I have 5 tables in a MS Access databse: tblMember, tblPoint, tblRace, tblRaceType and tblResult. (All of which have primary keys.)
tblPoint contains (RaceTypeID, Position, Points) fields.
What I want to do is look at all the races that the members participated in, see what position they came (stored in tblResult) and see if those positions score points (as defined in tblPoint). I then want to add up all the points for each member and show these, along with the member name in my query...
Is this possible? I came up with my best shot at this SQL query below:
SELECT Sum(tblPoint.Points) AS SumOfPoints, Count(tblRace.RaceID) AS CountOfRaceID,
tblMember.MemberName, tblPoint.Points
FROM ((tblRaceType INNER JOIN tblPoint ON tblRaceType.RaceTypeID = tblPoint.RaceTypeID)
INNER JOIN tblRace ON tblRaceType.RaceTypeID = tblRace.RaceTypeID) INNER JOIN
(tblMember INNER JOIN tblResult ON tblMember.MemberID = tblResult.MemberID) ON
tblRace.RaceID = tblResult.RaceID
GROUP BY tblMember.MemberName, tblPoint.Points
ORDER BY tblPoint.Points DESC;
Is anyone able to point me in the right direction at all?
I'd say this
GROUP BY tblMember.MemberName, tblPoint.Points
ORDER BY tblPoint.Points DESC;
should probably be more like this:
GROUP BY tblMember.MemberName
ORDER BY Sum(tblPoint.Points) DESC;
Also, remove tblPoint.Points at the end of your select. This is just a single point value, you want the sum.
Grouping by points means that you'll get one row per member and point value they scored - probably not what you intended.
Related
These 3 tables that you see in the image are related
Course table and coaching table and sales table
I want to make a report from this table on how much each coach has sold by each course period.
The query I created is as follows, but unfortunately it has a problem and I do not know where the problem is.
Please help me fix the problem
Thank you
SELECT
dbo.tblCustomersOrders.id, dbo.tblCustomersOrders.pid, dbo.tblPost.postTitle,
dbo.tblArticleAuthor.authorName, SUM(dbo.tblCustomersOrders.prodPrice) AS TotalBuys
FROM
dbo.tblPost
INNER JOIN
dbo.tblArticleAuthor ON dbo.tblPost.id = dbo.tblArticleAuthor.articleID
INNER JOIN
dbo.tblCustomersOrders ON dbo.tblPost.id = dbo.tblCustomersOrders.pid
GROUP BY dbo.tblCustomersOrders.pid
For this use, SUM() is an Aggregate Function, so you need to refer all the
fields that you want to get in your result set.
Example:
SELECT
dbo.tblCustomersOrders.id, dbo.tblCustomersOrders.pid, dbo.tblPost.postTitle,
dbo.tblArticleAuthor.authorName, SUM(dbo.tblCustomersOrders.prodPrice) AS TotalBuys
FROM dbo.tblPost
INNER JOIN
dbo.tblArticleAuthor ON dbo.tblPost.id = dbo.tblArticleAuthor.articleID
INNER JOIN
dbo.tblCustomersOrders ON dbo.tblPost.id = dbo.tblCustomersOrders.pid
GROUP BY dbo.tblCustomersOrders.id, dbo.tblCustomersOrders.pid,
dbo.tblPost.postTitle, dbo.tblArticleAuthor.authorName
But this query does not solve the need for your report.
If you just need to get "how much each coach has sold by each course" , you can try the query bellow.
SELECT
dbo.tblArticleAuthor.authorName, dbo.tblPost.postTitle,
SUM(dbo.tblCustomersOrders.prodPrice) AS TotalBuys
FROM dbo.tblPost
INNER JOIN
dbo.tblArticleAuthor ON dbo.tblPost.id = dbo.tblArticleAuthor.articleID
INNER JOIN
dbo.tblCustomersOrders ON dbo.tblPost.id = dbo.tblCustomersOrders.pid
GROUP BY dbo.tblArticleAuthor.authorName, dbo.tblPost.postTitle
If you need, send more details regarding the desired result.
