I've spend days trying to find a solution the problem i'm going to try to describe, i've googled alot and even looked at the .NET 4 reference source for SendReply and InternalSendReply activity. But until now i'm stuck.
To make the life of our end customers simpler i want to replace the Receive and SendReply activities with custom activites and use bookmarks instead.
I'm implementing a central webservice which can route to a correct workflow instance, that workflow modifies the bookmark value and finaly it creates a new bookmark while returning the modified bookmark value. It's rather complex already with a WorkflowServiceHostFactory which adds Behaviours and Attach a DataContractResolver to the endpoint.
The endpoint is derived from WorkflowHostingEndpoint which resolves a bookmark created in a custom activity (instead of a receive). And i want another activity instead of a sendreply. Those 2 should correlate and the custom sendreply does send a response on the open channel through the endpoint while creating a new bookmark.
The problem is that i didn't find a way yet to access the endpoint responseContext from within my custom send activity. On the other side, at the workflowcreating endpoint side, it seems that i'm not able to be notified whenever the workflow becomes Idle and as well i don't seem to be able to access the WorkflowExtensions from the host. i'm missing something?
A possible solution i've in mind might be not using a WorkflowServiceHost, but then i loose alot of AppFabric functionaly.
The workflowapplication in platform update 1 has some extension methods called RunEpisode with an overload Func called idleEventCallback. There it's possible to hook into the OnIdle and get a workflowextension to get the object to send back as response.
To answer my own question, i ended up in a workaround using the servicebroker functionality of sql server. The SqlDependency class where the workflow listens for the event to be fired whenever the workflow reach the activity that creates a new bookmark in another state.
Related
I have a subroutine in my Controller
<HttpPost>
Sub Index(Id, varLotsOfData)
'Point B.
'By the time it gets here - all the data has been accepted by server.
What I would like to do it capture the Id of the inbound POST and mark, for example, a database record to say "Id xx is receiving data"
The POST receive can take a long time as there is lots of data.
When execution gets to point B I can mark the record "All data received".
Where can I place this type of "pre-POST completed" code?
I should add - we are receiving the POST data from clients that we do not control - that is, it is most likely a client's server sending the data - not a webbrowser client that we have served up from our webserver.
UPDATE: This is looking more complex than I had imagined.
I'm thinking that a possible solution would be to inspect the worker processes in IIS programatically. Via the IIS Manager you can do this for example - How to use IIS Manager to get Worker Processes (w3wp.exe) details information ?
From your description, you want to display on the client page that the method is executing and you can show also a loading gif, and when the execution completed, you will show a message to the user that the execution is completed.
The answer is simply: use SignalR
here you can find some references
Getting started with signalR 1.x and Mvc4
Creating your first SignalR hub MVC project
Hope this will help you
If I understand your goal correctly, it sounds like HttpRequest.GetBufferlessInputStream might be worth a look. It allows you to begin acting on incoming post data immediately and in "pieces" rather than waiting until the entire post has been received.
An excerpt from Microsoft's documentation:
...provides an alternative to using the InputStream propertywhich waits until the whole request has been received. In contrast, the GetBufferlessInputStream method returns the Stream object immediately. You can use the method to begin processing the entity body before the complete contents of the body have been received and asynchronously read the request entity in chunks. This method can be useful if the request is uploading a large file and you want to begin accessing the file contents before the upload is finished.
So you could grab the beginning of the post, and provided your client-facing page sends the ID towards the beginning of its transmission, you may be able to pull that out. Of course, this would be reading raw byte data which would need to be decoded so you could grab the inbound post's ID. There's also a buffered one that will allow the stream to be read in pieces but will also build a complete request object for processing once it has been completely received.
Create a custom action filter,
Action Filters for executing filtering logic either before or after an action method is called. Action Filters are custom attributes that provide declarative means to add pre-action and post-action behavior to the controller's action methods.
Specifically you'll want to look at the
OnActionExecuted – This method is called after a controller action is executed.
Here are a couple of links:
http://www.infragistics.com/community/blogs/dhananjay_kumar/archive/2016/03/04/how-to-create-a-custom-action-filter-in-asp-net-mvc.aspx
http://www.asp.net/mvc/overview/older-versions-1/controllers-and-routing/understanding-action-filters-vb
Here is a lab, but I think it's C#
http://www.asp.net/mvc/overview/older-versions/hands-on-labs/aspnet-mvc-4-custom-action-filters
I have a requirement in hand where I need to change the Mule Flow Threading Behavior at runtime without the need of bouncing the whole Mule Container. I figured out few different ways to achieve this, but none of them are working.
