I want to create a trigger on a table called takes in postgresql to update a value in another table called student
I'm trying to do it in the following way. But I'm getting an error that there is syntax error near "OLD". I don't understand whats wrong with this. This is my code:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION upd8_cred_func
(id1 VARCHAR, gr1 VARCHAR,id2 VARCHAR, gr2 VARCHAR)
RETURNS void AS $$
BEGIN
IF (id1=id2 and gr1 is null and gr2 is not null) THEN
update student set tot_cred = tot_cred + 6 where id = id1;
END IF;
RETURN;
END;
$$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;
CREATE TRIGGER upd8_cred
AFTER UPDATE ON takes
FOR EACH ROW
EXECUTE PROCEDURE upd8_cred_func(OLD.id,OLD.grade,NEW.id,NEW.grade);
You do not need to pass the NEW and OLD as parameters to the trigger function. They are automagically available there:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/interactive/trigger-definition.html :
The trigger function must be declared as a function taking no arguments and returning type trigger. (The trigger function receives its input through a specially-passed TriggerData structure, not in the form of ordinary function arguments.)
About the records passed to the trigger procedure, please see http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/interactive/plpgsql-trigger.html :
When a PL/pgSQL function is called as a trigger, several special variables are created automatically in the top-level block. They are: [...] NEW, [...] OLD [...]
As SeldomNeedy pointed in the comment below, you can still pass and use parameters to the trigger function. You declare the function as taking no parameters, but when defining the trigger (by CREATE TRIGGER), you may add some.
They will be available for the trigger as TG_NARG (the number of such parameters), and TG_ARGV[] (an array of text values).
As Greg stated, trigger functions can take arguments, but the functions themselves cannot have declared parameters. Here's a simple example in plpgsql:
CREATE TABLE my_table ( ID SERIAL PRIMARY KEY ); -- onelined for compactness
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION raise_a_notice() RETURNS TRIGGER AS
$$
DECLARE
arg TEXT;
BEGIN
FOREACH arg IN ARRAY TG_ARGV LOOP
RAISE NOTICE 'Why would you pass in ''%''?',arg;
END LOOP;
RETURN NEW; -- in plpgsql you must return OLD, NEW, or another record of table's type
END;
$$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;
CREATE TRIGGER no_inserts_without_notices BEFORE INSERT ON my_table
FOR EACH ROW EXECUTE PROCEDURE raise_a_notice('spoiled fish','stunned parrots');
INSERT INTO my_table DEFAULT VALUES;
-- the above kicks out the following:
--
-- NOTICE: Why would you pass in 'spoiled fish'?
-- NOTICE: Why would you pass in 'stunned parrots'?
--
There are a few other goodies such as TG_NARGS (to know how many args you got without looping through them) discussed in the docs. There's also information there about how to get the name of the triggering table in case you have mostly-but-not-quite-shared logic for one trigger-function that spans a number of tables.
The trigger function can have parameters, but, you can't have those parameters passed like a normal function (e.g. arguments in the function definition). You can get the same result... In python you get access to the OLD and NEW data as the answer above describes. For example, I can use TD['new']['column_name'] in python to reference the new data for column_name. You also have access to the special variable TD['args']. So, if you like:
create function te() returns trigger language plpython2u as $function$
plpy.log("argument passed 1:%s 2:%s" %(TD['args'][0], TD['args'][1], ))
$function$
create constraint trigger ta after update of ttable
for each for execute procedure te('myarg1','myarg2');
Granted, these arguments are static, but, they are useful when calling a common trigger function from multiple trigger declarations. I am pretty sure that the same variables are available for other stored procedure languages. (sorry if the code doesn't work verbatim, but, I do practice this technique, so I know you can pass arguments!).
Related
I ask this question in light of the following trigger producing this error:
ERROR: syntax error at or near "("
LINE 5: ...cessBlogPostApproval"('Blog Post Approval', concat('Your blo...
