AutoStart/Pre-warm features not working in IIS 7.5 / WCF service - wcf

For testing the many headaches of IIS/WCF implementation from scratch, I built the HelloWorld service and client walked through (very nicely) here. I added endpoints for net.tcp, and the service is working properly end-to-end for both bindings under IIS 7.5 (on Windows 7) in its own ApplicationPool called HW.
What I'm trying to get working is the announced AutoStart and Preload (or "pre-warm caching") features. I've followed the instructions laid out here and here (quite similar to one another, but always good to have a second opinion) very closely. Which means I
1) Set the application pool startMode...
<applicationPools>
<!-- ... -->
<add name="HW" managedRuntimeVersion="v4.0" startMode="AlwaysRunning" />
</applicationPools>
2) ...enabled serviceAutoStart and set a pointer to my serviceAutoStartProvider
<site name="HW" id="2">
<application path="/" applicationPool="HW" serviceAutoStartEnabled="true" serviceAutoStartProvider="PreWarmMyCache" />
<!-- ... -->
</site>
3) ...and named said provider, with the GetType().AssemblyQualifiedName of the class listed in its entirety below
<serviceAutoStartProviders>
<add name="PreWarmMyCache" type="MyWCFServices.Preloader, HelloWorldServer, Version=1.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null" />
</serviceAutoStartProviders>
using System;
namespace MyWCFServices
{
public class Preloader : System.Web.Hosting.IProcessHostPreloadClient
{
public void Preload(string[] parameters)
{
System.IO.StreamWriter sw = new System.IO.StreamWriter(#"C:\temp\PreloadTest.txt");
sw.WriteLine("Preload executed {0:G}", DateTime.Now);
sw.Close();
}
}
}
Alas, all this manual configuration, plus a couple iisreset calls, and I get nothing. No w3wp.exe process firing up in Task Manager (though I get it if I launch the HelloWorldClient), no text file, and above all, no satisfaction.
There is a frustratingly scant amount of discussion about this feature, either on SO or the wider web, and the few similar questions here got little attention, all of which rings an alarm bell or two. Perhaps needlessly though--any experts out there who have been down this very road a time or two care to chime in? (Happy to offer up the entire solution if you can suggest a good place to host it.)
EDIT: I tried resetting that path in the Preload method to the relative App_Data folder (another SO answer suggested that), didn't matter. Also, I learned the w3wp.exe process fires on a simple browse to the localhost. The process consumes an impressive 17MB of memory to serve up its single tiny OperationContract, while for the price offering zero Preload value. 17MB of ColdDeadCache.

