I have a simple UIViewTable, with a drill-down detail realized with a UINavigationController push segue in a storyboard.
It happen from time to time, that the table view controller seems to gets deallocated, while I am in the detail view, therefore I get the famous:
[MyViewController controllerWillChangeContent:]: message sent to deallocated instance
I explain better, I have an NSOperation queue which load my data asynchronously, and fill the table as soon as it just finished. The data are correctly retrieved and the table filled.
For the detail view, I am clicking on a cell and passing the NSManagedObjectID to the destination controller in prepareForSegue method. Very randomly when I made a change to the detail view the fetched controller loose its delegate, or as it seems, the delegate itself which is the controller gets deallocated. Causing a crash.
The fetched results controller is declared as a property:
#property(nonatomic,strong) NSFetchedResultsController *fetchedResultsController;
Then this is how everything is working starting from viewDidLoad.
- (void)viewDidLoad {
[super viewDidLoad];
[self loadDataAsynchronously];
}
-(void)loadDataAsynchronously {
NSOperationQueue *queue = [NSOperationQueue new];
NSInvocationOperation *operation = [[NSInvocationOperation alloc] initWithTarget:self
selector:#selector(loadData)
object:nil];
[queue addOperation:operation];
}
-(void)loadData {
NSFetchRequest *findAllEntities = [[NSFetchRequest alloc] init];
[findAllEntities setEntity:ENTITY_DESC];
NSSortDescriptor *sort = [[NSSortDescriptor alloc] initWithKey:#"created" ascending:YES];
[findAllEntities setSortDescriptors:[NSArray arrayWithObject:sort]];
[findAllEntities setFetchBatchSize:20];
[NSFetchedResultsController deleteCacheWithName:#"MyCache"];
if(self.fetchedResultsController==nil) {
self.fetchedResultsController = [[NSFetchedResultsController alloc]
initWithFetchRequest:findAllPlants
managedObjectContext:MOC
sectionNameKeyPath:nil
cacheName:#"MyCache"];
self.fetchedResultsController.delegate=self;
}
NSError *error=nil;
if (![FRC performFetch:&error]) {
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
[self.dataTableView performSelectorOnMainThread:#selector(reloadData) withObject:nil waitUntilDone:YES];
}
this code works, and most of the time also works within the detail view which is called as a segue like this:
-(void)prepareForSegue:(UIStoryboardSegue *)segue sender:(id)sender {
IP2SegueIdentifier segueIdentifier = [IP2Factory segueSolver:[segue identifier]];
MyDestinationViewController *dvc = [segue destinationViewController];
NSIndexPath *indexPath = [TV indexPathForSelectedRow];
dvc.entityID=[[self.fetchedResultsController objectAtIndexPath: indexPath] objectID];
}
and the destination controller correctly get the entity id and reconstruct the object by asking the context.
Then, when I am in the detail view controller, I can make change to the entity, and when I go back to the navigation hierarchy I do a context save.
It is at this point that the application crashes, just right at context save. Not so often, but from time to time.
Because the fetched results controller recognize the change and submitted to its delegate which is already deallocated.
I have few doubts at this point, I am using iOS 5 and ARC so the compiler is supposed to have (almost) full control over release and dealloc methods. And I am also using a storyboard with a simple navigation hierarchy, which should guarantee that the whole previous view controllers chain gets retained.
I also run the profiler for memory leak/zombies analysis, but wasn't able to spot anything wrong, on the contrary I was happy the all the objects management were fine.
I have not many guess at this point, so please feel free to point out something I could have forgotten to check, or something you see wrong in my code.
thanks
First, a note about ARC. While ARC provides auto-zeroing weak pointers, it does not make assign pointers auto-zeroing. NSFetchResultsController uses an assign property for its delegate (see NSFetchedResultsController.h):
#property(nonatomic, assign) id< NSFetchedResultsControllerDelegate > delegate;
It is still your responsibility to clear yourself as the delegate before you deallocate. You typically do this in dealloc:
- (void)dealloc {
_fetchedResultsController.delegate = nil;
}
You may also want to get rid of your fetchedResultsController in viewWillDisappear: (including removing yourself as the delegate). Typically you do not want fetch requests to stay around when you are offscreen. (If you do, you probably should manage the fetch in a model object rather than in a view controller, since a view controller can go away anytime its view is offscreen.)
Your loadData is strange in that it creates a findAllEntities, but actually uses findAllPlants. Was this a typo or a bug? If there is a separate findAllPlants fetch request in an ivar, this could also be a cause of your problems.
Related
I'm having an issue with regards to creating a separate Controller class for an NSOutlineView I have.
