ZADD myset 1 ad1
ZADD myset 1 ad2
SET order:ad1 1
SET order:ad2 2
How to sort firstly by ordered set score then the order value?
If you want to store a result (not altering the way data are stored), then you can use the SORT command. It can be applied to zset.
For instance:
> zadd myset 1 albert
> zadd myset 1 joseph
> zadd myset 4 bertrand
> zadd myset 2 casimir
> zadd myset 3 alfred
You can sort by value:
> sort myset alpha
1) "albert"
2) "alfred"
3) "bertrand"
4) "casimir"
5) "joseph"
You can sort by score AND value:
> zrange myset 0 -1
1) "albert"
2) "joseph"
3) "casimir"
4) "alfred"
5) "bertrand"
Now let's add a new property to these objects:
> set order:albert 5
> set order:alfred 3
> set order:casimir 1
> set order:joseph 4
> set order:bertrand 2
You can sort by the new order property:
> sort myset by order:*
1) "casimir"
2) "bertrand"
3) "alfred"
4) "joseph"
5) "albert"
Now if you need to sort by score AND this order property, then you have no other choice than materialize the order property in the zset OR materialize the score in the order property.
For instance, adding the order property in the zset, we get:
> del myset
> zadd myset 1 5:albert
> zadd myset 1 4:joseph
> zadd myset 4 2:bertrand
> zadd myset 2 1:casimir
> zadd myset 3 3:alfred
> zrange myset 0 -1
1) "4:joseph"
2) "5:albert"
3) "1:casimir"
4) "3:alfred"
5) "2:bertrand"
Beware: in that case, the property field is sorted according to the lexicographic order, so the value may have to be normalized if you need numerical order and multiple digits. There are various tricks to do this. For instance, instead of storing "1", "12" or "123", you can store "11", "212" or "3123", the first digit representing the number of digits of your number.
If both the score and the order property can change, this is not very convenient and you will be better served by sorting on client side. This can be achieved in two roundtrips by retrieving the zset with scores on one side, and the corresponding order values on the other side.
> zrange myset 0 -1 withscores
> sort myset by order:* get order:* get #
Up to the client to join the two results (using some kind of dictionary or associative array), and sort to get the final result.
Related
I'm trying to strategies how to calculate position/rank based on score and date
I have a two pieces of data with the same score shown in the image below.
If i run the command
$ZADD usersScores 11 userId6
It will add it above userId5 which is not something I want
Is it possible to add it below userId1 maybe based on date?
This is my goal essentially where i would like to show the position based on the amount and the oldest would be ontop via date
Thanks!
Sorted Set ordering
Sorted sets are ordered by their scores first, and then lexigraphically by their members if the scores are equivalent. So in your case if you added the following keys:
127.0.0.1:6379> ZADD myset 11 user1
(integer) 1
127.0.0.1:6379> ZADD myset 11 user5
(integer) 1
127.0.0.1:6379> ZADD myset 24 user3
(integer) 1
127.0.0.1:6379> zadd myset 54 user2
(integer) 1
127.0.0.1:6379> zadd myset 11 user6
(integer) 1
and then did a ZRANGE, you'd get them in ascending order with the members ordered in alphabetical order:
127.0.0.1:6379> zrange myset 0 -1 WITHSCORES
1) "user1"
2) "11"
3) "user5"
4) "11"
5) "user6"
6) "11"
7) "user3"
8) "24"
9) "user2"
10) "54"
What it looks like, is your GUI is using, or are just passing in the rev argument to ZRANGE under the hood, which orders everything in reverse (scores descending, reverse alphabetical)
127.0.0.1:6379> ZRANGE myset 0 -1 WITHSCORES REV
1) "user2"
2) "54"
3) "user3"
4) "24"
5) "user6"
6) "11"
7) "user5"
8) "11"
9) "user1"
10) "11"
Second sort-by
There are a couple of ways you could handle the second sort by with a sorted set, let's assume you wanted to do this with a 32 bit unix timestamp
You could prepend the second sortby field to the member name so if user6's score came in at 1659579650, you'd just make the member name be 1659579650:user1, then when it orders it, it would do so lexigraphically
You could combine the score with the second, since 11 is the score, we could shift 11 32 bits to the left and add/or the timestamp to it, which comes out to 48,904,219,906, those will then order correctly, and then when you want to find the score, all you need to do is right-shift the score by 32 bits.
I'm tracking members in multiple Sorted Sets in Redis as a way to do multi-column indexing on the members. As an example, let's say I have two Sorted Sets, lastseen (which is epoch time) and points, and I store usernames as members in these Sorted Sets.
I'm wanting to use ZREVRANGEBYSCORE against lastseen to get a list of users who were recently seen, but I only want a user to be included in the results if its also present in the points Sorted Set.
I looked at using ZINTERSTORE to help me do this, but the available AGGREGATE options are not conducive to my scenario. If one of the AGGREGATE options was to use the score from a specific set provided to the ZINTERSTORE command, then it would work, but that's not an option.