This is a slightly different approach for your problem:
Use Windows Server AppFabric for service auto-start
Use WCF infrastructure to execute custom startup code
Re 1: The Appfabric AutoStart feature should just work out of the box (provided you're not using MVC's ServiceRoute to register your services, they MUST be specified either in the Web.config's serviceActivations section or using physical *.svc files.
Re 2: To inject custom startup code into the WCF pipeline you could use an attribute like this:
using System;
using System.ServiceModel;
using System.ServiceModel.Description;
namespace WCF.Extensions
{
/// <summary>
/// Allows to specify a static activation method to be called one the ServiceHost for this service has been opened.
/// </summary>
[AttributeUsage(AttributeTargets.Class, AllowMultiple = true, Inherited = false)]
public class ServiceActivatorAttribute : Attribute, IServiceBehavior
{
/// <summary>
/// Initializes a new instance of the ServiceActivatorAttribute class.
/// </summary>
public ServiceActivatorAttribute(Type activatorType, string methodToCall)
{
if (activatorType == null) throw new ArgumentNullException("activatorType");
if (String.IsNullOrEmpty(methodToCall)) throw new ArgumentNullException("methodToCall");
ActivatorType = activatorType;
MethodToCall = methodToCall;
}
/// <summary>
/// The class containing the activation method.
/// </summary>
public Type ActivatorType { get; private set; }
/// <summary>
/// The name of the activation method. Must be 'public static void' and with no parameters.
/// </summary>
public string MethodToCall { get; private set; }
private System.Reflection.MethodInfo activationMethod;
#region IServiceBehavior
void IServiceBehavior.AddBindingParameters(ServiceDescription serviceDescription, ServiceHostBase serviceHostBase, System.Collections.ObjectModel.Collection<ServiceEndpoint> endpoints, System.ServiceModel.Channels.BindingParameterCollection bindingParameters)
{
}
void IServiceBehavior.ApplyDispatchBehavior(ServiceDescription serviceDescription, ServiceHostBase serviceHostBase)
{
serviceHostBase.Opened += (sender, e) =>
{
this.activationMethod.Invoke(null, null);
};
}
void IServiceBehavior.Validate(ServiceDescription serviceDescription, ServiceHostBase serviceHostBase)
{
// Validation: can get method
var method = ActivatorType.GetMethod(name: MethodToCall,
bindingAttr: System.Reflection.BindingFlags.Static | System.Reflection.BindingFlags.Public,
callConvention: System.Reflection.CallingConventions.Standard,
types: Type.EmptyTypes,
binder: null,
modifiers: null);
if (method == null)
throw new ServiceActivationException("The specified activation method does not exist or does not have a valid signature (must be public static).");
this.activationMethod = method;
}
#endregion
}
}
..which can be used like this:
public static class ServiceActivation
{
public static void OnServiceActivated()
{
// Your startup code here
}
}
[ServiceActivator(typeof(ServiceActivation), "OnServiceActivated")]
public class YourService : IYourServiceContract
{
}
That's the exact approach we've been using for quite a while and on a large number of services. The extra benefit of using a WCF ServiceBehavior for custom startup code (as opposed to relying on the IIS infrastructure) is that it works in any hosting environment (incl. self-hosted) and can be more easily tested.

I know this sounds absurd but I faced the same issue (w3wp.exe not firing automatically after making the config changes) and it was because I hadn't run the text editor in Admin mode when I was editing the applicationHost.config file. Stupid mistake on my part.
In my defense I was using Notepad++ which told me it was saving when it actually wasn't.

I've done the same. it works...
In preload method I have some code copied from a nice white paper available here!
Preload method looks like...
public void Preload(string[] parameters)
{
bool isServceActivated = false;
int attempts = 0;
while (!isServceActivated && (attempts <10))
{
Thread.Sleep(1 * 1000);
try
{
string virtualPath = "/Test1/Service1.svc";
ServiceHostingEnvironment.EnsureServiceAvailable(virtualPath);
isServceActivated = true;
}
catch (Exception exception)
{
attempts++;
//continue on these exceptions, otherwise fail fast
if (exception is EndpointNotFoundException ||
exception is ServiceActivationException ||
exception is ArgumentException)
{
//log
}
else
{
throw;
}
}
}
}

Maybe you are on a 64-bit system? There is a known "feature" in Windows where the save gets redirected to the 32 bit folder and thus no changes will be picked up
(I have converted my comment to an answer as answers might be easier to find)

