I am trying to fix a randomly occurring crash in a iOS app (EXC_BAD_ACCESS (SIGSEGV) KERN_INVALID_ADDRESS at 0xe104019e). The application performs many operations at the same time - loading data with NSURLConnection, redrawing a complex layout with many nested UIViews, drawing UIImages, caching downloaded files on the local disk, finding out files availability in local cache etc. etc. These operations are distributed into a number of threads and when the crash takes place I am totally confused what exact steps preceded it.
I would like to use a method to track the call stacks in the order of occurrence distributed into threads and see what objects methods were called during last 1-5ms before the crash, then I could isolate the bug that produces the crash.
At first sight the Time Profiler in Instruments offers this kind of tracking ability with many details but sampled call stacks seem to be presented in a random order - or maybe I get it wrong...
Is there a method that would tell me what exactly happens in the order of execution with ?
1) Run with zombies enabled, and removed all compiler and static analyzer warnings.
2) It is likely a threading issue, where you are not protecting your shared data appropriately.
Instruments is quite powerful regarding thread sorting/filtering, but there is no exact template for what you are trying to accomplish.
If you can reduce the problem to a small collection of object types, then you can follow execution based on the reference counts if you add the allocations instrument and enable reference count recording.
Related
I am currently working on an embedded firmware development which uses FreeRTOS running on an STM32F777II microcontroller. Resource wise, I have around 10 tasks (total sum of stack size will be under 40 KByte) at the same priority, around 4 queues of 1KByte each, 4 binary semaphores. I know this would be an incomplete question without posting the actual code, but I really do not have any specific portion in my firmware that I think will be worth sharing related to my issue. I have a ton of business logic in my code which I cannot fully share as well.
I have a struct which consists of multiple char and int arrays of a specific length. 4 of the tasks uses these structures each. Each structure consumes around 15KByte of space and is defined in the global space of the FreeRTOS environment, not local to a task. The structs are allocated statically only and not dynamically on runtime. And since I initialize few members of the struct when declaring, so they go to the .data section only if I am not mistaken. Until now, there had been absolutely no problem whatsoever in my code and it worked 100% without any issue at all. Now I recently had a requirement where I had to add the same stuct to 2 more tasks. So, I added this 15KByte stuct to one of my tasks, basically just allocated and initialized and did not do any processing in any of the tasks. Observed no problems, nothing, no data corruption, nothing. Now when I allocated one more struct variable of the same type only, what I observe is data corruption in a lot of other places in my project. Some of the queues stopped working correctly and showed garbage data when read. Some of the other buffers also showed data corruption. I am really not sure why just one more variable allocation of this struct is triggering a lot of data corruption at other places in my project. If I remove this one allocation, everything goes back to normal. My MCU has 512KB of RAM and as per the IDE's build analyzer feature, it showed below 40% RAM usage, so what is triggering this issue, any suggestions to try? Could be because of some overlapping of .data or .bss sections or something? I did not observe any stack overflows or hard faults in the system during this.
For a quick resolution,
I randomly just disabled the D-cache by commenting out the function:
SCB_EnableDCache();
and voila, everything started to function correctly as it should without any instances of data corruption.
For long run and correct resolution:
Looks like there are some latent issues with my coding. I need to review the memory use, and regions of memory with different properties. Look at the buses, review any DMA usage, and MPU memory settings. Also, review the correct usage of volatile memory directives, thread-safe operation, and cache-coherency issues. Also, Use memory fencing and cache flushing as appropriate.
More details: Level 1 cache on STM32F7 Series and STM32H7 Series
I'm working on a Mac app. Initially monitoring Xcode's memory report while I ran my app showed showed the memory was just ramping up crazy. I used Instruments and profiled my app for allocations and leaks. Turned out there wasn't much leaked memory as you would expect due to strong reference cycles etc. However there was a lot of abandoned memory. By following the stack trace that lead to my code I have fixed by 70% using autorelease pools etc. Still the remaining 30% of abandoned memory seems to point system calls.
Now I have two questions based on that I have two questions
1) I want to fix the remaining 30%. How can I get rid of abandoned memory? I have already used Instruments and know exactly where those system calls are spawned but still dont know what to do to have that memory be cleaned up. (using ARC no manual retain/ release and autorelease doesn't seem to make a diff.)
