At present i am using Behat-Mink Bundle for performing automation testing via sahi.The other way to do Automation Testing is recording Test Cases using Sahi Recorder.So which method is better, Using Sahi Recorder or Behat-Mink Bundle?
Thanks for your time.
Related
I've recently found and fallen in love with Cypress for e2e testing, much more so than Selenium, but there's a catch: our web app will actually be within jxbrowser, inside a java app. Whatever e2e framework we choose has to be able to run all the tests within jxbrowser inside of this embedded application (hence why we originally looked at selenium, because of the remote driver)
Is it possible to get this working? We absolutely need the embedded jxbrowser tests (Cots integration, can't get around it), and I'd hate to have to fall back to selenium.
I am currently working on node-webkit based desktop app. I was searching for a way to do automation testing for this . But most of the automation tools required a server to start up but in my case i have on but it runs in the chromium that comes by default. Is there a way to automate UI acceptance test for nwjs apps.
Take a look at the NW.js Wiki under How to run node webkit's test cases
You will need to setup the chrome driver in order to use selenium for example
Once you have those, check out Yaniv kessler's blog post on how to Automate NW.js UI testing using mocha.
I have a hard time figuring out how you actually do integration tests
Is it still automated test with JUnit, NUnit or whatever, or is it just using the program (it has a gui) an making sure that everything works?
You can refer what-kinds-of-tests-are-there and whats-the-difference-between-unit-functional-acceptance-and-integration-test
GUI testing can be listed in system testing, acceptance testing.
GUI test tool mostly depends on type of UI (Web/Desktop/Mobile). e.g. for web testing you can evaluate good open source tools like selenium.
1) Is there is any way to use selenium functional test scripts for load and performance testing.
2) Or any other tool for handle both functional and load using same script.
The problem with running selenium tests as load testing, and it can be done with TestNG or Visual Studio's load test wizard is that it will be very machine intensive as each test will run in it's own browser window.
A better option would be Grinder or JMeter
I'm writing functional tests for a chrome app written entirely in javascript. I decided to use Cucumber and Selenium Webdriver and run the tests on chrome. Wrote Selenium code inside Cucumber step definitions and it works fine (I've only just begun though).
I see that I can do headless testing with capybara (or webrat) and I'm not interested in that. Is there anything else that I'd gain if I use capybara?
I recently had the same question. Capybara gives you a pretty nice DSL to interact with the DOM for one thing. Another big advantage is you can easily switch drivers. On my team, we constantly switch from the Chrome driver (desktop browser) to the iWedbDriver (mobile safari in iphone simulator).
Headless testing is generally a very good thing, since the tests run faster if they don't have to draw the browser window. If the tests run faster, then you'll run them more often. If you're not interested in that, you're making a big mistake.