I've created a new class named LTSidebarViewController and in my MainMenu.xib file I've added an Object to the 'workbench' and linked it to my LTSidebarViewController class. I've also set the delegate and datasource to be linked to the NSOutlineView in MainMenu.xib.
What I am looking to do is create an instance of this class from within - (void)applicationDidFinishLaunching:(NSNotification *)aNotification in my AppDelegate file and when I do so I want to pass in the App Delegate's managedObjectContext. So, I've created a custom init method in LTSidebarViewController which looks like so:
-(id)initWithManagedObject:(NSManagedObjectContext*)managedObject{
self = [super init];
if (self) {
self.managedObjectContext = managedObject;
NSFetchRequest *subjectsFetchReq = [[NSFetchRequest alloc]init];
[subjectsFetchReq setEntity:[NSEntityDescription entityForName:#"Subject"
inManagedObjectContext:self.managedObjectContext]];
subjectsArray = [self.managedObjectContext executeFetchRequest:subjectsFetchReq error:nil];
_topLevelItems = [NSArray arrayWithObjects:#"SUBJECTS", nil];
// The data is stored in a dictionary
_childrenDictionary = [NSMutableDictionary new];
[_childrenDictionary setObject:subjectsArray forKey:#"SUBJECTS"];
// The basic recipe for a sidebar
[_sidebarOutlineView sizeLastColumnToFit];
[_sidebarOutlineView reloadData];
[_sidebarOutlineView setFloatsGroupRows:NO];
// Set the row size of the tableview
[_sidebarOutlineView setRowSizeStyle:NSTableViewRowSizeStyleLarge];
// Expand all the root items; disable the expansion animation that normally happens
[NSAnimationContext beginGrouping];
[[NSAnimationContext currentContext] setDuration:0];
[_sidebarOutlineView expandItem:nil expandChildren:YES];
[NSAnimationContext endGrouping];
// Automatically select first row
[_sidebarOutlineView selectRowIndexes:[NSIndexSet indexSetWithIndex:1] byExtendingSelection:NO];
}
return self;
}
I also have all the required methods in this class, - (NSView *)outlineView:(NSOutlineView *)outlineView viewForTableColumn:(NSTableColumn *)tableColumn item:(id)item etc.
Inside the - (void)applicationDidFinishLaunching:(NSNotification *)aNotification method in the App Delegate, I have the following:
LTSidebarViewController *sidebarViewController = [[LTSidebarViewController alloc] initWithManagedObject:self.managedObjectContext];
My problem is that this isn't working, I don't get any errors and the app runs but no data is displayed in the NSOutlineView.
Now from what I can tell the problem is that when the MainMenu.xib file is initially loaded, it's automatically creating an instance of my LTSidebarViewController class and calling it's init method but because my init method isn't doing anything the app doesn't finish launching correctly.
Am i taking the correct approach here? In simple terms all I'm looking for is to have a separate file that is used as the datasource for my NSOutlineView.
When working with NSOutlineView I generally put in extreme amounts of logging to figure out what's going on. I would probably do something like the following (maybe you have already done some of this):
Make sure you really have data in subjectsArray by logging it, e.g.
NSLog(#"subjectsArray");
NSLog(#"%#", subjectsArray);
Make sure you have implemented the NSOutlineView Datasource protocol methods from NSOutlineView Datasource Methods in your AppDelegate.m file and that they're returning the appropriate data.
If you need help implementing these, try a tutorial such as Source Lists and NSOutlineView.
I usually wind up with NSLog statements in each of the NSOutlineView data source methods to make sure they are being called and that I understand what each is expecting and returning.
Make sure your delegate and datasource are not nil for some reason in your initWithManagedObject:(NSManagedObjectContext *)managedObject method by logging them, e.g.
NSLog(#"datasource: %#", [self datasource]);
NSLog(#"delegate: %#", [self delegate]);
If you find that for some reason they are nil, you could manually set them just to make sure that's not the problem, e.g. in initWithManagedObject:
[self setDelegate: [NSApp delegate]];
[self setDatasource: [NSApp delegate]];
As far as whether this is the "correct" approach: I'm not clear from your code whether you're intending that the sideBarController is both the delegate and the datasource or whether the AppDelegate is serving those roles. Obviously, you'll need to implement the delegate and datasource protocols in the appropriate files. You certain can have AppDelegate serve those roles, although it seems to make more sense to have your sideBarController do that.
A small note: I sometimes access AppDelegate's managedObjectContext directly from supporting files with something like
-(NSManagedObjectContext *)managedObjectContext
{
return [[NSApp delegate] managedObjectContext];
}
rather than passing the managedObjectContext in manually to every file.
Resloved!