Related

gRPC doesn't seem to generate client side code needed for accessing service

I am exploring gRPC by downloading and following the PortfoliosSample from here.
The sample code are all working fine. When I tried to create my own simple service and client by following the sample, however, I noticed that the generated code on the client side doesn't include the class and functions needed for accessing the service.
In the PortfoliosSample, the client side code generated based on the portfolios.proto includes and class named PortfoliosClinet (in PortfoliosGrpc.cs)
public partial class PortfoliosClient : grpc::ClientBase<PortfoliosClient>
Various functions (such as Get, in the class) are available for client side program to use for invoking the service.
In my generated code, BrokerGrpc.cs, there is no "GroupClient" class or anything similar in it. As a result, my client side code cannot use the generated code to access the service. What am I missing?
Here is the TSAPIBroker.proto file defined on the server
syntax = "proto3";
option csharp_namespace = "Test.API.TSAPIBroker.Protos";
package TSAPIBroker;
message Group {
int32 id = 1;
string name = 2;
}
message Groups {
repeated Group group = 1;
}
message GetRequest {
int32 groupId = 1;
}
message GetResponse {
Group group = 1;
}
service GroupService
{
rpc Get(GetRequest) returns (GetResponse);
}
And here is the generated TSAPIBrokerGrpc.cs
// <auto-generated>
// Generated by the protocol buffer compiler. DO NOT EDIT!
// source: TSAPIBroker.proto
// </auto-generated>
#pragma warning disable 0414, 1591
#region Designer generated code
using grpc = global::Grpc.Core;
namespace Test.API.TSAPIBroker.Protos {
public static partial class GroupService
{
static readonly string __ServiceName = "TSAPIBroker.GroupService";
static readonly grpc::Marshaller<global::Test.API.TSAPIBroker.Protos.GetRequest> __Marshaller_TSAPIBroker_GetRequest = grpc::Marshallers.Create((arg) => global::Google.Protobuf.MessageExtensions.ToByteArray(arg), global::Test.API.TSAPIBroker.Protos.GetRequest.Parser.ParseFrom);
static readonly grpc::Marshaller<global::Test.API.TSAPIBroker.Protos.GetResponse> __Marshaller_TSAPIBroker_GetResponse = grpc::Marshallers.Create((arg) => global::Google.Protobuf.MessageExtensions.ToByteArray(arg), global::Test.API.TSAPIBroker.Protos.GetResponse.Parser.ParseFrom);
static readonly grpc::Method<global::Test.API.TSAPIBroker.Protos.GetRequest, global::Test.API.TSAPIBroker.Protos.GetResponse> __Method_Get = new grpc::Method<global::Test.API.TSAPIBroker.Protos.GetRequest, global::Test.API.TSAPIBroker.Protos.GetResponse>(
grpc::MethodType.Unary,
__ServiceName,
"Get",
__Marshaller_TSAPIBroker_GetRequest,
__Marshaller_TSAPIBroker_GetResponse);
/// <summary>Service descriptor</summary>
public static global::Google.Protobuf.Reflection.ServiceDescriptor Descriptor
{
get { return global::Test.API.TSAPIBroker.Protos.TSAPIBrokerReflection.Descriptor.Services[0]; }
}
/// <summary>Base class for server-side implementations of GroupService</summary>
[grpc::BindServiceMethod(typeof(GroupService), "BindService")]
public abstract partial class GroupServiceBase
{
public virtual global::System.Threading.Tasks.Task<global::Test.API.TSAPIBroker.Protos.GetResponse> Get(global::Test.API.TSAPIBroker.Protos.GetRequest request, grpc::ServerCallContext context)
{
throw new grpc::RpcException(new grpc::Status(grpc::StatusCode.Unimplemented, ""));
}
}
/// <summary>Creates service definition that can be registered with a server</summary>
/// <param name="serviceImpl">An object implementing the server-side handling logic.</param>
public static grpc::ServerServiceDefinition BindService(GroupServiceBase serviceImpl)
{
return grpc::ServerServiceDefinition.CreateBuilder()
.AddMethod(__Method_Get, serviceImpl.Get).Build();
}
/// <summary>Register service method with a service binder with or without implementation. Useful when customizing the service binding logic.
/// Note: this method is part of an experimental API that can change or be removed without any prior notice.</summary>
/// <param name="serviceBinder">Service methods will be bound by calling <c>AddMethod</c> on this object.</param>
/// <param name="serviceImpl">An object implementing the server-side handling logic.</param>
public static void BindService(grpc::ServiceBinderBase serviceBinder, GroupServiceBase serviceImpl)
{
serviceBinder.AddMethod(__Method_Get, serviceImpl == null ? null : new grpc::UnaryServerMethod<global::Test.API.TSAPIBroker.Protos.GetRequest, global::Test.API.TSAPIBroker.Protos.GetResponse>(serviceImpl.Get));
}
}
}
#endregion
Using the container image mcr.microsoft.com/dotnet/sdk:5.0, I'm able to use your proto to generate both files:
TSAPIBroker.cs
TSAPIBrokerGrpc.cs
Repro:
dotnet new console
dotnet add package Grpc --version 2.33.1
dotnet add package Grpc.Tools --version 2.33.1
dotnet add package Google.Api.CommonProtos --version 2.2.0
Reference your proto from ther project file and then build.
My generated *Grpc.cs contains GroupServiceClientclass.
NOTE the message Groups is defined but not used.