I tried accessing the Mule Context Registry and from there I was trying to do a lookup of "FlowConstructLifecycleManager" Object so that I can tap in there and access the threading profile of the object and reset those values, then stop and start the flow programmatically in order to get the change applied in the flow. I am stuck in this approach as I was unable to get hold of the FlowConstructLifecycleManager Object neither from the Mule Spring Registry nor from the Transient Registry. I was able to get hold of the Flow object though which has a direct reference to that FlowConstructLifecycleManager Object. But, unfortunately, they made this object as protected and didn't expose any method for us to access this object.
Since I was unable to access this FlowConstructLifecycleManager directly from Mule implemented Flow class, I decided to extend this Flow class and just add another public method to it so that I can access FlowConstructLifecycleManager object from Flow object programmatically. But, I am stuck in this approach as well as even if I am putting my version of the same Flow class packaged and dropped in lib/user folder of the container, it is still not picking up my version of the class, and loading the original version instead.
It would be of great help if I can get any pointer on the approach of solving either my first or second problem.
Thanks in advance,
Ananya
In our company, we are building a dashboard from where we should be able to start/stop any flow or change the processing power of any flow by increasing/ decreasing the active threads for a flow or changing the pollen polling frequency. All of these should be done at runtime without any server downtime.
Anyway, I made it working finally. I had to patch up the mule-core jar and expose few objects so that I can get to the thread profile object and tweak the values at runtime and stop/ start the flow to reflect the changes to take effect. I know this is little bit messy and but it works.
Thanks,
Ananya
Is it possible to write a plugin for Glimpse's existing SQL tab?
I'm trying to log my SQL queries and the currently available extensions don't support our in-house SQL libary. I have written a custom plugin which logs what I want, but it has limited functionality and it doesn't integrate with the existing SQL tab.
Currently, I'm logging to my custom plugin using a single helper method inside my DAL's base class. This function looks takes the SqlCommand and Duration in order to show data on my custom tab:
// simplified example:
Stopwatch sw = Stopwatch.StartNew();
sqlCommand.Connection = sqlConnection;
sqlConnection.Open();
object result = sqlCommand.ExecuteScalar();
sqlConnection.Close();
sw.Stop();
long duration = sw.ElapsedMilliseconds;
LogSqlActivity(sqlCommand, null, duration);
This works well on my 'custom' tab but unfortunately means I don't get metrics shown on Glimpse's HUD:
Is there a way I can provide Glimpse directly with the info it needs (in terms of method names, and parameters) so it displays natively on the SQL tab?
The following advise is based on the fact that you can't use DbProviderFactory and you can't use a proxied SqlCommand, etc.
The data that appears in the "out-of-the-box" SQL tab is based on messages of given types been published through our internal Message Broker (see below on information on this). Because of the above limitations in your case, to get things lighting up correctly (i.e. your data showing up in HUD and the SQL tab), you will need to simulate the work that we do under the covers when we publish these messages. This shouldn't be that difficult and once done, should just work moving forward.
If you have a look at the various proxies we have here you will be above to see what messages we publish in what circumstances. Here are some highlights:
DbCommand
Log command start - here
Log command error - here
Log command end - here
DbConnection:
Log connection open - here
Log connection closed - here
DbTransaction
Log Started - here
Log committed - here
Log rollback - here
Other
Command row count here - Glimpses calculates this at the DbDataReader level but you could do it elsewhere as well
Now that you have an idea of what messages we are expecting and how we generate them, as long as you pass in the right data when you publish those messages, everything should just light up - if you are interested here is the code that looks for the messages that you will be publishing.
Message Broker: If you at the GlimpseConfiguration here you will see how to access the Broker. This can be done statically if needed (as we do here). From here you can publish the messages you need.
Helpers: For generating some of the above messages, you can use the helpers inside the Support class here. I would have shifted all the code for publishing the actual messages to this class, but I didn't think there would be too many people doing what you are doing.
Update 1
Starting point: With the above approach you shouldn't need to write your own plugin. You should just be able to access the broker GlimpseConfiguration.GetConfiguredMessageBroker() (make sure you check if its null, which it is if Glimpse is turned off, etc) and publish your messages.
I would imagine that you would put the inspection that leverages the broker and published the messages, where ever you have knowledge of the information that needs to be collected (i.e. inside your custom lib). Normally this would require references inside your lib to glimpse (which you may not want), so to protect against this, from your lib, you would call a proxy (which could be another VS proj) that has the glimpse dependency. Hence your ado lib only has references to your own code.
To get your toes wet, try just publishing a couple of fake connection and command messages. Assuming the broker you get from GlimpseConfiguration.GetConfiguredMessageBroker() isn't null, these should just show up. Then you can work towards getting real data into it from your lib.
Update 2
Obsolete Broker Access
Its marked as obsolete because its going to change in v2. You will still be able to do what you need to do, but the way of accessing the broker has changed. For what you currently need to do this is ok.