Thanks to Lone Gunman, this issue was due to an oversight of not setting the many delegates to nil before releasing them.
This is a strange one... I'm familiar with basic memory management but I think something is unusual about what I am seeing. Here is a little background...
I have a NavigationController that handles the navigation between the following ViewControllers:
Home -> Games -> Game
When running the code it falls down when leaving the Game. Within the GameViewController there is a dealloc method that resembles:
- (void)dealloc
{
[board release];
[opponentsViewController release];
[instructionsViewController release];
[imgPicker release];
[gameView release];
[super dealloc];
}
When the navigation controller goes back to the Games list (from the Game) it throws a EXC_BAD_ACCESS. So I bring up my trusty profiler and check for Zombies. Alas, just as I expected a message is being sent to a deallocated object! Digging deeper I find there to be 3 entries in the object's history:
Board getting alloc'd (called by Game's init method)
Board getting released (called by Game's dealloc method)
Board being Zombie'd (called by Game's dealloc method)
Both calls 2 and 3 are called from UINavigationController setDisappearingViewController.
In my dealloc method I set breakpoints to each release call, when doing so - the [board release] call occurs, then the [opponentsViewController release] call occurs then the [board release] call occurs again. So I'm seeing the dealloc method does not finish completely and calls again.
What might be causing this?
Edit: This is the GameViewController Implementation
Code from the Games controller that adds this game:
-(void) gotoGame:(int)tag {
game = [[GameViewController alloc] init];
[self.navigationController pushViewController:game animated:YES];
[game release];
}
Edit: This is the GameViewController Header
I would try setting all your ivar's delegates to nil (EDIT: in dealloc). I've had a similar problem with a fetched results controller. Failed to set the its delegate to nil in dealloc and the core data stack still had a pointer to it when the view controller was released.
So that's my bet, set ivar delegates to nil in dealloc, although I can't see your header to know what protocols your are conforming to be sure.
EDIT: Explanation
Setting a delegate is actually giving the object that is doing the delegation a pointer (I believe it usually an assigned property).
#property (assign) delegate;
I'll use the problem I had as an example.
So let's say you have a view controller that has a fetchedResultsController as an ivar. When you set the FRCs delegate:
fetchedResultsController.delegate = self;
and the view controller gets released, any object that is using that pointer still thinks it's live. You would think since the FRC is getting released in dealloc as well, you'd be fine(which is why it took me 4 days to figure this out :) ), but sometimes other parts of an implementation use your delegate as well. So the fix is:
-(void)dealloc
{
self.fetchedResultsController.delegate = nil;
[_fetchedResultsController release];
[super dealloc];
}
Note: as soon as the new tools are available to everyone you won't have to worry about this stuff anymore ^ ^;
try
- (void) dealloc {
if(game != nil){
//release here
[game release];
}
[super dealloc];
}
By the way it seems you have declare game in header file and just after pushing you are releasing it and also in dealloc method you are releasing it. Either remove the release call from dealloc method or change you method like this.
-(void) gotoGame:(int)tag {
GameViewController *game = [[GameViewController alloc] init];
[self.navigationController pushViewController:game animated:YES];
[game release];
}
UPDATE
Also you are not using the tag anywhere. Why don't you create your init method like this
GameViewController *game = [[GameViewController alloc] initWithTag:tag];
[self.navigationController pushViewController:game animated:YES];
[game release];
I have a class with a viewDidLoad method and an artworkInfo method as follows:
-(void)viewDidLoad {
mainDelegate = (AppDelegate*)[[UIApplication sharedApplication]delegate];
[super viewDidLoad];
}
-(void)artworkInfo:(NSNumber *)pos{
mainDelegate = (AppDelegate*)[[UIApplication sharedApplication]delegate];
[self.image setImage:(UIImage *)[[mainDelegate.mapAnnotations objectAtIndex:0]image]];
}
the mainDelegate thing is to gain access to the appDelegate where an array is stored, but anyway, with the "[self.image setImage...]" command where it is, the image on the app does not appear, but when I copy that exact line of code into the viewDidLoad method, it shows up like it should. I know that the artworkInfo method is being called because I debugged it and it goes through, so I can't figure out why the command would not be doing anything it's current method while it will in the viewDidLoad...?
Also, here is where the method is called and this new view is loaded from another class:
infoPage *info = [[infoPage alloc] initWithNibName:#"infoPage" bundle:nil];
info.modalTransitionStyle = UIModalTransitionStyleCoverVertical;
[self presentModalViewController:info animated:YES];
infoPage *myInfoPage = [[infoPage alloc] init];
[myInfoPage artworkInfo:position];
[info release];
OH, I see the problem. You're instantiating 2 different infoPage classes.