^
The trigger in question:
CREATE TRIGGER "processBlogPostApproval_AFTER_INSERT"
AFTER INSERT
ON public."ApprovedBlogPosts"
FOR EACH ROW
EXECUTE PROCEDURE public."processBlogPostApproval"('Blog Post Approval', concat('Your blog post, "', SELECT "Title" FROM public."BlogPosts" WHERE "PostID" == NEW."PostID", '"has been approved.'));
The problem seems to be arising due to the fact that I passed a concatenation function as my second argument, or rather, that I did not pass it correctly. Would appreciate your assistance in identifying which of the two is the cause of the problem.
Sometimes it turns out the easiest/cleanest way to do something is --- well not to do it. This seems to be the case here. The issue you are having deal with passing a message into a trigger function, that getting it properly formatted. Well since a trigger function must defined without parameters.
A trigger procedure is created with the CREATE FUNCTION command,
declaring it as a function with no arguments and a return type of
trigger.
Don't do it. Build the message in the trigger function. It actually makes the code there easier (IMO). You didn't provide much detail so just a minimal example:
-- setup
create table approved_blog_posts( id integer ) ;
create table blog_posts(id integer, title text) ;
insert into blog_posts( id, title)
values (1 ,'Blog Rant')
, (2 ,'Still Rant again')
, (3 ,'Rambling about nut''en!');
-- trigger function
create or replace function blog_post_approved()
returns trigger
language plpgsql
as $$
declare
l_title text;
begin
select title
into l_title
from blog_posts
where id = new.id;
raise notice 'Your blog post "%" has been approved.',l_title;
return new;
end;
$$;
-- attach trigger to table
create trigger approved_blog_posts_air
after insert
on approved_blog_posts
for each row
execute procedure blog_post_approved();
-- demo/test
insert into approved_blog_posts(id) values (1),(3);
The issue actually comes from the usage of ", in the concatenation mechanism as well as on the objects naming.
I think you can avoid altogether the usage of " there as so:
EXECUTE PROCEDURE public.processBlogPostApproval('Blog Post Approval', concat('Your blog post, "', (SELECT Title FROM public.BlogPosts WHERE PostID == NEW.PostID), '" has been approved.'));
I am trying to make a TRIGGER that responds on an update at a table (appointments) which then calls a procedure (proc1()). The procedure needs to get arguments in order to insert a new row -based on those arguments- on a different table (medical_folder). Procedures can't have arguments, but after a bit of search I found that you can use a method like the following to kinda force your way though:
Passing arguments to a trigger function
With the above as my base I made the following UDF:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION AppointmentUpdate(docAMKA bigint, patAMKA bigint, dateNtime timestamp, conclusion varchar(500),cure2 varchar(500), drug_id integer)
RETURNS void AS $$
DECLARE
patAMKAv2 text;
drug_idv3 text;
BEGIN
patAMKAv2 := cast(AppointmentUpdate.patAMKA as text);
drug_idv3 := cast(AppointmentUpdate.drug_id as text);
DROP TRIGGER IF EXISTS tr1 on appointments;
CREATE TRIGGER tr1 BEFORE UPDATE ON appointments
EXECUTE PROCEDURE proc1(patAMKAv2,cure2,drug_idv3);
UPDATE appointments
SET diagnosis = conclusion
WHERE patientamka = patAMKA
AND doctoramka = docAMKA
AND t = dateNtime;
END;
$$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;
My procedure is as follows:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION proc1()
RETURNS trigger AS $$
declare
newid integer;
BEGIN
newid =((select max(medical_folder.id) from medical_folder)+1);
INSERT INTO medical_folder AS Medf(id,patient,cure,drug_id)
VALUES(newid,cast(TG_ARGV[0] as bigint),TG_ARGV[1],cast(TG_ARGV[2] as integer));
RETURN NEW;
END;
$$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;
If I run it as is I am getting an error in proc1() here cast(TG_ARGV[0] as bigint) and it seems that in the UDF instead of sending the value of the arguments it sends the arguments themselves(if for example i do this EXECUTE PROCEDURE proc1(324,cure2,234); INSTEAD OF THIS EXECUTE PROCEDURE proc1(patAMKAv2,cure2,drug_idv3); ). Is there any way that you can force it to get the values instead?
