Hi,
We have a winform application that is only to be executed as a singelton, If a second instance try to start this new instance will connect to the current and transmit parameters over namedpipes.
The problem is that when starting the first instance there will be a try to connect to existing host. If the host is not existing(like in this case) an exception will be thrown. There is no problem to handle this exception but our developers is often using "Break on Exception" and that means that every time we startup the application the developer will get two(in this case) breaks about exception. Thay will have to hit F5 twice for every start.
Is there any way to check if the service is available without throw exception if its not?
BestRegards
Edit1:
[DllImport("kernel32.dll", SetLastError = true)]
[return: MarshalAs(UnmanagedType.Bool)]
static extern bool CloseHandle(IntPtr hObject);
[DllImport("kernel32.dll", SetLastError = true)]
static extern IntPtr OpenFileMapping(uint dwDesiredAccess, bool bInheritHandle, string lpName);
The following code says : Error 152 Cannot implicitly convert type 'System.IntPtr' to 'Orbit.Client.Main.Classes.Controllers.MyClientController.SafeFileMappingHandle'
using (SafeFileMappingHandle fileMappingHandle
= OpenFileMapping(FILE_MAP_READ, false, sharedMemoryName))
{
If there is already a WCF server listening on the named pipe endpoint, there will be a shared memory object created, via which the server publishes the actual name of the pipe. See here for details of this.
You can check for the existence of this shared memory object with code something like the following, which will not throw, just return false, if there is no server running already. (I've extracted this from code I already have working, and then edited it to do what you want - but without testing the edited version, so apologies if you have to fix up assembly/namespace refs etc to get it running.)
public static class ServiceInstanceChecker
{
public static bool DoesAServerExistAlready(string hostName, string path)
{
return IsNetNamedPipeSharedMemoryMetaDataPublished(DeriveSharedMemoryName(hostName, path));
}
private static string DeriveSharedMemoryName(string hostName, string path)
{
StringBuilder builder = new StringBuilder();
builder.Append(Uri.UriSchemeNetPipe);
builder.Append("://");
builder.Append(hostName.ToUpperInvariant());
builder.Append(path);
byte[] uriBytes = Encoding.UTF8.GetBytes(builder.ToString());
string encodedNameRoot;
if (uriBytes.Length >= 0x80)
{
using (HashAlgorithm algorithm = new SHA1Managed())
{
encodedNameRoot = ":H" + Convert.ToBase64String(algorithm.ComputeHash(uriBytes));
}
}
else
{
encodedNameRoot = ":E" + Convert.ToBase64String(uriBytes);
}
return Uri.UriSchemeNetPipe + encodedNameRoot;
}
private static bool IsNetNamePipeSharedMemoryMetaDataPublished(string sharedMemoryName)
{
const uint FILE_MAP_READ = 0x00000004;
const int ERROR_FILE_NOT_FOUND = 2;
using (SafeFileMappingHandle fileMappingHandle
= OpenFileMapping(FILE_MAP_READ, false, sharedMemoryName))
{
if (fileMappingHandle.IsInvalid)
{
int errorCode = Marshal.GetLastWin32Error();
if (ERROR_FILE_NOT_FOUND == errorCode) return false;
throw new Win32Exception(errorCode); // The name matched, but something went wrong opening it
}
return true;
}
}
private class SafeFileMappingHandle : SafeHandleZeroOrMinusOneIsInvalid
{
public SafeFileMappingHandle() : base(true) { }
public SafeFileMappingHandle(IntPtr handle) : base(true) { base.SetHandle(handle); }
protected override bool ReleaseHandle()
{
return CloseHandle(base.handle);
}
}
}
The host name and path you pass in are derived from the WCF service url. Hostname is either a specific hostname (e.g. localhost) or +, or *, depending on the setting for HostNameComparisonMode.
EDIT: You'll also need a couple of P/Invoke declarations for the Win API functions:
[DllImport("kernel32.dll", SetLastError = true)]
static extern bool CloseHandle(IntPtr hObject);
[DllImport("kernel32.dll", SetLastError = true)]
static extern SafeFileMappingHandle OpenFileMapping(
uint dwDesiredAccess,
bool inheritHandle,
string name
);
EDIT2: We need to tweak the return value of DeriveSharedMemoryName to specify the Local kernel namespace, assuming that your application is not run with elevated privileges. Change the last line of this function to read:
return #"Local\" + Uri.UriSchemeNetPipe + encodedNameRoot;
You also need to specify the hostname parameter correctly to match the hostNameComparisonMode setting used in your binding. As far as I recall, this defaults to StrongWildcard matching in the NetNamedPipeBinding, so you probably need to pass in "+" rather than "localhost".
