I have read in MSDN that in Sharepoint 2010 developer can realize many-to-many relationships betwen lists using intermidiate list and sme custom logic.
Could you recomend me some already created controls for this porpose?
What exactly do you want controls to do? As the article states, the method is simply to have two lists, and a third with a lookup to each of those two lists. You create items normally in those two lists and then create another item to link pairs of existing items. You can either do all of this manually using OOB controls, or you can make a custom page (or pages) that will be used to create both an item and to link it as well. Note that in sharepoint you also have the option of using multi-valued lookups. This will perform slower, and have less options when querying the data, but it does make entering the data using OOB webparts easier.
All that said, we can't really help you much without knowing what you're looking for.
Related
I have a dataset table with various columns that are created during form load.
These columns are currently either system.double or system.string types.
And it is displayed in a datagridview.
This works fine.
But I need another column that can store a "list" or some collection in the data table.
A list of strings would do but a custom class would be better.
How is this usually done?
I have spent literally weeks googling this and I dont know where to start. The more I have looked the more confused I have ended up. I end up with more questions than answers, like how is it displayed in the datagridview? I read about a combo box?
I hope someone can give me some pointers in how to get this achieved. I've not posted any code as I think its more the theory of this I need help with.
What you are asking for has does have multiple concerns for most programmers. The storage of data (#1) and the displaying of said data to the user (#2)
For #1 I recommend the .net entity framework. It gives support for storing, querying and updating classes for use in the database. Through most tutorials that I have found it is possible to model the structure of the database tables and their relations and then build a database around that model OR to use an existing database and create entities (entity framework's class objects) around the existing structures and relationships.
Here is a link to a very good beginner tutorial that I have used before: CodeProject Entity Framework Tutorial for Absolute Beginners
For #2 I can recommend the Windows Presentation Foundation. It has lots of bells and whistles to make using a data source and displaying the relevant dependent data very easily through its unique method of data binding. From the tutorials I have used on PluralSight it can be as easy as dragging and dropping from an imported data source like the entity framework database. Alternatively, one can just handle selected row changes for one data grid and then show the dependent data in another data grid.
I'm interested in displaying 1-5 model instances using forms on a page using a grid similar to something one would find in a desktop database application. I understand I would need to use multiple forms or formsets but an additional requirement is that I'd prefer it to be in more of a grid format with each model's fields being display in columns with common field labels on the y-axis.
I should have the ability to edit multiple columns (so in effect, model instances) at the same time and then commit either the single column (model instance) or commit all. I'd also like to be able to highlight the changed cells that have changed to give visual feedback to the user that there are pending changes.
Sorry for the rather long list of requirements and I'm aware this probably requires a few different technologies/techniques to achieve. I'm throwing this out there because I'm asking this kind community for guidance on what components/technologies I should look at. If luck would have it, there would be some jQuery component that can handle this for me almost out of the box. If not, some guidance on achieving the editing of multiple model instances would be of help.
I will also need to build in versioning in case the data displayed on the view page is stale and to prevent overwriting a newer commit. I'd probably achieve the latter using a versioning field in the table that will perform the check and handle it accordingly.
Also, Flask and Django are both options for the engine and WTForms look to be promising at least at first look.
Thanks
There is no such ready to use solution in Django. Just create your custom form that handles as many instances as you want and do anything that you want, or extend formset.
Is there a quick and easy way to make a VB.NET user interface for managing the data in a normalized DataSet?
I know that is a very subjective question, so let me explain. For a brief period early in my career, I used to create user interfaces in Microsoft Access. I developed a simple, but very effective approach to user interface design. Here are some details of that approach:
Create one form per table. Put on
each form all controls necessary to
completely manage one row in the
table.
Use combo boxes for
foreign-key columns.
Give the user a
standard way to add rows and delete
rows.
Use Apply and Undo buttons.
Let
the user navigate from one row to
another with a list box.
Provide a
search box and filter options for
more efficient navigation.