2) After I know whatever my application was doing has completed and there is no need for any memory to be there (just like the application first started) I want to get rid of all memory that my app has used up. This I plan to use as a brute force approach to clean up all memory just like the system would if the user closes the app or turns off the system.
Basically if I know where my apps memory is in the file system I'll just programmatically call purge command on that or something similar. Because at this point I'm 100% sure nothing needs to be in memory for the app except for the first screen that you would expect the first time you launch the app.
I read this, this, this and this but they weren't helpful.
I'm working on a cocoa app that receives and stores large amount data into core data ( > 500K objects with many reverse relationships). The app has to constantly run in cycles. The problem i encounter is after each cycle the allocated memory is growing by 20-40 megabytes (as indicated by xcode; of course, same tendency showed by activity monitor).
What i have so far:
wrapped methods that insert objects into context in autorelease pools;
reset context, undoManager nil, stalenessInterval 0;
recreate persistent store coordinator on cycle completion (remove-add the store);
many hours of profiling, but could not find leak causes
Thought i'll appreciate advices if this list of actions can be improved, my main question is how should i deal with system memory, which my app will eventually eat up. Because it's possible i wont be able to optimize my code any more. I must not allow the app to crash due to not enough memory; so the way i deal with it now is i relaunch the app if its memory allocation reaches some hardcoded value (lets say, 1 GB).
I don't like this solution, so hopefully someone can advice me on appropriate way to handle this. Or on ways experienced people handle such situations. Thanks
UPDATE
Adding snapshots from instruments and xcode's memory debug gauge when first cycle has finished.
I recently I came across an error that I cannot understand. The game I'm developing using Cocos2D just freezes at a certain random point -- it gets a SIGSTOP -- and I cannot find the reason. What tool can I use (and how do I use it) to find out where the error occurs and what's causing it?
Jeremy's suggestion to stop in the debugger is a good one.
There's a really quick way to investigate a freeze (or any performance issue), especially when it's not easy to reproduce. You have to have a terminal handy (so you'll need to be running in the iOS simulator or on Mac OS X, not on an iOS device).
When the hang occurs pop over to a terminal and run:
sample YourProgramName
(If there are spaces in your program name wrap that in quotes like sample "My Awesome Game".) The output of sample is a log showing where your program is spending time, and if your program is actually hung, it will be pretty obvious which functions are stuck.
I disagree with Aaron Golden's answer above as running on a device is extremely useful in order to have a real-case scenario of where the app freezes. The simulator has more memory and does not reproduce the hardware of the device in an accurate way (for example, the frame rate is in certain cases lower).
"Obviously", you need to connect your device (with a developer profile) on Xcode and look at the console terminal to look for traces that user #AaronGolden suggested.
If those are not enough you might want to enable a general exception breakpoint in Xcode to capture more of the stacktrace messages.
When I started learning Cocos2D my app often frooze. This is a list of common causes:
I wasn't using sprite sheets and hence the frame rate was dropping drammatically
I was using too much memory (too many high-definition sprites. Have a look at TexturePacker and use pvr.ccz or pvr.gz format; it cuts memory allocation in half)
Use instruments to profile your app for memory warnings (for example, look at allocation instruments and look for memory warnings).
I'm having strange effects with my app. I implemented my own PDF viewer. It shows ONE page at a time. Using Instruments Activity Monitor I see that my real memory is constantly at around 50MB.
After switching pages forth and back a couple of times I receive a memory warning level 0.
I do my best to react on it and sacrifice the low-res background image I'm rendering first to show something until CATiledLayer catches up.
Does not help. A few pages later I get memory warning level 1 and level 2 and after a few more pages my app gets killed with reason "9". Memory NEVER goes above 50MB!
Why do I get those warnings in the first place? There IS enough memory available.
This is happening on on iPad running iOS 4.3.
I don't think there's anything mysterious going on here -- which I'm sure is not what you wanted to hear. There are no absolute figures of "safe" amounts of memory to use. The rule is: when the OS tells you you're using too much, use less. It will jettison background processes first and in preference to your foreground app but there are still limits.
In the "olden days," you used to be lucky to get 20Mb. I'm sure you can safely get more than that on an iPad but, apparently, it's less than 50Mb.
You don't say how much memory you free by releasing the background image, but it seems that you need to be caching less data. You might also want to check Leaks (also in Instruments) to make sure you're releasing the objects you think you are.