P.S.:I now that this can be done a lot easier without the use of a TRIGGER and just make a UDF that does everything itself but unfortunately I have to do it using a TRIGGER.
P.S.2: I tried using function_name.variable_name instead of just var_name also tried using $1, $2, $3, ... , $n.
From the CREATE TRIGGER docs:
arguments
An optional comma-separated list of arguments to be provided to the function when the trigger is executed. The arguments are literal string constants. Simple names and numeric constants can be written here, too, but they will all be converted to strings.
http://rextester.com/OCA59277
You might be able to achieve what you are trying with dynamic SQL though (see EXECUTE). But I believe that you overcomplicate things. What you want to do is simply to get rows or IDs which participated in an UPDATE statement. PostgreSQL's DML statements (INSERT, UPDATE & DELETE) has a RETURNING clause just for that. Also, you can actually write more DML (sub-)statements within a single statement with writeable CTEs. Something like this should suffice:
WITH upd AS (
UPDATE appointments
SET diagnosis = conclusion
WHERE patientamka = patAMKA
AND doctoramka = docAMKA
AND t = dateNtime
RETURNING *
)
INSERT INTO medical_folder(patient, cure, drug_id)
SELECT patAMKAv2, cure2, drug_idv3
FROM upd;
Note: while writing this I realized that you actually don't use any of the fields from the UPDATE, but using FROM upd will ensure that as much rows will be inserted into medical_folder just as much appointments got updated. Which is what your original trigger-based logic did.
The Situation:
I have a function fn_SetFoo() that inserts records into table TableFoo.
I also have a trigger function that runs after each insert into TableFoo. It takes the new primary key TableFooID from the newly inserted row and inserts it into a second table TableFooBar (with a foreign key constraint).
I created a trigger that runs AFTER INSERT ON TableFoo FOR EACH ROW EXECUTE PROCEDURE fn_SetFooBar();
If I call fn_SetFoo() directly then everything works as expected.
However, I have a separate function fn_NormalizeFoo() that processes some data and then calls fn_SetFoo() for each record it has processed.
If I call fn_NormalizeFoo() then the only the first record is processed and the function stops.
The Question:
Why would the process stop after the first record when called from fn_NormalizeFoo() when the entire process runs when the contents of fn_NormalizeFoo() is run directly?
Some Code:
--------------------------------------------------------
-- Insert Into TableFoo --
--------------------------------------------------------
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION "example"."fn_SetFoo" (
IN "Foo1" INTEGER,
IN "Foo2" INTEGER,
IN "Foo3" INTEGER
) RETURNS "void" AS
$$
BEGIN
INSERT INTO
"example"."TableFoo"(
"Foo1",
"Foo2",
"Foo3"
)
VALUES
(
$1,
$2,
$3
);
RETURN;
EXCEPTION WHEN "unique_violation" THEN
-- DO NOTHING
END;
$$
LANGUAGE plpgsql;
--------------------------------------------------------
-- Insert Into TableFooBar --
--------------------------------------------------------
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION "example"."fn_SetFooBar" (
IN "FooPK" INTEGER,
IN "BarPK" INTEGER
) RETURNS "void" AS
$$
BEGIN
INSERT INTO
"example"."TableFooBar"(
"FooPK",
"BarPK"
)
VALUES
(
$1,
$2
);
RETURN;
EXCEPTION WHEN "unique_violation" THEN
-- DO NOTHING
END;
$$
LANGUAGE plpgsql;
--------------------------------------------------------
-- Trigger Function --
--------------------------------------------------------
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION "example"."tr_SetFooBar"() RETURNS TRIGGER AS
$$
BEGIN
PERFORM
"example"."fn_SetFooBar"(
"TableFoo"."FooPK",
"TableBar"."BarPK"
)
FROM
"example"."TableFoo" JOIN
"example"."TableBar" ON [SOMETHING TRUE]
WHERE
NEW.SOMECOLUMN = SOMETHING AND
[MORE STUFF IS TRUE];
RETURN NULL;
END;
$$
LANGUAGE plpgsql;
--------------------------------------------------------
-- Trigger --
--------------------------------------------------------
CREATE TRIGGER "SetFooBar" AFTER INSERT ON "example"."Foo" FOR EACH ROW EXECUTE PROCEDURE "example"."tr_SetFooBar"();
--------------------------------------------------------
-- Normalize Foo --
--------------------------------------------------------
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION "example"."fn_NormaliseFoo" (
IN "Param1" VARCHAR,
IN "Param2" VARCHAR,
IN "Param3" VARCHAR
) RETURNS "void" AS
$$
SELECT
"example"."fn_SetFoo" (
"Foo1",
"Foo2",
"Foo3"
)
FROM
[TABLES]
WHERE
[STUFF IS TRUE]
$$
LANGUAGE SQL;
As you can see, this is a bit more complex then I originally posted. The general idea is to create a many to many relationship as each record is added.