Change this:
infoPage *info = [[infoPage alloc] initWithNibName:#"infoPage" bundle:nil];
info.modalTransitionStyle = UIModalTransitionStyleCoverVertical;
[self presentModalViewController:info animated:YES];
infoPage *myInfoPage = [[infoPage alloc] init];
[myInfoPage artworkInfo:position];
[info release];
to this:
infoPage *info = [[infoPage alloc] initWithNibName:#"infoPage" bundle:nil];
info.modalTransitionStyle = UIModalTransitionStyleCoverVertical;
[self presentModalViewController:info animated:YES];
[info artworkInfo:position];
[info release];
Ok detailed answer. In order to understand why this image is not displaying properly you have to first look at how Runloops work in Objective C.
While viewDidLoad is the method that is called when a view is loaded and it is technically also called before a view is displayed and it's view objects initialized. Since presentModalViewController is an animation there is actually some threading going on in the works.
viewDidLoad gets called before the animation is created for the presentModalView. This initializes your objects. However, due to some of the inner workings of UI Kit some processes are loaded off into a thread. When they complete they run callback methods on the main UI thread.
Since presentModalViewController is a non-blocking method your artworkInfo method gets added to the mainRunLoop before the initializer form thread adds its callback methods to the main run loop. The best approach would be to have both a UIImage property of your viewController and a UIImageView.
set the value of UIImage by calling artworkInfo BEFORE the presentModalViewController method.
in your ViewDidLoad go ahead and set the value of your UIImageView
[self.imageView setImage:self.image];
Problem solved.
This seems pretty straight forward.
So you initialize your nib and try to call your method artwork before the nib is fully loaded. <-- This is not working for you.
Then you do additional initialization by overrider viewDidLoad per the doco where the nib is loaded <-- This is working for you
So the answer is, when you call setImage before your nib is loaded, then there is nothing to set the image to. When you call setImage in viewDidLoad your nib is loaded and then things should work just fine.
I hope this explains it a bit.
I have a UIViewController residing in a UINavController. The view controller which is playing audio through AVAudioPlayer. When it get's poped, it keeps playing audio, even though in the dealloc method I released the audioplayer. I even tryed setting audioplayer to stop/pause before releasing it in dealloc, but it doesn't work.
So,
Why is it not calling dealloc when the UIViewController is popped?
What method should I use to stop the audioplayer right before/after the controller is popped.
EDIT: I don't think my view controller is being retained somehwere else. Here's my code when I allocate it and push it in nav controller:
- (void)tableView:(UITableView *)tableView didSelectRowAtIndexPath:(NSIndexPath *)indexPath {
NSString *name = [tableData objectAtIndex:[indexPath row]];
ToquesDetailVC *toqueDetail = [[ToquesDetailVC alloc] initWithNibName:#"ToquesDetail"
audioPath:[[NSBundle mainBundle] pathForResource:name ofType:#"mp4"]
imageNamed:[[NSBundle mainBundle] pathForResource:name ofType:#"jpg"]];
[[self navigationController] pushViewController:toqueDetail animated:YES];
[toqueDetail release];
}
Concerning point (2) did you try:
- (void)viewDidDisappear:(BOOL)animated
on your view controller subclass to know when it 'disappears'?
The nav controller does release the view controller but since you've retained it (with the initwithnibname call into toqueDetail), and it's autoreleased, it won't get dealloc'd until the run loop completes. You'll have to either not use the convenience intializer or explicitly clear the autorelease pool.
Are you assigning the audio player delegate, and if so, is that holding a reference to the VC? The code to the class that actually has the problem might help us solve this faster. o_O
I push a view controller into current navigation controller. It works fine, except when I am getting out of the current view controller, it crashes.
MyTableView *newPage = [[MyTableView alloc] initWithNibName:#"table2" bundle:nil];
[[self navigationController] pushViewController:newPage animated:YES];
//[newPage release];
I comment out the last line to prevent crash. I read another post about variables being over released. In the newPage, I only have one variable (arrCellText), and is initialized in the initWithNibName
NSArray *temp = [[NSArray alloc] initWithObjects:#"string1", #"string2", #"string3", nil];
[self setArrCellText: temp];
[temp release];
I put the release in the dealloc
[arrCellText release];
If I comment out setting and release of arrCellText, it works fine too.
I must not have complete understanding of memory management, and I would like to understand this better. TIA
Where does the crash happen exactly?
First you can release 'newPage' after pushing it onto the navigationController (because it's retained there).
You might try to access anything from newPage after coming back. 'newPage' was released in the mean time and thus has some garbage value (but not nil).