Developing an iPhone game with Cocos2d-iphone. I have a huge sprite and I want to apply a CCLiquid (or any other liquid-wave-like effect) on it.
However, the image is huge, so it consumes a lot of memory (without mentioning I have many other big elements during gameplay).
Well, I figured I could try to "only apply the liquid effect on the area that is visible by the player" (dimensions of such area being 480x320). That could help a lot.
I already got a CGRect representing the area of the CCSprite that should be affected. However, how would I actually apply the effect only within such area? Any ideas?
You could manually create a CCSprite from a sprite frame and set the boundaries of that frame to your CGRect. Then use the effect on this resulting CCSprite. Essentially, your original CCSprite image would act like a larger texture atlas form which you are specifying a small portion of that image to be the actual frame of your sprite. If you layered this new copied sprite on top of your main, larger one in the exact position, it would appear to be part of that larger sprite, but only the small CGRect portion would be affected by your code.
Related
I have a layer with a sprite of a simple black donut. I want the user to be able to draw on the sprite in a different color (which I've managed to do without any problem using CCRenderTexture).
My question is how I can calculate whether the image has been traced at least 95% (meaning, find out when 95% of the black pixels are now the new color). I've tried methods like taking a screenshot of the layer and counting the number of black pixels, but it hasn't worked that well (using this solution: https://stackoverflow.com/a/1262893/1577738).
It would be even better if I could just change the color of each pixel as it's touched (to avoid issues with coloring out of the lines). I could theoretically just split the donut into like 10 sprites and change that section's color if the user touches it, but that seems ridiculous if I give the user options to use a bunch of different colors.
Am I going about this the wrong way? Your suggestions are much appreciated!
Reading pixel colors will be rather inaccurate and slow. I suggest dividing the area into smaller rectangles (ie 8x8 or 4x4) and then flag each as "visited" when the user draws on it. If most rectangle areas are flagged, the user has drawn on most parts of the texture.
I'm developing an ipad application about 2d drawing.
I need a UIView.frame size of 4000x4000. But if I set a frame with size 4000x4000 the application
crash since i get memory warning.
Right night I'm using 1600*1000 frame size and the user can add new object (rectangle) on frame. User can also translate fram along x and y axis using pan gesture in order to see or add new object.
Have you got some suggestion? how can I tackle this problem?
thanks
Well, I would suggest what is used in video games for a long time - creating a tiled LOD mechanism, where only when you zoom in toward specific tiles, they are rendered at an increasing resolution, while when zoomed out, you only render lower resolution.
If the drawing in based on shapes (rectangles, points, lines, or anything can be represented by simple vector data) there is no reason to create a UIView for the entire size of the drawing. You just redraw the currently visible view as the user pans across the drawing using the stored vector data. There is no persistent bitmapped representation of the drawing.
If using bitmap data for drawing (i.e. a Photoshop type of app) then you'll likely need to use a mechanism that caches off-screen data into secondary storage and loads it back onto the screen as the user pans across it. In either case, the UIView only needs to be as big as the physical screen size.
Sorry I don't have any iOS code examples for any of this - take this as a high-level abstraction and work from there.
Sounds like you want to be using UIScrollView.
I am trying to develop an iOS app to make any given image (UIImage) warp on selected locations.
So for this task to be accomplished what should be the rightmost way going forward, for now i'm doing some research on doing this on OpenGL (frankly any heads up on the framework would be nice too).
So finally the requirement is to get the UIImage warp on some given locations. (If x, y coordinates are there)
If you're sufficiently familiar with (or willing to learn) OpenGL, then you could do this:
Create a flat, rectangular grid of points to be a mesh that will be displayed with OpenGL.
Apply the image to the mesh as a texture.
When distorting the image at a particular location, you can just decide which points on the mesh will be affected by the distortion, and move them.
You can push points out from the center, or in toward a center, or shift them all in the same direction. If the distortion affects a large area, then you change a lot of points (possibly changing those in the center by more than those near the edges of the affected area).
Not sure what you mean by 'warp'. Do you mean skew it in 3 dimensions? If so you can adjust the CGAffineTransform for the UIImageView you are displaying it in to get that effect.
If you mean some kind of image processing warp, and you are using iOS 5, you can use Core Image for that.
I got a tiled map and I want to make lava lakes. I wish to have some kind of lava texture image on the background looping diagonally slowly. I could make it with four 960x640 images and move all of them diagonally etc. But when I do, a black/white line appears between each...
... and someone suggested me "CCParallax". I have never used it and am not sure if it really can achieve the effect I am seeking.
Also note that as the player moves on the map, the parallax will need to simulate that as well etc.
So my question is, what would you do for this effect? Four looping images or "CCParallax"?
CCParallaxNode is pretty limited because you can't specify endless parallax scrolling without modifying the class. It also doesn't quite fit your use case.
Using four 960x640 images is wasteful. Just to make some lakes underneath the background this is overkill and will negatively affect performance.
The solution depends a bit on how big the lakes are. For example, if these are just 1 or 3x3 tiles in size you could add a textured sprite underneath each lake. If on the other hand your tilemap consists mostly of a few narrow pathways while the rest is lava lakes, then you need a different approach.
You might want to try GL_REPEAT to repeat a single sprite's texture over a defined area. That allows you to use a relatively small texture, for example 64x64, that will be repeated over the rectangle you specified.
You can then modify the sprite's position each frame to scroll the texture. Every time the sprite has moved 64 pixels in horizontal or vertical direction, you subtract 64 pixels (sprite.contentSize.width) from the sprite's position to reset it back to its original state. That means the sprite will never move further than 64 pixels from its initial position in any direction but you still get smooth scrolling.
I have a sprite and if it is touched the touch should be recognized. I used the coordinates to do so. I took the coordinates (min x, min y, max x , max y)of the sprite image. But The sprite image is not a rectangular shape. So, even if I touch the coordinates outside the sprite and inside the rectangular bounds the sprite is recognized.
But for my application I need only the sprite to be recognized. So, I have to take only the coordinates of the sprite, but it is not regular shape. I am using CCSprite in my program.
So, what can I do to for only the sprite to be selected ? Which classes should use for this?
Thank You.
You could try one of the following...
Create a bounding box smaller than the absolute extents of the sprite image. Yes it will be smaller than the sprite. This will eliminate the dead space click detection of the sprite the trade off being parts of your sprite which look selectable won't be
Use a circular bounding area to detect if the user has clicked on your sprite. Again you will have the dead space problem in my first suggestion but the sphere may give you some better coverage area over the sprite giving you better results on touch detection
This is a standard problem in physics collision detection systems which often end up using circles or rectangles as their collision bodies. I would go with the either a circle or rectangle smaller than the size of your sprite as your bounding area. Going finer detail than that you could generate bounding area polygons. This would however introduce a whole bunch of new issues and concerns.
I am building a Cocos2D game right now and what I am doing is first I step through my sprites and see which sprites the touch hit (they overlap in my app)
Then, for each sprite hit I use [sprite convertTouchToNodeSpace] to get an X,Y co-ordinate inside the sprite, which I can use (although the Y axis is flipped) to reference the CGImage I created the sprite with.
If the pixel at the touch point is 'clear' ie alpha 0, then the sprite was not really touched, and I check the next sprite in the z-order to see if it has color where it was touched.
Sometimes I think I should be using a two color mask image to go along with each sprite, not the sprite image. But, I am mr. make it work, then make it fast.
I realise this is not super efficient, but I do not have very many sprites and I do this only for touches.