Sql get first 2 groups of a number - sql

I have a number formatted in the following manner: 123.456.789.1.2.3
I want a function that retrieves the first 2 groups of the number and puts them in a bigint: result: 123456
What I've done so far:
CREATE FUNCTION bl.fn_get_2_groups
(
#str nvarchar(255)
)
RETURNS bigint
AS BEGIN
DECLARE #newStr nvarchar(255)
select #newStr = SUBSTRING(#str,1,charindex('.',#str)-1), #str = SUBSTRING(#str,charindex('.',#str)+1,LEN(#str))
select #newStr += SUBSTRING(#str,1,charindex('.',#str)-1)
return convert(bigint,#newStr)
END GO
Does anyone know a different way to do this? Maybe more elegant or shorter?

This should work:
cast(REPLACE(LEFT(#str,CHARINDEX('.', #str,CHARINDEX('.', #str)+1)),'.','') as bigint)

Your method looks OK. If you want something much more elegant or easier, I think you are going to have to write a CLR function. Then, you could avail yourself of all that .NET API has to offer for string parsing. Alternatively, you could try to do this parsing in the application layer. Of course, that may not be feasible.
You can read about regexs and CLR functions here:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/cc163473.aspx
Also, I would suggest amending your SQL UDF to ensure that the input string does in fact have two periods.

Related

Is it better to use Custom TABLE TYPE as parameter instead of SQL "IN" clause when passing a large comma separated value

I have a stored procedure it takes comma separated string as input. Which might be too large some times approximately more than 8 thousand characters or more. In that situation, query performance goes down sometimes. And I think there is a limitation for the character length inside the IN clause. For that, sometimes I get errors. Now, I need to know is it better to use a Custom TABLE TYPE as parameter and use Inner JOIN to find the result. If it is then why is it. Here are my 2 stored procedures (minimal code):
CREATE TYPE [dbo].[INTList] AS TABLE(
[ID] [int] NULL
)
Procedure 1
CREATE PROCEDURE [report].[GetSKU]
#list [INTList] READONLY,
AS
Select sk.SKUID,sk.Code SCode,sk.SName
FROM SKUs sk
INNER JOIN #list sst ON sst.ID=sk.SKUID
Procedure 2
CREATE PROCEDURE [report].[GetSKU]
#params varchar(max),
AS
Select sk.SKUID,sk.Code SCode,sk.SName
FROM SKUs sk
WHere CHARINDEX(','+cast( sk.SKUID as varchar(MAX))+',', #params) > 0
Now, which procedures is better to use.
Note: Original Stored Procedures does have few more Joins.
As this question did raise quite some discussion in comments but did not get any viable answer, I'd like to add the major points in order to help future research.
This question is about: How do I pass a (large) list of values into a query?
In most cases, people need this either in a WHERE SomeColumn IN(SomeValueList)-filter or to JOIN against this with something like FROM MyTable INNER JOIN SomeValueList ON....
Very important is the SQL-Server's version, as with v2016 we got two great tools: native STRING_SPLIT() (not position-safe!) and JSON support.
Furthermore, and rather obvious, we have to think about the scales and values.
Do we pass in a simple list of some IDs or a huge list with thousands of values?
Do we talk about simple integers or GUIDs?
And what's about text values, where we have to think about dangerous characters (like [ { " in JSON or < & in XML - there are many more...)?
What about CSV-lists, where the separating character might appear within the content (quoting / escaping)?
In some cases we might even want to pass several columns at once...
There are several options:
Table valued parameter (TVP, CREATE TYPE ...),
CSV together with string splitting functions (native since v2016, various home brewed, CLR...),
and text-based containers: XML or JSON (since v2016)
Table valued paramter (TVP - the best choice)
A table valued parameter (TVP) must be created in advance (this might be a draw back) but will behave as any other table once created. You can add indexes, you can use it in various use cases and you do not have to bother about anything under the hood.
Sometimes we cannot use this due to missing rights to use CREATE TYPE...
Character separated values (CSV)
With CSV we see three approaches
Dynamic Sql: Create a statement, where the CSV list is simply stuffed into the IN() and execute this dynamically. This can be a very efficient approach, but will be open to various obstacles (no ad-hoc-usage, injection threat, breaking on bad values...)
String splitting functions: There are tons of examples around... All of them have in common that the separated string will be returned as a list of items. Common issues here: performance, missing ordinal position, limits for the separator, handling of duplicate or empty values, handling of quoted or escaped values, handling of separators within the content. Aaron Bertrand did some great research about the various approaches of string splitting. Similar to TVPs one draw back might be, that this function must exist in the database in advance or that we need to be allowed to execute CREATE FUNCTION if not.
ad-hoc-splitters: Before v2016 the most used approach was XML based, since then we have moved to JSON based splitters. Both use some string methods to transform the CSV string to 1) separated elements (XML) or 2) into a JSON-array. The result is queried by 1) XQuery (.value() and .nodes()) or 2) JSON's OPENJSON() or JSON_VALUE().
Text based containers
We can pass the list as string, but within a defined format:
Using ["a","b","c"] instead of a,b,c allows for immediate usage of OPENJSON().
Using <x>a</x><x>b</x><x>c</x> instead allows for XML queries.
The biggest advantage here: Any programming language provides support for these formats.
Common obstacles like date and number formatting is solved implicitly. Passing JSON or XML is - in most cases - just some few lines of code.
Both approaches allow for type- and position-safe queries.
We can solve our needs without the need to rely on anything existing in advance.
For the very best performance you can use this function:
CREATE FUNCTION [dbo].StringSplit
(
#String VARCHAR(MAX), #Separator CHAR(1)
)
RETURNS #RESULT TABLE(Value VARCHAR(MAX))
AS
BEGIN
DECLARE #SeparatorPosition INT = CHARINDEX(#Separator, #String ),
#Value VARCHAR(MAX), #StartPosition INT = 1
IF #SeparatorPosition = 0
BEGIN
INSERT INTO #RESULT VALUES(#String)
RETURN
END
SET #String = #String + #Separator
WHILE #SeparatorPosition > 0
BEGIN
SET #Value = SUBSTRING(#String , #StartPosition, #SeparatorPosition- #StartPosition)
IF( #Value <> '' )
INSERT INTO #RESULT VALUES(#Value)
SET #StartPosition = #SeparatorPosition + 1
SET #SeparatorPosition = CHARINDEX(#Separator, #String , #StartPosition)
END
RETURN
END
This function return table - select * from StringSplit('12,13,14,15,16', ',') so you can join this function to your table or can use IN on the where clause.