Can you try to list the named pipes available using
String[] listOfPipes = System.IO.Directory.GetFiles(#"\.\pipe\");
and then determine is your named pipe is amongst them?
My solution is the following :
if (Debugger.IsAttached)
return true;
This will make sure that the code for checking the service is never runned during debugging.
BestRegards
Related
I'm making a basic IntelliJ plugin that lets a user define Run Configuration (following the tutorial at [1]), and use said Run Configurations to execute the file open in the editor on a remote server.
My Run Configuration is simple (3 text fields), and I have it all working, however, after editing the Run Configuration, and click "Apply" or "OK" after changing values, the entered values are lost.
What is the correct way to persist and read-back values (both when the Run Configuration is re-opened as well as when the Run Configuration's Runner invoked)? It looks like I could try to create a custom persistence using [2], however, it seems like the Plugin framework should have a way to handle this already or at least hooks for when Apply/OK is pressed.
[1] https://www.jetbrains.org/intellij/sdk/docs/tutorials/run_configurations.html
[2] https://www.jetbrains.org/intellij/sdk/docs/basics/persisting_state_of_components.html
Hopefully, this post is a bit more clear to those new to IntelliJ plugin development and illustrates how persisting/loading Run Configurations can be achieved. Please read through the code comments as this is where much of the explanation takes place.
Also now that SettingsEditorImpl is my custom implementation of the SettingsEditor abstract class, and likewise, RunConfigurationImpl is my custom implementation of the RunConfigiration abstract class.
The first thing to do is to expose the form fields via custom getters on your SettingsEditorImpl (ie. getHost())
public class SettingsEditorImpl extends SettingsEditor<RunConfigurationImpl> {
private JPanel configurationPanel; // This is the outer-most JPanel
private JTextField hostJTextField;
public SettingsEditorImpl() {
super();
}
#NotNull
#Override
protected JComponent createEditor() {
return configurationPanel;
}
/* Gets the Form fields value */
private String getHost() {
return hostJTextField.getText();
}
/* Copy value FROM your custom runConfiguration back INTO the Form UI; This is to load previously saved values into the Form when it's opened. */
#Override
protected void resetEditorFrom(RunConfigurationImpl runConfiguration) {
hostJTextField.setText(StringUtils.defaultIfBlank(runConfiguration.getHost(), RUN_CONFIGURATION_HOST_DEFAULT));
}
/* Sync the value from the Form UI INTO the RunConfiguration which is what the rest of your code will interact with. This requires a way to set this value on your custom RunConfiguration, ie. RunConfigurationImpl##setHost(host) */
#Override
protected void applyEditorTo(RunConfigurationImpl runConfiguration) throws ConfigurationException {
runConfiguration.setHost(getHost());
}
}
So now, the custom SettingsEditor, which backs the Form UI, is set up to Sync field values In and Out of itself. Remember, the custom RunConfiguration is what is going to actually represent this configuration; the SettingsEditor implementation just represents the FORM (a subtle difference, but important).
Now we need a custom RunConfiguration ...
/* Annotate the class with #State and #Storage, which is used to define how this RunConfiguration's data will be persisted/loaded. */
#State(
name = Constants.PLUGIN_NAME,
storages = {#Storage(Constants.PLUGIN_NAME + "__run-configuration.xml")}
)
public class RunConfigurationImpl extends RunConfigurationBase {
// Its good to 'namespace' keys to your component;
public static final String KEY_HOST = Constants.PLUGIN_NAME + ".host";
private String host;
public RunConfigurationImpl(Project project, ConfigurationFactory factory, String name) {
super(project, factory, name);
}
/* Return an instances of the custom SettingsEditor ... see class defined above */
#NotNull
#Override
public SettingsEditor<? extends RunConfiguration> getConfigurationEditor() {
return new SettingsEditorImpl();
}
/* Return null, else we'll get a Startup/Connection tab in our Run Configuration UI in IntelliJ */
#Nullable
#Override
public SettingsEditor<ConfigurationPerRunnerSettings> getRunnerSettingsEditor(ProgramRunner runner) {
return null;
}
/* This is a pretty cool method. Every time SettingsEditor#applyEditorTo() is changed the values in this class, this method is run and can check/validate any fields! If RuntimeConfigurationException is thrown, the exceptions message is shown at the bottom of the Run Configuration UI in IntelliJ! */
#Override
public void checkConfiguration() throws RuntimeConfigurationException {
if (!StringUtils.startsWithAny(getHost(), "http://", "https://")) {
throw new RuntimeConfigurationException("Invalid host");
}
}
#Nullable
#Override
public RunProfileState getState(#NotNull Executor executor, #NotNull ExecutionEnvironment executionEnvironment) throws ExecutionException {
return null;
}
/* This READS any prior persisted configuration from the State/Storage defined by this classes annotations ... see above.