RavenDB - One client can't see changes from a different client

I'm running two instances of my application. In one instance, I save one of my entities. When I check the RavenDB (http://localhost:8080/raven), I can see the change. Then, in my other client, I do this (below), but I don't see the changes from the other application. What do I need to do in order to get the most recent data in the DB?
public IEnumerable<CustomVariableGroup> GetAll()
{
return Session
.Query<CustomVariableGroup>()
.Customize(x => x.WaitForNonStaleResults());
}
Edit: The code above works if I try to make a change and get a concurrency exception. After that, when I call refresh (which invokes the above code), it works.
Here is the code that does the save:
public void Save<T>(T objectToSave)
{
Guid eTag = (Guid)Session.Advanced.GetEtagFor(objectToSave);
Session.Store(objectToSave, eTag);
Session.SaveChanges();
}
And here is the class that contains the Database and Session:
public abstract class DataAccessLayerBase
{
/// <summary>
/// Gets the database.
/// </summary>
protected static DocumentStore Database { get; private set; }
/// <summary>
/// Gets the session.
/// </summary>
protected static IDocumentSession Session { get; private set; }
static DataAccessLayerBase()
{
if (Database != null) { return; }
Database = GetDatabase();
Session = GetSession();
}
private static DocumentStore GetDatabase()
{
string databaseUrl = ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["databaseUrl"];
DocumentStore documentStore = new DocumentStore();
try
{
//documentStore.ConnectionStringName = "RavenDb"; // See app.config for why this is commented.
documentStore.Url = databaseUrl;
documentStore.Initialize();
}
catch
{
documentStore.Dispose();
throw;
}
return documentStore;
}
private static IDocumentSession GetSession()
{
IDocumentSession session = Database.OpenSession();
session.Advanced.UseOptimisticConcurrency = true;
return session;
}
}
Lacking more detailed information and some code, I can only guess...
Please make sure that you call .SaveChanges() on your session. Without explicitly specifiying an ITransaction your IDocumentSession will be isolated and transactional between it's opening and the call to .SaveChanges. Either all operations succeed or none. But if you don't call it all your previous .Store calls will be lost.
If I was wrong, please post more details about your code.
EDIT: Second answer (after additional information):
Your problem has to do with the way RavenDB caches on the client-side. RavenDB by default caches every GET request throughout a DocumentSession. Plain queries are just GET queries (and no, it has nothing to do wheter your index in dynamic or manually defined upfront) and therefore they will be cached. The solution in your application is to dispose the session and open a new one.
I suggest you rethink your Session lifecycle. It seems that your sessions live too long, otherwise this concurrency wouldn't be an issue. If you're building a web-application I recommend to open and close the session with the beginning and the end of your request. Have a look at RaccoonBlog to see it implemented elegantly.
Bob,
It looks like you have but a single session in the application, which isn't right. The following article talks about NHibernate, but the session management parts applies to RavenDB as well:
http://archive.msdn.microsoft.com/mag200912NHibernate
This code is meaningless:
Guid eTag = (Guid)Session.Advanced.GetEtagFor(objectToSave);
Session.Store(objectToSave, eTag);
It basically a no op, but one that looks important. You seems to be trying to work with a model where you have to manually manage all the saves, don't do that. You only need to manage things yourself when you create a new item, that is all.
As for the reason you get this problem, here is a sample:
var session = documentStore.OpenSession();
var post1 = session.Load<Post>(1);
// change the post by another client
post2 = session.Load<Post>(1); // will NOT go to the server, will give the same instance as post1
Assert.ReferenceEquals(post1,post2);
Sessions are short lived, and typically used in the scope of a single form / request.

