
w194 w194
wda110 wda110wcs
wa5714 wa5714silber
wda100 wda100
First of all as DLeh mentioned #model should not be in quotes.
I don't understand why a different value is being assigned to #model1
even though I am forcing it
No different value is assigned to #model
If you execute query below you can see PATINDEX is returning 0 and then substring is getting full value of p.UpdateModel from 0th index to its length
select g.updatedmodel as GFK,p.updatedmodel Product, PATINDEX(#model1,p.updatedmodel)
from dbo.tmpModels g
join dbo.tmp_product p
on g.updatedmodel= substring(p.updatedmodel,PATINDEX(#model1,p.updatedmodel),LEN(#model1))
One solution I can suggest is to use WHERE condition instead of JOIN
set #model1 = '%wa5714%'
select DISTINCT g.updatedmodel as GFK,p.updatedmodel Product
from dbo.tmpModels g
, dbo.tmp_product p
WHERE PATINDEX(#model1,p.updatedmodel) > 0
AND PATINDEX(#model1,g.updatedmodel) > 0
I am assuming your model should display values of tmpModel and tmp_Product.
If you have different requirement the provide more details/example
I have a many to many relationship between people and some electronic codes. The table with the codes has the code itself, and a text description of the code. A typical result set from a query might be (there are many codes that contain "broken" so I feel like it's better to search the text description rather than add a bunch of ORs for every code.)
id# text of code
1234 broken laptop
1234 broken mouse
Currently the best way for me to get a result set like this is to use the LIKE%broken% filter. Without changing the text description, is there any way I can return only one instance of a code with broken? So in the example above the query would only return 1234 and broken mouse OR broken laptop. In this scenario it doesn't matter which is returned, all I'm looking for is the presence of "broken" in any of the text descriptions of that person's codes.
My solution at the moment is to create a view that would return
`id# text of code
1234 broken laptop
1234 broken mouse`
and using SELECT DISTINCT ID# while querying the view to get only one instance of each.
EDIT ACTUALLY QUERY
SELECT tblVisits.kha_id, tblICD.descrip, min(tblICD.Descrip) as expr1
FROM tblVisits inner join
icd_jxn on tblVisits.kha_id = icd_jxn.kha)id inner join tblICD.icd_fk=tblICD.ICD_ID
group by tblVisits.kha_id, tblicd.descrip
having (tblICD.descrip like n'%broken%')
You could use the below query to SELECT the MIN code. This will ensure only text per id.
SELECT t.id, MIN(t.textofcode) as textofcode
FROM table t
WHERE t.textofcode LIKE '%broken%'
GROUP BY t.id
Updated Actual Query:
SELECT tblVisits.kha_id,
MIN(tblICD.Descrip)
FROM tblVisits
INNER JOIN icd_jxn ON tblVisits.kha_id = icd_jxn.kha)id
INNER JOIN tblicd ON icd_jxn.icd_fk = tbl.icd_id
WHERE tblICD.descrip like n'%broken%'
GROUP BY tblVisits.kha_id