I built a application with 5 wcf services and hosted them in IIS 7.5. I used the default configuration for the net.Tcp port (808*).
I am not used to host WCF services in IIS (I always hosted in Windows Services) and I found interesting that when I call the service (using tcp binding) I got two different process on the server.
One is SMSvcHost.exe (the one that is actually using the 808 port) and the other is w3wp.exe wich I think is handling a instance of the server I am calling.
I have a lot of questions so I will enumerate them:
Should I use IIS instead of Windows Service to host WCF Services (tcp binding) ?
The fact that I have two processes to answer my request means that I may have cpu impacts ?
Sometimes my services stop answering using the tcp binding. I got a timeout error on my clients but the mex is correctly answering if I go to the http://myServer/Service1.svc. I suspect that this problem is caused by fault connections but I am throwing exceptions correctly (using fault exceptions) and catching them correctly on my clients. Besides, I am also implementing a partial class for every service to dispose corretly (either using Close or Abort methods). Is there any way to figure out what's going on when the services stop answering ?
Shouldn't the w3wp.exe processes be closed after the client ends the request ? They remain on the Task Manager even when no one is using the services. I guess this is the reason of why my Entity Library logging locks the file after my request is completed.
Ideally it would be better hosted in Windows Activation Services (WAS) which is close to what you think of as IIS, but not quite. Here's a good introductory article on MSDN magazine:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/cc163357.aspx
Related
I have developed a WCF Web Service using C# that works and serves up the data I need to my mobile client using a COBOL VM that talks to my backend data. It works, but it is very unreliable. I think it has to do with the lifecycle of the web service and I just don't understand how it is breaking down. I believe the problem is the COOBL VM, which is a singleton, and the process of shutting it down each time. I've already tried
lock(myobject)
{
... run my code here
}
I want to move the COBOL VM to a server service where I can persist my COBOL VM and just make calls to it. I don't know how to persist the COBOL VM across all WCF Web Service calls. I'm looking for examples the show a wcf web service communicating with a server service so I can move my business layer code out of the service and just have it make calls to the server service for the data it needs. This way I can keep the COBOL VM running all the time rather than going through a load-up, execute, and then shutdown process as I'm doing in the Web Service.
Does anyone have any GOOD examples of a WCF Web Service communicating with a WCF Server Service?
keep the COBOL VM running all the time rather than going through a load-up, execute, and then shutdown process as I'm doing in the Web Service.
Then create a Windows service that hosts this VM client, so you only have to connect once and can keep it running. Then you can let that service also host a WCF service, which then queries the VM client.
You might be better off looking into a CORBA solution - CORBA is the only remoting technology that can give you access into an already running process.
We have been tumbling, for more than a month now, with an issue where a wcf msmq service hosted in IIS7.5 (WAS) will stop processing messages from the queue.
We have been unable to narrow it down more than "at some point" it will stop processing messages from the queue. Calling the svc through a http browser call will start the processing again.
After reading really many articles, blogs and forum posts about this issue we have ensured the following: Security settings, protocol bindings and msmq/service naming, but alas: the service will still stop processing messages (at some point).
Encouraged by this article http://www.daczkowski.net/2010/11/19/leveraging-msmq-in-asp-net-application-through-wcf-service/ we seem to have now finally (almost) eliminated the problem for windows server 2008 r2 sp1 64 bit, but it still seems to appear on Windows 7 32 bit.
Now to get to my question: Can anyone tell me if there actually exists a guarentee (documentation on this would be appreciated) that a msmq WAS hosted wcf service will actually restart (under all conditions) on a IIS7.5 NOT running the AppFabric extension?
I am aware that this question is very compounded, but I'm hard pressed for documentation on why we should extend our OTS package with AppFabric to resolve this restart problem.
Best regards,
Are you're net.msmq endpoints actually using addresses that IIS can bind to a queue name? It's possible to use non-IIS compatible names in the config and WAS won't really ever be able to wake your application up because WAS will only ever register to queues following a path name it can resolve. In that case you need something like AppFabric or a "startup" script to actually activate your services so that they will bind to the queues in their own.
I have a fairly straightforward WCF service that performs one-way file synchronization for a bunch of smart clients. I've noticed that when there's a network or service interruption during a call, the client stops being able to communicate with the server until the entire application is restarted.
The service runs with BasicHttpBinding and is hosted with IIS6 (a .svc page), using transferMode="Streamed" and messageEncoding="Mtom". The service is configured to use the default InstanceContextMode (I think it's Per Call?) and ConcurrencyMode=Single. It's using the default throttling behavior, but I'm in an isolated test environment that nobody else is hitting.
Clients are Windows Services. I'm using this ServiceProxyHelper to ensure connections are Close()'d or Abort()'d correctly when Dispose()'d, though there are no sessions so I don't think that even matters. When an error occurs, the Client object is disposed and then goes out of scope. After the exception is detected, the service waits a bit, then creates a new client object and tries again. So it should recover from the failure, but for some reason all subsequent calls to the service fail.