Just to reiterate, running "example"."fn_NormaliseFoo" fails after the first row; however, manually running the contents works as expected.
fn_NormalizeFoo() is described as:
a separate function fn_NormalizeFoo() that processes
some data and then calls fn_SetFoo() for each record it has processed.
However, the code shown for fn_NormaliseFoo is declared in the SQL language so it's not procedural, and therefore it can't do what is claimed. It can just run one query and returns its results (or nothing if no results). Such code has to be compatible with inlining into the calling query.
So the first problem is that fn_NormaliseFoo is declared as returning void but it's not compatible with the fact that it's a SELECT. Normally the function creation shouldn't even be accepted by the interpreter of the sql language.
Example:
CREATE FUNCTION f(int) returns void as 'select $1;' language sql;
This fails with:
ERROR: return type mismatch in function declared to return void
DETAIL: Actual return type is integer.
A second problem would be that fn_SetFoo is likely to be called only once, which is what I understand from the question's "the process stop after the first record". Despite the call being in the select list of a query with some joined tables that presumably produce N rows, there's no reason that can be seen here for the SQL engine to call it N times. Better for it call it only once and affect the same result to every row formed as the output of the query.
It looks a bit like you're using sql in spite of plpgsql. To make sure that a function is call N times, loop N times in procedural code and that will be guaranteed to work.
I have the following update trigger for a tsvector column
CREATE TRIGGER tsvector_user_update
BEFORE INSERT OR UPDATE ON users
FOR EACH ROW EXECUTE PROCEDURE
tsvector_update_trigger(user_tsv, 'pg_catalog.english', firstname, surname, email, card_id);
This works fine, however my card_id column (text) contains a pre-amble that the user is not aware of (it is added after the card is scanned), so I would like to strip out the pre-amble when the tsvector value is generated, I have tried the trigger function as a start
CREATE FUNCTION user_change_trigger() RETURNS trigger AS $$
BEGIN
NEW.user_tsv = setweight(to_tsvector('pg_catalog.english', coalesce(NEW.firstname,'')), 'A') ||
setweight(to_tsvector('pg_catalog.english', coalesce(NEW.surname,'')), 'A') ||
setweight(to_tsvector('pg_catalog.english', coalesce(REGEXP_REPLACE(NEW.card_id, '^\d+PRE', ''),'')), 'B') ||
setweight(to_tsvector('pg_catalog.english', coalesce(NEW.email,'')), 'C');
return new;
END
$$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;
CREATE TRIGGER tsvectorupdate BEFORE INSERT OR UPDATE
ON users FOR EACH ROW EXECUTE PROCEDURE user_change_trigger();
Which executes, but I get the following:
WARNING: nonstandard use of escape in a string literal
And no updated tsvector
The pre-amble is an integer followed by 'PRE'.
(PostgreSQL 9.0)
Basic trigger design
The problem is of principal nature. In PostgreSQL you create a trigger function that does the work. I don't see your trigger function in the question.
