Im building a registration form and planning to use dojox.form.PasswordValidation to verify if the inputted passwords are the same. Is there a way to use dojox.form.PasswordValidation programatically? If i do this:
<div id="sample">
<input type="password" pwType="new" />
<input type="password" pwType="verify" />
</div>
<script>
var a = new dojox.form.PasswordValidation({}, "sample");
</script>
The above code works as expected, but I want to strip-off those "pwType" tags and create a pure HTML tags only. If I do that, where should I put "pwType"?
P.S. I'm using Dojo 1.6
Unfortunately it looks like this widget is not really up-to-date with the recent changes where dojo tries to move all the invalid html attributes into the valid data-* attributes. When looking at the postCreate method of that widget it has this code in the middle of it:
dojo.forEach(["old","new","verify"], function(i){
widgets.push(dojo.query("input[pwType=" + i + "]",
this.containerNode)[0]);
}, this);
And just afterwards it makes sure that it found the necessary inputs, otherwise it will throw an error.
So if you want to use something other than the pwType attributes, then you will probably have to overwrite the postCreate method of this widget to query something else, for example:
dojo.query("input[data-dojo-password-type=" + i + "]")
and then you can specify the values in data-dojo-password-type instead of pwType like this:
<div id="sample">
<input type="password" data-dojo-password-type="new" />
<input type="password" data-dojo-password-type="verify" />
</div>
what about something like :
var theDiv = dojo.create("div", {id: "sample"}),
theNewPass = dojo.create("input", {type: "password", pwType: "new"}, theDiv, "last"),
theVerifPass = dojo.create("input", {type: "password", pwType: "verify"}, theDiv, "last"),
a = new dojox.form.PasswordValidation({}, "sample")
;
Related
Here are the codes:
<EditForm OnValidSubmit="#SubmitText" id="inputText">
<InputText #bind-Value="_InputMsgModel.Msg" />
</EditForm>
After the program ran, it turned out to be this:
<form id="inputText">
<input class="valid">
</form>
Now I wanna add an attribute type="text" to the input element, how can I achieve this?
I tried to modify the code like this:
<EditForm OnValidSubmit="#SubmitText" id="inputText">
<input type="text" #bind-Value="_InputMsgModel.Msg" />
</EditForm>
Meanwhile, now visual studio reports an error:
I can not bind the model anymore.
I need to set the type to text for needing to set the keyboard in mobile correctly.
How can I solve this? Thank you.
What is wrong with this code:
<EditForm Model="#_InputMsgModel" OnValidSubmit="#SubmitText" id="inputText" >
<InputText #bind-Value="#_InputMsgModel.Msg" />
</EditForm>
Run this code with the above:
#code {
InputMsgModel _InputMsgModel = new InputMsgModel();
private void SubmitText()
{
Console.WriteLine(_InputMsgModel.Msg);
}
public class InputMsgModel
{
public string Msg { get; set; } = "My new message";
}
}
Do you see the text "My new message" in the text box ? I believe you do... All is well, and the two-way binding mechanism works well. Go and see now the Html...it's still <input class="valid"> which does not reflect the real state of the text box. Think about it...
Update: Of course you can use the following:
<EditForm Model="#_InputMsgModel" OnValidSubmit="#SubmitText" id="inputText" >
<input type="text" #bind-value="#_InputMsgModel.Msg" />
</EditForm>
Important: The error "The attribute names could not..." is triggered because you use capital "V" in #bind-Value. You should use lower case: #bind-value. This is because your using input 'Html element' here, and it has a value attribute, not a Value attribute. But when you use the InputText Component, the capital Value in #bind-Value refers to a Value property defined in the component.
Weird this one.
On my .NET MVC 4 project I've added a file on App_Code who contains this method:
#helper CheckBox(string name, bool isChecked = false, string className = "") {
<div class="checkboxHolder">
<input id="#name" name="#name" type="hidden" value="#isChecked") />
<i class="#className checkboxBts fa #((isChecked) ? "fa-check-square-o" : "fa-square-o")" data-checkbox-associated="#name"></i>
</div>
}
I'm using it to style checkboxes using font-awesome, so my app checkboxes are made of an input type hidden who stores a boolean value and an icon to give feedback to users.