Sharepoint 2010 Event receiver not firing for subsite

I have an event receiver (WebAdding and WebProvisioned) which works just fine for sites created off the root of the site collection. However, subsites (for example, teamsites created within other areas) do not trigger the code at all.
Does anyone have any idea as to why?
using System;
using System.Security.Permissions;
using Microsoft.SharePoint;
using Microsoft.SharePoint.Security;
using Microsoft.SharePoint.Utilities;
using Microsoft.SharePoint.Workflow;
using System.Text;
namespace TestEventReceiver.EventReceiver1
{
/// <summary>
/// Web Events
/// </summary>
public class EventReceiver1 : SPWebEventReceiver
{
/// <summary>
/// A site is being provisioned.
/// </summary>
public override void WebAdding(SPWebEventProperties properties)
{
base.WebAdding(properties);
using (SPWeb web = properties.Web)
{
StringBuilder output = new StringBuilder();
output.AppendFormat("Web Adding");
output.AppendFormat("<br>Web title: {0}",web.Title);
SendMyEmail(web, "SendItToMe#MyTestAddress.com", "Web Adding", output.ToString());
}
}
/// <summary>
/// A site was provisioned.
/// </summary>
public override void WebProvisioned(SPWebEventProperties properties)
{
base.WebProvisioned(properties);
using (SPWeb web = properties.Web)
{
StringBuilder output = new StringBuilder();
output.AppendFormat("Web Provisioned");
output.AppendFormat("<br>Web title: {0}", web.Title);
SendMyEmail(web, "SendItToMe#MyTestAddress.com", "Web Provisioned", output.ToString());
}
}
private void SendMyEmail(SPWeb Web, String toAddress, String subject, String message)
{
bool appendHtmlTag = false;
bool htmlEncode = true;
SPSecurity.RunWithElevatedPrivileges(delegate()
{
SPUtility.SendEmail(Web, appendHtmlTag, htmlEncode, toAddress, subject, message);
});
}
}
}
Thanks in advance,
Matt
I think you should not be using 'Using' .
The SPWeb object reference you get is from properties.Web which is being passed to the WebAdding method. You will run into issues because of this.
Have a look at how your event receiver is provisioned - it may be the scope needs to be changed to Site rather than Web. Perhaps you could post here so we can see.
On my site I had the same issue. Still figuring out the xml files, but in my Elements.xml file for the Receivers, each receiver had the same sequence number. Once I made them unique within the Elements.xml file, the WebProvisioned event started firing. Don't know if this is the same issue you were having.
This code is showing the WebAdding event and that event is occurring on the parent Web.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/microsoft.sharepoint.spwebeventreceiver.webadding.aspx
Try to change scope of your receiver (in Elements.xml file add attribute ). Also, make sure that the feature of your Event receiver is activated in you site features in the subsite.