Then you create a trigger which makes use of this function. You can only pass constants to a trigger function. Consider this quote from the manual about CREATE TRIGGER
function_name
A user-supplied function that is declared as taking no arguments and
returning type trigger, which is executed when the trigger fires.
arguments
An optional comma-separated list of arguments to be provided to the
function when the trigger is executed. The arguments are literal
string constants. Simple names and numeric constants can be written
here, too, but they will all be converted to strings. Please check the
description of the implementation language of the trigger function to
find out how these arguments can be accessed within the function; it
might be different from normal function arguments.
Bold emphasis mine.
Use NEW to access the column values inside the trigger function. You don't need to pass them as arguments. Get a grip on the basic concept first. Start here.
regexp_replace()
Use:
regexp_replace(card_id, '^\d+PRE', '')
.. since the leading characters are supposed to be digits only (and at least one of them).
Proper trigger & function
The following test case works for me on PostgreSQL 9.1.6. Your version looks basically good to me, I only made minor changes. But keep reading ...
Create test environment (will be rolled back at the end):
BEGIN;
CREATE SCHEMA test;
SET search_path = test;
CREATE TABLE users (
users_id serial primary key
,firstname text
,surname text
,card_id text
,email text
,user_tsv tsvector
);
Trigger function:
CREATE FUNCTION user_change_trigger()
RETURNS trigger AS
$func$
BEGIN
NEW.user_tsv :=
setweight(to_tsvector('pg_catalog.english', coalesce(NEW.firstname,'')), 'A')
|| setweight(to_tsvector('pg_catalog.english', coalesce(NEW.surname,'')), 'A')
|| setweight(to_tsvector('pg_catalog.english', coalesce(regexp_replace(NEW.card_id, '^\d+PRE', ''),'')), 'B')
|| setweight(to_tsvector('pg_catalog.english', coalesce(NEW.email,'')), 'C');
RETURN NEW;
END
$func$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;
The assignment operator of plpgsql is := - unlike SQL where = is used.
Trigger:
CREATE TRIGGER tsvectorupdate
BEFORE INSERT OR UPDATE ON users
FOR EACH ROW EXECUTE PROCEDURE user_change_trigger();
Tests:
INSERT INTO users (firstname, surname, card_id, email)
VALUES ('Erwin', 'Brandstetter', '123PRE456', 'foo#dummy.org')
RETURNING *;
-- looks good!
UPDATE users SET firstname = 'Walter' WHERE TRUE
RETURNING *;
-- looks good, too!
Clean up:
ROLLBACK;
standard_conforming_strings
Explore your setting of standard_conforming_strings. The WARNING suggests that you don't have this setting on, which would require that you double the backslash in:
'^\\d+PRE'
I have problem with importing documents to postgres db. I have plpgsql function, simplier version could look like that:
create function add_file(flag integer, sth varchar) returns void as
begin
if flag = 1 then
insert into tab_one values (my_file_oid, sth);
else
insert into tab_two values (my_file_oid, sth);
end if;
end;
And psql command:
\lo_import('path/to/file');
Both code in one file. I cant put lo_import() to insert statement, becouse I need client-site lo_import. There is variable LASTOID, but it is not avaible in add_file function. And it wouldnt be updating on every call add_file().
So, how can I put oid to database with, in our example, 'flag' and 'sth' by insert statement and everything in function with arguments? File is in client computer.
psql's \lo_import returns the OID resulting from the import. You need to hand that in as parameter to the function, which could look like this:
CREATE FUNCTION add_file(_flag integer, _sth varchar, _oid oid)
RETURNS void LANGUAGE plpgsql AS
BEGIN
IF _flag = 1 THEN
INSERT INTO tab_one(file_oid, sth) VALUES (_oid, _sth);
ELSE
INSERT INTO tab_two(file_oid, sth) VALUES (_oid, _sth);
END IF;
END;
As an aside: always add a column list to your table with an INSERT command (except for ad-hoc calls, maybe).
From within a plpgsql function you can make use to the also provided server side functions. Could look like this:
INSERT INTO tab_one(file_oid, sth) VALUES (lo_import('/etc/motd'), _sth);
Note that this operates within the file system of the database server with the privileges of the owner (usually system user postgres). Therefore, use is restricted to superusers.