Weird thing is, on executing when isChecked == false, the hidden returned by this method is like:
<input id="myCheckboxId" name="myCheckboxId" type="hidden" />
There is no value at all, when I try to save it to the model an exception is thrown saying that model cannot be saved.
I've fixed it changing the method to use:
<input id="#name" name="#name" type="hidden" #((isChecked) ? "value=true" : "value=false") />
Which is working fine. However, I wonder if anyone know what could be happening on the original output.
Thank you all.
It's not entirely a duplicate, but this is answered in Why is my hidden input writing: value=“value” instead of true/false?:
if you have:
<input name="somefield" type="hidden" someprop="#(SomeBooleanExpression)"/>
[and #SomeBooleanExpression] is false it is omitted completely:
<input name="somefield" type="hidden"/>
To get around this, consider .ToString()
So, use:
<input id="#name" name="#name" type="hidden" value="value="#(isChecked.ToString())" />
OK here is the deal. I have a survey that I am putting up with over 60 questions. I want to make them all mandatory. I really need to know if the group has a value, don't care what it is.
Here is what I have, but it is only giving me the first value.
<function CheckField(myFieldName, myText){
var x=document.getElementById(myFieldName).value;
window.alert(myFieldName + "1: " +x);
. . .. . .
OK so this returns the first value of 5. It does not matter what I select. All I just need to know if they selected something if not I want to mark the question with a different color so the user knows to go back and answer the question.
You can try HTML5 required:
<label><input type="radio" name="option" required /> Option 1</label>
<label><input type="radio" name="option" /> Option 2</label>
You can use it on one radio (per each name), or on all of them (see HTML5: How to use the "required" attribute with a "radio" input field).
Option 1: (EASY!)
Having the attribute "checked" set to "true" would make have a default value either way.
<input type="radio" name="option" />Option 1
<input type="radio" name="option" checked="true" />Option 2
You could also use required instead of checked attribute but some browsers don't support it like Safari.
For info on support:
required
checked
Option 2:
JSFiddle:
http://jsfiddle.net/FE7sK/2/
jQuery(function () {
jQuery('#validateOpt').bind('click', checkRadio);
})
function checkRadio() {
var isChecked = jQuery("input[type=radio]:checked").val();
var booleanVlaueIsChecked = false;
if (isChecked) {
booleanVlaueIsChecked = true;
$('#form1').submit();
} else {
alert("aaa");
}
}
NOTE: Please see edit below. Primary issue is that I did something dumb.
This question is a duplicate, but the accepted answer didn't actually address the problem, and the listed workaround didn't work for me.
My HTML looks like this:
<div class="row checkbox_row">
<div class="col-xs-1 checkbox_cell">
<input type="radio" class="answerCheckbox assessmentQuestion" name="currently_employed_select" value="yes" id="currently_employed_select_1"/>
</div>
<div class="col-xs-11">Yes</div>
</div>
<div class="row checkbox_row">
<div class="col-xs-1 checkbox_cell">
<input type="radio" class="answerCheckbox assessmentQuestion" name="currently_employed_select" value="no" id="currently_employed_select_2"/>
</div>
<div class="col-xs-11">No</div>
</div>
Neither this jQuery:
var name = $(this).attr('name');
var value = $('input[name=' + name + ']:radio:checked').val();
Nor this Javascript:
var radios = document.getElementsByTagName(name);
for(var x = 0; x < radios.length; x++){
if(radios[x].checked){
return radios[x].value;
}
}
... are getting a value out of the radio button.
Is there something obvious and stupid I'm overlooking here? Is there some Bootstrap formatting that's mandatory when using radio buttons?
EDIT: I've figured out what piece of code is killing me, and it has bugger-all to do with Bootstrap.
