I want to get some object form Ad table.
I tried:
Ad.find(:all, :conditions => {:header => "1"})
and:
Ad.find(:all, :conditions => ["header=?", "1"])
but return a empty array.
when i try Ad.all I see Objects which match to my conditions
can you help me?
If you are on Rails 3.0, you should be using the new Arel syntax:
Ad.where(:header => "1")
Check out http://guides.rubyonrails.org/active_record_querying.html and http://asciicasts.com/episodes/202-active-record-queries-in-rails-3 for more info
Related
I can't find a working solution for the following piece of code:
def search_last_rate
self.rate = Rate.find(:first, :select => "rateconverted", :conditions => ["dominant_id = ? and converted_id = ?", self.currency_bought_iso, self.currency_sold_iso], :order => 'ratedate, dateloaded, timeloaded DESC')
end
When I execute this in the console I retrieve the appropriate value:
`=> #<Rate rateconverted: 0.8131>`
All columns are defined in MYSQL2 as an decimal but when I'm using it in the model and new html page it's always saving the value 0.0.
Please advice :)
decimal and integer are different in mysql. if u want the data to be numeric then use 'integer' in migrations else 'float'. checkout Decimal VS Int in MySQL?
Make sure that self.rate is not an integer
Try
self.rate = Rate.find(:first, :select => "rateconverted", :conditions => ["dominant_id = ? and converted_id = ?", self.currency_bought_iso, self.currency_sold_iso], :order => 'ratedate, dateloaded, timeloaded DESC').to_f
I've a table with an integer column called "map_id", I want to add an activeadmin filter to filter if this column IS NULL or IS NOT NULL.
How could this be implemented ?
I tried the following filter
filter :map_id, :label => 'Assigned', :as => :select, :collection => {:true => nil, :false => ''}
But, I get the following error message :
undefined method `map_eq' for #
If anyone is happening on this thread belatedly, there is now an easy way to filter for null or non null in active admin :
filter :attribute_present, :as => :boolean
filter :attribute_blank, :as => :boolean
It is no longer necessary to add a custom method to the scope to accomplish this.
Not found a good solution but here is a how.
filters of Active_admin are accomplished by meta_search, you can override the functions automatically generated by meta_search in your model to get the behavior that you want, the best way is to use the scope since you need to return a relation in order to chain with other query/scopes, as stated here
in your model:
for :as=>:select filters, acitve_admin use the _eq wheres, here is the source code
scope :map_eq,
lambda{ |id|
if(id !='none')
where( :map_id=> id)
else
where( :map_id=> nil)
end
}
#re-define the search method:
search_method :map_eq, :type => :integer
in your ative_admin register block:
filter :map_id, :label => 'Assigned', :as => :select, :collection => [['none', 'none'], ['one', 1],['tow', 2]]
# not using :none=>nil because active_admin will igore your nil value so your self-defined scope will never get chained.
Hope this help.
seems search_method doesn't work in recent rails version, here is another solution:
add scope to your model:
scope :field_blank, -> { where "field is null" }
scope :field_not_blank, -> { where "field is not null" }
add to /app/admin/[YOUR MODEL]
scope :field_blank
scope :field_not_blank
you will see buttons for these scopes appear (in top section, under model name, not in filter section)
The new version of ActiveAdmin uses Ransacker. I manage to got it working this way:
On the admin
filter :non_nil_map_id, :label => 'Assigned', :as => :select, :collection => [['none', 'none'], ['one', 1],['tow', 2]]
For consistency, I took the same code from #Gret answer just changing the filter name
On your model
ransacker :not_nil_map_id, :formatter => proc {|id| map_id != 'none' ? id : 'none' } do |parent|
parent.table[:id]
end
This should trigger a search against nil in case the id is 'none', and active record will return all the nil id entries.
This thread helped a lot.