Sometimes null
As you have found this is really dependent on where in the page lifecycle you are currently at. To get around this, I would probably change my original recommendation a little.
In the code where you are currently creating messages and pushing them to the message bus, try putting them into HttpContext.Current.Items. If you haven't used it before, this is a store which asp.net provides out of the box which lasts the lifetime of a given request. You could have a list that you put in there, still create the message objects that you are doing, but put them into that list instead of pushing them through the broker.
Then, create a HttpModule (its really simple to do) which taps into the PostLogRequest event. Within this handler, you would pull the list out of the context, iterate through it and push the message into the message broker (accessing the same way you have been).
Can I extend the server-side Java Code in Worklight?
For example, there is a class called JavaScriptIntegrationLibraryImplementation under com.worklight.integration.js. Inside this class, there is a method broadcastNotification and I would like to override this method. Is it possible to do so?
EDIT
The reason is that:
When I make the subscription in client side with option field (e.g. add customType: A), I would like to retrieve a list of devices which have been subscribed to this event source. Base on the option field in deviceSubscrpition, I would like to have some business logic to determine who to send the notification message. For example, I will only submit the message to the user which 'customType=A'.
However, there is no API in Worklight which can retrieve a list of devices which make me to retrieve the list first. Then do the logic in JavaScript and called WL.Server.notifyDevice..
Therefore, I would like to check whether there is any method to retrieve a list of devices (through API / Adapter which connects to DB) which have subscribed to an event source.
Thanks.
This part of Worklight is not extendable. You can try and override this method as you say, but do note this is not supported and we cannot help in this case.
Edit
Now that it is clear what you're trying to achieve... what you are looking for currently not available. I will open a feature request for it and it will get evaluated at some point (if you are a customer of IBM, I suggest to get in touch with your contact...).
My suggestion (somewhat hackish in form): you could perhaps use multiple Event Sources, where each event source represents an iOS version. On the client-side, upon app initialization, you can retrieve the iOS version and use it to register to the correct event source (this would be very generic code to allow re-use). In case a new iOS version is released (you will likely know of this in advance), you simply add this event source to the adapter code and re-deploy the adapter. Users of the new iOS version could still register for notification, because you get the iOS version upon init, and use this information to register to the correct event source...
To reiterate:
The adapter contains: ES_iOS5 ES_iOS6
The client:
fetches iOS version, stores it in some variable.
registers to event source, where event source name is ES_${iOSVersion}
if a new iOS version is released, simply create a new event source and re-deploy
the adapter; the client is already equipped to handle this.
#Red23jordon,
i had similar case, i created a custom table where at the time of subscription, I was saving
user ID and event type in custom table. and when user unsubscribe then i also remove details from custom table.
For sending push to users subscribed to a particular "even type" i look into custom table to get list of user IDs subscribed to particular event type, and then i went into Notification user/device tables and fetching corresponding devices and sending Push.
Hope it may help you.
thanks
I'm working on a small application using C++/wxWidgets, where several parts of the GUI need to be updated based on e.g. received UDP datagrams. More specifically, a secondary thread tries to keep a list of available "clients" in the network (which may come and go away) and e.g. corresponding comboboxes in the UI need to be updated to reflect the changes.
The documentation mentions that for this kind of thing EVT_UPDATE_UI would be a good choice. As far as I can understand from the sparse documentation, this event is sent automatically by the system and provides some support for assisted UI change.
However, I'd feel more comfortable using a more direct approach, i.e. where e.g. a window object could register/subscribe to receive notifications (either events or callbacks) upon particular events and another part of the code is sending out these notifications when required. I could do this in C++ using my own code, however I guess if wxWidgets already supports something like that, I should make use of it. However I haven't found anything in that regards.
So, the question is: does wxWidgets support this kind of notification system (or similar alternatives) or would I be best served coding my own?
AFAIK there is nothing directly usable in wxWidgets, but doing it on your own seems easy.
What I would do:
Create a wxEvtHandler-descendent class to hold the list of available "clients" in the network. Let this class have a wxCriticalSection, and use a wxCriticalSectionLocker for that in all methods that add or delete "clients".
Create a worker thread class by inheriting wxThread to handle your UDP datagrams, using blocking calls. The thread should directly call methods of the client list object whenever a client has to be added or removed. In these methods update the list of clients, and ::wxPostEvent() an event to itself (this will execute the whole notification calls in the main GUI thread).
Handle the event in the client list class, and notify all listeners that the list of clients has changed. The observer pattern seems to me a good fit. You could either call a method of all registered listeners directly, or send a wxCommandEvent to them.
Have you tried calling Update() on the widget(s) that change? Once you update the contents of the combo box, call Update(), and the contents should update.