how to convert persian number to int

There is a nvarchar(100) column named value, when users insert into this column I need to check this code below in a trigger:
if exists
(
select *
from inserted i
where isnumeric(value)=0
)
begin
rollback transaction
raiserror('when productType is numeric, You have to insert numeric character',18,1)
return
end
but in application interface numbers inserted in persian, so always isnumeric(value)=0.
For example I need to if user insert ۴۵ in interface in my trigger value shown as 45.
So far I use CAST,CONVERT and collate Persian_100_CI_AI but I couldn't get any result.
Thanks.
Which version of SQL Server? v2017+ offers a new function TRANSLATE.
Might be, there is a more elegant way, but a pragmatic one is this:
DECLARE #PersianNumber NVARCHAR(100)=N'۴۵';
SELECT CAST(REPLACE(REPLACE(REPLACE(REPLACE(REPLACE(REPLACE(REPLACE(REPLACE(REPLACE(REPLACE
(#PersianNumber,N'۰',N'0'),N'۱',N'1'),N'۲',N'2'),N'۳',N'3'),N'۴',N'4')
,N'۵',N'5'),N'۶',N'6'),N'۷',N'7'),N'۸',N'8'),N'۹',N'9') AS INT);
Take a look at this topic, it's the opposite of what you asked but it might help you if you could reverse it :
https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/sqlserver/en-US/a44ce5c1-d487-4043-be73-b64fa98ed7a5/converting-english-numbers-to-arabic-numbers-and-vice-versa
If you are using the latest version of sql server, try this link :
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/t-sql/functions/translate-transact-sql
the obvious thing is that SQL does not have a solution out-of-the-box and you have to implement some kind of function yourself and use the returned value in the WHERE statement.
I have used Shungo's answer to implement the function you need (also works for English numbers or a mix of both):
CREATE FUNCTION IS_NORMALIZED_NUMBER (#PersianNumber NVARCHAR(MAX))
RETURNS NVARCHAR(MAX)
BEGIN
SET #PersianNumber = CAST(REPLACE(REPLACE(REPLACE(REPLACE(REPLACE(REPLACE(REPLACE(REPLACE(REPLACE(REPLACE
(#PersianNumber,N'۰',N'0'),N'۱',N'1'),N'۲',N'2'),N'۳',N'3'),N'۴',N'4')
,N'۵',N'5'),N'۶',N'6'),N'۷',N'7'),N'۸',N'8'),N'۹',N'9') AS NVARCHAR(MAX));
RETURN ISNUMERIC(#PersianNumber)
END
Here is a more optimized version (which will only work for Persian numbers) :
CREATE FUNCTION IS_NUMBER (#PersianNumber NVARCHAR(MAX))
RETURNS NVARCHAR(MAX)
BEGIN
RETURN IIF(REPLACE(REPLACE(REPLACE(REPLACE(REPLACE(REPLACE(REPLACE(REPLACE(REPLACE(REPLACE
(#PersianNumber,N'۰',N''),N'۱',N''),N'۲',N''),N'۳',N''),N'۴',N'')
,N'۵',N''),N'۶',N''),N'۷',N''),N'۸',N''),N'۹',N'') = N'',1 ,0 );
END
You can use TRANSLATE (Transact-SQL) function
SELECT TRANSLATE('1234', '0123456789', N'٠١٢٣٤٥٦٧٨٩') AS KurdishNumber

How do you pass values for a parameter by position when you need to check multiple values?