You must manually read and populate the fields using JDOMExternalizerUtil.readField(..).
This method is invoked at the "right time" by the plugin framework. You dont need to call this.
*/
#Override
public void readExternal(Element element) throws InvalidDataException {
super.readExternal(element);
host = JDOMExternalizerUtil.readField(element, KEY_HOST);
}
/* This WRITES/persists configurations TO the State/Storage defined by this classes annotations ... see above.
You must manually read and populate the fields using JDOMExternalizerUtil.writeField(..).
This method is invoked at the "right time" by the plugin framework. You dont need to call this.
*/
#Override
public void writeExternal(Element element) throws WriteExternalException {
super.writeExternal(element);
JDOMExternalizerUtil.writeField(element, KEY_HOST, host);
}
/* This method is what's used by the rest of the plugin code to access the configured 'host' value. The host field (variable) is written by
1. when writeExternal(..) loads a value from a persisted config.
2. when SettingsEditor#applyEditorTo(..) is called when the Form itself changes.
*/
public String getHost() {
return host;
}
/* This method sets the value, and is primarily used by the custom SettingEditor's SettingsEditor#applyEditorTo(..) method call */
public void setHost(String host) {
this.host = host;
}
}
To read these configuration values elsewhere, say for example a custom ProgramRunner, you would do something like:
final RunConfigurationImpl runConfiguration = (RunConfigurationImpl) executionEnvironment.getRunnerAndConfigurationSettings().getConfiguration();
runConfiguration.getHost(); // Returns the configured host value
See com.intellij.execution.configurations.RunConfigurationBase#readExternal as well as com.intellij.execution.configurations.RunConfigurationBase#loadState and com.intellij.execution.configurations.RunConfigurationBase#writeExternal
I have a Windows Form in Visual Studio C++. (CLR)
In the header file I declare bool isRunning (to find if notepad is running):
private:
bool isRunning(LPCSTR pnotepad)
{
HWND hwnd;
hwnd = FindWindow(NULL, pnotepad);
if (hwnd != 0)
{
return true;
}
else
{
return false;
}
}
Now on a checkbox, I want it to check if the process is running.
private: System::Void checkBox2_CheckedChanged(System::Object^ sender, System::EventArgs^ e) {
if (bool application::GUI::isRunning)
label1->Text = "cat";
I get this error:
a pointer-to-member is not valid for a managed class
I tried changing it to &isRunning. This gives me the same error as above and
illegal operation on bound member function expression
How can I fix this?
everything with below seems wrong:
if (bool application::GUI::isRunning)
you don't need bool if you don't wanna save the result of function. Either define a variable that's bool and assign the result of function to that:
bool result = isRunning(...);
if(result)
...
or
if(isRunning())
...
application::gui::isRunning expression returns the pointer of isRunning function which you are trying to define as a bool variable.
Lets say you fixed first two as:
LPCSTR arg = ...;
if(application::GUI::isRunning(arg))
label1->Text = "cat";
Which implies that you are calling static function of a GUI class
or a function under the namespace of GUI (also GUI is under application namespace).
My guess is GUI is a Form class so you are trying to invoke and since the function is not static you will get error again. So you have two cases to fix:
if you are getting this error from another function of GUI
LPCSTR arg = ...;
if (isRunning(arg))
label1->Text = "cat";
otherwse you need a pointer to GUI object:
LPCSTR arg = ...;
if (gui-> isRunning(arg))
label1->Text = "cat";
I think you are making function call in incorrect manner.
