I'm creating some tests with JMeter, the situation is very simple, I have a search page with a list of results, and I have to retrieve from this results some values to use in the next request.
Those results are around 350, I don't need them all.
I used the RegexExtractor to retrieve those results and it works (I setted it to retrieve just 10 results), but now I don't know how to access the results inside a LoopCounter.
The extractor put the results into a variable named Result.
The problem is that I don't know hot to build dinamically the name of a variable.
Do I have to use some function like _p()??
I can access the variable just putting the static name Result_0_g1
Inside the LoopCounter I putted also a Counter to store the loop count into the variable index
Thank you
EDIT:
SOLVED I have to write:
${__V(Result_${index}_g1)
You have to reference the variable with the function:
${__V(Result_${index}_g1)
...Just for collection.
See also this post for another implementation (case without using ForEach Controller):
ThreadGroup
HttpSampler
Regex Extractor (variableName = links)
WhileController(${__javaScript(${C} < ${links_matchNr})})
HTTPSampler use ${__V(links_${C})} to access the current result
Counter (start=1, increment=1, maximum=${links_matchNr}, referenceName=C)
Use the ForEach Controller - it's specifically designed for this purpose and does exactly what you want.
You may use ForEach Controller:
ThreadGroup
YourSampler
Regular Expression Extractor (match -1, any template)
Foreach controller
Counter(Maximum -> ${Result_matchNr} , Rf Name -> index)
LinkSamplerUsingParsedData(use -> ${__V(Result_${index}_g1)}
Now, if you want to iterate to all groups, you need another foreach to do that. As you know which group represent what value, you can use this way.
Related
In my program I need to join 2 and more collections by some json properties.
When I run only subsequence method it return array of json objects but when I use it in op.fromLiterals in my optic plan it returns a list of document uris.
I can't use the method op.fromSearch because I can't upgrade to a later MarkLogic version.
I need something like this to work:
var items = fn.subsequence(search).toArray();
op.fromLiterals(items)
.joinInner(article, op.on('fragmentId', 'viewDocId'))
.result()
But now items is a list of document locations (document_1.json) and this code gives me an error:
XDMP-ARGTYPE:
xdmp.documentGet(cts.doc("/Documents/document_1.json"))
Solution: I push properties to results in this way: results.push({id: doc.toObject()["document_id"]}); and its work fine.
Category Name
|
Geograpy (8)
Study Db (18)
i am implement my own advance search in alfresco. i need to read all files which related with particular category.
example:
if there is 20 file under geograpy, lucene query should read particular document under search key word "banana".
Further explanation -
I am using search.lib.js to search. I would like to analyze the result to find out to which category the documents belong to. For example I would like to know how many documents belong to the category under Languages and the subcategories. I experimented with the Classification API but I don't get the result I want. Any Idea how to go through the result to get the category name of each document?
is there any simple method like node.properties["cm:creator"]?
thanks
janaka
I think you should specify more your question:
Are you using cm:content or a customized content?
Are you going to search the keyword inside the content of the file? or are you going to search the keyword in a specific metadata(s)?
Do you want to create a webscript (java or javascript)?
One thing to take in consideration:
if you use +PATH:"cm:generalclassifiable/...." for the categorization in your lucene queries, the performance will be slow (following my experince)
You can use for example the next query to find all nodes at any depth below /cm:Languages:
var results = search.luceneSearch("+PATH:\"cm:generalclassifiable/cm:Languages//*\");
Take a look to this url: https://wiki.alfresco.com/wiki/Search#Path_Queries
Once you have all the elements, you can loop all, and get to which category below. Of course you need to create some counter per each category/subcategory:
for(i = 0; i < results.length; i++){
var node = results[i];
var categoryNodeRef = node.properties["cm:categories"];
var categoryDesc = categoryNodeRef.properties["cm:description"];
var categoryName = categoryNodeRef.properties["cm:name"];
}
This is not exactly the solution, but can be a useful idea to start.
Sorry if it's not what you're asking for, I have just arrived from my holidays.
Im using custom filtering for my datatable using the method:
$.fn.dataTableExt.afnFiltering.push("custom filter function");
This function adds a filter to my datatable.
The problem is that when I use ajax to create an other datatable object, this filter persists and is applied to this other table that should have nothing to do with this filter. How do I clear the filter or bind it to the first datatable only?
if you make a push on $.fn.dataTableExt.afnFiltering, it means it's an array. So when you receive your data, you can remove the filter reference in this array by using :
delete $.fn.dataTableExt.afnFiltering[index or key];
this method will set the element to undefined
or by using the splice method in javascript.
$.fn.dataTableExt.afnFiltering.splice(index,1);
this method will remove the element from the array.
so
var index = $.fn.dataTableExt.afnFiltering.indexOf("custom filter function");
$.fn.dataTableExt.afnFiltering.splice(index,1);
should resolve your problem
(you can have precision here Javascript - remove an array item by value as indexOf is not supported by IE<9)
If you are going to use the 1.10+ version of the datatable in the future, the use of the search plug-in document is shown below:
Search plug-in development
To reset the filter for version 1.10+, simply add any of the following;
$.fn.dataTable.ext.search = [];
$.fn.dataTable.ext.search.pop();
after this blocks you can add;
table.draw();
$.fn.dataTableExt.afnFiltering.pop();
credit to #DrewT
As mentioned from #kthorngren, there is no build in way of tracking, if or how much custom searches are active.
If you are sure, that there is only one custom search is active a
$.fn.dataTableExt.afnFiltering.pop();
will work - there is big BUT:
$.fn.dataTable.ext.search is an array which contains the search settings for custom search and for searchPanes.
