Does Microsoft provide a web hosting solution similar to Cpanel/Whm in linux?
what i really want is to build a powerful server where i give my org developer a cpanel-like tool to manage their sites instead of giving them vps or direct access to the server.
You're in luck Enkompass by cPanel.
Enkompass is now free
http://www.cpanel.net/2011/10/cpanel-to-offer-enkompass-for-free.html
For Linux servers cPanel is the best but on windows Plesk is the best option http://www.parallels.com/products/plesk/
Related
I want to ask if I can use NAS to store the main database like for example Firebird or MySQL and access this database from network ? if so how to install the database server software ?
Sure!
What's your nas model?
For example in my Synology i can enable web server and install mysql + phpmyadmin just in few clicks.
I just need to access in the admin panel and using the PacketManager start installing the software.
I'm sure it's possible to do the same with Qnap.
A "NAS" is simply Network Attached Storage. A personal example is the Western Digital My Cloud. You can use it to host the data files themselves, but no software can be installed.
There are networked solutions that are basically mini servers. They have slimmed down versions of a Linux build that run web servers, database servers and the like. I do not have any examples to provide since I do not have the need for one, but I know they are out there from prior research.
To learn about what a NAS is, you can check out the Wikipedia article.
NAS is basically just storage, it doesn't really run a useful OS. You need a server to host MySQL or similar DB. You can install MySQL on a Windows, Mac or Linux OS, the DB file(s) would reside on those machines and the MySQL services would respond to API requests appropriately. Here are some links to installing MySQL:
Windows - http://www.iis.net/learn/application-frameworks/install-and-configure-php-on-iis/install-and-configure-mysql-for-php-applications-on-iis-7-and-above
Linux - https://www.digitalocean.com/community/tutorials/how-to-install-linux-apache-mysql-php-lamp-stack-on-ubuntu
As the title suggests, I'm trying to install Trac as a Windows Service on Windows Server 2008. I've looked into the instructions at Installing Trac as a Windows Service. Out of the different options given there, I would prefer an Option 1 like approach which uses some Windows utilities instead of installing additional software but the instructions seem a bit outdated for Windows Server 2008 as instsrv.exe and srvany.exe are not available for Server 2008. There is a suggestion to use winserv.exe but I can't find it anywhere and the suggested Google search does not provide any credible results.
Is there a way to use the sc Windows utility to install Trac as a service? Has anyone tried this?
Update: I tried using sc but that does not work. sc only interacts with programs developed as Windows Service Applications so they have hooks to interact with sc.
I could solve this problem using winserv.exe, that can be downloaded from this tutorial page: http://wiki.go-redrock.com/wiki/TechAsService
Once you get the binary file run:
"C:\path\to\winserv.exe" install tracd -displayname "tracd" -start auto "C:\path\to\python.exe" c:\path\to\python\scripts\tracd-script.py <your tracd parameters>
net start tracd
Hope you can solve your problem like I did!
If you just want to easily install Trac on a Windows server, I can recommend Bitnami Trac Stack to you. It comes as 2 services, one for Apache web server running Trac as python module and one for SVN.
Are you restricted to using tracd to host your Trac installation? If you use a real web server, this is typically a bit easier. Web servers like IIS and Apache typically install themselves as a service. If you set up something other than tracd to serve up your Trac site, it will most likely run as a service by default. In general, you'll have a better experience using a full-featured web server like Apache instead of the minimalistic tracd.
does anyone know if this can be done? I can find Windows Server 2003 but not 2008.
I read you can create your own EC2 Virtual machines, but I haven't found any articles that say you can do this with Windows Server 2008.
I'm really after IIS7, but I'd also intend to use SQL Server Express 2008 until such time as I can add support for SimpleDB or maybe fire up a seperate SQL Server instance.
I also have some Windows Services which run. Which puts shared hosting out the window mostly. Yes there's Azure but I think that would involve more effort than I want to spend initially.
Any help much appreciated,
My current stack is
Windows Server 2008
IIS7
.Net 3.5 SP1
Asp.net MVC
Some Windows Services
Linq2Sql
SQL Server Express 2008
You can now!
Amazon revealed Windows Server 2008 availability in december 2009 and there are pre-build AMIs ready for use either with or without Sql Server 2008.
See their Windows information page for more info about pricing and such. The Windows & .NET Developer Center is also a useful resource.
Amazon EC2 does not currently support any Windows besides Windows 2003.
Have you tried hosting.com's cloud? http://hosting.com/cloudhosting/enterprise/
Yes you can!
Using either QEmu or VirtualBox on top of a bare-bone linux server
as for the QEmu option you may start here.
Guides for VirtualBox are available everywhere, simply Google for them
I am considering switching to a co-located solution running a DNN (DotNetNuke) installation and an email server that mostly just does alias forwarding. I think I can get DNS services outside of this colocation box - but that could be an issue.
I am running this website for a non-profit group and trying to stay inexpensive. Will Windows Server 2008 Web Edition be acceptable for running all of this? My research so far says it will but I am looking for anyone with any experience running web edition and what sort of pitfalls does it have?
I was going to install SQL express as the backend for the DNN site. Indications are that you can't connect to SQL from outside the Web Edition box. Does this include SQL Management studio?
Any assistance or advice on this would be appreciated.
Update:
Still looking for any specifics with Windows Server 2008 Web Edition
We tried running DNN on Windows 2008 64-bit and 32-bit a while back. Not a great experience with intermittant failures and application hangs. We had to revert back to Windows 2003.
This was on a moderately loaded site. If you want to give them any sort of guaranteed uptime/availability I would recommend Windows 2003.
I'm currently looking for a webhost that offers Windows 2008 virtual or dedicated hosting for my ASP.NET app. On dedicated hosting you pay a monthly fee for Windows, I noticed there's a noticeable difference in cost between the web edition and the standard edition, so, my question is:
Does the standard edition come with MS Exchange? If so, is there any reliable equivalent in the web edition?
Thanks
No version of Windows Server 2008 OS (Web, Standard, Enterprise) comes with Exchange. They all have basic outgoing smtp capabilities but if your want imap, pop3, or webmail you need to look for a 3rd party product.
A popular free mail server is SmarterMail
As far as I know the web edition is only for hosting web sites. It does not include any mail server like exchange. It should have an smtp server and should be able to accept mail, but nothing like Exchange.
It might be possible to install a mail server on web edition, but I don't have enough knowledge to know for sure.
In past versions you could not install sql server on the web edition. I am not sure if that has changed.
Another good free email server is hMailServer. I've been using it, and its greylisting feature has really cut down on spam. However, I don't know if this will run on the web edition of Windows Server.
I just read on the SmartTools forum that SmarterMail will run on the web edition.
Does anything know the purpose of getting the Standard Edition of Server 2008 over the Web Edition? I am hosting ASP.NET websites with MySQL 5, SmarterMail and SmarterStats, and need 4 GB min of memory. Will the Web Edition work for this? Just want to make sure it doesn't block ports or anything. I read on another site that they don't allow you to run a mail server on the web edition. The price difference between the two is huge.