I'm trying to use the beta open graph API to publish about a user playing songs in my app. Besides the "normal" Open Graph docs, I found these:
https://developers.facebook.com/docs/opengraph/music/
Unfortunately I am not able to add generic actions like 'music.listens' or generic objects like 'music.song' to my app in the dev app. In order to get the publish_actions permission, however, I seem to be obliged to add at least an action, an object and a preview aggregation. If I don't, the auth dialog won't ask for the publish_actions permission.
When I do all this, I am able to get the publish_actions permission, but still I cannot publish a user listening to a song.
I get a 500 error 'OAuth "Facebook Platform" "unknown_error" "An unknown error has occurred."' when I try to publish by POSTing a request to this url:
https://graph.facebook.com/me/music.listens?song=http://open.spotify.com/track/34uKquOrQLgzBsUbFTkMTc&access_token=[...]
Is the publish_action permission bound to actions and objects that I have created within the namespace of my app? If so, how should I go about when I want to perform generic actions on generic objects? Or could this just be that I cannot use the spotify song for testing?
Hope someone can help.
Erwin
The built in music actions and objects are currently only available to the music launch partners.
In the meantime, please create your own custom song objects and listen actions.
publish_actions is the permissions used for all publishing of actions, custom and built-in.
Related
I am trying to integrate ms teams API to my project. I have created an app in the Azure portal.I have added permissions User.ReadWriteAll and Meetings.ReadWriteAll.I can create a user through API but I am not able to create a meeting. Is there anything else I need to do for creating a meeting using API.
UPDATE
I gave delegated permission for creating the meeting,but unable to create the meeting.
Error Message
{code:"Forbidden",message:"Forbidden",innerError:{"request-id":"e1abb815-09d3-4b78-5063-39b0236c0968","Date":"2020-06-09T04:14:39"}}
Permissions
Screenshot of permission
You should check what kind of permissions are added for your app. To be able to create a meeting, only delegated permission OnlineMeetings.ReadWrite is supported - https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/graph/api/application-post-onlinemeetings?view=graph-rest-1.0&tabs=http#permissions
If you have added an application permission, then the request for creating meetings won't work.
Update:
In the beta version of the MS Graph API, there is an OnlineMeetings.ReadWrite.All application permission which doesn't seem to be implemented yet. There is a note on the documentation page (https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/graph/api/application-post-onlinemeetings?view=graph-rest-beta&tabs=http#permissions) that supports this.
Creating an online meeting with an application token will be supported
in the near future.
It depends on whether there is user interaction.
If you are get access on behalf of a userhere,follow this way app-user,just add delegated permission OnlineMeetings.ReadWrite.please check
If you get access without a userhere,follow this way app-only,just add application permission OnlineMeetings.ReadWrite.All.(Please note that this method can only use beta version https://graph.microsot.com/beta).please check beta version
Update:
I've implemented an application using Moqui Framework. I provided url:http://localhost:8080/fvl-plus-runtime/rest/s1/example/examples
It is getting error like:
User [null] is not authorized for View on AT_REST_PATH [/example/loginexamples/{username}]
You can add ArtifactAuthz records for all users, like the ones already in place for admin users for the REST APIs. In general it is best to secure all API access, and that is how things are setup by default. There are various examples you can follow to see them in action, see the extensive comments in the rest.xml file (the XML Screen for the /rest path).
This feature as been added in commit #44272ba. You are now able to create a new REST service and set require-authentication=anonymous-view or anonymous-all.
See How to create a publicly accessible REST API in Moqui for more details.
I'm trying to apply Social Service 2.1.3 to my app (play framework). I have hard time with find method implementation. Right now (in save) method (after user login) i'm putting user Identity obj. to play cache (to avoid overusege of rest api that i'm useing). But it dose not work in the way I wont to.
When user logout from google account my app miss this event, user can still operate and manipulate with data. How can i get to information about current status of user login/logout. I thought about event listener or AuthenticatorStore but cant find any examples how to use it.
best regards
Andrew
SecureSocial can't detect if a user logs out from an external service such as Google or Facebook.
When a user logs into your app SecureSocial will ask the external service to perform authentication. If successful the module will create an Authenticator to track that authenticated session.
The event listener works for actions done against SecureSocial itself, not the external providers.
I'm developing a JIRA Client using the SOAP API and I want to check in advance what features the user will have available.
For example I don't want to show a button to comment on an issue if the user doesn't have Add Comments RemotePermission.
I tried with getAllPermissions method, but it seems it gets all permissions int the application, not the ones that the user has.
Not easy. There is a method for checking comment permission in 4.4 but not for all permissions in general, IIRC.
http://docs.atlassian.com/rpc-jira-plugin/4.4/com/atlassian/jira/rpc/soap/JiraSoapService.html#hasPermissionToEditComment(java.lang.String, com.atlassian.jira.rpc.soap.beans.RemoteComment)
Better to go with REST if you can.
I am designing a twitter iPhone app for my school. I wanted to moderate the users who can access the school account. In simple terms i do not want to use the original twitter server but make it local to only few users. Simply lets say a twitter for class. This will be running on our server and only few people can access it. I am very cofused about this any open sugeestions would help me.
Please help
Simplest way - twitter allows "protected profiles", where only users you are following can see your updates.. This is basically a whitelist of people who can see your statuses..
If you wish to allow multiple users to post from the same account, without hardcoding the twitter account into the application.. you could create your own API, essentially just a proxy for the twitter API..
You could then add your own level of authentication over this, so each user would have their own account (and you don't give out the shared account's login details)
In pseudo code, the application would be something like..
if request['username'] not in ['bob', 'alice']:
raise AuthError
if request['password'] != ['theuserspassword']:
raise AuthError
twitter_api = TwitterLibrary.login("sharedaccount", "secretpassword")
switch request['api_method']:
case "getPublicTimeline":
return twitter_api.getPublicTimeline()
case "postStatus":
return twitter_api.postStatus(request['something'])
Final option I can think of - you could run your own Twitter-like site.. There are plenty of "twitter clones", such as status.net (which is the code that runs identi.ca)
status.net and several other similar projects have Twitter-compatible API's, so you could quite easily take an open-source client (NatsuLiphone for example), and, with permission, rebrand and modify it to use the URL of your own site.
I'm not exactly sure what you mean by "not want to use the original twitter server". If you only want a few people to see the updates from that classes twitter account you could protect the updates and only allow students to follow the account.
However, this should help you create/customize your own twitter iPhone application. This is a link to Stanford's CS-193P course on Cocoa Development. The assignments in the class are creating and customizing a twitter client. All of the project files are available online.
http://www.stanford.edu/class/cs193p/cgi-bin/index.php
I hope this helps.
Create a regular twitter app that requires credentials, don't hard code the credentials in the app. Problem solved. Anybody could get the app on their phone, but only people previously authenticated on twitter would be able to actually use it. If you want to use Oauth you have do this anyway.