An erasing of this array with $.fn.dataTable.ext.search = []; or two pop()'s, allthough there is only one custom search is active --> will brake searchPanes.
e.g. if you have three panes active, this would mean:
$.fn.dataTable.ext.search[0] -> SearchPane Col1
$.fn.dataTable.ext.search[1] -> SearchPane Col2
$.fn.dataTable.ext.search[2] -> SearchPane Col3
$.fn.dataTable.ext.search[3] -> Custom Search -> safe to delete
$.fn.dataTable.ext.search[4] -> Custom Search -> safe to delete
Following code does the job in my case:
let lenOfSearchPanes = dt.settings()[0]._searchPanes.c.columns.length;
let lenOfSearchArr = $.fn.dataTable.ext.search.length;
let diff = lenOfSearchArr - lenOfSearchPanes
if (diff > 0) {
$.fn.dataTable.ext.search = $.fn.dataTable.ext.search.slice(0, -diff);
}
I recently created a Form Builder form with a repeat to show a list of data. The repeat is working fine. My question is that i need to get the index for the data inside the repeat so that i can use it to get another set of data from tables.
Here is my
<fr:grid columns="2" repeat="true" ref="instance('fr-form-data')/name" id="data-repeat" origin="instance('fr-form-data-template')">
<xh:tr>
<xh:td>
<xf:output id="name-control" ref="person_name">
<xf:label>Name :</xf:label>
</xf:output>
</xh:td>
<xh:td>
<xf:trigger>
<xf:label>Get</xf:label>
<xf:action ev:event="DOMActivate">
<xf:setvalue ref="instance('fr-param-instance')/person/mni" value="am_mni"/>
<xf:send submission="get-invl"/>
</xf:action>
</xf:trigger>
</xh:td>
</xh:tr>
</fr:grid>
I need to get the data to put inside here:
<xf:setvalue ref="instance('fr-param-instance')/person/mni" value="am_mni"/>
Thanks
If you have an element am_mni inside the repeat, at the same level of person_name, then your xf:setvalue can look like:
<xf:setvalue ref="instance('fr-param-instance')/person/mni"
value="context()/am_mni"/>
context() refers to the context in which the xf:setvalue runs, which will be the current repeat iteration, since it is inside a repeat. If you just write value="am_mni", this will be evaluated relative to the ref, and thus return instance('fr-param-instance')/person/mni/am_mni, which in your case is most likely an empty sequence.
I use jqGrid to display data which is retrieved using NHibernate. jqGrid does paging for me, I just tell NHibernate to get "count" rows starting from "n".
Also, I would like to highlight specific record. For example, in list of employees I'd like a specific employee (id) to be shown and pre-selected in table.
The problem is that this employee may be on non-current page. E.g. I display 20 rows from 0, but "highlighted" employee is #25 and is on second page.
It is possible to pass initial page to jqGrid, so, if I somehow use NHibernate to find what page the "highlighted" employee is on, it will just navigate to that page and then I'll use .setSelection(id) method of jqGrid.
So, the problem is narrowed down to this one: given specific search query like the one below, how do I tell NHibernate to calculate the page where the "highlighted" employee is?
A sample query (simplified):
var query = Session.CreateCriteria<T>();
foreach (var sr in request.SearchFields)
query = query.Add(Expression.Like(sr.Key, "%" + sr.Value + "%"));
query.SetFirstResult((request.Page - 1) * request.Rows)
query.SetMaxResults(request.Rows)
Here, I need to alter (calculate) request.Page so that it points to the page where request.SelectedId is.
Also, one interesting thing is, if sort order is not defined, will I get the same results when I run the search query twice? I'd say that SQL Server may optimize query because order is not defined... in which case I'll only get predictable result if I pull ALL query data once, and then will programmatically in C# slice the specified portion of query results - so that no second query occur. But it will be much slower, of course.
Or, is there another way?
Pretty sure you'd have to figure out the page with another query. This would surely require you to define the column to order by. You'll need to get the order by and restriction working together to count the rows before that particular id. Once you have the number of rows before your id, you can figure what page you need to select and perform the usual paging query.
OK, so currently I do this:
var iquery = GetPagedCriteria<T>(request, true)
.SetProjection(Projections.Property("Id"));
var ids = iquery.List<Guid>();
var index = ids.IndexOf(new Guid(request.SelectedId));
if (index >= 0)
request.Page = index / request.Rows + 1;
and in jqGrid setup options
url: "${Url.Href<MyController>(c => c.JsonIndex(null))}?_SelectedId=${Id}",
// remove _SelectedId from url once loaded because we only need to find its page once
gridComplete: function() {
$("#grid").setGridParam({url: "${Url.Href<MyController>(c => c.JsonIndex(null))}"});
},
loadComplete: function() {
$("#grid").setSelection("${Id}");
}
That is, in request I lookup for index of id and set page if found (jqGrid even understands to display the appropriate page number in the pager because I return the page number to in in json data). In grid setup, I setup url to include the lookup id first, but after grid is loaded I remove it from url so that prev/next buttons work. However I always try to highlight the selected id in the grid.
And of course I always use sorting or the method won't work.
One problem still exists is that I pull all ids from db which is a bit of performance hit. If someone can tell how to find index of the id in the filtered/sorted query I'd accept the answer (since that's the real problem); if no then I'll accept my own answer ;-)
UPDATE: hm, if I sort by id initially I'll be able to use the technique like "SELECT COUNT(*) ... WHERE id < selectedid". This will eliminate the "pull ids" problem... but I'd like to sort by name initially, anyway.
UPDATE: after implemented, I've found a neat side-effect of this technique... when sorting, the active/selected item is preserved ;-) This works if _SelectedId is reset only when page is changed, not when grid is loaded.
UPDATE: here's sources that include the above technique: http://sprokhorenko.blogspot.com/2010/01/jqgrid-mvc-new-version-sources.html