I created a stored procedure (spBalanceRange) with 2 optional parameters. They've been set to a default value and the sp works fine when I pass only 1 value per parameter by position. However, I have a situation where I'm trying to pass, by position, two strings immediately followed by a wildcard. I want the user to be able to search for Vendor names that start with either 'C%' or 'F%'. Here's the gist of the CREATE PROC statement:
CREATE PROC spBalanceRange
#VendorVar varchar(40) = '%',
#BalanceMin money = 1.0
...
Here's what I've tried so far, but doesn't work:
EXEC spBalanceRange '(C%|F%)', 200.00;
EXEC spBalanceRange 'C%|F%', 200.00;
Is there a way to check for 2 or more string values with a wildcard when passed by position? Thanks.
EDIT: According to your comments you are looking for the first letter of a vendor's name only.
In this special case I could suggest an easy, not well performing but really simple approach. CHARINDEX returns a number greater than zero, if a character appears within a string. So you just have to pass in all your lookup-first-characters as a simple "chain":
DECLARE #DummyVendors TABLE(VendorName VARCHAR(100));
INSERT INTO #DummyVendors VALUES
('Camel Industries')
,('Fritz and Fox')
,('some other');
DECLARE #ListOfFirstLetters VARCHAR(100)='CF';
SELECT VendorName
FROM #DummyVendors AS dv
WHERE CHARINDEX(LEFT(dv.VendorName,1),#ListOfFirstLetters)>0
This was the former answer
Checking against more than one value needs either a dedicated list of compares
WHERE val=#prm1 OR val=#prm2 OR ... (you know the count before)
...or you use the IN-clause
WHERE LEFT(VenoderName,1) IN ('C','F', ...)
...but you cannot pass the IN-list with a parameter like ... IN(#allValues)
You might think about a created TYPE to pass in all your values like a table and use an INNER JOIN as filter: https://stackoverflow.com/a/337864/5089204 (and a lot of other examples there...)
Or you might think of dynamic SQL: https://stackoverflow.com/a/5192765/5089204
And last but not least you might think of one of the many split string approaches. This is one of my own answers, section "dynamic IN-statement": https://stackoverflow.com/a/33658220/5089204
I'm answering my own question, and maybe other solutions exist but here is what had to happen with my stored procedure in order to pass variables by position:
CREATE PROC spBalanceRange
#VendorVar varchar(40) = '%',
#BalanceMin money = 1.0
AS
IF (#VendorVar = '%' AND #BalanceMin IS NULL OR #BalanceMin = '')
BEGIN
PRINT 'BalanceMin cannot be null.';
END
IF (#VendorVar = % AND #BalanceMin IS NOT NULL)
BEGIN
(sql statement using parameters)
END
EXEC spBalanceRange '[C,F]%', 200.00;
That's what I know.

SQL: SELECT number text base on a number

Background: I have an SQL database that contain a column (foo) of a text type and not integer. In the column I store integer in a text form.
Question: Is it possible to SELECT the row that contains (in foo column) number greater/lesser than n?
PS: I have a very good reason to store them as text form. Please refrain from commenting on that.
Update: (Forgot to mention) I am storing it in SQLite3.
SELECT foo
FROM Table
WHERE CAST(foo as int)>#n
select *
from tableName
where cast(textColumn as int) > 5
A simple CAST in the WHERE clause will work as long as you are sure that the data in the foo column is going to properly convert to an integer. If not, your SELECT statement will throw an error. I would suggest you add an extra step here and take out the non-numeric characters before casting the field to an int. Here is a link on how to do something similar:
http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2007/05/13/sql-server-udf-function-to-parse-alphanumeric-characters-from-string/
The only real modification you would need to do on this function would be to change the following lines:
PATINDEX('%[^0-9A-Za-z]%', #string)
to
PATINDEX('%[^0-9]%', #string)
The results from that UDF should then be castable to an int without it throwing an error. It will further slow down your query, but it will be safer. You could even put your CAST inside the UDF and make it one call. The final UDF would look like this:
CREATE FUNCTION dbo.UDF_ParseAlphaChars
(
#string VARCHAR(8000)
)
RETURNS int
AS
BEGIN
DECLARE #IncorrectCharLoc SMALLINT
SET #IncorrectCharLoc = PATINDEX('%[^0-9]%', #string)
WHILE #IncorrectCharLoc > 0
BEGIN
SET #string = STUFF(#string, #IncorrectCharLoc, 1, '')
SET #IncorrectCharLoc = PATINDEX('%[^0-9]%', #string)
END
SET #string = #string
RETURN CAST(#string as int)
END
GO
Your final SELECT statement would look something like this:
SELECT *
FROM Table
WHERE UDF_ParseAlphaChars(Foo) > 5
EDIT
Based upon the new information that the database is SQLite, the above probably won't work directly. I don't believe SQLite has native support for UDFs. You might be able to create a type of UDF using your programming language of choice (like this: http://www.christian-etter.de/?p=439)
The other option I see to safely get all of your data (an IsNumeric would exclude certain rows from your results, which might not be what you want) would probably be to create an extra column that has the int representation of the string. It is a little more dangerous in that you need to keep two fields in sync, but it will allow you to quickly sort and filter the table data.
SELECT *
FROM Table
WHERE CAST(foo as int) > 2000

