I am reviewing a coworkers sqlgen job and I am unable to figure out what this means in the table generation settings.
Specify number of rows by: "Same as mapped data"
My coworker has this selected on each table, I just need to know what is meant by this I have looked through documentation and been unable to find a definition for this.
I am on version 2 at the moment. Probably not the best question but I need an answer and he is gone for a long period of time and our data is not working correctly with this tool.
The "Same as mapped data" option is only available when you're using an existing table or view as a data source - it just means that the generator will insert all the rows from the source table or view. The other options are:
Numeric value - a set number of rows
Proportion of table - a proportion of the source table/view
Generation time - as much data as the tool can generate in a set time
There's a little more about using an existing table/view as a data source here on the website, but it doesn't have much else useful in it.
Related
I am responsible for creating period-over-period and trend reporting for our Team's Issue Management Department. What I need to do is at copy table Issues at month-end into a new table IssuesHist and add a column with the current date example: 1/31/21. Then at the next month-end I need to take another copy of the Issues table and append it to the existing IssuesHist table, and then add the column again with the current date. For example: 2/28/21.
I need to do this to be able to run comparative analysis on a period-over-period basis. The goal is to be able to identify any activity (opening new issues, closing old ones, reopening issues, etc.) that occurred over the period.
Example tables below:
Issues Table with the current data from our front-end tool
I need to copy the above into the new IssuesHist and add a date column like so
Then at the following month end I need to do the same thing. For example if the Issues table looked like this (changes highlighted in Red)
I would need to Append that to the bottom of the existing IssuesHist table with the new Date. So that I could run queries comparing the data periods to identify any changes.
My research has shown that a Temporal Table may be the best solution here, but I am unable to DIM our existing database's tables to include system versioning.
Please let me know what solution would work, best, and if you have any SQL Statement Tips.
Thank you!
How do I link my activities variable to only the corresponding KPIs variable?
Using guidance from a number of sources, but primarily the genius of Jeffery Shafer articulated through the SuperDataScience video, I built a Sankey Diagram for my work. For the most part it works, however, I have been trying to figure out how to adjust my Sankey Diagram model to line up each activity with ONLY the corresponding KPIs, but am having no luck.
The data structure looks like this:
You'll note I changed the binary value to "", 2 instead of 0, 1 as it makes visual calculations easier. For the "Viz" variable, I have "Activity" for the raw data set, then I copy/paste/replicate the data to mirror the data (required for the model) but with "KPI" for the mirrored data.
In the following image, you'll see my main issue is that the smallest represented activity still shows as corresponding to all KPIs when in fact it does not. I want activity to line up only with the corresponding KPIs as some activities don't correspond with all, or even any, KPIs.
Finally, here is the model very similar to what the above video link shows:
Can someone help provide insight into how I can adjust the model to fit activities linking only to corresponding KPIs? I appreciate any insight. Thanks!
I have a solution to the issue, thanks to a helpful Tableau support member named Anthony. It was in the data structure. The data was not structured to only associate "Activities" with their "KPI" values within Tableau's requirements, but every "Activities" value with every "KPI" value. As a result, to achieve the desired result, the data needs to be restructured to only contain a row for every valid "Activities" and "KPI" combination. See the visual below where data is removed to format properly:
-------------------------------------->
Once the table is restructured, the desired visual result should configure with the model. It works like a charm!
Good luck out there!
"meta/background about the use of code and person using it"
1.site built by professional that left company,
2.I am inexperienced but trying/ want to learn,
3.Customer support site for service reps,
................................................
What im trying to do exactly per stackoverflows parameters.
We have a drop down box listing issues that the customer had in a column labeled "issue_type". I can export via csv entire table load onto excel then give to boss for overall review of what the issues were. However data base has a "hide" column. Its function is that when the row is updated the record is kept but the same "job or call" has only one viewable report on site (the most recently updated one). Hide is a boolean. In conclusion I want to export rows that only has the "hide" column Boolean status at 0, AND to only export the columns "customer", and "issue_type". I can seem to only do one or the other. and have researched a minimum of 4 hours to find answer myself and cannot find a syntax to do both at the same time with phpmyadmin.
I dont want an enormous data that is mostly useless but for issue type and customer but i will have to manually delete all the rows with hide = 1?
Thanks anyone 1st attempt question sorry if not correct for stackflow.
SELECT Customer,Issue_type FROM tickets where hide =0;
Elaborating on what is above for anyone that may be looking for a similar answer, SQL supports the "where" clause of which you can when properly syntaxed select many of your columns and their associated strings, booleans, and numbers to = what your looking for. Wildcards I found later for other uses work as well.
Sorry about the self answer but hopefully someone finds this usefull
I'm a bit of a newbie with the workings of phpmyadmin. I have a database and now there are 2 parts within it - the original tables jos_ and the same again but with a different prefix, say let's ****_ that will be the finished database.