Let the
user double-click on controls
representing foreign-key columns to
quickly navigate from one form to
another.
Make the state of each form
persistent (so the user always
returns to the last navigation point)
etc.
Simple, right? I found that Access encouraged this approach. It has many built-in features that make this kind of UI easy. For instance, creating a combo box to represent a foreign key relationship takes about 10 seconds.
Well, I haven't worked in Access for a while. A couple of years ago, however, I was hired to write an application in VB.NET on the NET 2.0 framework. To get a data management user interface up and running quickly, I used my Access experience to write a quick & easy prototype in Access -- that took me about one week. Then I hired a programmer to implement that same UI in VB.NET. What a nightmare! We've been working on that implementation for a year, and I'm still very unsatisfied with the results. Some of the problems we are having:
Apply and Undo buttons don't work quite right. We can't find an event that tells us when the form is "dirty" (thus making Apply and Undo relevant).
Navigation from row to row and from form to form requires surprisingly complicated code. I get the impression that we are fighting against NET's binding features, not working with them the way they were intended to be used.
The NET controls seem buggy. For instance, when the user types a value into a combo box (as opposed to choosing it from the drop down), it doesn't trigger the SelectedValueChanged event.
We seem to be repeating a lot of information. For instance, the DataSet knows there is a relationship between the columns in two tables, but we must nevertheless effectively repeat the details of that relationship when we program the combo boxes, binding, navigtation features, etc.
We still don't have good solutions for the filter and search features. There are lots of little details to work out. (For instance, what if you choose a filter that doesn't include the currently displayed row?)
We are writing many helper functions and classes to simplify the work, and I can't figure out why that effort hasn't already been done by others -- I'm certain we are reinventing the wheel.
etc.
By themselves, none of the above are a big deal -- there are effective solutions to each one. Taken together, however, these problems are making my UI development go much slower than expected.
In an ideal world, I should be able to create a small amount of code relevant to my specific data model (for instance, one user control per table establishing the layout and logic relevant to the rows in that table) then integrate that code into a template which interprets the data model and handles everything else -- navigation, adding and deleting, apply and undo, search and filter, etc.
Thus, my question: Is there anything out there which makes this type of UI development easier?
I've searched the web for various combinations of "generic forms", "UI templates", "data managment forms", etc., but I haven't found anything on topic. Perhaps I just don't know the buzzwords. Is there a specific name for this type of UI development task?
Create UCs for each table. Drop a grid control onto the UC and bind it to the tables dataset using VS's wizard. Select the options that allow for insert, update, delete. Each row on the grid will have those buttons/actions automatically added for you.
I am new the sharepoint development, hope my question makes sense,
using sharepoint 2010,
structure of the application I am working on is like below:
site collection root
some lists and content types that are common to all sites below.
a site for doing something with x-type projects
a site for doing something with y-type projects
a site for doing other stuff not directly related to the projects but may be indirectly
if I was designing a tratidional database application, I would have a BaseProject entity, and would discriminate the sub projects by a projectType field or even would have subEntities which are related 1-1 (kind of inheritace relationship) to the baseProject entity-if normalization issues bother me much.
people around suggest to have seperate lists for x,y projects which have different workflows, document templates, different users, etc, and isolate the contents of different sites, aggerate the datas when reporting, not even to think of inheritance-like relations between entities but this means the relations from common entities would need to be made seperately to the different lists of projects. and many look-up lists would be repeated around different lists of "project" entities. so expanding the data model would be difficult in the future. and for the reports that are interested in whole scope of the application, would need to aggregate the lists scattered among the sites.
if I design the lists to be more expandable later on
only one baseProject list in root site with a projectType column:
I would have to filter every lists that contains more than what I need in a specific site
one baseProject list in root site and sub-lists for other types of
projects in sub sites: I would need to syncronize the data between base list and sub lists. to have all the project items in baseProject list.
the question is: what are the best practices to design sharepoint lists to model inheritance between entities ?
regards..