Providing workflow extensions to a workflow service - WF 4.0

Greetings one and all!
I'm new to WF 4.0 and WWF in general so forgive me if this seems like a newbie type of question, but believe me I've scoured the depths of the Internet for a solution to this problem, but to no avail.
I have created a sample WF application with a custom CodeActivity that requires an extension be provided, as per below:
public sealed class PreparePizza : CodeActivity
{
public InArgument<Order> Order { get; set; }
protected override void CacheMetadata(CodeActivityMetadata metadata)
{
base.CacheMetadata(metadata);
if (this.Order == null)
metadata.AddValidationError("You must supply an Order.");
metadata.RequireExtension<IPreparePizzaExtension>();
}
// If your activity returns a value, derive from CodeActivity<TResult>
// and return the value from the Execute method.
protected override void Execute(CodeActivityContext context)
{
// Obtain the runtime value of the Text input argument
Order order = context.GetValue(this.Order);
var extension = context.GetExtension<IPreparePizzaExtension>();
extension.Prepare(order);
}
}
public interface IPreparePizzaExtension
{
void Prepare(Order order);
}
I then slot this activity into a workflow service and attempt to consume via my web app by adding a service reference. However, when I add the reference I get:
System.Activities.ValidationException: An extension of type 'PizzaMan.ActivityLibrary.IPreparePizzaExtension' must be configured in order to run this workflow.
Fair enough - of course my activity requires that I pass it an implementation of IPreparePizzaExtension - after all, I've told it to!
So my question is, how on earth do I pass this to the service? I can manage this easily enough in a console app scenario, using the WorkflowInvoker, but I cannot see any obvious way to do this via the service approach. I would assume that obviously a programmatic approach to adding the reference is what's needed, but again I'm at a loss as to precisely how to go about this.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Best regards
Ian
The WorkflowServiceHost has a WorkflowExtensions property where you can add the workflow extenstion. There are several ways you can do that. If you are self hosting this is easy as you create the WorkflowServiceHost. If you are usign IIS you need to create a ServiceHostFactory to configure you WorkflowServiceHost. Finally there is an option to add the workflow extension in the CacheMetadata of your activity using the metadata.AddDefaultExtensionProvider() function.
Solved it as follows, self-hosting style:
static void Main(string[] args)
{
Workflow1 workflow = new Workflow1();
// Provide some default values; note: these will be overriden once method on the service is called.
workflow.productID = -1;
Uri address = new Uri("http://localhost:1234/WorkflowService1");
WorkflowServiceHost host = new WorkflowServiceHost(workflow, address);
// Behaviours
host.Description.Behaviors.Add(new ServiceMetadataBehavior { HttpGetEnabled = true });
host.Description.Behaviors.Remove(typeof(ServiceDebugBehavior));
host.Description.Behaviors.Add(new ServiceDebugBehavior { IncludeExceptionDetailInFaults = true });
// Persistence
var connStr = #"";
var behavior = new SqlWorkflowInstanceStoreBehavior(connStr);
behavior.InstanceCompletionAction = InstanceCompletionAction.DeleteNothing;
behavior.InstanceLockedExceptionAction = InstanceLockedExceptionAction.AggressiveRetry;
behavior.InstanceEncodingOption = InstanceEncodingOption.None;
host.Description.Behaviors.Add(behavior);
// Add extension implementations
if (!TEST_MODE)
{
host.WorkflowExtensions.Add(new MyExtension());
}
else
{
host.WorkflowExtensions.Add(new MyExtensionTest());
}
host.Faulted += new EventHandler(host_Faulted);
host.Open();
foreach (System.ServiceModel.Description.ServiceEndpoint endpoint in host.Description.Endpoints)
{
Console.WriteLine(endpoint.Address);
}
Console.WriteLine("Listening...");
Console.ReadLine();
host.Close();
}
My toolkit has configuration support for this. See http://neovolve.codeplex.com/wikipage?title=Neovolve.Toolkit.Workflow.dll%20-%201.1
There is also this method of doing things:
http://wf.codeplex.com/wikipage?title=How%20do%20I%20add%20an%20extension%20to%20a%20WCF%20Workflow%20Service?

Can we host a Workflow Service as a Windows Service?