Probably it should be like below,
if (application::GUI::isRunning())
{
label1->Text = "cat";
}
Above is just a hint to make proper function call - but since isRunning is a private member function, how it can be invoked directly from outside class and that too without creating any object. It is not a static member function. Please check this point.
Is there any way to use the Interlocked.CompareExchange(); and Interlocked.Increment(); methods against values stored in a memory-mapped file?
I'd like to implement a multi-threaded service that will store its data in a memory-mapped file, but since it's multi-threaded I need to prevent conflicting writes, therefore I wonder about the Interlocked operations rather than using explicit locks.
I know it's possible with native code, but can it be done in managed code on .NET 4.0?
OK, this is how you do it! We had to figure this out, and I figured we could give some back to stackoverflow!
class Program
{
internal static class Win32Stuff
{
[DllImport("kernel32.dll", SetLastError = true)]
unsafe public static extern int InterlockedIncrement(int* lpAddend);
}
private static MemoryMappedFile _mmf;
private static MemoryMappedViewStream _mmvs;
unsafe static void Main(string[] args)
{
const int INT_OFFSET = 8;
_mmf = MemoryMappedFile.CreateOrOpen("SomeName", 1024);
// start at offset 8 (just for example)
_mmvs = _mmf.CreateViewStream(INT_OFFSET, 4);
// Gets the pointer to the MMF - we dont have to worry about it moving because its in shared memory
var ptr = _mmvs.SafeMemoryMappedViewHandle.DangerousGetHandle();
// Its important to add the increment, because even though the view says it starts at an offset of 8, we found its actually the entire memory mapped file
var result = Win32Stuff.InterlockedIncrement((int*)(ptr + INT_OFFSET));
}
}
This does work, and works across multiple processes! Always enjoy a good challenge!
TravisWhidden, actually you can use Interlocked.Increment Static method as dan-gph said, you just have to be careful with pointer casting and operator priority, plus parenthesis usage, in facts...
You'll cast a memory pointer (plus the desired offset), into a pointer to an int variable, then you'll use that pointer as a variable. Then you'll have to use it as a variable reference.
Below you'll find the corresponding snippet of yours using .net library instead of external static import.
P&L
class Program
{
private static MemoryMappedFile _mmf;
private static MemoryMappedViewStream _mmvs;
static void Main(string[] args)
{
const int INT_OFFSET = 8;
_mmf = MemoryMappedFile.CreateOrOpen("SomeName", 1024);
_mmvs = _mmf.CreateViewStream(INT_OFFSET, 4);
unsafe
{
IntPtr ptr = _mmvs.SafeMemoryMappedViewHandle.DangerousGetHandle();
Interlocked.Increment(ref (*((int*)(ptr + INT_OFFSET)))
}
}
}
I have a winform app that is writing to console and it seems to work well. I'm using this code:
AttachConsole(-1)
Console.Out.WriteLine("Hellow world")
FreeConsole()
The question is:
If I run the app's exe file from command line, and try to redirect the output into a file. It doesn't work.
For example:
C:\ > myapp.exe > c:\output.txt
I still get the output to console screen (c:\output.txt file is created but empty), but I want it to to be saved into c:\output.txt
What's going wrong ? How to do that?
Many thanks!
You can have your cake and eat it too if you first check if output was redirected. Here's a little helper class that contains the P/Invoke voodoo:
using System;
using System.Runtime.InteropServices;
public static class ConsoleEx {
public static bool OutputRedirected {
get { return FileType.Char != GetFileType(GetStdHandle(StdHandle.Stdout)); }
}
public static bool InputRedirected {
get { return FileType.Char != GetFileType(GetStdHandle(StdHandle.Stdin)); }
}
public static bool ErrorRedirected {
get { return FileType.Char != GetFileType(GetStdHandle(StdHandle.Stderr)); }
}
// P/Invoke:
private enum FileType { Unknown, Disk, Char, Pipe };
private enum StdHandle { Stdin = -10, Stdout = -11, Stderr = -12 };
[DllImport("kernel32.dll")]
private static extern FileType GetFileType(IntPtr hdl);
[DllImport("kernel32.dll")]
private static extern IntPtr GetStdHandle(StdHandle std);
}
Usage:
bool redir = ConsoleEx.OutputRedirected;
if (!redir) AttachConsole(-1);
// etc...