Here you can find more information about SQL SERVER Aggregate Functions:
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/t-sql/functions/aggregate-functions-transact-sql?view=sql-server-ver15
And here a quick example regarding SQL Aliases to build queries with a simple
and effective way:
https://www.w3schools.com/sql/trysql.asp?filename=trysql_select_alias_table
Per your description of the task, the problem is that you only GROUPed BY dbo.tblCustomersOrders.pid, which is the period's id I guess, but you also need to GROUP BY the coach, which is dbo.tblArticleAuthor.authorName, I guess again. Plus in the SELECT field list you can not use more columns only that are aggregated + GROUPed.
I am fairly new in Access and SQL programming. I am trying to do the following:
Sum(SO_SalesOrderPaymentHistoryLineT.Amount) AS [Sum Of PaymentPerYear]
and group by year even when there is no amount in some of the years. I would like to have these years listed as well for a report with charts. I'm not certain if this is possible, but every bit of help is appreciated.
My code so far is as follows:
SELECT
Base_CustomerT.SalesRep,
SO_SalesOrderT.CustomerId,
Base_CustomerT.Customer,
SO_SalesOrderPaymentHistoryLineT.DatePaid,
Sum(SO_SalesOrderPaymentHistoryLineT.Amount) AS [Sum Of PaymentPerYear]
FROM
Base_CustomerT
INNER JOIN (
SO_SalesOrderPaymentHistoryLineT
INNER JOIN SO_SalesOrderT
ON SO_SalesOrderPaymentHistoryLineT.SalesOrderId = SO_SalesOrderT.SalesOrderId
) ON Base_CustomerT.CustomerId = SO_SalesOrderT.CustomerId
GROUP BY
Base_CustomerT.SalesRep,
SO_SalesOrderT.CustomerId,
Base_CustomerT.Customer,
SO_SalesOrderPaymentHistoryLineT.DatePaid,
SO_SalesOrderPaymentHistoryLineT.PaymentType,
Base_CustomerT.IsActive
HAVING
(((SO_SalesOrderPaymentHistoryLineT.PaymentType)=1)
AND ((Base_CustomerT.IsActive)=Yes))
ORDER BY
Base_CustomerT.SalesRep,
Base_CustomerT.Customer;
You need another table with all years listed -- you can create this on the fly or have one in the db... join from that. So if you had a table called alltheyears with a column called y that just listed the years then you could use code like this:
WITH minmax as
(
select min(year(SO_SalesOrderPaymentHistoryLineT.DatePaid) as minyear,
max(year(SO_SalesOrderPaymentHistoryLineT.DatePaid) as maxyear)
from SalesOrderPaymentHistoryLineT
), yearsused as
(
select y
from alltheyears, minmax
where alltheyears.y >= minyear and alltheyears.y <= maxyear
)
select *
from yearsused
join ( -- your query above goes here! -- ) T
ON year(T.SO_SalesOrderPaymentHistoryLineT.DatePaid) = yearsused.y
You need a data source that will provide the year numbers. You cannot manufacture them out of thin air. Supposing you had a table Interesting_year with a single column year, populated, say, with every distinct integer between 2000 and 2050, you could do something like this:
SELECT
base.SalesRep,
base.CustomerId,
base.Customer,
base.year,
Sum(NZ(data.Amount)) AS [Sum Of PaymentPerYear]
FROM
(SELECT * FROM Base_CustomerT INNER JOIN Year) AS base
LEFT JOIN
(SELECT * FROM
SO_SalesOrderT
INNER JOIN SO_SalesOrderPaymentHistoryLineT
ON (SO_SalesOrderPaymentHistoryLineT.SalesOrderId = SO_SalesOrderT.SalesOrderId)
) AS data
ON ((base.CustomerId = data.CustomerId)
AND (base.year = Year(data.DatePaid))),
WHERE
(data.PaymentType = 1)
AND (base.IsActive = Yes)
AND (base.year BETWEEN
(SELECT Min(year(DatePaid) FROM SO_SalesOrderPaymentHistoryLineT)
AND (SELECT Max(year(DatePaid) FROM SO_SalesOrderPaymentHistoryLineT))
GROUP BY
base.SalesRep,
base.CustomerId,
base.Customer,
base.year,
ORDER BY
base.SalesRep,
base.Customer;
Note the following:
The revised query first forms the Cartesian product of BaseCustomerT with Interesting_year in order to have base customer data associated with each year (this is sometimes called a CROSS JOIN, but it's the same thing as an INNER JOIN with no join predicate, which is what Access requires)
In order to have result rows for years with no payments, you must perform an outer join (in this case a LEFT JOIN). Where a (base customer, year) combination has no associated orders, the rest of the columns of the join result will be NULL.
