How to make single executable file ( not installation file) that run on every windows 7 . without needing any type of specific framework or platform .
For example if i make c# application and try to run on another system, it require dot net framework. How can i get rid of this problem.
Which Language or IDE i use to make independent executable file.
I don't know if it is exactly what you want,
but why not just write a c application that only makes use of Windows API and compile this one into an executable file?
IDE's compile it for you and you can run this *.exe on any computer you want.
Related
I use Cygwin to build source code to DLL used by windows app.
When I use GCC core / GCC g++, the app crash if it calls function (which includes printf or malloc) in DLL.
When I use Mingw64-x86_64-gcc-core / Mingw64-x86_64-gcc-g++ it reports error like sys/socket.h：No such file or directory.
Can anyone explain how to do it? Thanks.
The first problem is due to the tentative to build a stand alone DLL (not depending on cygwin1.dll) using cygwin only specific tools.
You have collision between multiple malloc and other C library call present in cygwin1.dll.
The second is due to the fact that sys/socket.h does not exist on Windows
see for possible solution:
Using sys/socket.h functions on windows
So you need to define what is your target : Cygwin/Posix or Windows and choose programming style and tools accordingly, you can not mix.
Can cmake configuration files also be used to automatically extend the system PATH variable to include the directory paths to all the installed executable applications and if it is possible (and a standard practice), how can I do this?
This way, as soon as I configure all the CMakeLists.txt files and everything compiles (and hopefully runs) nicely, I can start using the applications, and the path configuration would be packaged together with the build process. I am working with Linux and my code is written in C++, but since cmake is cross-platform, the question extends to other systems as well.
I'm unaware of any capability in CMake to do this. However, we based what we do what Cantera does. They upgraded to SCONS recently instead of their old build system, but the idea still applies.
Anyway, there's a script that CMake configures with the paths during the configure step and then installs somewhere. So once built on Linux, one would run make install then source ~/setup_cantera and it sets up all the variables needed.
We do the same thing for our libraries built with CMake. It's possible to detect which shell the user is running and configure an appropriate template script.
I am trying to install some commercial software that was written in Java for a Windows computer operating system. I have downloaded Java from their site and I have also downloaded the JDK package for a 64bit windows system so to my knowledge I should have everything I need to have java work. I then create a shortcut of the java exectuable javaw.exe and edit the target path and the start in path to my specifications but when I go to execute it, it tells me that it "Could not create Java virtual machine".
Does anyone know how to fix this error?
Luke H
How are you creating the shortcut? In windows, this might not be the correct approach.
Does the installer use an embedded version of java? It is possible that the software uses some native libraries that aren't compatible with 64 bit java.
Depending on the setup script, it may be passing invalid command line arguments to the version of Java you installed.
Its a bit late, but this might help others later.
Here's what worked for me:
Target: "C:\Program Files\Java\jre1.7.0\bin\javaw.exe" -classpath C:\OLINDA olinda
Start in: C:\OLINDA
It seems that you don't know how properly start the Java Virtual Machine, in Windows, the JVM can be started with two executables one is java.exe and the other one is javaw.exe, both do the same, the only difference is that java.exe is a command line tool (so you'll see a command line when you start your application) and javaw.exe simply omits the command line. Both use the same paramaters that can be found here: http://docs.oracle.com/javase/1.5.0/docs/tooldocs/windows/java.html, from this the shorter way to open a Java program will be:
java MainJavaClass.class
or
java -jar JavaProgram.jar
Most commercial programs are packed in jar files so probably you will use the second approach, but also be warned that usually commercial Java programs use a native wrapper so you can simply launch a native application (in Windows .exe), without the need to set anything, so you may need to create a shortcut for it instead of the java.exe program, in the case you really need to call the Java program through the JVM, then what you need to change is the Target field so you include the parameters you need to pass to it like this:
"C:\Program Files\Java\jre7\bin\java.exe -jar JavaProgram.jar"
Another way could be use a batch file to start the program and create a link to it instead.
Is it possible to write an obj-C code with any text editor and then upload it to Mac server to compile it using Xcode??
I know that it is possible to compile your project using Xcode without open it something like use some command lines, but I am not sure is it possible to make it a server and then upload any obj-c code!
You can compile your projects from the command line using the xcodebuild command. Automating your builds is another story altogether: you'll need to set up your server to download the updated source code (typically via version control, e.g. svn update or p4 sync), do the build, and then upload the builds results somehwere (e.g. check into version control).
Doing this is non-trivial, and there's a lot of software out there, such as FinalBuilder, to help make this easier, although FinalBuilder is Windows software so probably isn't what you want.
I'm using Powerbuilder to call an external function from a DLL created in C#
If I generate an executable it works fine, it call the web service perfectly well, but when I'm trying to run it in "development" mode it don't use the "application_name.exe.config" file.
I tried to set "app.config" file hard coded in the DLL, but I was unsuccessful
Clues to resolve this issue?
I think you described it yourself: you're looking for it to use something used by the EXE when you're running from development mode. When you run from development mode, there is no EXE generated or used, so Windows won't be leveraging functionality linked to the EXE. (PB starts your application so quickly because it is only loading the application to the virtual machine and running its Open event.) If you need this, it sounds like you'll have to include Deploying of the EXE and running it as part of your testing cycle.
Good luck,
Terry.
When you compile and run from the exe you're using your exe. But when you run from the dev environment you're actually using pbxxx.exe (pb115.exe, pb110.exe etc.). You may be able to copy the "application_name.exe.config" into your pb directory and rename it something like pbxxx.exe.config. At least that's the way it works with manifest files -- I had two, one called appname.exe.manifest and one called pb115.exe.manifest.
Just curious but how many libraries/objects are in your application?
I have some very large applications and the longest any of them takes to do a full build is about 30 minutes. Something odd about your aapplication for it to take 2 hours to do a full build.
DLL's dont have config files. Only EXE's.