This has come about because I am upgrading my Joomla 1.5 site to 2.5. I used a migration tool for the bulk of the new database but one particular piece of information did not transfer because the new database has a different structure.
I want to copy the entire contents of jos_content, attribs, keyref= across to ****_content, metadata, "xreference"."VALUE" if that makes sense. This will save manually typing in the information contained within 1000s of articles.
jos_content, attribs currently contains
show_title=
link_titles=
show_intro=
show_section=
link_section=
show_category=
link_category=
show_vote=
show_author=
show_create_date=
show_modify_date=
show_pdf_icon=
show_print_icon=
show_email_icon=
language=
keyref=41.126815,0.732623
readmore=
****_content, metadata currently contains
{"robots":"all","author":""}
but I want it to end up like this
{"robots":"","author":"","rights":"","xreference":"41.126815,0.732623","marker":""}
Could anyone tell me the SQL string that I would need to run to achieve this please?
If it makes any difference I have manually changed about 300 of these articles already and thought there must be a better way.
Edit: Being nervous of trying this I would like to try and find the exact syntax (if that's the right word) for the SQL Query to run.
The value I want to extract from the source table is just, and only, the numbers next to keyref= and I want them to turn up in the destination table prefixed by "xreference". - so it shows "xreference"."VALUE" with VALUE being the required numbers. There is also an entry - ,"marker":"" that is in the destination table so I guess the Query needs to produce that as well?
Sorry for labouring this but if I get it wrong, maybe by guessing what to put, I don't really have the knowledge to put it all right again....
Thanks.
Please Try it
insert into tableone(column1,column2) select column1,column2 from Tablesecond
if You have not Table another Daabase Then This query
select * into anyname_Table from tablesource
I am having some trouble with SSAS and data mining - specifically the Microsoft Clustering package.
I intend to ultimately do my work in AMO and MDX, but for now, just happy to understand how it works in the BIDS via Visual Studio. One step at a time!
The whole problem is around clustering both "vertically" and "horizontally" (separately) from a table that is organized vertically. My main source data table in my OLTP database looks like =>
ID_NUM
{numbers 1 - 20,000}
TECK_ID
{numbers 1-500, {for each ID_NUM}}
(though just grabbed a few of these for playing around with the data in the screencaps)
TECK_VALUE
{a double, the 'fact' bit}
So- 10 million rows, of two ints and a double.
Which looks like this- http://i.imgur.com/KG1LhaJ.jpg
So I create a new Analysis Services project in Visual Studio, set up a Data Source, and bring in the above table, as well as two "dimension tables" (identity of what id_num is, names of what each teck_id is) into a Data Source View and link it up, matching up the appropriate keys.
Which looks like this- http://i.imgur.com/Q0vgwIc.jpg
Next I want to manipulate how my data is represented, so I go to set up a cube from this Data Source View. I create dimensions based on my two "dimension" tables (the above "id_num" primary key one, and the "teck_id" primary key one), and create a single measure (as sum) of the teck_value column from my main table. This all seems to compile successfully.
Which looks like this- http://i.imgur.com/y5pUSjh.jpg
The reason I think everything has worked well is I can arrange my data how I want by browsing the cube. I am able to define my "rows" as both the id_num, or as the "teck_id", with the other one filling up the columns. The measure "Teck_value" always makes up the dataset of the table. This is exactly how I want it, the flexibility to arrange my data both ways.
Which looks like this- http://i.imgur.com/ugLUkgg.jpg
And this- http://i.imgur.com/RwQgj58.jpg
Beautiful! Now I wish to do some mining on this basis!
I wish to, quite simply, using Microsoft Clustering to (separately) -
Assign each TECK_ID a cluster number based on how it varies on each ID_NUM
Assign each ID_NUM a cluster based on how it varies on each TECK_ID
Seemingly a simple requirement - just changing what is represented as "rows" and what as "columns" - which I already appear to be able to do through the cube browser. This seems to be one of the main points of OLAP rather than OLTP from my uneducated perspective!
Yet when I try to set this up I fail utterly!
The Clustering Wizard leaves me confounded and I come up with nonsense results. I am given the option of selecting a key (for which I can choose either of the above), but no option to parse by the other dimension. Indeed, the only thing I can choose to mine on is TECK_VALUE, which isn't any good as that doesn't separate out the different fields!
My wizard looks like this- http://i.imgur.com/lHfasv0.jpg
So, I am left in a pickle. I really don't want to go back and line up my OLTP databases horizontally because 1) this would mean having 20k columns when I try to categorize my TECK_IDs. and 2) I was hoping SSAS and OLAP can give me the flexibility I need to mine the fields that I want - isn't that part of the reason you set up a cube "chop up the data how you like" ?
Bonus points for helping me with the AMO / MDX side as well! :)