I am working on a logging application that requires me to have a Workflow that is exposed as a Service (Workflow Service). We want to host it as a Windows Service (don't want to host workflow service as .svc file in IIS). Another reason for having it as windows service is to be able to communicate with the service through the Named pipes.
Can we expose a Workflow Service through Named Pipes without hosting it in IIS?
Yep bep, you sure can. At least, I have accomplished as much with Workflow 4 Release Candidate.
Consider,
// a generic self-hosted workflow service hosting thingy. Actual
// implementation should contain more logging and thread safety, this
// is an abbreviated version ;)
public class WorkflowHost
{
// NOTE: with Workflow, it helps to maintain a concept of
// Workflow definition [the Activity or WorkflowService from
// a designer] and a Workflow instance [what is running within
// WorkflowInvoker, WorkflowApplication, WorkflowServiceHost].
// a definition may be used to generate an instance. an instance
// contains run-time state and cannot be recycled into a new
// instance. therefore, to repeatedly re-host a WorkflowService
// we need to maintain references to original definitions and
// actual instances. ergo services and hosts maps
//
// if you are special purpose and require support for one and
// only one service and endpoint\uri, then you may reduce this
// to a simple tuple of Uri, WorkflowService, WorkflowServiceHost
// services represents a definition of hosted services
private readonly Dictionary<Uri, WorkflowService> _services =
new Dictionary<Uri, WorkflowService> ();
// hosts represents actual running instances of services
private readonly Dictionary<Uri, WorkflowServiceHost> _hosts =
new Dictionary<Uri, WorkflowServiceHost> ();
// constructor accepts a map of Uris (ie service endpoints) to
// workflow service definitions
public WorkflowHost (IDictionary<Uri, WorkflowService> services)
{
foreach (KeyValuePair<Uri, WorkflowService> servicePair in services)
{
_services.Add (servicePair.Key, servicePair.Value);
}
}
// have your windows service invoke this to start hosting
public void Start ()
{
if (_hosts.Count > 0)
{
Stop ();
}
foreach (KeyValuePair<Uri, WorkflowService> servicePair in _services)
{
WorkflowService service = servicePair.Value;
Uri uri = servicePair.Key;
WorkflowServiceHost host = new WorkflowServiceHost (service, uri);
host.Open ();
_hosts.Add (uri, host);
}
}
// have your windows service invoke this to stop hosting
public void Stop ()
{
if (_hosts.Count > 0)
{
foreach (KeyValuePair<Uri, WorkflowService> servicePair in
_services)
{
WorkflowService service = servicePair.Value;
Uri uri = servicePair.Key;
IDisposable host = _hosts[uri];
host.Dispose ();
}
_hosts.Clear ();
}
}
}
I believe endpoint configuration may be set via standard Wcf service configuration sections in App.config. I have not personally attempted a change to default transport layer in my experiments with Workflow.
The above represents a generic pure hosting class [ie it self-hosts WorkflowServices]. This allows us to re-use this hosting functionality within a console, WinForm, WPF, or yes, even a WindowsService application. Below is a WindowsService that leverages our host class
// windows service. personally i would abstract service behind
// an interface and inject it, but again, for brevity ;)
public partial class WorkflowWindowsService : ServiceBase
{
WorkflowHost _host;
public WorkflowWindowsService ()
{
InitializeComponent();
Dictionary<Uri, WorkflowService> services =
new Dictionary<Uri, WorkflowService> ();
// do your service loading ...
// create host
_host = new WorkflowHost (services);
}
protected override void OnStart(string[] args)
{
_host.Start ();
}
protected override void OnStop()
{
_host.Stop ();
}
}
If you have fiddled with WorkflowServices in VS2010RC, then you may already know that WorkflowServices are not first class Xaml classes like their Workflow cousins. Instead, they are saved as loose Xaml files with the .xamlx extension. There is no design-time intellisense support for WorkflowServices [as far as I know] and are not recognized as declared types, so our only options to load a WorkflowService at run-time are
Read pure Xaml markup from .xamlx file directly
Read pure Xaml markup from some other source [embedded string, resource, or other source]
Either way, we must interpret markup and create a WorkflowService definition. The following will transform a string [that may be a filename or markup] into a WorkflowService. Keeners may also note that there is a difference between this process and the process for transforming Workflow markup to Workflow definitions.
// converts a string value [either pure xaml or filename] to a
// WorkflowService definition
public WorkflowService ToWorkflowService (string value)
{
WorkflowService service = null;
// 1. assume value is Xaml
string xaml = value;
// 2. if value is file path,
if (File.Exists (value))
{
// 2a. read contents to xaml
xaml = File.ReadAllText (value);
}
// 3. build service
using (StringReader xamlReader = new StringReader (xaml))
{
object untypedService = null;
// NOTE: XamlServices, NOT ActivityXamlServices
untypedService = XamlServices.Load (xamlReader);
if (untypedService is WorkflowService)
{
service = (WorkflowService)(untypedService);
}
else
{
throw new ArgumentException (
string.Format (
"Unexpected error reading WorkflowService from " +
"value [{0}] and Xaml [{1}]. Xaml does not define a " +
"WorkflowService, but an instance of [{2}].",
value,
xaml,
untypedService.GetType ()));
}
}
return service;
}
Yes it is possible. You will have to create your own service. See Hosting and Consuming WCF Services on MSDN, especially the section Hosting in Windows Services.