T-SQL User defined function overloading?

I understand that T-SQL is not object oriented. I need to write a set of functions that mimics method overloading in C#.
Is function overloading supported in T-SQL in any way? If there is a hack to do this, is it recommended?
No, there is no way to do this.
I recommend you revisit the requirement, as "make apples look like oranges" is often difficult to do, and of questionable value.
One thing I have done successfully is to write the function in such a way as to allow it to handle null values, and then call it with nulls in place of the parameters you would like to omit.
Example:
create function ActiveUsers
(
#departmentId int,
#programId int
)
returns int
as
begin
declare #count int
select #count = count(*)
from users
where
departmentId = isnull(#departmentId, departmentId)
and programId = isnull(#programId, programId)
return #count
end
go
Uses:
select ActiveUsers(1,3) -- users in department 1 and program 3
select ActiveUsers(null,3) -- all users in program 3, regardless of department
select ActiveUsers(null,null) -- all users
You could pass in a sql_variant, but it comes with all sorts of hazards around it; you can't really use strong typing like you can with OO languages and overloading.
If you need to find the base type within your function, you can use the SQL_VARIANT_PROPERTY function.
You can pass in an array of values within a single string and parse them out using this techique by Erland Sommarskog.
Create a function with a varchar(max) parameter or several if necessary, then have your parameter values in that string like:
param1;param2;parma3;param4
or
param1:type;param2:type;param3:type
or
calltype|param1;param2;param3
etc, you are only limited by your imagination...
Use the technique from the link to split apart this array and use program logic to use those values as you wish.
One solution would be to utilize the sql_variant data type. This example works as long as you use the same datatype for both values. Returns whatever datatype you send it.
create function dbo.Greater(
#val1 sql_variant
,#val2 sql_variant
) returns sql_variant
as
begin
declare #rV sql_variant
set #rV = case when #val1 >= #val2 then #val1
else #val2 end
return #rV
end
go
A solution I've had some luck with is either creating a number of functions that each takes a different data type - or casting all input to NVARCHAR(MAX).
1. creating a number of functions that each takes a different data type
CREATE FUNCTION [dbo].[FunctionNameDatetime2]
CREATE FUNCTION [dbo].[FunctionNameInt]
CREATE FUNCTION [dbo].[FunctionNameString] --(this is not a typo)
CREATE FUNCTION [dbo].[FunctionNameUniqueidentifier]
...
Problem: duplication of code, and a lot functions
2. Cast all input to NVARCHAR(MAX)
CREATE FUNCTION [dbo].[IntToNvarchar]
(
#Key INT
)
RETURNS NVARCHAR(MAX)
AS
BEGIN
RETURN ISNULL(CAST(#Key AS NVARCHAR), '');
END
CREATE FUNCTION [dbo].[FunctionName]
(
#Key NVARCHAR(MAX)
)
RETURNS CHAR(32)
AS
BEGIN
DECLARE #something CHAR(32)
do stuff ...
RETURN #something;
END
SELECT [dbo].[FunctionName]([dbo].[IntToNvarchar](25))
Problem: less elegant code than overloading
I overload Functions all the time, but I happen to know that these kind of issues are often highly dependent on platform.
On our DB2 system, I routinely overload like the following:
CREATE Function Schema1.F1 (parm date)
returns date
return date + 1month;
CREATE Function Schema1.F1 (parm timestamp)
returns date
return date(timestamp) + 1month;
This is actually quite useful when you have multiple queries which have similar formating requirements.
The only problem I have found about this so far, is you better be sure that you want the function because the standard drop function "schema"."name" fails because it cannot determine which function to drop. If anyone knows how to drop overloaded sql functions, let me know!