I'm selecting the CustomerId from Base_CustomerT because you would sometimes get a NULL if you selected from SO_SalesOrderT as in the starting query
I'm using the Access Nz() function to convert NULL payment amounts to 0 (from rows corresponding to years with no payments)
I converted your HAVING clause to a WHERE clause. That's semantically equivalent in this particular case, and it will be more efficient because the WHERE filter is applied before groups are formed, and because it allows some columns to be omitted from the GROUP BY clause.
Following Hogan's example, I filter out data for years outside the overall range covered by your data. Alternatively, you could achieve the same effect without that filter condition and its subqueries by ensuring that table Intersting_year contains only the year numbers for which you want results.
Update: modified the query to a different, but logically equivalent "something like this" that I hope Access will like better. Aside from adding a bunch of parentheses, the main difference is making both the left and the right operand of the LEFT JOIN into a subquery. That's consistent with the consensus recommendation for resolving Access "ambiguous outer join" errors.
Thank you John for your help. I found a solution which works for me. It looks quiet different but I learned a lot out of it. If you are interested here is how it looks now.
SELECT DISTINCTROW
Base_Customer_RevenueYearQ.SalesRep,
Base_Customer_RevenueYearQ.CustomerId,
Base_Customer_RevenueYearQ.Customer,
Base_Customer_RevenueYearQ.RevenueYear,
CustomerPaymentPerYearQ.[Sum Of PaymentPerYear]
FROM
Base_Customer_RevenueYearQ
LEFT JOIN CustomerPaymentPerYearQ
ON (Base_Customer_RevenueYearQ.RevenueYear = CustomerPaymentPerYearQ.[RevenueYear])
AND (Base_Customer_RevenueYearQ.CustomerId = CustomerPaymentPerYearQ.CustomerId)
GROUP BY
Base_Customer_RevenueYearQ.SalesRep,
Base_Customer_RevenueYearQ.CustomerId,
Base_Customer_RevenueYearQ.Customer,
Base_Customer_RevenueYearQ.RevenueYear,
CustomerPaymentPerYearQ.[Sum Of PaymentPerYear]
;
So I got this query:
Data structure:
Users
id---inlog----name----more stuff
llntoets
id---code----inlog----more stuff
oefeningen
id---speler---status----morestuff
(inlog and speler are always the same values for a user)
SELECT
// Some other stuff working
SUM(o.status) AS oefn
FROM users AS u
LEFT JOIN llntoets AS l
ON (u.inlog = l.inlog)
LEFT JOIN oefeningen AS o
ON (u.inlog = o.speler) AND o.status = 'afgewerkt'
WHERE
code = '$code'
GROUP BY l.inlog
ORDER BY klas ASC, klasnr ASC
Everything runs fine except 1 thing the oefn variable. It shows a number sometimes it shows the correct value and sometimes it shows a value that is much higher than it should be. Someone told me it could be because of the GROUP BY. Can someone help me pls?