With ransackable scopes:
On the ActiveAdmin resource definition:
filter :map_id, :label => 'Assigned', as: :select, :collection => [['Is Null', 'none'], ['Not null', 'present']]
On your model:
scope :by_map_id, ->(id) { (id == 'none' ? where(map_id: nil) : where('map_id IS NOT NULL')) }
def self.ransackable_scopes(_auth_object = nil)
%i[by_map_id]
end
The following query returns the collection of AR objects that I want to update:
Variant.all(:joins => { :candy_product => :candy }, :conditions => "candies.name = 'Skittles'")
I'm trying to do something like the following:
Variant.update_all(:price => 5, :joins => { :candy_product => :candy }, :conditions => "candies.name = 'Skittles'")
This should only update the price for the variants returned from original query. Is this possible with AR or will I have to write the SQL? This is a pretty large collection, so anything that iterates is out.
Using Rails 2.3.4.
As #François Beausoleil pointed correctly we should use scoped
Variant.scoped(:joins => { :candy_product => :candy }, :conditions => "candies.name = 'Skittles'").update_all(:price => 5)
I'm trying to load all the collections eagerly, using NHibernate 3 alpha 1. I'm wondering if this the right way of using ThenFetch()?
Properties with plural names are collections. The others are just a single object.
IQueryable<T> milestoneInstances = Db.Find<T, IQueryable<T>>(db =>
from mi in db
where mi.RunDate == runDate
select mi).Fetch(mi => mi.Milestone)
.ThenFetch(m => m.PrimaryOwners)
.Fetch(mi => mi.Milestone)
.ThenFetch(m => m.SecondaryOwners)
.Fetch(mi => mi.Milestone)
.ThenFetch(m => m.Predecessors)
.Fetch(mi => mi.Milestone)
.ThenFetch(m => m.Function)
.Fetch(mi => mi.Milestone)
.ThenFetchMany(m => m.Jobs)
.ThenFetch(j => j.Source)
;
I thought of asking this in the NHibernate forums but unfortunately access to google groups is forbidden from where I am. I know Fabio is here, so maybe the guys from the NHibernate team can shed some light on this?
Thanks
Apparently, there's no "right" way to use ThenFetch in such a case. Your example works fine but SQL produced contains many joins to Milestone, which isn't that right.
Using IQueryOver instead of IQueryable allows you to use complex syntax in Fetch:
Fetch(p => p.B)
Fetch(p => p.B.C) // if B is not a collection ... or
Fetch(p => p.B[0].C) // if B is a collection ... or
Fetch(p => p.B.First().C) // if B is an IEnumerable (using .First() extension method)
So in your case it would be:
query // = session.QueryOver<X>()
.Fetch(mi => mi.Milestone).Eager
.Fetch(mi => mi.Milestone.PrimaryOwners).Eager
.Fetch(mi => mi.Milestone.SecondaryOwners).Eager
.Fetch(mi => mi.Milestone.Predecessors).Eager
.Fetch(mi => mi.Milestone.Function).Eager
.Fetch(mi => mi.Milestone.Jobs).Eager
.Fetch(mi => mi.Milestone.Jobs.First().Source).Eager
The one thing you are missing is that you should use FetchMany() and ThenFetchMany() is the child property is a collection.
IQueryable<T> milestoneInstances = Db.Find<T, IQueryable<T>>(db =>
from mi in db
where mi.RunDate == runDate
select mi);
var fetch = milestoneInstances.Fetch(f => f.Milestone);
fetch.ThenFetch(f => f.PrimaryOwners);
fetch.ThenFetch(f => f.SecondaryOwners);
//...
As leora said, make sure when fetching children collections that you use
FetchMany()
ThenFetchMany()
A new Fetch, should pick up from the root, but this does not always happen. Sometimes you need to create them as separate queries or use Criteria Futures to batch up a multiple fetch.
Quick one, but thought I'd ask.
Is there a better way of getting the column values from a model's column than something like this?
Item.count(:all, :group => 'status').reject! { |i, e| i.blank? }.collect { |i,e| i}
Item.find(:all, :select=>:status, :group => 'status', :conditions => "status != ''").collect{|r| r.status}
Is it the same thing as the following code?
Item.count(:all, :group => "status", :conditions => "status != ''"}
.. maybe not ..
but then could you please specify more criteria you want? i.e. status is blank? count is blank?