I can reproduce this reliably by starting a client, allowing it to transfer a few files, then iisresetting the server. First the client generally displays a "Service is Too Busy" error (which maps to the IIS 503 error that you get during an app restart). After that, all subsequent calls to the service time out. As far as I can tell the calls are not even being attempted by the client. I have tracing enabled and what I see is: Timeout error, followed by a "Failed to send request message over HTTP" warning, followed by another Timeout error.
The crazy thing is that when I configure the client to use Fiddler (port 8888) as a proxy in app.config, everything works as desired. So somehow Fiddler as the proxy is closing or finalizing some kind of connection that WCF on its own is not.
Thoughts?
Edit 2009-10-30 8:54PM: Changed service attributes to: InstanceContextMode=Single and ConcurrencyMode=Multiple. No difference.
Well that was painful. It took me forever but finally I zeroed in on the difference between running with a proxy vs without and started poking around the <system.net> settings. It turns out that adding this configuration bit to the client fixes the problem:
<system.net>
<settings>
<servicePointManager expect100Continue="false" />
</settings>
</system.net>
Can somebody explain what's going on? Why should this setting cause WCF clients to hang irreparably when there's a service interruption?
Are you sure this isn't a client side issue. If your Windows service is making the WCF calls on a seperate thread from the main, and you have an un-handled exception happening on the child thread...the calling thread may or may not sit there and wait forever becaues it's waiting for that thread to return.
That would explain why there's an Exception inside the service and then it looks like the service makes no more calls to the service...it's hung.
Used to be a huge issue when using Timers to spawn processes in .NET 2.0 Windows Services.
I have a WCF service with netMsmqBinding. My client can send messages to my queue, and when the service is running it retrieves messages from the queue as expected. If the service is not running, messages received are queued until the service starts.
My problem is that the service does not start when a message hits the queue. The service is hosted in IIS, and so it is not instantiated until IIS receives a request. If I browse to the service then it processes the messages in the queue, but obviously this is not my desired method of processing the queue!
I expect that I need to change the service implementation, or change the IIS setup, but I do not know where or what to change.
UPDATE
Does anyone actually use MSMQ over WCF? I had this working for a short time - I enabled the binding on a different website on the same server, bizarrely - but now it has somehow stopped working again.
The only problem I am having is with the Activation of the service when there is a message in the queue. At present the queue only processes when the service is instantiated, e.g. when I browse the the .svc file. I have the net.msmq protocol enabled on the application, and I have the net.msmq binding enabled on the site... is there anything else I need to do?
You explicitly need to configure IIS for non HTTP activation. I don't know all the details of the top of my head but basically you need to use appcmd to configure and enable the net.msmq binding activation.
Check this blogpost or this screencast should give you all the details.
This might save somebody the hours it took me:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms731053.aspx
I believe that my problems using MSMQ binding over WCF were mainly around IIS.
I had no end of problems using Windows XP / Server 2003 with IIS 6.
Using Windows 7 or Server 2008 with IIS 7.5 everything works well.
An even better suggestion is to run MSMQ as a managed service / Windows Service or a stand-alone application rather than under IIS.
We have an existing WCF service that makes use of wsDualHttpBinding to enable callbacks to the client. I am considering moving it to netTcpBinding for better performance, but I'm quite wary of moving away from the IIS-hosted service (a "comfort zone" we currently enjoy) into having our own Windows service to host it. I was hoping we could still host this on IIS 7 but Win2K8 won't be reality for us for some time.
What things should I watch out for when creating our own Windows service to host our WCF service? Things like lifetime management and request throttling are features that come free with IIS hosting so I'd also like to know how we can effectively host our service on our own without the convenience of having IIS do the hard work for us. Thanks! :)
So as you cannot host using WAS there are a couple of things to realise.
If the service crashes it doesn't restart by default (although you can change this in service properties)
IIS will recycle the application pool if it hangs or grows too big; you must do this yourself if you want the same sort of reliability.
You must create an account for the service to run under, or use one of the default services. Resit the temptation to run the service as SYSTEM or under an administrator account; if you want to use a built in account use NETWORK SERVICE.
It becomes harder to debug in situ.
Consider using a error logger such as log4net
Having said that I deployed a WCF/Windows service combination for a customer 9 months ago; it's heavily used and hasn't died once.
You can request throttle in a Windows service, it's part of the WCF configuration. Note the defaults are very low, it is likely you will have to increase these.
Hosting in a Windows Service Application (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms734781.aspx) is a good start.
If you can host your service on Vista, you can also benefit from Windows Process Activation Service (WAS). WAS is a generalization of the IIS process activation, which can be used to activate processes over non-HTTP endpoints (TCP, Named Pipe, MSMQ). To learn more about WCF hosted in WAS, read http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms733109.aspx. To learn how to install and configure WAS, read http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms731053.aspx.