This:
$(document).ready(function() {
$('.answerCheckbox').val(function() {
highlightCheckedRow(this);
});
... is meant to highlight the container rows of any checked boxes (including radio buttons) on page load. Which it does, admirably, but apparently at the expense of nuking the values of said radio buttons.
... which, given that val() overwrites the value when you give it a parameter, should not come as a surprise to me.
That'll teach me to do cargo cult programming.
Right, so, need to figure out some other way to run that function on all my answerCheckbox elements on page load, and I'm all set.
I am trying to make a Google custom search (I just need some sort of search engine on my site), and I need to make it so that I can use my own search box (input field). I need it to be of exact size. I also need to be able to make my own button to search. I am going to need to be able to change the size and background of the search button. I am not completely sure yet, but I might actually need it to be a regular img.
Does anyone know how to do this?
If you cannot do this with Google, do you know of another way to do it?
If there is no other way besides using your own search engine, can I please get a link to a very simplified tutorial on how to make my own. I am willing to put in the extra work to learn, but I tried a bit, and after looking at three different tuts, I gave up because they were very very long and confusing. I hope I was just looking in the wrong places.
Here is the one I am using, you just need to add some styles to <input id='q' which is the search box, and <input value='MyButton' is the button to click
<!-- Google CSE Search Box Begins -->
<center>
<form id="searchbox_XXXXXXXXXX:YYYYYYYYY" action="http://myblog">
<input value="XXXXXXXXXX:YYYYYYYYY" name="cx" type="hidden"/>
<input value="FORID:11" name="cof" type="hidden"/>
<input id="q" style="width:600px;" name="q" size="75" type="text"/>
<input value="MyButton" name="sa" type="submit"/>
</form>
</center>
....
Edit: Above is my answer from 2010, I cannot confirm it is working or not anymore, but here is the one working.
<div id="cse" style="width: 100%;">Loading</div>
<script src="http://www.google.com/jsapi" type="text/javascript"></script>
<script type="text/javascript">
google.load('search', '1', {language : 'en'});
google.setOnLoadCallback(function() {
var customSearchControl = new google.search.CustomSearchControl('XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX:YYYYYYYYYYYYYY');
customSearchControl.setResultSetSize(google.search.Search.FILTERED_CSE_RESULTSET);
var options = new google.search.DrawOptions();
options.setAutoComplete(true);
customSearchControl.draw('cse', options);
}, true);
</script>
For more info: refer to https://developers.google.com/custom-search/docs/js/cselement-devguide
For Googlers who are looking for a solution with new "Overlay Results" option under "Look and Feel" . I used YOU's answer and added some minor hacks to make it work. Basic idea is get the code Google gives you, hide Google's search box and button, and use YOU's answer with the proper XXXXX:YYYY codes. While hiding <gcse:search></gcse:search>" do not use display:none otherwise search results will not work.
<script>
(function() {
var cx = 'XXXXXXXXXX:YYYYYYYYY';
var gcse = document.createElement('script'); gcse.type = 'text/javascript'; gcse.async = true;
gcse.src = (document.location.protocol == 'https:' ? 'https:' : 'http:') + '//www.google.com/cse/cse.js?cx=' + cx;
var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(gcse, s);
})();
</script>
<div style="width:0px;overflow:hidden;height:0px;"> <!-- if you use display:none here, it doesn't work-->
<gcse:search></gcse:search>
</div>
<form id="searchbox_XXXXXXXXXX:YYYYYYYYY" action="">
<input value="XXXXXXXXXX:YYYYYYYYY" name="cx" type="hidden"/>
<input value="FORID:11" name="cof" type="hidden"/>
<input id="q" style="" name="q" size="75" type="text"/>
<button class="btn">Search</button>
</form>
ge stackoverflow,
the issue really got me fired-up enough to do a mini walk-through - if you are trying to set up a v2 bar, dealing with the flat spyglass, just want to get the spyglass to work, want to replace the custom bar altogether using v2, finding and locating the styles used and overriding them. Hope it helps! http://t.co/9nvx2l0DeD #eb_p1
long address: http://eburnett.hubpages.com/hub/googlecustomsearchenginev2