It is supposed to count the total records from table oefeningen where status = 'afgewerkt' and where the speler is the inlog from users. Thanks, if you got other questions ask will try to explain more.
the SUM(o.status) in your query it is not supposed to count the total records of table oefeningen.
that sum is the sum of the values of all the joined rows that satisfy your criteria that can be a much higher number.
also note that applying the filter o.status = 'afgewerkt' you are performing a JOIN even if you wrote LEFT JOIN throghout the query.
having a problem with a SQL query and can't seem to figure it out. Pretty sure I'm going about it all wrong.
Basically, I have PRVDR_NUM and ITM_VAL. I Want to sum up the related ITM_VALS so each PRVDR_NUM just has one "summed up" ITM_VAL [SumReimb is the alias].
PRVDR_NUM is actually in another table; I related to it using an inner join of RPT_REC_NUM, which is in both tables.
Here's a very not working example.
SELECT PRVDR_NUM,SUM(ITM_VAL) as SumReimb FROM hha2011num
INNER JOIN hha2011rpt ON hha2011num.RPT_REC_NUM = hha2011rpt.RPT_REC_NUM
WHERE (WKSHT_CD='D000000' AND LINE_NUM = '01201') AND (CLMN_NUM='0100' OR CLMN_NUM='0200')
GROUP BY PRVDR_NUM,ITM_VAL ORDER BY ITM_VAL
The main thing I'm summing is CLMN_NUM 0100 and 0200, each have a different item value and I want to add them up and then group by the PRVDR_NUM.
Any suggestions?
Main problems I'm having in SQL is GROUP, Aggregates, and Calculated fields. I'm not sure how to... tie it all together. I started learning SQL about two days ago.
EDIT BELOW THIS LINE------------
Here's two different but should be the same queries.
SELECT RPT_REC_NUM,SUM(ITM_VAL) SumReimb FROM hha2011num
WHERE (WKSHT_CD='D000000' AND LINE_NUM = '01201') AND CLMN_NUM in('0100','0200')
GROUP BY RPT_REC_NUM ORDER BY SumReimb
SELECT PRVDR_NUM,SUM(ITM_VAL) as SumReimb FROM hha2011num
INNER JOIN hha2011rpt ON hha2011num.RPT_REC_NUM = hha2011rpt.RPT_REC_NUM
WHERE WKSHT_CD='D000000' AND LINE_NUM = '01201' AND CLMN_NUM in('0100','0200')
GROUP BY PRVDR_NUM ORDER BY SumReimb
Now; most of the data between them IS the same, except one has 39 more entries than the other [Top one does]. Which is probably why just a handful of the data in the second one are orders of magnitude higher than I expect.
SELECT PRVDR_NUM,SUM(ITM_VAL) as SumReimb FROM hha2011num
INNER JOIN hha2011rpt ON hha2011num.RPT_REC_NUM = hha2011rpt.RPT_REC_NUM
WHERE WKSHT_CD='D000000' AND LINE_NUM = '01201' AND CLMN_NUM in('0100','0200')
GROUP BY PRVDR_NUM ORDER BY PRVDR_NUM
Please remove ITM_VAL from the group by and order by clause. Also, I've made one small change in the where clause, instead of using or for checking the value of column CLMN_NUM, you can use "IN"
We have a database that stores vehicle's gps position, date, time, vehicle identification, lat, long, speed, etc., every minute.