---EDIT---
Example:
redis> ZADD lastseen 12345 "foo"
redis> ZADD lastseen 12346 "bar"
redis> ZADD lastseen 12347 "sucka"
redis> ZADD points 5 "foo"
redis> ZADD points 9 "bar"
Now, if I run:
redis> ZREVRANGEBYSCORE lastseen +inf -inf
1) "sucka"
2) "bar"
3) "foo"
What I'm looking for is a way to only get "foo" and "bar" returned by the call to ZREVRANGEBYSCORE for lastseen since "sucka" isn't resent in the points Sorted Set.
I can do:
redis> ZINTERSTORE out 2 lastseen points
redis> ZRANGE out 0 -1 WITHSCORES
1) "foo"
2) "12350"
3) "bar"
4) "12355"
As you can see, the ZINTERSTORE does cut out the "sucka" member, but the scores for the other two members get aggregated using SUM. There's two other aggregation options (MIN and MAX) available for use with ZINTERSTORE. In this case, using MAX would give me what I'm looking for, but that wouldn't be the case if a user's points were greater than the epoch value for the last time they were seen.
You can get what you're asking by setting the WEIGHT of points to 0 and of lastseen to 1 when running ZINTERSTORE so that only the weight of lastseen is considered:
redis> ZINTERSTORE out 2 lastseen points WEIGHTS 1 0
(integer) 2
Then, depending on what ordering you're going for, you can either:
redis> ZRANGE out 0 -1 WITHSCORES
1) "foo"
2) "12345"
3) "bar"
4) "12346"
or:
redis> ZREVRANGE out 0 -1 WITHSCORES
1) "bar"
2) "12346"
3) "foo"
4) "12345"
I am new to sorted sets in Redis (3.0.2). I basically want to update my value in sorted sets of Redis based on unique key. As of now "zadd" each time keeps on adding new values to a specific key.
As of now:
127.0.0.1:6379> zadd xyz 1 "abc"
(integer) 1
127.0.0.1:6379> zadd xyz 1 "newabc"
(integer) 1
127.0.0.1:6379> zrange xyz 0 -1
1) "abc"
2) "newabc"
Required Output: (It should over write the xyz key's value from "abc" to "newabc"
127.0.0.1:6379> zadd xyz 1 "abc"
(integer) 1
127.0.0.1:6379> zadd xyz 1 "newabc"
(integer) 1
127.0.0.1:6379> zrange xyz 0 -1
1) "newabc"
A sorted set in Redis is a set when we talk about the element, while multiple different elements can coexist with the same score.
If you want that output, you'll need to design a different data model, and since I don't know your actual issue or what's your goal in your project, I won't be able to provide a clear solution.
How do I get most weighted elements from a sorted set, but excluding those found in another set(or list or hash).
>zadd all 1 one
>zadd all 2 two
>zadd all 3 three
>sadd disabled 2
>sdiff all disabled
(error) WRONGTYPE Operation against a key holding the wrong kind of value
Is my only option is to get elements from the sorted set one-by-one and compare to the list of "disabled" items? Wouldn't that be very slow because of so many transactions to a server?
What is the approach here?
Note: I assume you've meant sadd disabled two
As you've found out, SDIFF does not operate on sorted sets - that is because defining the difference between sorted sets isn't trivial.
What you could do is first create a temporary set with ZUNIONSTORE and set the intersect's scores to 0. Then do a range excluding the 0, e.g.:
127.0.0.1:6379> ZADD all 1 one 2 two 3 three
(integer) 3
127.0.0.1:6379> SADD disabled two
(integer) 1
127.0.0.1:6379> ZUNIONSTORE tmp 2 all disabled WEIGHTS 1 0 AGGREGATE MIN
(integer) 3
127.0.0.1:6379> ZREVRANGEBYSCORE tmp +inf 1 WITHSCORES
1) "three"
2) "3"
3) "one"
4) "1"
I have an ordered set in Redis (I am actually using a python client https://github.com/andymccurdy/redis-py), for example:
zadd myset 1 key1
zadd myset 1 key2
zadd myset 1 key3
zadd myset 0 key4
Note that 3 keys have the same score.
Using ZRANGE, i would like to get the top 2 entries (i.e lowest scores). "key4" will always be the first result as it has a lower value, but I would like the second return value to be randomly selected between the ties: key1,key2,key3. ZRANGE actually returns the keys in the order they are indexed: "keys1" is always my second result:
zrange myset 0 -1 WITHSCORES
1) "key4"
2) "0"
3) "key1"
4) "1"
5) "key2"
6) "1"
7) "key3"
8) "1"
any idea?
thanks,
J.
As kindly requested by Linus G Thiel, here are more details about my usecase:
I would like to use zsets to perform a simple ranking system. I have a list of items, for each one a score representing the relevance of the item. For the cold start of my system, most of the scores will be identical (i.e 0), and I would like to randomly select among the items having the same score. Otherwise I will always return the exact same lexicographic ordering, which will introduce a bias in the system.
The solution you propose, using one specific set for each duplicated score value will work. I will give it a try.
Thanks,