You are attaching to the parent process to provide output, which in your case is probably cmd.exe. The parent process' stdout stream has not been redirected and therefore continues to display the output on the screen.
I am not aware of a direct approach. If you do not call AttachConsole you will find that the redirect works as expected, but of course then you loose the option to have a console window. However, there is a work around that I think is reasonable.
If you want the output to go to a console window then you provide your application with a commandline switch that indicates this requirement, something like
C:\> myapp.exe /console
When the /console argument is present you call AttachConsole and the output will be written to the console. When this switch is not present you do not make the call to AttachConsole and you will be able to redirect the output to a file.
I'm using certificates to secure my communications between client and server (no code, just endpoint configuration). Certificates are currently stored in ACOS5 smart cards. Everything works very well except that every time when WCF creates a new channel to access the server, the ACOS5 driver asks user to enter “User PIN”. Unfortunately, it happens quite often.
Is there any way to configure driver to cache PIN that user has already entered within current process at least for some time or how can I cache pin and provide it every time programmatically within same session?
I have found some useful in this article:
This is because in previous versions
of Windows each CSP would cache the
PIN you entered, but Windows 7
actually converts the PIN to a secure
token and caches that. Unfortunately
there’s only one global token cache
but the CSPs can’t use tokens
generated by others, so first the
smart card CSP prompts you and caches
a token, then SSL prompts you and
caches its own token (overwriting the
first one), then the smart card system
prompts you again (because its cached
token is gone).
But I can't use solution that was proposed by author. So what should I do?
This is a way we found and use from many years in our main application:
static class X509Certificate2Extension
{
public static void SetPinForPrivateKey(this X509Certificate2 certificate, string pin)
{
if (certificate == null) throw new ArgumentNullException("certificate");
var key = (RSACryptoServiceProvider)certificate.PrivateKey;
var providerHandle = IntPtr.Zero;
var pinBuffer = Encoding.ASCII.GetBytes(pin);
// provider handle is implicitly released when the certificate handle is released.
SafeNativeMethods.Execute(() => SafeNativeMethods.CryptAcquireContext(ref providerHandle,
key.CspKeyContainerInfo.KeyContainerName,
key.CspKeyContainerInfo.ProviderName,
key.CspKeyContainerInfo.ProviderType,
SafeNativeMethods.CryptContextFlags.Silent));
SafeNativeMethods.Execute(() => SafeNativeMethods.CryptSetProvParam(providerHandle,
SafeNativeMethods.CryptParameter.KeyExchangePin,
pinBuffer, 0));
SafeNativeMethods.Execute(() => SafeNativeMethods.CertSetCertificateContextProperty(
certificate.Handle,
SafeNativeMethods.CertificateProperty.CryptoProviderHandle,
0, providerHandle));
}
}
internal static class SafeNativeMethods
{
internal enum CryptContextFlags
{
None = 0,
Silent = 0x40
}
internal enum CertificateProperty
{
None = 0,
CryptoProviderHandle = 0x1
}
internal enum CryptParameter
{
None = 0,
KeyExchangePin = 0x20
}
[DllImport("advapi32.dll", CharSet = CharSet.Auto, SetLastError = true)]
public static extern bool CryptAcquireContext(
ref IntPtr hProv,
string containerName,
string providerName,
int providerType,
CryptContextFlags flags
);
[DllImport("advapi32.dll", SetLastError = true, CharSet = CharSet.Auto)]
public static extern bool CryptSetProvParam(
IntPtr hProv,
CryptParameter dwParam,
[In] byte[] pbData,
uint dwFlags);
[DllImport("CRYPT32.DLL", SetLastError = true)]
internal static extern bool CertSetCertificateContextProperty(
IntPtr pCertContext,
CertificateProperty propertyId,
uint dwFlags,
IntPtr pvData
);
public static void Execute(Func<bool> action)
{
if (!action())
{
throw new Win32Exception(Marshal.GetLastWin32Error());
}
}
}
The full post and author is here:
http://www.infinitec.de/post/2010/11/22/Setting-the-PIN-of-a-smartcard-programmatically.aspx
Actually I have found answer on my question: the described behavior caused by bug in Advanced Card Systems CSP v1.9. After switching to Alladin eToken application works as it should.
So I can't provide PIN from code but it is remembered by CSP after entering and providing from code is not required. More good news: user sees PIN request in familiar dialog from CSP in this case.