It is very difficult to answer specifically without a lot more detail on the project. Building your site model is a complex task that is specific to a particualar projects requirements.
In simple terms, if a list has different processing associated with it, then it is a separate list. If you need to indicate similar data, then use defined fields, which will maintain your consistency. Reporting can be made to work whatever your structure, so treat that as a lesser issue.
But the primary focus for site design should be the functional behaviour of the business. If you match that correctly, then everything else will eventually fall into place.
How would you create a database in Microsoft Access that is searchable only by certain fields and controlled by only a few (necessary) text boxes and check boxes on a form so it is easy to use - no difficult queries?
Example:
You have several text boxes and several corresponding check boxes on a form, and when the check box next to the text box is checked, the text box is enabled and you can then search by what is entered into said text box
(Actually I already know this, just playing stackoverflow jeopardy, where I ask a question I know the answer just to increase the world's coding knowledge! answer coming in about 5 mins)
My own solution is to add a "filter" control in the header part of the form for each of the columns I want to be able to filter on (usually all ...). Each time such a "filter" control is updated, a procedure will run to update the active filter of the form, using the "BuildCriteria" function available in Access VBA.
Thus, When I type "*cable*" in the "filter" at the top of the Purchase Order Description column, the "WHERE PODescription IS LIKE "*cable*" is automatically added to the MyForm.filter property ....
Some would object that filtering record source made of multiple underlying tables can become very tricky. That's right. So the best solution is according to me to always (I mean it!) use a flat table or a view ("SELECT" query in Access) as a record source for a form. This will make your life a lot easier!
Once you're convinced of this, you can even think of a small module that will automate the addition of "filter" controls and related procedures to your forms. You'll be on the right way for a real user-friendly client interface.
This is actually a pretty large topic, and fraught with all kinds of potential problems. Most intermediate to advanced books on Access will have some kind of section discussing "Query by Form," where you have an unbound form that allows the user to choose certain criteria, and that when executed, writes on-the-fly SQL to return the matching data.
In anything but a flat, single-table data structure, this is not a trivial task because the FROM clause of the SQL is dependent on the tables queried in the WHERE clause.
A few examples of some QBF forms from apps I've created for clients:
Querying 4 underlying tables
Querying a flat single table
Querying 3 underlying tables
Querying 6 underlying tables
Querying 2 underlying tables
The first one is driven by a class module that has properties that reflect the criteria selected in this form, and that has methods that write the FROM and WHERE clauses. This makes it extremely easy to add other fields (as long as those fields don't come from tables other than the ones already included).
The most complex part of the process is writing the FROM clause, as you have to have appropriate join types and include only the tables that are either in the SELECT clause or the WHERE clause. If you include anything else, you'll slow down your query a lot (especially if you have any outer joins).
But this is a big subject, and there is no magic bullet solution -- instead, something like this has to be created for each particular application. It's also important that you test it thoroughly with users, since what is completely clear and understandable to you, the developer, is often pretty darned mystifying to end users.
But that's a principle that doesn't just apply to QBF!
At start-up, you need to show a form and disable other menus etc. That way your user only ever sees your limited functionality and cannot directly open the tables etc.
This book excerpt, Real World Microsoft Access Database Protection and Security, should be enlightening.
For a question that vague, all that I can answer is open MS Access, and click the mouse a few times.
On second thought:
Use the "WhereCondition" argument of the "OpenForm" method
If the functionality is very limited and/or specialised then a SQL database is probably going to be overkill anyhow e.g. cache all combinations of the data locally, in memory even, and show one according to the checkboxes on the form. Previously you could have revoked permissions from the table and granted them only on VIEWs/PROCs that queried the data in the prescribed way, however security has been removed from MS Access 2007 so you can you now really stop users bypassing your simple app using, say, Excel and querying the data any way they like ...but then isn't that the point of an enterprise database? ;-)