The following select pulls each vehicle position and info, but the problem is that returns the first record, and I need the last record (current position), based on date (datagps.Fecha) and time (datagps.Hora). This is the select:
SELECT configgps.Fichagps,
datacar.Ficha,
groups.Nombre,
datagps.Hora,
datagps.Fecha,
datagps.Velocidad,
datagps.Status,
datagps.Calleune,
datagps.Calletowo,
datagps.Temp,
datagps.Longitud,
datagps.Latitud,
datagps.Evento,
datagps.Direccion,
datagps.Provincia
FROM asigvehiculos
INNER JOIN datacar ON (asigvehiculos.Iddatacar = datacar.Id)
INNER JOIN configgps ON (datacar.Configgps = configgps.Id)
INNER JOIN clientdata ON (asigvehiculos.Idgroup = clientdata.group)
INNER JOIN groups ON (clientdata.group = groups.Id)
INNER JOIN datagps ON (configgps.Fichagps = datagps.Fichagps)
Group by Fichagps;
I need same result I'm getting, but instead of the older record I need the most recent
(LAST datagps.Fecha / datagps.Hora).
How can I accomplish this?
Add ORDER BY datagps.Fecha DESC, datagps.Hora DESC LIMIT 1 to your query.
I'm not sure why you are having any problems with this as Lex's answers seem good.
I would start putting ORDER BY's in your query so it puts them in an order, when it's showing the record you want as the first one in the list, then add the LIMIT.
If you want the most recent, then the following should be good enough:
ORDER BY datagps.Fecha DESC, datagps.Hora DESC
If you simply want the record that was added to the database most recently (irregardless of the date/time fields), then you could (assuming you have an auto-incremental primary key in the datagps table (I assume it's called dataID for this example)):
ORDER BY datagps.dataID DESC
If these aren't showing the data you want - then there is something missing from your example (maybe data-types aren't DATETIME fields? - if not - then maybe a CONVERT to change them from their current type before ORDERing BY would be a good idea)
EDIT:
I've seen the screenshot and I'm confused as to what the issue is still. That appears to be showing everything in order. Are you implying that there are many more than 5 records? How many are you expecting?
Do you mean: for each record returned, you want the one row from the table datagps with the latest date and time attached to the result? If so, how about this:
# To show how the query will be executed
# comment to return actual results
EXPLAIN
SELECT
configgps.Fichagps, datacar.Ficha, groups.Nombre, datagps.Hora, datagps.Fecha,
datagps.Velocidad, datagps.Status, datagps.Calleune, datagps.Calletowo,
datagps.Temp, datagps.Longitud, datagps.Latitud, datagps.Evento,
datagps.Direccion, datagps.Provincia
FROM asigvehiculos
INNER JOIN datacar ON (asigvehiculos.Iddatacar = datacar.Id)
INNER JOIN configgps ON (datacar.Configgps = configgps.Id)
INNER JOIN clientdata ON (asigvehiculos.Idgroup = clientdata.group)
INNER JOIN groups ON (clientdata.group = groups.Id)
INNER JOIN datagps ON (configgps.Fichagps = datagps.Fichagps)
########### Add this section
LEFT JOIN datagps b ON (
configgps.Fichagps = b.Fichagps
# wrong condition
#AND datagps.Hora < b.Hora
#AND datagps.Fecha < b.Fecha)
# might prevent indexes to be used
AND (datagps.Fecha < b.Fecha OR (datagps.Fecha = b.Fecha AND datagps.Hora < b.Hora))
WHERE b.Fichagps IS NULL
###########
Group by configgps.Fichagps;
Similar question here only that that one uses outer joins.
Edit (again):
The conditions are wrong so corrected it. Can you show us the output of the above EXPLAIN query so we can pinpoint where the bottle neck is?
As hurikhan77 said, it will be better if you could convert both of the the columns into a single datetime field - though I'm guessing this would not be possible for your case (since your database is already being used?)
Though if you can convert it, the condition (on the join) would become:
AND datagps.FechaHora < b.FechaHora
After that, add an index for datagps.FechaHora and the query would be fast(er).
What you probably want is getting the maximum of (Fecha,Hora) per grouped dataset? This is a little complicated to accomplish with your column types. You should combine Fecha and Hora into one column of type DATETIME. Then it's easy to just SELECT MAX(FechaHora) ... GROUP BY Fichagps.
It could have helped if you posted your table structure to understand the problem.